choyse of meates suche other ceremonies / that were theÌ„ anulled made voyd by chryst For he thus hath If ye be dead with chryste from the elementes of this worlde why do ye yet decree or teach or els as the greke nowe hath Dodmatizesthe are ye taught suche decrees and ceremonyes as yet lyuynge in the world Touche not nother taste nor handle Who seeth not that these wordes do playnlye show that saynte Paule mente of the iewes decrees and ordinaunces perteynynge to theyr olde ceremonies theÌ„ abrogate cleane by chryst and nothyng of the churches decrees or the apostles tradicions It is therfore a greate blyndnes to applye suche textes agaynste the traditions of the churche and they do verye lytle regard theyr soules health that do folowe suche teachers which do so manifestly abuse and mistake the scrypture to kyll theyr owne soules and other mennes by an heresye Some man perchaunce wyll say to me chrysten people are indued with libertye Vrbanns regiê° of conscyence .ii. Cor .iii. whiche nother ought nor can be bound to the obseruynge of any tradicion set vp by man whiche scrypture speaketh not of for theÌ„ we shulde be the seruauntes of meÌ„ agaynst saynte Paules coÌ„mauÌ„demente To that I saye that chrysten men are free and idued 1. Cor. 7. with a certayne libertie froÌ„ the yocke of the olde lawe / and the bondage of synne in which two standeth the lybertye of chrystes gospell not in the lybertie froÌ„ the obseruynge of good and hol some tradytions institute set forth by the holy apostles without wrytynge by mouth onely The obedience due vnto the hyer powers and to the kepyng of theyr lawes standeth not onelye with the libertie of the gospel but yâ— gospeÌ„ll doth also coÌ„mauÌ„d that to be done of vs. They that suppose them selues free frome obseruynge of the apostles traditions by reason of the lyberte of the gospell do agaynst pauls coÌ„maundement vse theyr lybertie to satisfye the flesshes lustes and haue as saynt Peter sayth Gala. 5. 1. Pâ— 2. it as a cloke or a couer of theyr malyce Chrysten people shuld not be the seruauntes of men it is true but what thaÌ„ Wylt not thou therfore be bounde in conscyence to obedientlye kepe thy prynce and kynges ordynauÌ„ces and lawes when Paule biddeth vs to be obediente vnto his coÌ„mauÌ„demeÌ„tes for coÌ„scyence sake It is not therfore holly vnleful Ro. 13. nor forbydden of saynte Paule to be mennes seruauntes but to obey them and to serue them coÌ„mauÌ„dyng any thiÌ„g ageÌ„st the lybertye of chrystes gospell or els any vnlefull thinge the kepyng of the which shulde cause theÌ„ to fall from the benifite of christes deathe and therfore he dyd put them in remembrauÌ„ce that they were bought with a great pryce Thus saynt Chrysostome doth vnderstande this paules texte byddynge that we shulde not be mens seruauntes Saynt paule also he ment that the corynthyaÌ„s shulde not be meÌ„s seruauntes to reyse schismes or diuisioÌ„s so yâ— one of theÌ„ shulde be counted cephas scholer because he was christened and instructed by hym another Apollos Take nowe this text whether way thou wylt it maketh nothyng at al against the traditions of the holye apostles and the church Moreouer wheÌ„ we do beleue certen truthes and obserue theym also whiche the apostles lefte vnwryten by the inspiratioÌ„ of the holy goost / as they dyd manye thynges whiche are aboue rehearsed in this boke what madde manne wyl saye yâ— therby we be mennes seruauntes / and not rather the holy goostê the autour of those tradicyons Some men do suppose that these god the fathers wordes IpsuÌ„ audite heare hym do bynde vs onelye to learne of Mat. 17. drâ—auê° â—eâ—â—ê° chryste the doctoure and teacher of the church and to beleue and obserue nothynge but his doctrine therfore we oughte not nor can be bounde to any thyng not wrytten in the scrypture as though we are not bounde to be leue the apostles teachiÌ„ge in thiÌ„ges not taught afore by chryste or yâ— we ought not to beleue as I haue touched before that chyldren ought to be chrystened albeit we fynde not in yâ— scrypture that euer christ taught that doctrine or els hys apostles but it cometh onely without wytnesse of the scrypture by theyr tradition If thou yet wylt reasoÌ„ further and saye that Chryste sendynge his apostles to preach abrode yâ— gospel in the hole world commaunded them to teache the people what soeuer he had commaunded and therfore men are not bounde vnto any thyng not commaunded of Chryste of the whiche it muste neades folowe that there are no traditions vnwrytten necessarye for vs eyther to beleue or to fulfyll This reason of one vrbanê° regiê° a lutherans makynge declareth the autours ignoraunce or blinde malyce conceyued agaynste yâ— churche of chryst For chryst byddiÌ„ge the apostles teach the people all that he had coÌ„maunded theym dyd not bydde theÌ„ teach nothing more then he coÌ„maunded them For who doubteth but the apostles taught afterwarde manye thynges by inspiratioÌ„ of the holy goost which chryst neuer coÌ„maunded as that the gentyles shulde abstayne from bloudde and meates suffocate or strangled with manye other thynges as it appeareth in theyr epystles and the actes wrytten by Luke the euangelyste But se what kynde of argumeÌ„t is this of regiê° Chryste commauÌ„ded his apostles to preach al what soeuer he had dyd theÌ„ do ergo the apostles lefte nothynge vnwrytten to the church yâ— ought to be beleued or obserued or men are not buunde to kepe the churches traditions This is a wonderfull blyndnes What madnes were it to beleue suche teachers Maye it not be sayde truely of them yâ— blynde leaders they that are Mat. 15. ledde by theim do fall bothe togyther into the den as our sauy our chryste sayed There are other obiectyoÌ„s as fonde and folyshe as these be which because they are made agaynste mannes lawes and constitutions not agaynste the apostles and hole churches traditioÌ„s vnwrytteÌ„ in the holy scrypture I wyll recyte them very compendiouslye as coÌ„pendiouslye confute the same Thys is one of them Paule sayeth Si spiritu ducimini noÌ„ estis sub lege It ye be ledde wyth the The. 8. argument spirite ye are not vnder the law These wordes do proue sayeth the lutherans that no mannes traditions can bynde vs to the obseruinge of theÌ„ yf we do leade our lyues after ryghte reasons and the holy goostes guydynge and styrrynge for els we shulde be vnder the lawe whyche saynt The answere Paule denyeth here Thys auctorytie of saynte Paule proueth nothing more agaynst the churches constitutions ordinaunces and traditions of the apostles that they oughte not to bynde mennes consciences then it doth agaynste the law of god that iuste and good men ledde by reason and the holye gooste shulde not be bounde to kepe it because yâ— paule vnderstode not here the law of man but the law of god whiche rested in ceremonyes was
that zachary whom chryst sayed that Mat. 23. the iewes murdered betwene the temple and the aultare was S. Iohan baptistes father prouiÌ„g by certen bokes dreames which were apocriphi because theyr makers were hyd and not knowen that he was therfore sleane because he publy sshed our sauyours coÌ„mynge Hoc quia de scripturis inquit hieronimus non habet autoritateÌ„ eadem facilitate coÌ„temnitur qua probatur That for as moche as it hath not auctoritie of the scryptures is with the same easynes despysed by which it is praysed or aproued Loo we se that the holy father saynt hiecome mente of that one thynge which was proued onely by bokes of none auctorytie what is this agaynste the apostles tradicions or to proue that we are bouÌ„d to beleue and kepe nothyng but onely that whiche is expresselye written in the scrypture Do the churches traditions hange and depende of bookes the autours wherof be vnknowen Haue not I declared that scrypture approueth the apostles vnwrytten traditions and that they taught or ordeyned diuers thinges by the motion and inspiratioÌ„ of the holy goost which they lefte to the churche vnwrytten and so they remayne hytherto and shal styll whyles the world dureth Now to make an ende of this boke I exhorte euery man and woman to be ware of erroneê° doctours and yll bookes which do teache and auauÌ„ce any learnynge contrary to the fayth of the churche of chryste / that is yâ— deare spouse of our sauyour bought with the shedynge of his moost precious bloude and therfore hath euer bene so tenderly beloued of hym that he hath not suffred hyr wholly to erre in any weightye point of our religion nor hereafter wyll permit to erre accordyng to his ê“mes sayeng hel gates yâ— is syn and heresye shal not preuayle agaynste hyr Who that leaneth to this sure pyller the church shall be euer in the ryght waye ouercome all heresye to the great coÌ„forte of his soule / at the length throughe the helpe of god lyuiÌ„g deuoutly he shal come to endles Ioyes of heauen which our saniour Iesu Chryste purchased for all his seruauntes to whom with the father the holy goost be honoure glorye for euer AmeÌ„ ☞ Another tradition of the apostles ⧠The catholyke and vniuersall churche of chryste our sauyoure hathe beleued almoste this xv huÌ„dred yeres euen sence our ladyes deceace that her body is in heauen and yet there is no scrypture to proue that poynte wherupoÌ„ it must neades folowe that this beleefe came vp fryste by the holye apostles tradition especially sence no man can tell whaÌ„ by whoÌ„ it was fryste of al begone brought iÌ„ to the church ¶ Saynt Hierome sayeth vnto Theophilus Scito nobis nihil esse antiquiê° quaÌ„ nec christi iura nec patrum transire terminos That is in englyssh Knowe thou that we do set by nothynge more then nother to passe ouer Chrystes lawes nor the fathers lymytes or determinations †Hieronimê° vigilaÌ„tio OiÌ„a coÌ„tra ecclesiaÌ„ dogmata reprehendo et publica voce damno I do reproue al doctrine that is agaynste the churche and condempne it with an open voyce Theophilê° hieronimo Optamus sifieri potest in diebus nostris catholicam fideÌ„ et ecclesiae regulas cum subiect is nobis populis custodire et omnes nouas sopire doctrinas We wysshe or desyre yf it maye be to kepe with the people vnder vs the catholyke fayth and the churches rules and to brige a sleape al newe doctrine ☞ Imprinted at LoÌ„don in paules churche yearde at the sygne of the maydeÌ„s hed by Thomas petit M. D. XL vii
heresye that none of the auÌ„cient doctours had eyther set it forth or allowed it set forth by other that it shuld be contrary to the doctrine of chyrstes church and we such is our pryde and want of grace do despise the iudgemente both of the godlye fathers and of the hole catholyke churche which is as saynte Chrysostom wytnesseth the mother of the beleuyng people Here nowe what Tertulian â—ermoneÌ„ 76 de 〈◊〉 hath sayed of the church in these fewe wordes Non alia agnosceÌ„da eÌ„ apostoloruÌ„ traditio quaÌ„ quae hodie apud ipsorum ecclesias aeditur Exhibe ergo aliquem ex tuis apostolici Lib. â— aduersê° MattioneÌ„ habet euaÌ„gelium marcionis ecclesias sed suas taÌ„ posteras quam adulteras quaruÌ„ si câ—sum requitas factitus apostaticum inuenias quam apostolicaÌ„ lib. 4. aduersus mart â— ceÌ„sus et obduxeris None other tradition is to be recognysed or knwledged the apostles then that whiche is published or set forth at theyr churches Therfor shew forth some man of thyne of the apostles estimation numbre or iudgemeÌ„t and thou shalt ouercome or obteyne the victorye Agayne thus he hath In summa si constat id verius ê™ prius id prius ê™ ab initio id ab initio quod ab apostolis pariter vtique constabit id esse ab apostolis traditum quod apud ceclesias apostolorum fuerit sacrosanctum That is to say brieflye If it be playne that to be trewer that is fyrste that to be fyrste or before that was froÌ„ the begynnynge whyche was of the apostles it shall in lykewyse be verily euident that to be taught of the apostles whyche hathe bene much estemed as a thynge halowed or that ought not to be touched but reuerentlye at or wyth the apostles churches Furthermore the councell kepte In registro lib. 1. ca. 23 at Nicea whych was one of the four general couÌ„cels that s Gregorye sayed he no lesse theÌ„ yâ— four gospels beleued declareth how muche the churches autoritie determinations shulde be regarded sayeng Si cathari venerint ad Cap. â— â— ecclesiaÌ„ catholicam prae omnibus eos scriptis conuenit profiteri ê™ ca tholice et apostolice ecclesie dogmata suscipiant et sequaÌ„tur That is If the heretykes whyche called them selues cathoros for yâ— cleanes of lyuing which they proudlye challynge to them shal come to the catholyke churche it is mete that they fyrste or before all thynges do by wrytyng promise openlye or confesse that they do receiue and folow the doctrines or determinations of the catholyke apostles churche Againe Cap. 9. the councell sayeth Quod irreprehensibile est catholica tenet ecclesia The catholyke churche holdeth that thynge whiche can not be reproued If we wolde marke well thys sayenge which as I sayed saynt Gregorye estemed it as the gospel folowe it we shuld not so shamefully ere go out of the waye as we nowe Lib. de verâ— sapien daylye do For as Lactantius witnesseth Sola catholica ecclesia est quae verum cultum retinet Hic est fons veritatis hoc est domicilium fidei hoc templum dei quo si quis noÌ„ intrauerit vel a quo si quis exiuerit a spe vitae et salutis aeternae alienus That is to saye The catholyke churche onelye is that holdeth styll the trewe worshyppynge of God Thys is the well of truth thys the house or mansyoÌ„ of fayth thys the teÌ„ple of god whither yf any man shal not entre or out of whyche yf any man goo he is wythout hope of lyfe and euerlastynge saluation These are both trewe wordes also dreadful and therfore lette men beware that forsake the catholyke churche and folow any particular churches opynyons as they do whyche leane to Luthers And that we maye knowe the catholyke churche from the heretycall he addeth sayenge But yet because euery coÌ„panye of heretikes do iudge theÌ„ selues chyefly chrysteÌ„ people and theyr church to be the catholike church we muste knowe that that is the trewe churche of Chryste in the whyche is religion confession and penaunce By confession he vnderstode aurycular coÌ„fession of synnes / whyche is made to a preeste / for confession to god is refused of no church / be it neuer so hereticall / therfore he ment that where aurycular confession was not regarded / vsed / there was not the trew churche of christ Lib. 4. Epistola â— But Cypryan shall speake hys mynde in this matter with these wordes Quisquis ille est et qualis cuÌ„que est christianê° non est si in christi ecclesia noÌ„ est quae vna est per totum mundum in multa membra diuisa Who so euer he be / and what so euer he be / he is not a chrysten maÌ„ / yf he be not in christes churche the whyche is one dyuyded through all the worlde in to many members Nestorius an arrogant heretike as al such be / sayed that all the hole number of doctours wryters that were before hym were deceyued and the whole churche erred froÌ„ the truth and he onelye founde out the truth and folowed it Dyd not euen so saye and boost Marten Luther folowinge him therein the Donatians Nouatians Ruthenes Armenos and all other heretykes affyrmynge that the churche of Chryste was wyth them onelye Beware of them good chrysten reader and stedfastlye folowe the catholyke vniuersal churche whyche the apostles buylded set vp wyth preachynge the gospell to them This is not in one place cytie corner nor couÌ„trey but euerye where where true beleuyng folk be It can not erre the holy gost rulynge guydynge and gouernynge it from tyme to tyme vntyll Io. 14. 16. the worldes ende accordingly as christ promysed to it This is the pyller of the truth as S. Paule affyrmethe and therfore leane vnto it fast and thou shalt neuer fall from thy fayth but abyde therin to thy greate coÌ„fort and soules health But nowe to the nexte chaptre which reciteth the anncient doctours sentences pronounced and publysshed in theyr bokes vpon this matter of verytes vnwrytten and the churches tradicions Saynt Ireneê° policarpes saynte Iohan the euangelystes dyscyples scholer sheweth what doctours we shuld folowe in learnyng the truth of our fayth sayenge We must beleue those preestes which are in the church hauynge successyoÌ„ of Lib. 4ca 43 et 45. the apostles and all other that come frome that the pryncypall successyon in what place soeuer they are gathered togyther or els to be suspected eythera s hetykes and of an euyl iudgemeÌ„t Cap. 44. or deuidyng the church againe Adhaerere oportet his qui a postolorum doctrinam custodiunt et ab eis discere verit atem apud quos est illa quae est ab aposto lis ecclesie successio ☞ The auncyent doctours sentences wrytten and set forth vpon traditions of the apostles chrystes holye church NOwe for as moch as Saynt
and vpoÌ„ this matter agaynste Heluidiê° alledged not one texte of the scrypture to proue this truth but onely dyd make answere to the auctorities that Heluidiê° mysse toke for his purpose the which he did as Erasmus In argumeÌ„ to epistoâ—e illius sayeth truely because the scrypture spake nothyng of that thynge but it was set forth and lefte to the church by the holy apostles tradicion Certaynlye yf the prophet Ezechiels texte alleged before of Bullynger coulde haue proued that our blessed ladye was a virgyn to the ende of her lyfe saynte Hierome wolde haue alledged it to that purpose synce he expowned that whole pphet and therfore for as moche as he dyd not recyte it to yâ— ende it may appere that he sawe that it made nothynge at al to proue that thyng But this of this veryte vnwrytten delyuered from the apostles to vs by mouth wtout any expresse worde of scrypture speakynge therof Further we beleue as iÌ„ dede we are bouÌ„d The crede of the apostles to do that the holy .xii. apostles made a certayne crede called in latyn symboluÌ„ apostoloruÌ„ as S. CypriaÌ„ affirmeth expowning it because euery one of them made an artycle therof and yet it can not be proued by the scrypture that they made any suche Rufinus aquiliensis saynte Austen In exposâ—illiê° August sermo 10. de penteco c. in ramis palmarum Lyprianus in symbo apost ait Tenet fidel traditio saÌ„ctaÌ„ ecclesiaÌ„ diuers other do wytnesse that the apostles wrote that crede thys article I beleue the holye church catholyke whyche is coÌ„teined in it can not be proued by any texte of the scrypture If we shulde beleue nothynge that is not expressely namely set forth in the holye scrypture then we shulde not beleue that christ the sonne of god is equall wyth hys father of the same nature substance power for Ariê° denyed it because he saw nothyng in the scrypture namely to proue it as saynte Athanasius wrytynge agaynst hym affyrmeth playnly Lib 2 dispâ— in arianos Where fynde ye sayed Arius thys worde homousios that betokeneth one that is of lyke or the same substaÌ„ce in al the scripture Dasillê° cp 78. Si vero quis dixerit exaiteta essentia et substaÌ„tia esse filiuÌ„ euÌ„ reprobat as detestatur catholica et apostolica ecclesia O. did est satis ad illius hereseos explosionem was he not as foolyshe as many nowe are many now as then he was / which do euer aske where fyndeste thou that in the scrypture Saynt Athanasius and the great councel holden at Nicea wyth as manye as haue written against yâ— heresie which holdeth yâ— the sonne is not equal wyth hys father haue made answeare vnto the arryans that albeit this worde or name homousios signifiynge that christe the sonne is of one nature and substaunce wyth hys father is not put forth expressely in gods holy worde yet the scrypture alloweth and proueth the thynge it selfe in dyuers places the which they iudged to be sufficyent as in dede it is not in thys matter oneâ—â—â— but in sundrye other as that there be three persons in the trinitie though it be not expressed in the scripture and therfore Sabelliê° denyed it yet yâ— scrypture doth fully and plenteouslye set the thynge it selfe forth Also that the holye gooste procedeth from the father and the sonne is not namely expressed in the scripture and for that cause the grecians and the Armenes denyed it and yet the scrypture proueth that thynge sufficiently as it is expowned of the holy doctours Wherfore it is peryllous to demaunde for the beliefe of euerye thynge receyued of vs where it is wrytten in the scrypture or howe can it be proued by the holy scrypture syth it is ynoughe that the scripture is not against it beynge receyued of the catholique churche or that the scrypturs dothe sette it forth as it is vnderstande and expowned of Tertulianê° de corona militis the holye churche and her doctours catholike In this matter concernyng the askyng of scrypture for the proufe of euery thing I wolde that euerye man wolde marke wel what the eldest latine doctour of christes church Tertulyan sayth therin whose wordes are these Cum quaeritur cur quid obseruetur obseruari interim constat ergo nec nullum nec incertum videri potest delictuÌ„ quod coÌ„mittitur in obseruationem suo nomine vindicandam et satis autoratam consensus patrocinio That is to say When it is asked whyany thynge shulde be obserued it is euydente in the meane season the it is obserued Therfore it may seme some faulte a certen synne that is coÌ„mitted agaynste an obseruation whyche is to be defended by hyr name is sufficyentlye authorysed by the defence of consente These wordes do rubbe some men of thys oure tyme vpon the gall as also do Tertuliande corona militis those whyche now folow in thys olde authoure Quale est autem vt quis tuÌ„c in questioneÌ„ prouocet obseruationem cum ab ea excidit et tunc requirat vnde habuerit obseruationeÌ„ cuÌ„ ab ea desiit But what thynge is it sayeth he that anye man shulde then cal in to question or doubte an obseruation when he is fallen from it And then requyre froÌ„ wheÌ„se or wherof he had the obseruation when he hath lefte it Do not dyuers men euen after thys sort now among vs chrysteÌ„ people For we do forsake fastynge and dyuers other thynges longe kepte of al chrysten nations before we were borne / and then we call them in doubte / and aske what autoritie they be of and how they may be proued by scripture It is an easy thing to aske where is it written that we shulde faste the lent obserue any feastes kepe many other thynges not playnly namely set out in scrypture but we maye aske of them where is it wrytten that these thynges oughte not to be obserued ExpostulaÌ„tesenim scripturae patrocinium So reasoneth Tertulian in parte diuersa praeiudicaÌ„t suae quoque parti scripturae patrocinium adesse debere That is For they / askyng a defeÌ„ce or an eayd of scrypture in the coÌ„trary part do iudge before that the scryptures defence oughte to helpe theyr parte Habemus obseruationem inueteratam quae praeueniendo statum fecit Hanc si nulla scriptura determinauit certe coÌ„suetudo corroborauit quae sine dubio manauit detraditione Quomodo enim vsurpari quid potest si traditum non sit priê° Tthus maye be the englyshe We haue an olde obseruation whych coÌ„myng before hath made a state or a certayntie in it Thoughe no scrypture hath determyned thys obseruation yet at lest the custome hath streÌ„ghthened it or made it stronge whyche doubtles came of tradition For how maye any thynge be obserued or kepte yf it be not fyrste taught or delyuered by tradition Hitherto Tertulyan whyche was aboue M. ccc yeres xl before
wrytteÌ„ by saynt Peter and a boke of actes with a reuelatioÌ„ which are not alowed to be scripture Enoch wrote a boke of the which Iudas iÌ„ his epystle spake and also Tertulian Manye dyuers De habitu muliâ—bri other bokes were ascrybed vnto the apostles and euangelystes beynge put forth in theyr names and bearynge theyr tytles whiche in dede eyther they neuer wrote or els the holy gooste moued not them to make them or thought it not good nor necessary to haue them receyued and vsed amonge chrysten people which thing he opened taught the holy apostles and other the beleuynge people of and frome whom the certeyne knowledge whych is the holy scripture and whych is not doth come as S. Cypryan sayeth thus wrytyng In enarrâ— symbo apâ— Quae sunt noui ac veteris instrumeÌ„ti volumina quae secundum maiorum traditionem per ipsum spirituÌ„ sanctum inspirata creduntur etecclesiis tradita competens videtur in hoc loco euidenti numero sicut expatrum monumentis accepimê° designare That is to wyt Whiche are the bookes of the newe and olde testament that accordynge to the elders tradition are beleued to be inspired by the holye gooste and delyuered vnto the churches it semeth mete to assigne or note in thys place by an euidente noÌ„bre lyke as we haue learned of the fathers recordes or bookes Then streyght he recyteth the numbre of the bokes whyche are reckened to be holy scrypture Wherby it appeareth yet ones agayne that we knowe not what bookes be to be iudged estemed gods worde but by tradition of the apostles and oure auncetours or elders whom the holye gooste sayeth saint Cyprian that blessed martyr taught that thinge by inspiratioÌ„ It foloweth therfore that yf thou wylte beleue nothynge wythout wytnesse of the scrypture that thou causte beleue nothynge of the gospell to be scripture nor no other parte called scrypture and so all the fayth wholly muste neades at ones by that one deuellish opinioÌ„ cleane peryshe Wherfore cease asking where it is wrytten in the scrypture in thinges at the lest receyued generally of Christen nations and gyue credence vnto the catholyque churche whose authoritie as it is moost certeyne and sure so it is verye longe and greate as this chaptre shall proue to the by goddes grace sufficientlye ¶ The auctoritie of christes catholike churcch of and vpon the Apostles traditions and veryties not written in the scripture AS touching the authorite of christes catholyke or vniuersal church I entende at thys tyme to be very briefe and shorte The olde and auncyent wryter saynt Ireneus Iâ—eneus lib. 5. cap. 4 whyche was scholer to one Polycarpe saynt Iohan the euangelystes disciple thus wryteth of the churches auctoritye We ought not to seke yet the truth at other the which it is easy to take of the churche seyng that the apostles haue brought al thinges beloÌ„gyng to the truth in it most pleÌ„teously as it were into a rich treasure house or store house so that euery man that wyll maye receyue of it water of lyfe Here thys holye martyr sendeth vs to the catholyke churche to learne the truthe sayeth we maye not seake it but there onelye Thys churche neyther doth approue any thynge agaynste the fayth good lyuynge nor suffereth any thing agayust eyther of theÌ„ to be Tomo â— Epist 119. kept as s Austen testifyeth If thys churche through the whole worlde do teache anye thynge Epist 118. quiÌ„ ita facieÌ„duÌ„ sit disputare inquit August insoleÌ„tissime iÌ„saniae est yâ— is but that it must so be done to reasoÌ„ or dispute it is most proud Tâ—en was Luther madde as many other are that folowe him nowe madnes Thys sayeng of saynte Austen declareth many meÌ„ both to be proud and very madde also whyche do reason stubbornely and spytefullye agaynste dyuers thynges obserued kepte through the whole church these many hundred yeres Oure Lorde make theym meke humble and wyse that they maye acknowledge the hygh and certeyne authoritye of Chrystes catholyke churche agaynst the whyche no Aug. de trinita lib. 4. cap. 6. quiete man hath or wyl as S. Austeyne testifyeth iudge saint Austen intreating of the christenyng agayne of them that were baptysed or christened of an heretyke thus wryteth Thoughe there were no exaÌ„ple of this matter taken out of the holye scrypture yet the veritie of the same â—ib 1 cap. 33. contra â—resconium graÌ„maticuÌ„ scriptures is holdeÌ„ of vs in this thynge when we do that whyche hath pleased the whole churche wheÌ„ the same scriptures authoritie commeÌ„deth setteth forth so that foras much as the holy scripture can not deceyue vs who so euer feareth to be deceyued by the darkenes of thys questyon whether one baptysed of an heretyke shâ—â—lâ—e be chrystened agayne or not let hym aske councel of the same catholike church whom wythout al doubt the holy scrypture coÌ„mendeth Hytherto this great clerke saynt AusteÌ„ whyche wylleth vs to aske couÌ„saile of christes catholike church in thys doubtefull question of baptyme of the which the scripture speaketh not and therfore al thynges can not be proued by the scrypture whyche we muste both beleue / do also thoughe many men vngodly / and falsely saye they may The same AusteÌ„ / which sayed he wolde not beleue the gospel / except the authoritie of the catholyke churche shulde moue hym / in another place defineth / declareth / what is the catholike churche sayeng I beleue Tomo 10. sermoneÌ„ de teÌ„pore 131. the holy churche catholike that is to saye whyche is spred and dyspersed throughe all the worlde because the churches of dyuers heresyes for that cause are not called catholyke that they what churche is called the catholike church are conteyned in theyr places and countreyes Hec vero a solis ortu usque ad occasum usque vnius fidei spleÌ„dore diffunditur That is Thys the catholyke churche is scattered abrode wyth the shynynge of our faythe from the sunnes rysyng vntyll the goyng done The donatystes whyche were a certeÌ„ kynde of heretykes in Numidia aboute the yere of oure Lorde thre hundred fyftye thre affyrmed that the church or congregation of christen people was no where but with them as Luther and hys scholers are not asshamed to booste of theyr flockes which is agaynst the nature and name of the catholyke churche of the whiche VinceÌ„tiê° lirynensis which was aboue aleuen hundred yeres before this VinceÌ„tius lirinensis gallus tyme wryteth after this sorte I haue often with great studye asked of very many men both wel learned and godly also by what rule or sygne I myght discerne the truth of the catholyke fayth from the falsite And I had almoste euer this aunsweare that whether I or els anye other wolde espye out the gyles or deceytes of heretykes and auoyde theyr snares and abyde sownde and hole in a sownde faythe he oughte two wayes by goddes
Basyll proueth a truth concernyng the holy goost to be godby saynte Llemente Ireueê° Dionisius AleraÌ„drinus Eusebiê° palestinê° origin Affricanus historicus Gregori NaziaÌ„zane saynte Paule good chrysten reader / wytnesseth that Chryste sente some doctours for the edifyeng of the churche not onelye by preachyuge of the scrypture to the people but also by the true and godly openynge and expowning the same I wyl alledge certayne of the eldeste best learned of theym that men maye perceyue the more clerely and perfectlye that all thynges whiche we muste beleue and do are not expressed and publyshed in and by the byble scrypture but that dyuers thynges which ought to be beleued and kept of vs do come and defende also of and vpon the blessed apostles of chryst the churches tradicyon without any texte of the scripture speakynge of them I haue alre dye rehearsed some sentences of saynte Basyll Chrysostom Damascene Theophilactê° which therfore I neade not now again to recyte except it be iÌ„ other wordes then they be alredy rehearsed as nowe I wyll allege here saynt Basyll godly and notable saiges which he hath in a boke of the holy goost thus wrytyng Basilius de spe s ca. 27. Dogmata quae in etclesia predican tut quaedam habemus e doctrina scripto predita quedam rursê° ex apostolorum traditione in mysterio id est in occulta tradita recepim us QuoruÌ„ vtraque pareÌ„ vim habentlad pietateÌ„ nec his quisquaÌ„ contradicit quisquis sane vel tenuiter expartus est quae sint iura ecclesiastica Nam si coÌ„suetudines quae scripto proditae noÌ„ sunt tanquaÌ„ haud multum ha bentes momenti conemur reiicere imprudentes et ea daminabimus que in euangelio necessaria ad salutem habeÌ„tut imo potiê° ipsam fidei predicationem ad nudum nomeÌ„ coÌ„ trahemus These wordes may be turned in to englysshe after this maner The lawes ordinauÌ„ces decrees statutes or coÌ„maundementes for all these the greake word dogmata signifieth whiche are preached or publysshed in the churche we haue certayne of doctrine set furth in wrytyng eftsones or agayne we haue receyued certayne by the apostles tradicyon in a mysterie that is in secrete deliuered Of the which two bothe haue lyke streÌ„gth power or vertue to the knowledge the honour deuote worshyppiÌ„g or loue of god nother anye man coÌ„trary to them truely who soeuer hathe proued or learned by experience yea barely or poorely which are the lawes power auctorite or ryght of the church For yf we shuld endeuour or labour to caste away the customes whiche are not put forth in wrytyng lyke as not hauyng moch pyth or not beynge of moche value we shall also vnwards condemne those thynges whiche are in the gospell had necessary to saluaty on yea we shall also abridge or Vnum est crimen ê™ nunc vehementer daÌ„natur ac punitur di ligens obseruatiotra diâ—yonâ—â— pa trum basilius Episto 70. drawe togyther the same preachynge or publishyng of yâ— fayth vnto a bare or a naked name This saynte Basyll rehearsyng streight many thynges set forth withoute scrypture by the apostles tradition of the whiche I haue spokeÌ„ before Thou maest note here good reader dyuers lessons agaynste the lutherans bearynge vs in hande that all thynges are wryteÌ„ in scrypture which we must neades beleue kepe but pryncypally that this blessed doctoure affyrmeth that those thynges whiche the apostles lefte without scripture or vnwryten haue lyke efficacye vertue to the honorynge and lo uynge of god as haue those thiges whiche are wryten in scrypture and that because bothe of them cometh by the inspiracyon of the holy goost which styrred both the apostles and the euangelistes also to write that which is wrytten and the apostles in lyke maner to leaue certen thinges vnwrytten by tradition vnto the church the which was done as S. Basyll wytnesseth that such thiÌ„ges shulde remayne hyd or secrete lest they shulde be knowen of the rude and vngodlye folke and therby myght be despysed vtterly But this shall be ynough of saynt Basyl though he wrote in this mattier moche more Saynt Hierome thus writeth AdiluciniaÌ„ of traditions to luciniê° demaundyng of hym whether men ought to faste the saterday and dayly receyue the sacramente of the aulrer Sed ergo breuiter te admonendum puto traditiones ecclesiasticas praesertim quae fidei non officiant ita obseruandas vt a maioribus traditae suntâ— Nec aliorum coÌ„suetudineÌ„ alioruÌ„ more contrario subuerti Vnaquaeque prouincia suo sensu abunder et praecepta maioruÌ„ Roma 19. leges apostolicas arbitretur That is to wytte But I thynke thou Roma 14. must be warned bryefly that the traditions of the churche prynrypally those whych caÌ„ not hurt the fayth So are to be obserued as they are taught or delyuered of the elders or auÌ„cient fathers Nother other mennes custome ought to be subuerted or turned vp so downe by the contrary custome of other Let euerye countrey haue hys owne iudgement and iudge the auncetours or elders coÌ„maundementes the apostles lawes I passeouer manye Lege enim in eccleseasteÌ„ ca. 10 et in Mat. cap. 21. like sentences of saynt Hieroms whyche he wrote in thys matter left my boke shuld be ouer loÌ„ge Austen hath very much of thys matter in suÌ„dry of hys bokes of the which some is alleged before out of his epistle wrytten to Ianuarye where he sayeth those thynges whyche are oblerued through the hole world without wrytynge came eyther from the apostles or els froÌ„ the generall couÌ„cels whose autoritie is most holsome in christes church Alâ—o to one Casulane he thus hath intreating of the saterdayes fast In his rebê° de quibê° nihil certi statuit scriptura diâ—ina mos populi dei vel instituta maâ—oruÌ„ ê“lege teneÌ„ da suÌ„t That is to saye In these thynges of the whyche the holy scipture hath ordeined or stablished nothyng certeÌ„ / the custome of gods people or the elders ordinaunces are to be kepte for a lawe Luther and hys disciples teache nâ—eÌ„ to breake the fathers ordinauÌ„ces preceptes lawes saye that wtout manifest wytnes of the scrppture we shuld be bounde to beleue do nothyng Austen here affyrmeth the clene Lib 2. Tâ—â— coÌ„trary whether ptye wylt yâ— beleue good christeÌ„ man Epiphaniê° also which was aboute M. cc. yeres seÌ„ce coÌ„firmeth my purpose sayeng Oportet auÌ„t et traditione vti NoÌ„ eniÌ„ oiÌ„a a diuina scriptura accipi possuÌ„t qua ppter aliqua sacris seripturis aliqu a traditione faÌ„cti apostoli nobis coÌ„meÌ„dauerunt queÌ„admoduÌ„ dicit saÌ„ctê° apostolê° Sicut tradidi vobis Et alibi Sic doceo et sic tradidi in ecclesiis etc. That is But we must of necessitie vse tradition For al thinges caÌ„ not be taken of the holye scripture / wherfore the holye apostles coÌ„mitted to vs some thinges by the holye scripture some by traditioÌ„ lyke as paule sayth As I
abrogated by chrystes death That Paule spake there of that olde lawe of Moses it appeareth by that the proces of that epistle and chaptre where he speaketh of circumcision Now what argumeÌ„t is this good reader If ye be ledde with the spirite ye are not vnder Moses lawe ergo the traditions of the apostles vnwritten oughte not nor can not bynde meÌ„nes coÌ„science Saynte Chrysostom expowneth it thus He that hath the holy goost and in his liuing and dedes is ruled and ledde by the same doth quenche al yll desires and lustes and therfore he hath no nede of the lawes helpe that by feare of it he shulde lyue well Etiam qui ex sese suo fungitur officio quid opê° habet paedagogo For what nede hath he yâ— of hymselfe doth hys duetie of one appoynted to se hym well ordered as a childe As a horse that runneth fast of hym selfe nedeth not to be spurred eueÌ„ so the ryghteous and perfecte good maÌ„ ledde wyth the holy gooste is not vnder the lawe of god for as much as he doth lyue godly wold so contynew yf there were no lawe to enforce and constrayne hym so to do But what is thys to the holye apostles traditions Yea what maketh iâ— agaynste anye ordynaunce of the churche The beste men that lyue in the worlde haue nede of gods lawe to leade them streyghte in the waye and payth of vertuous lyuynge thoughe they ncade no lawe to compel them for feare of punyshmente to do well and to absteyne from synne After thys meaning and sense Paule saied Justo non est lex posita the lawe is â— Timâ— 1. not made for the ryghteous because sayeth Chrysostome the lawe is made that by feare and threteninge of it synners shulde leaue committyng of synne and be punished wheÌ„ they do amisse and therfore Paule sayed to the Galathians Lex propter transgressiones posita est the lawe is Gala. 3. made for transgressyons to be restrayned and punyshed thereby But of thys sufficient Some men alledge saynte Austen agaynst traditions whiche in a certen epistle to saynte Hierom wolde that we shoulde beleue that the wryters of the holye scrypture onelye neuer erred and gyue no credence vnto any other man be he neuer so holye and well learned excepte he dyd proue by the scrypture eyther by autours or by probable reasons that he sayed the truth and therfore men oughte not to beleue them that teache traditions To thys wyse reason J fyrste saye that seynge saint Austeyne hym selfe sayeth in sundrye places of hys bookes that we muste nedes obserue traditious as J haue declared before it is a great blyndnes or rather malice agaynste the truth to alledge hym agaynste traditions as though he were contrarye to hym selfe Secondarilye J saye that they whiche do set forth the apostles traditioÌ„s do proue theÌ„ by the scrypture other autours and probable reasons also as J haue done in thys booke therfore saynte Austeynes authoritie alledged before holdeth with vs agaynst the reprouers of traditions Thyrdlye J saye that saynte Ansteyne in the sayed epistle resembled and compared the bokes of holy scrypture vnto other bookes compiled made set forth by mans wyt without the reuelation of the holy goost as it appeareth by the tenour of that epystle euidently and therfore he mente nothynge there agaynste anye thynge taught or lefte to the churche of chryste by the holy goostes stirring and in spiration but he called there all suche doctryne holye scrypture that is good godlye though it be not wrytten expresselye in the bible but delyuered by tradition wythout wrytyng Therfore this argumente is soyled clerely Furthermore thys reason is made agaynst traditions of the churche The olde testamente The. 9. argument and the new are as sufficient for chrysten people beleuynge nowe in chryste as the olde testamente onely was for the iewes but the whole fayth vnto the which the Jewes were bound was expressed in the olde testament and the bokes of it / ergo the hole fayth to the whyche chrysten men are nowe bounde is expressely written in the newe testamente and the olde and therfore the faythfull are not bounde to beleue anye thynge not expressed in the Byble / and so there are no traditions vnwrytten necessarye to be beleued of vs christen people Thoughe thys reason do The answeare appeare good and pythye vnto them that are not learned in the scrypture or beynge meanelye learned therein are affectionate and so maryed to the coÌ„trarye opniyon / that all thynge whyche doth anye thynge soune to theyr purpose pleaseth them hyghelye yet in very dede it nothynge serueth for theyr malycious intent partely because the Hebrewes were of longe tyme faithful peple before theyr faith was wrytten by Moyses in hys fyue bokes and yet they were yâ— tyme bounde to beleue the thinges then not wrytten but afterwarde partelye for as moche as after Moyses had wrytten and the other bokes of the law were all wrytten the people beleued many thynges perteynyng both to the faith and also to maners whiche were taught by mouthe onely without wrytynge to the beleefe of the which and fulfyllynge also they were neuerthelesse bounde of necessytie And these traditioÌ„s not wrytteÌ„ some men of the hebrues called iÌ„ that Cabala toÌ„gue cabalaÌ„ because they were receyued by the yonger or later lyuynge people of the elders wtout wrytynge of the olde testament lyke as dyuers dilygente searchers of such thynges haue wytnessed by wrytynge Therfore this argument is answered vnto sufficyently as the next anone shall be god willynge whiche is thus framed of the lutherans vpon these saynt Hieroms wordes Quod ex scriptutis sacris In Math. 23. auctoritatem non habet eadem facilitate coÌ„temnitur qua approbatur That is to say That which hath not auctorytie of the holye scriptures is despised by the same easeynes by whiche it is approued or allowed but all traditions haue not theyr autorite of yâ— scrypture therfore they are as easely despised asalowed which they shulde not be yf men were bouÌ„de of necessyte to beleue theÌ„ or to kepe them wherof it foloweth that we are not bouÌ„d to beleue obserue any of them not wrytteÌ„ in the holy scrypture This reason hangeth altogether vpoÌ„ the yll vnderstanding of saynt Hieroms sentence which mente not by holy scripture that onely whiche is sette forth in the byble expresselye but all doctryne commynge of the holy goostes reuelatyon wrytten in the Byble or not written but taught the apostles and the church of them by mouth onely for els he had writen agaynste hym selfe which in dyuers places of his bookes exhorteth men to beleue and kepe many thynges not wrytten in the scrypture as it appereth before in this boke This is thoughte by a learned maÌ„ to be saint Hieroâ—s mynde where I examiniÌ„g and wayenge diligentlye saynte Hieroms commentaryes there haue founde that he mente another thing For he recyteth some mens opinion to haue bene