Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
authority_n bishop_n church_n rome_n 17,242 5 7.2290 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A07350 The English catechisme explained. Or, A commentarie on the short catechisme set forth in the Booke of common prayer Wherein diuers necessarie questions touching the Christian faith are inserted, moderne controuersies handled, doubts resolued, and many cases of conscience cleared. Profitable for ministers in their churches, for schoole masters in their schooles, and for housholders in their families. By Iohn Mayer, Bachelour of Diuinitie.; English catechisme Mayer, John, 1583-1664. 1622 (1622) STC 17733; ESTC S100659 485,672 636

There are 4 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Lybia and Pentapolis and the Roman Bishop had the like custome for the Churches about him so the Bishop of Antioch and of euery other Prouince should be supreame within his owne Diocesse and the same thing is decreed in the Constantinopolitan Councell vnder Theodosius the Emperour and in many more and in the sixt African councell Con. Constant Can. 2 when the Bishop of Rome laboured for the supremacy of all he was discouered to falsifie the Councell of Nice for his purpose by comparing the Copy which hee had sent with others kept by the Patriarke of Constantinople and of Alexandria and so was reiected with disgrace both Zozimus Boniface Con. Affric 6 and Siluester and it was decreed that it should not bee lawfull for any of Africa or any other Prouince hauing Metropolitanes of their own to appeale to the Bishop of Rome But first their owne Bishops and Metropolitane should haue the cause brought before them then a prouinciall councell and then a generall And in the seuenth African all Prince-like supremacy is taken away from the highest Bishop Can. Affric 7 Can. 6. Primae sedis episcopus non appelletur Princeps sacerdotum aut summus Sacerdos c that is the Bishop of the first seat may not be called the Prince of Priests or chiefe Priest or such like but onely the Bishop of the first seat Hist ●sagde Cent 6. cap. ● pag. 41. And according to these councels some Romane Bishops themselues haue affirmed Iohn the third hath left written that none ought to be called chiefe Priest or vniuersall Bishop Clement the third Bishop of Rome from Peter as they reckon liuing in the dayes of John the Apostle wrote an Epistle vnto vnto him with this superscription Clement Epist Johan Clement to the Brother of the Lord the Bishop of Bishops gouernour of all the Churches of God wheresoeuer the are founded by his prouidence Now if the Apostle as longest liuer of them all were chiefe gouernour of al as he acknowledgeth he denyeth his superiority to any other in the world that I may adde no more of the learned Fathers of the Church that could not beare this high title in any but the Antichrist as in Gregory the great Bishop of Rome who affirmed Gregor Epist. lib. 4 Epist 32.34.36.38.39 that the title of vniuersall Bishop agreed to none but either to Antichrist or to his forerunner c. But the Bishop of Rome hath intruded vpon this title in degenerating times in the Roman councell called by Boniface the third this thing was chiefely handled and decreed that the Roman Bishop should be Pope and Pontifex that is chiefe Bishop and haue full power to call and to disssolue Councels and to ratifie or abolish things decreed by Councel through the fauour of wicked Phocas Anno 606. who slew his maister Mauritius to obtaine the Empire and being reproued by the Bishop of Constantinople preferred his aduersary the Bishop of Rome in this manner who had a long time gaped after it And this his priuiledge was after confirmed by Pipin who was made King of France his master being deposed and did this to gratifie the Bishop of Rome for this good office done vnto him But his authoritie ouer councels hath since againe beene reuersed and he made subiect vnto them by the councell of Constance and of Basil Againe for free-will you may see the contrary decrees of councels before in the Treatise of mans corrupt estate vnder the third question For the worshipping of Images it was the plaine decree of the Constantinopolitan councell vnder Constantine Copronymus wherein were 338. Hist Magd. C●m 8. cap. 9. pa 550. Of Images Bishops that if any man should presume to make the Image of God the Father or of Christ or of any Saint hee should bee accursed Hist Mag. Cent. 8. cap. 9. p. 639. And about forty yeeres after viz. Anno 794 vnder Charles the Great was a Councell held at Franckfort wherein it was decreed that Jt should be altogether estranged from the Christian faith and held agreeable to the superstition of the Heathen to worship and adore Images And with this doth all antiquitie consent But contrariwise in the second Nicene Councell assembled by Irene the Empresse of Constantinople who wickedly and vnnaturally put out her owne sonnes eyes and draue him into banishment it was decreed that they should bee worshipped Con. Trid. Ses 25 c. 2. and more lately in the Councell of Trent order is taken that the same Nicene decree bee of all men followed The like might be shewed of the calling of Councels anciently by Emperours but now by Popes of supreame honour which was wont to be giuen to Kings Emperours but now to Popes Of Purgatory the reall presence in the Sacrament the adoration of the Host workes meritorious supererogatory of Monkery infinit ceremonies of which nothing anciently but now the world is full of decrees hereabout But these contradictions already obserued may suffice to shew that the Roman Church it selfe is not free but subiect to errour and heresie for contradictories cannot bee both truthes therefore it must needes sometime onely haue beene in the truth and sometime againe carried away with heresie Lastly this further appeareth from the consideration of the manner how things haue beene carried from time to time in the Church viz. sometime according to the will of one Emperour King or Pope and sometime of some few and that not sincerely but apparantly seeking themselues and oftentimes to satisfie their malicious mindes I should dwell too long here if I should enter into a particular exemplification of this it is so plaine to all that read of their proceedings as that it cannot be denied First something hath beene conceiued by an higher power then a Councell called and his minde being divulged they feare to appeare that be of a contrary opinion or if they appeare they are not admitted into the Councell or through feare recanting are receiued so it is proceeded to the matter propounded Then a great shewe is made of calling vpon the Spirit of truth for his assistance but all is concluded according as was before conceiued and accordingly is taught in the Churches and thus the people of God vnder the pretext of Councels is seduced Which things being so let the Reader iudge whether the Church visible may not easily erre seeing the fountaine from whence things there held doe proceed is thus troubled and filthy Againe admit that freer councels which represent the Church bee called which cannot be granted to haue beene in the Roman Church certaine hundreds of yeeres last past yet who be they that make vp councels are they not men that I may not say men altogether intangled with voluptuous liuing aspiring after nothing but honours filthy lucre for the most part what assurance I pray you can we then haue that they cannot er yea what feare may we not iustly haue that they haue
vnnaturall Sinne that can bee in the world and therfore because other meanes of punishment is taken away the law doth brand the dead carcasse with infamous buriall 2. It is also the most dangerous and vnrecouerable except the sinne against the holy Ghost for it seldome giueth any time of repentance and perhaps more seldome any probability Hee that dyeth thus dyeth alas in Satans worke and I feare me in Satans hands Yet I presume not to confine Gods extraordinary and boundles mercy that can reach it selfe forth inter ●ontem font●m after voluntary headlong percipice I deny not this to be possible But O dreadfull tryall of this ballance which in probability weigheth down so heauy on the other side as to presse wretched man to hell it selfe Distressed Brother art thou tempted to this hellish and monstrous sinne Gather thy strength vnto thee say Auoid Satan if thou tell mee I shall notwithstanding bee saued commending my soule to God when I dye say thou art a lyar and the father of lyes for the truth saith ●f a righteous man turneth from his righteousnesse and committeth iniquity in the sinne wherein he is found he shall surely dye If hee telleth thee that thou shalt thus end thy sorrowes say thou art heerin a lyar also Satan I shall passe thus rather from sorrow to greater sorrow from temporall woe to eternall to be gnawed vpon by the worme that neuer dyeth and to bee burned with the fire that neuer goeth out If it be said there are some that dye thus Obiect 2. Selfe-murther ●● p●eseru● vertue inuiolate August de Ciuit D●i to preserue vertue vnuiolate as Lucretia to preserue her chastity and certaine Matrons of Rome of whom S. Augustine writeth and some that they may be glorious Martyrs as the Donatists of old holding that if they could procure death to themselues they should immediately passe to glory in heauen Sol. They are all in the same dangerous and demnable plight notwithstanding without extraordinary and euen miracu-repentance they perish as guilty of their owne death Read S. Augustine in the same place excellently setting forth the vice of Lucretia which by the Heathen was commended for a vertue 2. Murthereing of other men 2. Vniust blood-sh●d This is vniustly to shed the bloud of any man by any meanes whatsoeuer First I say it is an vniust shedding of bloud because there is a shedding of bloud that is no sin as of the bloud of creatures which are giuen vnto man for meat or which are any way noysome vnto him contrary to the Tacian heresie which denyed it to be lawfull to kill any thing Againe there is s shedding of the bloud of man which is no sinne viz. when it is done iustly by such persons as to whom it doth belong and this is by the Magistrate or at his appointment onely and that by iust proceedings for Hee ●eare●h not the sword in vaine Rom. 13.4 but is Gods Minister to take vengeance on those that doe euill And it is so necessary for them to put to death where there is iust and necessary cause as that if they spare Gods curse will follow for the Lord hath expressly taught Num. 35.33 that bloud defileth the land and the land cannot be clensed of the bloud that is shed therein but by the bloud of him that shed it And on the other side if they put to death vniustly through malice or for any priuate reuenge they are murtherers for so far forth only may they reuenge by death as they are Gods Ministers set a worke by him Ioh. 21.15 Whence we may see that heathen Kings persecuting the poor Christians to the death were murtherers and in like manner are such as be in authority in the Church of Rome that doe diuersly murther the poore people of God by burning by the sword and by cutting their throats in butcherly manner only for following a righter and more holy way then is allowed amongst them Peter of whose succession they brag so much durst not so to haue turned his maisters charge Feed my sheepe feed my lambs into killing them though they had run out of the fold He would not haue taken heart vpon so sleighty a ground Act. 10. vp Peter kill an eate as some doe to iustifie this killing of the poore sheepe of Christ nay to murther or expose to murther Gods Anointed Lastly there is another iust cause of shedding bloud viz. in lawfull and iust wars and in defence of a mans owne life for iust warres are called the Lords battels 2 Chron. 20.15 as Iehoshaphat encouraging his men saith The battle is not yours but Gods But some make doubt whether it be lawfull for Chrstians to wage warre Answ This is the fancy of the Anabaptists whose follies are easily refuted out of their own furies and ourages in Germany where they that impugned lawfull warre and Magistracy made vse in their rebellions of that which themselues disauowed namely the Sword And as for the vocation of a Souldier surely Iohn Baptist when the Soldiers came vnto him Luk. 3.14 demanding of him What shall we doe Did not answer them that they must of necessity cast off their Swords if they would be the seruants of God but rather aduised thē to remaine still the Military seruants of Caesar else what place can those precepts haue Do violence to no man neither accuse any falsly be content with your wages Another frenzy of the same sect denieth all vse of the sword at home in time of peace by way of ciuil iustice as if it were against Christian perfection put any man to death by the hand of publike authority though for neuer so grieuous a crime tending to the dissolution of humane society and defacing the Image of God Alas frantique soules that in hatred of Murther maintaine Murther Shall he that hath murthered one man be suffered by suruiuing to embrue his hands with the guiltlesse blood of more Our Sauiour himselfe whose nearest Disciples these saintly innocents would seeme to bee expressly pronounced this law of Iustice Math. 2● 52 They that take the Sword shall perish by the Sword That is priuate auengers that wring the sword out of the Magistrates hand to vsurpe the vse of it for their own passions must expect to feele the edge of it and to be cut off by it This publique reuenge is so far from being a sinne that as euen now I shewed it is a necessary duty in him that beareth the Sword If this Sword had no edge or were not imployed vpon iust occasion verily it were borne in vaine Ob●ect But the Apostle Paul say they speaketh of Heathen not Christian Magistrates I answer hee speaketh of Magistrates as Magistrates generally of all whether Heathen or Christian Is not a Christian King Gods ordinance Gods Minister Doe we not owe tribute and honour to Christian Kings as well as to heathen Surely much more Are there not that
Church of God against which our aduersaries may onely barke but not be able to vtter one word with reason more specially for our ministery howsoeuer perhaps we might answere that when an ordinary calling cannot be had there is place for an extraordinary yet we can truly maintaine that wee can deriue canonically our ordination from the successors of the Apostles as Master Mason hath learnedly declared Proofe Beleeuers onely the true Church Now it followeth to be proued that they onely are the true Church before God who are beleeuers And this appeareth plainly first for that many of the visible Church are reprobates and without part in Gods Kingdome as our Sauiour Christ teacheth by many parables both of the sower that went forth to sowe some of his seede falling vpon the thorny ground Math. 13 some vpon stony and some vpon the high way and so bringing forth no fruit and in the parable of the drawnet Math. 25. of the good corne and the tares of the Virgins of the seruants with their talents c. all which tend to set forth the state of Gods Church to be such as that therein there be many castawayes Moreouer hee teacheth the same plainely Math. 7.21 wherein he saith They shall cry Lord Lord open vnto vs we haue prophesied in thy name and c. and in another place Thou hast eaten and drunke in our streetes Luk. 13.25 and taught in our Synagogues but I will say vnto you depart from me yee workers of iniquity Which being so it must needes follow that all the visible Church is not Gods true Church but onely the company of true beleeuers Secondly this is further manifest because faith onely setteth vs into Iesus Christ and maketh vs members of his body Eph 4.12 which onely is the true Church for to this effect speaketh the Apostle They were broken off by vnbeliefe and thou sta●dest by faith Rom. 11.20 viz Ingrafted into the Oliue tree Iesus Christ out of whom the Iewes were broken by vnbeliefe Faith onely maketh vs the children of Abraham Gal. 3. and heires by promise Thirdly the same appeareth from the description of the true Church to the Ephesians which hee calling them and magnifying Gods mercy in calling them to this estate he saith Eph. 2.8 By grace yee are saued through faith in Iesus Christ and againe through him yee are Citizens w●th the Saints Vers 19.20.21 and of the household of God and are built vpon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles Iesus Christ himselfe being the chiefe corner stone in whom all the building coupled together groweth to an holy Temple in the Lord. Here faith onely is that which makes vs grow to this Temple and to be thus neere vnto the Lord. No man therefore can beleeue himselfe to be a member of the true Church before God by reason of any outward priuiledge entring him into the visible company of Gods people vnlesse he be inwardly before God through sauing faith made a member of the same Fourthly The Church to be beleeued and not beleeued in Jeron part S. Epist 41. Non dicimus credo in sed credo ecclesiam that the Church is only to be beleeued thas is acknowledged where it is found to be and to be cleued vnto but not to be beleeued in that is to be made the foundation of our faith This point as it consisteth of seuerall members so are they distinctly and seuerally to be laid open First it is to be acknowledged wheresoeuer it is found out by the markes before spoken of thus the Church at Rome was once famous all ouer the world and Peter indeauoured much after that he had once beene with Cornelius and the Gentiles Rom. 1 8 Act 12.5.6 to bring the Church of the Iewes to acknowledge them to bee the Church of God also and indeed how otherwise can I say I beleeue the Church Which is firmely to hold and constantly to acknowledge it Secondly it is also to be cleaued vnto for when the Church began first to flourish vnder the Gospell it is said Act. 2 that God added vnto the Church daily such as should be saued he prouided that they should be ioyned vnto the assemblies of his people so that as Peter saide vnto the Lord whether should we goe thou hast the wordes of eternall life Ioh. 6.68 so saith euery faithfull man and woman of his spouse the Church Eternall life is no where else to be obtained all the creatures out of the Arke perished so doe all that keepe out of the Church The word preached therefore is by all to be attended the Sacraments are reuerently to be receiued the assemblies of Gods people to be frequented Cantic 1.8 Thus the Lord directeth all his to doe in that mysticall song Get thee forth by the steppes of the flockes and feede their Kids by the tents of the shepheards Thirdly it is not to bee made the foundation of our faith because so the spouse should be set in the roome of the husband Christ and because that so we might erre and fall from true Christianity as any visible Church may doe and many haue done For the first it was before shewed that there can be none other foundation for the next it is manifest that the Church of the Iewes did often times erre and chiefly in crucifying the Lords Messiah The Church of Galatia did erre so farre that the Apostle professeth himselfe to bee afraid that hee had laboured in vaine amongst them hee was afraide also of the Church of Rome for the same errour which maketh him so long in prouing iustification by faith without the workes of the Law Reuel 3.3 The Church of Sardis was so farre gone that the Lord saith it had onely a name to be aliue but was indeede dead and the Church of Laodicea was spiritually miserable poore blind and naked and ecclesiasticall history doth shew that scarce any Church hath beene free but at sometime infected with heresie which though it was not in former times noted in the Church of Rome yet I take it it could not be farre from heresie Jerom Damasus when the head thereof Liberius subscribed vnto Arianisme and Honorius vnto the errour of the Monothelites when Marcellinus sacrificed to Idols and Siluester the second sold himselfe to the Diuell and became a Coniurour and Negromancer But say it was free a long time doth that proue that it must needs be so euer nay rather it is likely that as other Churches had their time of infection formerly so the Romans turne came more lately Againe that the visible Church may fall into heresie is plaine because it hath sometimes made decrees and afterwards the contrary hereunto Of the supremacy Con Nic Can. 6. euen in matters of great moment As about the supremacy of Bishops In the counsell of Nice it is decreed that as the Bishop of Alexandria had authority ouer all Egypt
the matter is suppressed because that would haue beene too great an euidence against them Not long after Ardanus Bishop of Northumberland vnder King Oswaldus opposed himselfe against the same alledging that the grieuous things of the law the burthens of the Pharisees were not to bee propounded to the people Anno. 670. Colmanus another Bishop stoutly resisted the shauing of Priests and other fooolish ceremonies that were vrged but the King taking against him he preuailed not and therefore went from his Bishopricke into Scotland with those that tooke part with him The like resistance had his Predecessour Fannanus made before Auintint lib. 3. Annalium c. Afterwards anno 714. when Boniface who was called the Apostle of the Germans was sent of Gregory the second for the like purpose of establishing Romish ceremonies he was resisted by Adelbertus Gallus Clemens Scotus Sampson Scotus Virgilius and Sidorius learned men who could not endure the ceremonies vrged about the Sacrament of the Lords Supper and Baptisme but they were oppressed by the Popes authority viz. Gregory the second Gregory the third and Zachary Anno 774. Egila Nist Magdeb. Cent. 8. cap. 10. a Bishop in Spaine who before had much reuerenced the Bishop of Rome afterwards vnderstanding that his traditions depended not vpon Gods Word hee contemned them for which cause hee stirred vp other Spanish Bishops against the said Egila Anno 899. there was one Claudius Cent. 9. cap. 10. who had beene a Priest in the Court of Charles the Great which taught the same doctrine that Luther afterwards did inueighing against the imagery and superstition of those times Baleus Trithsnus Anno 841. Bertram a Priest in France who was greatly esteemed by Charles the brother of King Lotharius taught that the body of Christ was not really present in the Sacrament but is by faith receiued Anno 847. Thergaudus Bishop of Treuiris inueighed grieuously against Pope Nicolus hee called the Pope Antichrist and a Wolfe saying Auentini● Regin●l lib. 2 Cum sis seruus seruorum Dominus Dominantium esse contendis When as thou art by profession a seruant of seruants thou striuest to be a Lord of Lords Hee called Rome Babylon Being called to Rome together with Guntherius Guntherius Bishop of Calle● he was excommunicated vnheard and after slaine Anno 859. S. Vdasrick Bishop of Augusta held that the Roman Bishop might erre and proued learnedly by sundry arguments that it was lawfull for Priests to marry Hist Mag. Cent. 9. cap. 10. Anno 1054. Berengarius a learned man had many followers who stoutly maintained that the body of Christ was not really in the Sacrament Anno 1071. Lanfranke Hist Magdeb. Cent. 1● cap. 10. Arch-Bishop of Canterbury is said to haue corrected the writings of the Fathers according to the Catholique Faith whence it must needes follow that the Church was then gone frō the purity of the Fathers times which was noted by some but to blinde their eyes this correction was made In the Epistle of Anselme there is a forme of visiting the sicke prescribed in this manner The Priest should say Thou confessest that thou hast liued so ill that thou hast deserued hell Hist Magd. Cent 11. cap. 6. The sicke answers Yea Doest thou repent thee of these thing He answers Yea Doest thou beleeue that the Lord Iesus Christ dyed for thee He answers Yea Doest thou giue him thankes He answers Yea Doest thou beleeue that thou canst not be saued but by his death He answers Yea Go to therefore whilst thy soule is in thee put thy whole trust in this death trust in no other thing commit thy selfe wholly to this death with this couer thy selfe all ouer winde vp thy selfe all ouer in this death S. Anselme was a Lutheran Whence it appeares that according to the present doctrine of our Church it was held then and that meritorious workes wrought by men were in no request for iustification and saluation Anno 1110. Florentinus a Bishop auouched that Antichrist was then born Platina Blondas for which he was called to account by Paschalis the second and suppressed Anno 1135. one Francis an Abbot maintained that Christs body was not really in the Sacrament Hist Magd. Cent. 12. cap. 5. Anno 1110. Petrus de Beuis a Priest Henry a Monk in France taught that the body and bloud of Christ were not offered in the Masse neither that it was a sacrifice made for the saluation of soules that Altars were to be destroyed that the substances in the sacrament were not altered that sacrifices and masses and prayers and almes c. being made for the dead Cent. 12. cap 9. were fooleries and profited not that Priests and Monkes were rather to marry then to burne that Crosses were not to bee reuerenced that the Canonicall Scriptures were onely to bee beleeued and that the writings of the Fathers haue not equall authority and of these the one was burned the other hardly escaped Bernardi vita Anno 1190. Bernard a learned Father though hee was not so sound through the iniquity of the times in all things yet in the case of iustification he speaketh like a Protestant when being in danger of his life he said I am not worthy J confesse neither can I by mine owne merits obtaine the Kingdome of heauen but my Lord obtaining it by a double right viz. of inheritance and by the merit of his passion being content with the one himselfe h e bestoweth the other vpon mee Anno 1220. one William a Goldsmith said that Rome was Babylon the Pope Antichrist was therfore burned Hist Magd. Cent. 13. cap. 2. Anno 1250. G●lielmus de sancto Amore was banisht for an heretique and his bookes burnt Robert Grost●d Bishop of Lincolne a zealous opposer of Papall tyranny should haue had his bones digged vp and burnt but that the Pope being terrified in a dreame desisted from this his enterprize Anno 1260. on Laurence an Englishman had his bones burnt after that they were taken out of the graue Anno 1350. there were many sincere Teachers specially Iohannes de rupe Scissi● Anno 1360. Armachanus an Arch-bishop in Ireland Anno. 1370. Iohn Wick●liffe disputed openly at Oxenford and was defended by K. Edward the third and the Nobles against the Pope Summa Conc. a Bartholom●o Goranza collecta The poynts maintained by him were That the materiall substance of bread and wine remained in the Sacrament That outward confession to the Priest was superfluous and vnprofitable That if any man giueth almes to the idle Friers hee is excommunicate That hee which entreth into any such order is made more foolish and vnfit to obserue Gods Commandements That the Church of Rome is a Synagogue of Satan neither is the Pope the Vicar of Christ That it is a foolish thing to beleeue the Popes Indulgences c. Anno 1410. Iohn Husse and Ierome of Prague were famous in Bohemia Conc. fol.