summe of all controuersies betwixt the Catholickes and the Lutherans consists in these two things that besides the holy Scripture the Traditions of the Apostles and of the Church are necessary to bee beleeued And that the holy Scriptures themselues neither can nor ought to be interpreted of any with authority saue of the Catholike Roman Church In which two doctrines if one be once perswaded and setled hee will easily yeeld aioyne himselfe to the Church of Rome in the rest of the chiefe points of faith For if I were to dispute with the Heretikes about any article of faith it must needs be that there be somewhat set downe in the Bible touching my opinion or that there bee nothing at all to be found for it If there be nothing in the Bible forme presently then I say that it was wont so to be obserued by tradition from the Apostles in the Church of Rome But if there be somewhat contained in the Bible touching mine opinion and the Heretique will interpret it another way then might serue my turne then presently I oppose to him the Church of Rome that it hath so interpreted it so that euery Dispute ought to bee reduced to these two heads Thus farre he And truly this is it that the Pope of Rome labors for that hee may wrest the Scripture as seemeth him good and then it is as if any offering to fight with another and the weapon should be a sword he would fight vpon this condition that hee may be suffered to weild his aduersaries Sword as hee will And so it is likewise as if any would haue a suite in Law tryed before the Iudge according to the lawes but vpon this condition that it may be lawfull for him to interpret the Law on his owne side iust so the Pope doth for hee saith I will dispute with you out of the Scripture but so that it may bee lawfull for mee to interpret the Scripture on mine owne behalfe I would haue this also noted that if the Papists demaund who is the Iudge in the controuersies of faith Wee answer Syst The. pag. 174. item p. 203. that the chiefe and highest Iudge of controuersies of faith is he who is the Author both of faith and of the scripture to wit the holy Ghost According to that of Ioh. 16.8 When the Comforter shall come he shall reprooue he will iudge the world of sinne And then only the Scripture to bee the Law and Sentence of this Iudge according where vnto iudgment must be giuen concerning cōtrouersies of faith as it doth manifestly appeare by Ioh. 5.45 There is one who accuseth you euen Moses i. e. the writings of Moses which giue iudgement against you and yet more manifestly Ioh. 12. vers 48. He that reiecteth and receiueth not my words hath one that iudgeth him This word c It is not true therefore which the Pope of Rome saith that hee is the chiefe Iudge and decider of controuersies for he is not fit to bee a iudge who is accused and found guilty of deprauing and falsifying the Word of God I haue heard you sufficiently about the former sort of knowledge of Christian Religion or touching the principles of Diuinitie to wit God and Gods word Now I desire to bee instructed in the second kinde of knowledge arising from the former that is touching tthe parts of this heauenly Doctrine which doth spring from the doctrine which is of God and of the holy Scripture You tell mee right and I perceiue you well vnderstand the method and progresse which ouhgt to be obserued in vnderstanding the doctrine of Religion and therefore now will I instruct you touching the parts of Diuinity or Christian Religion How many parts hath this secondarie or deriued knowledge Two whereof the forme is of the end it selfe the latter is of the meanes that leade vs to that end What is the end of Diuinitie Saluation or life euerlasting How many waies is the saluation of man considered Two manner of waies either as it is perfect and compleate or as it is but begunne and imperfect or either in respect of the life to come or of this present life What is perfect and eternall saluation It cōsisteth in three things Syst Theol. pag. 110. First In most absolute perfection of body and soule Secondly In that vnutterable ioy wherewith wee shall triumph before God the holy Angels and godly men Thirdly In that most euident Maiestie glory and honor wherein wee shall triumph ouer death Sathan sinne and sinfull men And this is that which Peter saith 2. Pet. 1. v. 4. We shall be made pertakers saith he of the diuine nature of diuine perfection ioy and glory And Phil. 3. vers 21. Christ shall transforme our base body that it may be like the glorious body of Christ Esay 64. vers 4. 1 Cor. 2. vers 9. The things which the eye hath not seene nor the eare heard nor euer entred into the heart of man to conceiue are those which God hath prepared for them that loue him What is imperfect saluation or that which is begonne onely It is a taste of eternall saluation Syst Theol. pag. 211. V pag. hic 115. seqq or that comfort and ioy of conscience which wee haue in this life arising from the forgiuenes of our sins and from that confidence we haue towards God whom we certainely know to bee reconciled vnto vs by Christ Iesus so that no calamity whatsoeuer can be able to seperate vs from his loue no not death it selfe or that anxity and horror which vsually wee feele a◠the houre of death Of this the Apostle speaketh Rom. 5. uers 1. Therefore being iustified by faith we haue peace e. i. a ioyfull and merry conscience in the very midst of callamity and death Rom. 8. vers 35. Who shall seperate vs from the loue of Christ shall oppression shall anguish c. I see now what the end is I may expect to reape from this heauenly doctrine which how much the more it is desirable so much the more J long to know the meanes by which I may be conducted to this end The meanes whereby thou maist com to this most desired end are two First Partes Theologiae duae 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Naziaenzen Syst Theol. pag. 212. the knowledge of thy misery Secondly of thy redemption out of that misery The former part of this heauenly science touching the diseases of the Soule How may I come by the right knowledge of my misery or of the sores of my soule If thou shalt weigh well with thy selfe these foure things First that which went before thy misery Secondly the efficient cause of thy misery Thirdly the parts of thy misery Fourthly the exemplary cause or glasse wherein thou hast represented vnto thee thy misery What is that which went before the miserie of mankinde Quanto videmus maiora fuisse bona quae amisimus tanto grauiora cognoscemus
men his holy Scripture euen as a Prince vseth a Cryer for the promulgation of his lawes vnto his Subiects And here take this similitude with you a man goeth to the Vniuersitie as vnto the very shop and store-house of Learning yet hereupon it followeth not that the truth of that learning we are taught there in the Vniuersitie doth depend on the authority of the Vniuersity Besides this must aâ—so be obserued that whatsoeuer the Papists say tovching the authority of her Church aboue the Scripture doth nothing at all profit them but that they manifestly beg the point in question whilest they thus argue The Church hath authority aboue the Scriptures The Pope of Rome is the Church Ergo. For suppose wee grant them their Maior which notwithstanding is false as wee haue manifestly proued yet they are neuer able to prooue their Minor as shall bee showne anone more distinctly VVhat is the second propriety of the word of God or the holy Scripture Syst Theol. pag. 176. That it bee intire perfect and sufficient to saluation which is prooued by that Ioâ— 20.30 Many other signâ— did Jesus which are not writteâ— in this Booke but these thinges are written that you may beleeue that Jesus is the Christ that Son of God that you beleeuing might haue life by his name Out of which place â— thus reason That which is sâ— written that by it wee may beleeue in Christ Iesus and sâ— obtaine eternall life that 〈◊〉 say is sufficient to life eternall But the Scripture is so written Ergo. Againe thence I thus argue The holy Scripture was written to this end that wee might beleeue in the Sonne of God and get eternall life Ergo. Whatsoeuer Word is not written profiteth or auaileth vs nothing to faith to eternall life which must diligently bee noted against the errour of the Papists which say there are two words of God Quod non legi vsurpare non debeo Amb. Non sum alioruÌ„ sermonum discipulus nisi coelestium Origen the one written the other vnwritten vpon which pretence they will needs obtrude vnto vs Traditions which they call Apostolicall the Decrees of the Popes and the custome of the Church Of which the Councell of Trent in the fourth Session thus speaketh Whosoeuer doth not with like affection of mind reuerence the Traditions of the Church as hee doth the holy Scriptures let him bee accursed But against those Traditions first note the sufficiency of the Scriptures Secondly this argument The Traditions of the Chuâ—ch either agree with the holy writ or they dissent from it If they be coâ—sonant to it then they say the selfe same thing thâ— Scripture saith and so theâ— are Scripture for that oughâ— not in all reason to be done bâ— mâ—â— which may bee performed by fewer Or they dissenâ— from the Scripture as all thâ— Traditions of the Popes as namely that Tradition wherby the Cup in the Lords Supper is prohibited to be administred vnto the lay people and such like And if they disagree with the Scripture they cannot fill vp the Scripture for that which is repugnant to any thing doth not fill vp but rather quite ouerthrow it Another testimony of the perfection of the holy Scripture is most manifest in the 2 Tim. 3.16 The whole Scripture is giuen by inspiration from God and is profitable to teach to reprooue to correct to instruct that the man of God may be perfect and perfectly instructed to euery good worke From whence wee may frame these arguments First the Scripture is a totum an intire thing Ergo it is perfect for a totum is that which wanteth no necessary parts Secondly that which sufficeth vs for doctrine Adoro plenitudinem ScripturaruÌ„ Tertul. for reproofe for correction and instruction that is full compleate for there is none that can shew any thing besides whereunto the Scripture should bee profitable But the Scripture is sufficient to those things Ergo. Thirdly that which maketh a man perfect and furnished to euery good worke that same must needs be perfect but thâ— Scripture doth so Ergo. The Maior is therefore true because there is no effect which is more perfect then its cause or because a perfect effect presupposeth the cause to be perfect and nothing can giue that to another which it hath not it selfe if the Scripture therefore make men perfect then it must also be perfect VVhat is the third propriety of the holy Scripture That in the Articles of faith Syst Theol. pag. 199. which are necessary to saluation it bee plaine easie and perspicuous easie I say and perspicuous first in respect of them to whom 〈◊〉 ought to bee a light for theâ— saluatioÌ„ according vnto thâ— 2 Cor. 4.3 If our Gospell be hid it is hid to them which perish whence it necessarily followes that the Gospell is not hid but cleare and open to those which doe not perish as Peter saith 2 Pet. 1.19 You doe well in that you attend to the word of the Prophets as vnto a light that shineth in a darke place Psal 19.7.8 The word of God is cleare Psal 119.105 The word of God is a light to our feete and steppes Secondly the Scripture is easie as it is an instrument which it hath deriued to it from the principall guide the holy Spirit who is that true teacher and interpreter of the Scripture Ioh. 14.26 The Aduocate which is the holy Ghost he shall teach you all things 1 Ioh. 2.27 That annointing that is the holy spirit teacheth vs of all things Also Ioh. 16.13 When that spirit of truth shall come he shall leade you in all truth Lastly it is easie if that in the handling of it wee vse conuenient meanes and expound one place by another according to the rules of good and lawfull exposition which you may reade in the 201. page of my Systeme of Diuinitie If then any shall demand Syst Theol. pag. 201. who hath the authority to interpret the Scripture if the Pope of Rome be he I answer that euery one is the best interpreter of his owne words whereas therefore the Scripture is the Word of God and of the holy Ghost and not of the Pope of Rome therefore the holy Spirit hath the authority to interpret as that true aduocate and teacher of verity But why then doth the Bishop of Rome chalenge to himselfe this authority to interpret the Scriptures I answer because he knowes well enough how bad his cause is and therefore dares not submit his Tenents to the Word of God or the Scripture if it be rightly vnderstood and therefore will he wrest and stretch the scriptures at his owne pleasure Touching which poynt I would haue you note the words of a certaine Apostate from the faith Casper Schoppius Papist who is now at Rome with the Pope hee in that Epistle he wrot touching his defection from vs vnto the Papists about sixe yeares agoe set out at Ingolstadium in the 24 page saith thus The
of Christ by the Euangelists and Apostles as by his Pen-men or Notaries How is the Scripture diuided in respect of that authority it hath in prouing So it is diuided into the bookes which are Canonicall and those which are not Canonicall but Apocryphall Which doe you call the Canonicall Books Syst Theol. pag. 169. item p. 173. Hi constituūt 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrysost Those which are of vndoubted authority in prouing the Articles of Faith or which are the Square and Rule of our faith for Canonicall is deriued from Canon which signifieth as much as a Rule or Square Of what sort are the Canonicall books Of two sortes either of the Old or of the New Testament Which Books of the Old Testament are Canonicall The Canonicall Scripture of the old Testament is diuided into foure rancks Syst The. pag. 182. the first containeth the fiue Bookes of Moses the second those Bookes which are called Historicall as these Joshua Iudges Ruth the two Bookes of Samuel the two Bookes of Kings the two Bookes of the Chronicles the Bookes of Esdras Nehemiah Ester The third Bookes which are written in verse which are called Poeticall as these Job the Psalmes of Dauid the Prouerbs of Salomon Ecclesiastes and the Song of Songs the fourth comprehendeth the Prophets which are either greater Prophets in number foure or lesser to wit twelue Which Bookes of the New Testament are Canonicall The Canonicall Scripture of the New Testament is diuided into the History of the Euangelists the Acts of the Apostles the Apostles Epistles and the Prophecy or Reuelation of John Which are called Apocriphall or not Canonicall Syst Theol. pag. 190. Which are not of infallible truth and authority in prouing the Articles of faith and consequently which are not the Rule and Square of our beliefe but containe precepts of life and historicall instructions Which are those Apocryphall Bookes Among the Bookes of the Old Testament as wee haue before said there are some found not to bee Canonicall such as the Booke of Tobias Iudith Wisedome which falsly is ascribed to Salomon Ecclesiasticus or Syracides the third and fourth bookes of Esdras all the Bookes of the Maccabees Baruch with Ieremy his Epistle the Prayer of Manasses the fragments of Ester the additions to Daniel as is the Song of the three Children the Historie of Susanna the Historie of Bell and the Dragon None of all these Bookes are to be found in the Hebrew tongue in which Language onely God would haue the Bookes of the Old Testament to bee written neither were they written by the Prophets or any person immediately called of God Neither doth Christ the Euangelists or the Apostles cite them at any time and to conclude there bee many vntruths in them Wherefore when the Papists vrge any thinge out of these Bookes against vs wee must answer that those Bookes containe not the infallible Word of God and consequently that they haue no firme force or validity in prouing How is the Scripture diuided in respect of the matter it handleth Into the Law and the Gospell for that part of Gods Word is called the Law wherein wee are taught what we ought to doe but the Gospell is that part of Gods Word wherein we are taught what we ought to beleeue and consequently wherein wee haue the remission of our sins promised vs by faith in Christ I haue heard sufficiently touching the diuision of the Word of God J pray you also instruct mee in the proprieties of it That will I willingly doe so I first admonish you that hereafter wee shall alwaies take the holy Scripture for the Canonicall Bookes onely and not at all for the Apocryphall VVhat is the first proprietie of the holy Scripture The first propriety is that it deriues all its authority from God alone Syst Theol. pag. 171. not from the assembly of godly men which is called the Church How proue you this I proue it by these reasons first the testimony of God hath not any authority from men The Scripture is the testimony of God alone Ergo. It hath none authority from men yea the most holy men that bee and consequently not from the Church which is nothing else but a company of godly and sanctified men The force and pith of the argument you shall finde 1 Ioh. 5.9 If wee receiue the witnes of men the testymonie of God certainely is greater Secondly that must needs be before the Scripture in naturall order of which the authority of the Scripture dependeth But the Church is not before the Word of God Ergo. The Maior proposition is euident because that which dependeth of another must needs come after that on which it dependeth The Minor is thus prooued That which is gathered gouerned regenerated by the Word or by the Scripture that is in order after the Scripture But the Church Ergo. The Maior is plaine the Minor is prooued by 1 Pet. 1.23 Wee are regenerated and borne anew by the word of God Iames 1.18 He hath begotten vs by the word of truth Ioh. 17.20 Which by their word shall beleeue in me Thirdly the foundation of any building depends not on the roofe or vpper roomes which are built vpon the foundation but contrarily those same vpper roomes and the roofe depend vpon the foundation but the Word of God is the foundation Ergo. The Maior is plaine in it selfe The Minor is confirmed by that Ephes 2.20 You are built vpon the foundation of the Profits and Apostles Obict The Papists obiect to vs that place 1 Tim. 3.15 Where the Church is said to be the pillar and ground of truth Whereto we answer Answ that this argument is sophisticall or a fallacie commonly called a Dicto secundum quid a dictum simpliciter For the Church is not called the piller and ground of truth in regard of it selfe but in regard of Christ the head who is that corner stone And further it is so called in regard it is the keeper of the Scripture Syst Theol pag. 181. forsomuch as God hath made the Church onely to haue to doe with the treasurie of his Word and in the Church as on the piller and doore of his house or pallace he hangeth those holy Tables which euery man must go thither to read No otherwise then the Magistrate hangeth vp on pillars and gates of his Court Tables containing in them his Lawes and Decrees to the end that his Subiects may there reade them as in a publike place Lastly the Church is called the Pillar of Truth in this respect because that God vseth the testimony of the Church as his instrument and meanes for the proposing teaching and expounding of the holy Scriptures vnto men for the Ministers of the Church are the conseruers of truth and the interpreters of the Scriptures yet not so as if the authority of the Scripture did depend on them but because God vseth them as his seruants and Ministers to propound and to beate into the memories of
whom God hath chosen as peculiar to himselfe that the vertues of him might be manifest who hath called you out of darkenesse into his admirable light See concerning this most comfortable doctrine to wit the vnion of the members with Christ the Head in the Syst of Diuinitie pag. 376. What sorts be the members of Christ of Calu. Instit lib. 4. cap. 3. De Ministerio Zanch. in Epist p. 135 in pracept 4. Obiection They bee of two sorts the Ministers of the Word and the Hearers Here the Papists challenge vs that we haue no lawfull Ministers in the Church and by consequence that there be no lawful sheep because say they where there are no true Pastors and Shepheards there can be there no lawfull or true sheepe But we deny the Antecedent Soluti where they say that in our Churches there be no lawfull Pastors because hee is a right Pastor who rightly and lawfully executes his charge which is done by the pure preaching of the Word and the administration of the Sacraments But say they from whom had your Luther and Caluin their callings Wee answer That we depend not on Caluin and Luther but on the Prophets themselues and the Apostles As for Luther and Caluin they were neither Prophets nor Apostles But if they would know what kind of calling Caluins and Luther his was wee answer It was ordinary for Luther by the publike authority of the Vniuersitie at Witenberg was created Doctor of Diuinity and so was hee called to teach by an ordinary vocation Yea but the Vniuersitie at Witenberg it was Papisticall Answere True it was so at that time yet it called Luther to the sincere preaching of the Gospell For the Papists themselues say not that when Luther was called by them to teach that hee was called by them to teach heresies but to teach the Truth Therefore whē afterwards he taught the Truth he taught it being ordinarily called thereunto although hee taught it not according to the Popes minde and his Bishops Yea but hee taught errours of Papistrie before I answer that that fault of Luther made not his vocation voyd The same we say of Zwinglius Caluin and others which were created by Bishops where not withstanding it must bee considered that vnto that ordinarie calling there was somewhat extraordinarie adioyned to wit in that God set forth and adorned those first Miinsters of the doctrine of the Gospell with a singular vertue to discouer the fearefull abominations of Poperie for the rest of our Ministers which haue and yet do teach in the Reformed Church they were called ordinarily by them who haue authority and as yet to this day are so called Now I much desire to heare of the proprieties of the Church and first tell mee what kinds be the proprieties of the Church of They be oft two kinds some of them doe notifie and point out vnto vs where the Church is other are bare proprieties How many demonstratiue proprieties of the Church be there or how many bee the true markes of the Church Calu. Instit l. 4. c. 1. §. 9. There bee only two first the purity of Doctrine and Sacraments Secondly obedience and sanctity of conuersation answerable to the Word of God which is proued out of the tenth of Iohn 27. My sheepe heare my voice Mat. 28 v. 19. Goe and teach yee all nations baptising them Ioh. 15.14 Yee are my friends c. Ioh. 13.35 By this shall all men know that ye are my Disciples Obiect c. The Papists say these are not the notes of the true Church for say they Syst Theol pag. 393. all hereticks can challenge to themselues thus much that they haue the pure word of God and the lawfull vse of the Sacraments Therefore I answer Soluti that that which is but by an accident doth not take away that which is per se Now it is but by accident that the heretiques take this vsurpation on themselues for what is there more excellent in the Church then the pure Word of God and the lawfull vse of the Sacraments But in setting downe the markes of the Church they doe not agree among thecselues See the 396 page of my Syst of Diuinitie Yet generally they say that these are those markes 1. Antiquitie Whereto I answer Obiect that if they brag of antiquitie Solut. simply the Diuell also is a most ancient Serpent neither is he in that regard any whit the better therefore we ought to seeke after antiquitie of true doctrine Id est verius quod prius id prius quod ab initio id ab initio quod ab Apostolis Tertul. which wee say and affirme to be in our Church in that namely her Note and Marke is the pure Word of God then which nothing is more anciēt But your Church doe they obiect began but with Luther some 80 yeares agoe Proleps Looke beyond Luther therefore it is not the true Church I answer that it is an vntruth that our Church did but begin then For our Church begunne presently in Paradice and was also in the time of the Prophets The second marke they make a continuall succession Obiect Pietatis successio proprie successio est astimanda Greg. Naz Non habent haereditatē Petri quifidem Petri non habent Ambros or a perpetuitie of doctrine in the Church and som condemning our Church as in which there hath beene no such continuall succession they insult ouer vs saying Where were your Churches before Luther those 600 yeares wherein you say the World was obscured by the darknesse of Poperie Whereunto we answer Solut. that the Church is sometime more clearely manifest Calu Instit lib. 4. c. 2. sometime it is more obscurely apparant if therefore by succession they vnderstand the state of the Church alwaies alike flourishing then we say that it is false that such a succession is a propriety and marke of the true Church Ecclesia est quae aliquādo obscuratur tan quam obnubilatur multitudine scandalorum aliquando tribulationum tentationum flucti bus operitur atque turbatur Cum Arriani c. Aug. for the visible state of the Church consisteth in religious-worship and in doctrine wherein the Church is not alwaies like vnto it selfe hauing her obscurings and as it were eclipses such as the Sunne and Moone haue and sometimes it is wrapped about with errours so that it cannot shew its head by any visible estate or ministerie whereunto the Scripture beares manifest testimony 1 King 19.18 where it is plaine that the estate of the Church was altogether obscured insomuch that Elias thought with himselfe that he alone was left aliue of all the members of the Church being priuie to none beside himselfe that worshipped God purely yet euen then the Lord said vnto him I haue reserued vnto my selfe seuen thousand Syst Theol. pag. 389. which haue not bowed their knees before Baal So in the time of Christ his liuing vpon the