evident but also by all acknowledged who are able to judge of them Want of Catholick Tradition in all Ages of the Church from the first giving forth of § 39 any Writing testifying unto its Divine Original is another impeachment of its pretence unto Canonical Authority And this Argument ariseth fatally against the Apochryphal Books before mentioned Some of them are expresly excluded from the Canon by many of the antient Churches nor are any of them competently testified unto The Suffrage of this kind given unto our Epistle we have mentioned before The Doubts and Scruples of some about it have likewise been acknowledged That they are of no weight to be laid in the ballance against the Testimony given unto it might easily be demonstrated But because they were levied all of them principally against its Author and but by consequence against its Authority I shall consider them in a Disquisition about him wherein we shall give a further confirmation of the Divine Original of the Epistle by proving it undenyably to be Written by the Apostle St. Paul that eminent Penman of the Holy Ghost Thus clear stands the Canonical Authority of this Epistle It is destitute of no evidence § 40 needful for the manifestation of it nor is it obnoxious unto any just exception against its claim of that priviledge And hence it is come to pass that what ever have been the fears doubts and scruples of some the rash temerarious Objections Conjectures and Censures of others the Care and Providence of God over it as a parcel of his most holy Word working with the prevailing evidence of its Original implanted in it and its Spiritual Efficacy unto all the ends of holy Scripture hath obtained an absolute Conquest over the hearts and minds of all that believe and setled it in a full possession of Canonical Authority in all the Churches of Christ throughout the world Exercitatio II. Of the Penman of the Epistle to the Hebrews Knowledge of the Penman of any part of Scripture not necessary Some of them utterly concealed The Word of God gives Authority unto them that deliver it not the contrary Prophets in things wherein they are not actually inspired subject to mistake St. Paul the Writer of this Epistle The haesitation of Origen Heads of Evidence Vncertainty of them who assign any other Author St. Luke not the Writer of it Nor Barnabas The Epistle under his name Counterfeit His Writing of this Epistle by sundry Reasons disproved Not Apollos Nor Clemens Nor Tertullian Objections against St. Pauls being the Penman Dissimilitude of Style Admitted by the Antients Answer of Origen rejected Of Clemens Hierom c. rejected likewise St. Paul in what sense 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 His Eloquence and Skill Causes of the difference in Style between this and other Epistles Coincidence of Expressions in it and them The Epistle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Answer of Hierom Rejected Of Theodoret. Of Chrysostome Prejudice of the Jews against St. Paul Not the Cause of the Forbeâ—rance of his Name The true Reason thereof The Hebrews Church State not Changed Faith Evangelical educed from Old Testament Principles and Testimonies Thâ—se pressed on the Hebrews not meer Apostolical Authority Haesitation of the Latin Church about this Epistle answered Other Exceptions from the Epistle it self removed Arguments to prove St. Paul to be the Writer of it Testimony of St. Peter 2 Epist. 3. v. 15 16. Considerations upon that Testimony The second Epistle of St. Peter Written to the same Persons with the First The First Written unto the Hebrews in their Dispersion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 what S. Paul wrote an Epistle unto the same Persons to whom St. Peter wrote That this Epistle Not that to the Galathians Not one lost The Long-suffering of God how declared to be salvation in this Epistle The Wisdom ascribed unto St. Paul in the Writing of this Epistle wherein it appears The 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of it Weight of this Testimony The suitableness of this Epistle unto those of the same Author Who competent Judges hereof What required thereunto Testimony of the first Churches or Catholick Tradition Evidences from this Epistle its self The general Argument and Scope Method Way of Arguing All the same with St. Pauls other Epistles Skill in Judaical Learning Traditions and Customs Proper to St. Paul His Bonds and Sufferings His Companion Timothy His Sign and Token subscribed SECOND DISSERTATION § 1 THE Divine Authority of the Epistle being vindicated it is of no great Moment to enquire scrupulously after its Penman Writings that proceed from Divine Inspiration receive no addition of Authority from the Reputation or Esteem of them by whom they were written And this the Holy Ghost hath sufficiently manifested by shutting up the Names of many of them from the knowledge of the Church in all Ages The Close of the Pentateuch hath an uncertain Pen-man unless we shall suppose with some of the Jews that it was written by Moses after his Death Divers of the Psalms have their Penmen concealed as also have the whole Books of Joshua Judges Samuel Kings Ruth Esther Job and the Chronicles are but guessed at Had any prejudice unto their Authority ensued this had not been For those whose Authors are known they were not esteemed to be given by Prophesie because they were Prophets but they were known to be Prophets by the Word which they delivered For if the Word Delivered or Written by any of the Prophets was to be esteemed Sacred or Divine because delivered or Written by such Persons as were known to be Prophets then it must be because they were some other way known so to be and Divinely Inspired as by Working of Miracles or that they were in their dayes received and testified unto as such by the Church But neither of these can be asserted For as it is not known that any one Penman of the Old Testament Moses only excepted ever wrought any miracles so it is certain that the most and chiefest of them as the Prophets were rejected and condemned by the Church of the dayes wherein they lived The only way therefore whereby they were proved to be Prophets was by the Word it self which they delivered and wrote and thereon depended the Evidence and Certainty of their being Divinely inspired See Amos 7.14 15 16. Jer. 23.25 26 27 28 29 30 31. And setting aside that actual Inspiration by the Holy Ghost which they had for the Declaration and Writing of that Word of God which came unto them in particular and the Prophets themselves were subject to mistakes So was Samuel when he thought Eliab should have been the Lords Annointed 1 Sam. 16.6 and Nathan when he approved the purpose of David to build the Temple 1 Chron. 17.2 and the great Elijah when he supposed none left in Israel that worshipped God aright but himself 1 Kings 19.14 18. It was then as we said the Word of Prophesie that gave the Writers of it the Reputation and
by Eusebius That he was the most eminently learned and knowing person of the Roman or Latine Church in those dayes will I suppose not be greatly questioned Now to suppose that he knew not the customes opinions and practice of that Church but would suffer himself to be imposed on by a stranger destitute of those advantages which he had to come unto an unquestionable certainty in it is a very fond thing Besides he doth not any where speak as one that reported the words and Judgement of another but in three or four places expresly affirms it as of his own knowledge when at the same time in opposition thereunto he contends that it was received by all other Churches in the world and all Writers from the dayes of the Apostles § 15 Neither yet doth it appear from any thing delivered by Caius Hippolitus Eusebius or Hierome that the Latine Church did ever reject this Epistle Yea we shall find that many amongst them even in those dayes reckoned it unto the Canon of the Scripture and owned St. Paul as the Penman of it Eusebius himself acknowledges that Clemens useth sundry Testimonies out of it in his Epistle ad Corinthios And others also there were concurring with his judgement therein But these two things I allow on the testimonies insisted on 1. That sundry particular persons of note and esteem in the Roman Church owned not the Canonical authority of this Epistle as not esteeming it written by St. Paul 2. The Church it self had not before the dayes of Hierome made any publick Judgement about the Author or Authority of this Epistle nor given any Testimony unto them For it seems utterly impossible that if any such Judgement had passed or testimony been given that Hierome living in the midst of that Church should know nothing of it but so often affirm the contrary without haesitation And this undenyably evinceth the injustice of some mens pretensions that the Roman Church is the only proposer of Canonical Scripture and that upon the Authority of her proposal alone it is to be received Four hundred years were passed before she her self publickly received this Epistle or read it in her Assemblies so far was she from having proposed it unto others And yet all this while was it admitted and received by all other Churches in the world as Hierom testifies and that from the dayes of the Apostles whose judgement the Roman Church it self at length submitted unto No impeachment then of the Authority of this Epistle can be taken from this defect and inadvertency of the Roman Church it being convinced to be so by the concurrent suffrage and Testimony of all other Churches in the world from the dayes of the Apostle as we shall afterwards more fully declare Neither are the occasions of this haesitation of the Western Church obscure The Epistle was written it may be in Rome at least it was in some part of Italy Chap. 13.24 There no doubt it was seen and it may be Copied out before its sending by some who used to accompany the Apostle as Clemens who as we have shewed not long after mentioned divers things contained in it The Originall was without question speedily sent into Judea unto the Hebrews to whom it was written and directed as were all others of the Epistles of the same Apostle unto those Churches that were immediately intended and concerned in them That Copies of it were by them also communicated unto their Brethren in the East equally concerned in it with themselves cannot be doubted unless we will suppose them grosly negligent in their duty towards God and man which we have no reason to do But the Churches of the Hebrews living at that time and for some while after if not in a seperation yet in a distinction by reason of some peculiar observances from the Churches of the Gentiles especially those of the West they were not it may be very forward in communicating this Epistle unto them being written as they supposed about an especial concernment of their own By this means this Epistle seems to have been kept much within the Compass of the Churches of the Jews untill after the destruction of the Temple when by their dispersion and coalescency with other Churches in the East it came to be generally received amongst them and non solum ab Ecclesiis orientis sed ab omnibus retro Ecclesiis Graeci sermonis Scriptoribus as Hierom speaks But the Latin Church having lost that advantage of receiving it upon its first writing it may be also upon the consideration of the removall of its peculiar Argument upon the finall destruction of the whole Judaical Church and Worship was somewhat slow in their inquiry after it Those that succeeded in that Church it is not unlikely had their scruples increased because they found it not in common use amongst their Predecessors like to the rest of St. Pauls Epistles not considering the occasion thereof Add hereunto that by that time it had gradually made its progress in its return into the West where it was first written and attended with the Suffrage of all the Eastern Churches began to evince its own Authority sundry persons who were wrangling about peculiar opinions and practices of their own began to seek advantages from some expressions in it So did in particular the Novatians and the Donatists This might possibly increase the scruple amongst the Orthodox and make them wary in their admission of that Authority which they found pleaded against them And well was it for them that their opinions about which they disagreed with their Adversaries were according unto truth seeing it may justly be feared that some then would have made them their Rule and Standard in their reception or rejection of this Epistle for it was no new thing for the Orthodox themselves to make bold sometime with the Scripture if they supposed it to run cross unto their conceptions So Epiphanius informs us in Ancorat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And also he wept for so it is read in the uncorrected Copies of the Gospell according to Luke and St. Irenaeus useth this Testimony in his Book against Heresies for their confutation who affirmed that Christ took flesh only in appearance but the Orthodox or Catholicks being afraid of the importance of that expression took away that word out of the Copies not understanding its use and sense So also Sixtus Sinensis after he hath informed us out of Hilary that many Orthodox persons denyed the story of our Saviours Agony and bloody Sweat adds of his own Suspicor à Catholicis sublatam esse pio sed simplici zelo quod favere videbatur Arianis I suspect that the Story was taken out of the Copies by some Catholicks out of a godly but simple zeal because it seemed to favour the Arians So great is the power of prejudice and so little occasions have men taken whom others have esteemed Orthodox and pious to make bold with that word whereby both we
there is some variety both in antient Copies of the Original and Translations about it the most owning and retaining of it yet it would be of no moment seeing we know not whence or from whom any of them are The Objection then is taken from the want of the wonted Apostolical Salutation which should be in and a part of the Epistle And this is the substance of what on this account is excepted against our Assertion § 16 Various Answers have been given to this Objection some of them of no more validity than its self Hierom replyes it hath no mans name prefixed therefore we may by as good Reason Say it was written by no man as not by Paul which Instance though it be approved by Beza with other learned men and not sufficiently answered by Erasmus with a contrary instance yet indeed it is of no value for being written it must be written by some body though not perhaps by St. Paul Some have thought that it may be the Inscription inquired after was at first prefixed but by some means or other hath been lost But as there are very many Arguments and Evidences to evince the weakness of this imagination so the beginning and entrance of the Epistle is such as is uncapable of any contexture with such a Salutation as that used in other Epistles as is also that of St. John so that this Conjecture can here have no place § 17 Some of the Antients and principally Theodoret insist upon the peculiar allotment of his Work unto him among the Gentiles Paul was the Apostle of the Gentiles in an especial manner and if in Writing unto the Hebrews he had prefixed his name unto his Epistle he might have seemed to transgress the Line of his Allotment And if it be not certain that the Apostles by common consent cast their Work into distinct portions which they peculiarly attended unto as the Antients generally concurr that they did and there was not reason wanting why they should do so yet it is that there was a special Convention and agreement between James Peter and John on the one side and Paul and Barnabas on the other that they should attend the Ministry of the Circumcision and these of the Gentiles Hence Paul finding it necessary for him to write unto the Hebrews would not prefix his name with an Apostolical Salutation unto his Epistle that he might not seem to have invaded the Province of others or transgressed the Line of his Allotment But I must acknowledge that notwithstanding the weight laid upon it by Theodoret and some others this reason seems not unto me cogent unto the end for which it is produced For 1. The Commission given by the Lord Christ unto his Apostles was Catholick and had no bounds but that of the whole Creation of God capable of instruction Matth. 28.19 Mark 16.15 and that Commission which was given unto them all in general was given unto every one in particular and made him in solidum possessor of all the Right and Authority conveyed by it Neither could any following arbitrary agreement pitched on for convenience and the facilitating of their Work abridge any of them from exerting their Authority and exercising their Duty towards any of the Sons of Men as occasion did require And hence it is that notwithstanding the agreement mentioned we find St. Peter teaching of the Gentiles and St. Paul labouring the Conversion of the Jews Secondly In Writing this Epistle on this Supposition St. Paul did indeed that which is pretended was not meet for him to do namely he entered on that which was the Charge of another man only he conceals his Name that he might not appear in doing of a thing unwarrantable and unjustifiable And whether it be meet to ascribe this unto the Apostle is easie to determine As then it is certain that St. Paul in the Writing of this Epistle did nothing but what in duty he ought to do and what the Authority given him by Christ extended its self unto so the concealing of his Name lest he should be thought to have done any thing irregularly is a thing that without much temerity may not be imputed unto him § 18 There is another Answer to this Objection which seemeth to be solid and satisfactory which most of the Antients rest in And it is that St. Paul had weighty Reasons not to declare his Name at the entrance of this Epistle to the Hebrews taken from the prejudices that many of them had against him This is insisted on by Clemens in Eusebius He did Wisely saith he conceal his Name because of the prejudicate Opinion that they had against him and this is at large insisted on by Chrysostom who is followed therein by Theophilact Oecumenius and others without number The persecuting Party of the Nation looked on him as an Apostate a Desertor of the Cause wherein he was once engaged and one that taught Apostasie from the Law of Moses yea as they thought that set the whole World against them and all that they gloried in Acts 21.28 and what enmity is usually stirred up on such occasions all men know and his example is a sufficient instance of it And there was added thereunto which Chrysostom and that justly layes great weight upon that he was no ordinary Person but a man of great and extraordinary abilities which mightily increased the provocation Those among them who with the profession of the Gospel had a mind to continue themselves in and to impose upon others the observance of Mosaical Institutions looked on him as the only person that had frustrated their design Acts 15.2 And this also is usually no small cause of wrath and hatred The Spirit of these men afterwards possessing the Ebonites they despised St. Paul as a Grecian and Desertor of the Law as Epiphanius testifies And even the best among them who either in the use of their liberty or upon an Indulgence given them continued in the Temple Worship had a jealous eye over him lest he had not that esteem for Moses which they imagined became them to retain Acts 21.21 how great a prejudice against his Doctrine and Reasonings these thoughts and jealousies might have created had he at the entrance of his dealing with them prefixed his Name and usiâ—al Salutation is not hard to conjecture This being the State and Condition of things in reference unto St. Paul and not any other known Penman of the Holy Ghost or eminent Disciple of Christ in those dayes this defect of Inscription as Beza well observes proves the Epistle rather to be his than any other Persons whatever And though I know that there may be some Reply made unto this Answer both from the Discovery which he makes of himself in the end of the Epistle and from the high probability that there is that the Hebrews upon the first receipt of it would diligently examine by whom it was written yet I judge it very sufficient to frustrate the
like him ought to be interpreted not as though none should ever be like him but that none should be like him as to some particular quâ—lity or accident or that in all the space of time wherein the Prophets followed him until Prophecy ceased none should be like unto Moses but hereafter there shall be one like him or rather greater then he This is that which we affirmed before in the whole Series of Prophets that succeeded in that Church building on Moses foundation there was none like unto him but the Prophet here promised was to be so and in other regards as appears from other Testimonies far greater then he This was of old their common faith from this prediction of Moses And wherein this likeness was to consist our Apostle declares at large in his third chapter Moses was the great Law-giver by whom God revealed his mind and will as to his whole Worship whilst the Church State instituted by him was to continue Such a Prophet was the Messiah to be a Law-giver so as to abolish the old and to institute new Rites of Worship as we shall afterwards more fully prove and confirm 4. This raising up of a Prophet like unto Moses declares that the whole will of God as to his Worship and the Churches obedience was not yet revealed Had it so been there would have been no need of a Prophet like unto Moses to lay new foundations as he had done Those who succeeded building on what he had fixed and therefore said not to be like unto him would have sufficed But there are new counsels of the Will of God as yet hid to be finally and fully revealed by this Prophet And after his work is done there is no intimation of any further Revelation to ensue 5. The presence of God with this Prophet in his work is set down He would put his word into his mouth or speak in him as our Apostle expresseth the same matter chap. 1. v. 1. And lastly his Ministry is further described from the Event with respect unto them who would not submit unto his Authority nor receive the Law of God at his mouth God would require it at their hands that is as those words are interpreted by Peter they should be cut off from among his people or from being so And this signal Commination in the accomplishment of it gives light unto the whole praediction Some of the Jews from these words have fancied unto themselves another great Prophet whom they expect as they did of old before the coming of the Messiah So in their dealing with John the Baptist they asked him whetheâ—â—e was Elias which he denied because though he were promised under that name yet he was not that individual person whom they looked for that is the soul of Elias the Tishbite as Kimchi tells us with a body new created like unto the former Wherein they further demand whether he were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Prophet promised by Moses which he also denies because that Prophet was no other then the Messiah Joh. 1.21 To this purpose also is it that the Spirit of the Lord is promised to rest upon the Messiah Isa. 11.3 to make him of quick understanding in the fear of the Lord that he might not judge after the sight of his eyes c. v. 3 4 5. So also cap. 61.1 2. And from this great Prophet were the Isles of the Gentiles to receive the Law chap. 42.1 2. The summ of all is the Messiah was to be a Prophet a Prophet like unto Moses that is a Law-giver one that should finally and perfectly reveal the whole will and counsel of God all with that Authority that whosoever refused to obey him should be exterminated and cast out from the priviledge of being reckoned among the people of God § 36 We are then in the next place to consider the Accomplishment of this promise in the person of Jesus of Nazareth Now this the story of him and the event do abundantly testifie that he was a Prophet and so esteemed by the Jews themselves until through the envy of the Scribes and Pharisees and their own unwillingness to admit of the purity and holiness of his Doctrine they were stirred up to oppose and persecute him as they had done all other Prophets who in their several Generations foretold his coming is evident from the records of the Evangelical story see Joh. 1.46 chap. 6.17 Act. 3.22 23. Their present obstinate denial hereof is a meer contrivance to justifie themselves in their rejection and murder of him But this is not all he was not only a Prophet in general but he was that Prophet who was foretold by Moses and all the Prophets who built on his foundation who was to put the last hand unto divine Revelations in a full declaration of the wâ—ole counsel of God the peculiar work of the Messiah and this we shall evince in the ensuing considerations of his Doctrine and Prophesie with the success and event of them First The Nature of the Doctrine taught by this Prophet gives Testimony unto our § 37 assertion Whatever Characters of that Truth which is holy and heavâ—nly can rationally be conceived or apprehended thâ—y are all eminently and incomparably imprinted on the Doctrine of Jesus Christ. Whatever tends to the glory of God as the first Cause and last End of all things as the only Soveraign Ruler Judge and disposer of all as the only infinitely holy wise righteous good gracious merciful powerful faithful independent Being is clearly evidently and in a heaveâ—ly manner revealed therein Whaâ—ever is usâ—ful or suitable to excite and improve all that is of good in man in the nâ—tiâ—ns of his mind or inclinations of his will to discover his wants and defects that he may not â—xalt himself in his own imagâ—nation abovâ— hâ—s state and condition whatever is needful to reveal unto him his End or his Way hâ—s Happiness or the Means conducing thereunto whatever may bring him into a dâ—e subjection unto God and subordination unto his Glory whatever mâ—y teâ—ch him to be usâ—ful in all those Relations wherein he may be cast within the bounds and compass of the moral principles of his nature as a creature made for society wâ—atever is useful the deterr him from and sâ—ppress in him every thing that is evil even in those hidden seeds and Embrios of it which lye beneath the first instances that Reason can reach unto to discovery of and that in an absolute universality without thâ— lâ—ast indulgence on any pretence whatever and to stâ—r him up provoke him unto and direct him in the practice of whatever thing is true honest just pure lovely of good report that is virtuous or praise-worthy that may begin bound guide limit finish and perfâ—ct the whole Systeme of moral actions in him in relation unto God himself and others it is all revealed confirmed and ratified in the Doctrine of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. It hath-stood upon its
was the fittest to be used in this employment and how well all things of this nature agree unto St. Paul we shall see afterwards § 5 Some have assigned the Writing of this Epistle unto Barnabas Clemens Origen Eusebius make no mention of him Tertullian was the Author of this Opinion and it is reported as his by Hierom. Philastrius also remembers the report of it And it is of late defended by Camero as the former concerning Luke by Grotius whose Reasons for his conjecture are confuted with some sharpness by Spanhemius mindful as it seems of his Fathers Controversie with some of his Scholars The Authority of Tertullian is the sole foundation of this Opinion But as the Book wherein he mentions it was written in his Paroxysme when he uttered not that only unadvisedly so he seems not to lay much weight on the Epistle it self only preferring it unto the Apochryphal Hermes Receptior saith he apud Ecclesias Epistola Barnabae illo Apocrypho pastore Maechorum And we have shewed that the Latin Church was for a time somewhat unacquainted with this Epistle so that it is no marvel if one of them should mistake its Author Grotius would disprove this Opinion from the dissimilitude of its style and that which goes under the name of Barnabas which is corrupt and barbarous But there is little weight in that Observation that Epistle being certainly spurious no way savouring the Wisdom or Spirit of him on whom it hath been vulgarly imposed But yet that it was that Epistle which is cited by some of the Antients under the name of Barnabas and not this unto the Hebrews is well proved by Baronius from the names that Hierom mentions out of that Epistle which are no where to be found in this to the Hebrews But that Epistle of Barnabas is an open fruit of that vanity which prevailed in many about the third and fourth Ages of the Church of personating in their Writings some Apostolical Persons wherein they seldom or never kept any good decorum as might easily be manifested in this particular instance As to our present Case the Reason before mentioned is of the same validity against this as the other Opinion concerning Luke whereunto others of an equal evidence may be added Barnabas was not an Apostle properly and strictly so called nor had Apostolical Mission or Authority but rather seems to have been one of the LXX Disciples as Epiphanius affirms And Eusebius a Person less credulous than he acknowledging that a just and true Catalogue of them could not be given yet placeth Barnabas as the first of them concerning whom all agreed Much weight indeed I shall not lay hereon seeing it is evident that the Catalogues given us by the Antients of those Disciples are nothing but a rude Collection of such names as they found in the Books of the New Testament applied without Reason or Testimony but Apostle he was none Many circumstances also concurr to the removal of this conjecture The Epistle was written in Italy Chap. 13.24 where it doth not appear that Barnabas ever was The fabulous Author I confess of the Rhapsedy called the Recognitions of Clemens tells us that Barnabas went to Rome taking along Clemens with him and returning into Judaea found St. Peter at Caesarea But St. Luke in the Acts gives us another account both where Barnabas was and how he was employed at the time intimated by him who knew nothing of those things For whilst St. Peter was at Caesarea Acts 10.1 Barnabas was at Hierusalem Acts 9.27 being a little while after sent to Antioch by the Apostles chap. 11.22 Again Timothy was the Companion of the Writer of this Epistle chap. 13.23 a Person as far as appears unknown unto Barnabas being taken into St. Pauls Society after their difference and separation Acts 15.39 chap. 16.1 He had also been in bonds or imprisonment chap. 10.34 whereof we cannot at that time learn any thing concerning Barnabas those of St. Paul being known unto all And lastly not long before the Writing of this Epistle Barnabas was so far from that Light into and Apprehension of the nature use and expiration of Judaical Rites herein expressed that he was easily mislead into a practical miscarriage in the observation of them Gal. 2.13 wherein although some after Hieroms fancy that the difference between St. Peter and St. Paul was only in pretence have laboured to free St. Peter and his Companions on other grounds from any sinful failing as it should seem in a direct opposition unto the Testimony of St. Paul affirming that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in that particular he was to be blamed or condemned vâ—r 11. not unlike him who hath written a justification of Aaron in his making the Golden Calf yet that Barnabas was not come up unto any constancy in his practice about Mosaical Institutions is evident from the Text. And shall we suppose that He who but a little before upon the coming of some few Brethren of the Church of Jerusalem from St. James durst not avouch and abide by his own personal Liberty but deserted the use of it not without some blameable dissimulation Gal. 2.13 should now with so much Authority write an Epistle unto that Church with St. James and all the Hebrews in the world concurring with them in Judgement and Practice about that very thing wherein himself out of respect unto them had particularly miscarried This certainly was rather the work of St. Paul whose Light and Constancy in the Doctrine delivered in this Epistle with his engagements in the defence of it above all the rest of the Apostles is known from the story of the Acts and his own other Writings Apollos hath been thought by some to be the Penman of this Epistle and that because § 6 it answers the Character given of him For it is said that he was an Eloquent man mighty in the Scripture fervent in Spirit and one that mightily convinced the Jews out of the Scripture it self Acts 18.24 28. all which things appear throughout this whole Discourse But this Conjecture hath no Countenance from Antiquity no mention being made of any Epistle written by Apollos or of any thing else so that he is not reckoned by Hierom amongst the Ecclesiastical Writers nor by those who interpolated that work with some Fragments out of Sophronius Nor is he reported by Clemens Origen or Eusebius to have been by any esteemed the Author of this Epistle However I confess somewhat of moment might have been apprehended in the Observation mentioned if the Excellencies ascribed unto Apollos had been peculiar unto him yea had they not all of them been found in St. Paul and that in a manner and degree more eminent than in the other But this being so the ground of this Conjecture is taken from under it Origen Eusebius and Hierom in the places forecited mention a report concerning some § 7 who ascribed this Epistle unto Clemens Romanus
Exception insisted on though perhaps not containing the true at least the whole Cause of the Omission of an Apostolical Salutation in the entrance of it If then we would know the True and Just Cause of the Omission of the Authors § 19 name and mention of his Apostolical Authority in the entrance of this Epistle we must consider what were the Just Reasons of prefixing them unto his other Epistles Chrysostome in his Proem unto the Epistle to the Romans gives this as the only Reason of the mentioning the Name of the Writer of any Epistle in the Frontispiece of it otherwise than was done by Moses and the Evangelists in their Writings namely because they wrote unto them that were present and so had no cause to make mention of their own Names which were well enough known without the premising of them in their Writings whereas those who wrote Epistles dealing with them that were absent were necessitated to prefix their Names unto them that they might know from whom they came But yet this Reason is not absolutely satisfactory for as they who prefixed not their Names to their Writings wrote not only for the use and Benefit of those that were present and knew them but of all succeeding Ages who knew them not so many of them who did Preach and Write the Word of the Lord unto those that lived with them and knew them yet prefixed their Names unto their Writings as did the Prophets of Old and some who did write Epistles to them who were absent omitted so to do as St. John and the Author of this Epistle The real cause then of prefixing the Names of any of the Apostles unto their Writings was meerly the Introduction thereby of their Titles as Apostles of Jesus Christ and therein an Intimation of that Authority by and with which they wrote This then was the true and only reason why the Apostle St. Paul prefixed his Name unto his Epistles sometimes indeed this is omitted when he wrote unto some Churches where he was well known and his Apostolical Power was sufficiently owned because he joyned others with himself in his Salutation who were not Apostles as the Epistle to the Philippians chap. 1. and the second of the Thessalonians Unto all others he still prefixeth this Title declaring himself thereby to be one so authorized to reveal the Mysteries of the Gospel that they to whom he Wrote were to acquiesce in his Authority and to resolve their faith into the Revelation of the Will of God made unto him and by him the Church being to be built on the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles And hence it was that when something he had taught was called in question and opposed Writing in the Vindication of it and for their establishment in the Truth whom before he had instructed he doth in the entrance of his Writings singularly and Emphatically mention this his Authority Gal. 1.1 Paul an Apostle neither of man nor by man but by Jesus Christ and God the Father that raised him from the dead so intimating the absolute obedience that was due unto the Doctrine by him revealed By this Title I say he directs them to whom he wrote to resolve their assent into the Authority of Christ speaking in him which he tenders unto them as the proof and foundation of the Mysteries wherein they were instructed In his dealing with the Hebrews the case was far otherwise They who believed amongst them never changed the old foundation or Church-State grounded on the Scriptures though they had a new addition of Priviledges by their Faith in Christ Jesus as the Messiah now exhibited And therefore he deals not with them as with those whose Faith was built absolutely on Apostolical Authority and Revelation but upon the common Principles of the Old Testament on which they still stood and out of which Evangelical Faith was educed Hence the beginning of the Epistle wherein he appeals to the Scripture as the foundation that he intended to build upon and the Authority which he would press them withal supplies the Room of that intimation of his Apostolical Authority which in other places he maketh use of And it serves to the very same purpose For as in those Epistles he proposeth his Apostolical Authority as the immediate reason of their Assent and Obedience so in this he doth the Scriptures of the Old Testament And this is the true and proper cause that renders the prefixing of his Apostolical Authority which his Name must necessarily accompany needless because useless it being that which he intended not to ingage in this business And for himself he sufficiently declares in the close of his Epistle who he was for though some may imagine that he is not so certainly known unto us from what he there sayes of himself yet none can be so fond to doubt whether he were not thereby known to them to whom he wrote so that neither hath this Objection in it any thing of real weight or moment § 20 We have spoken before unto the Haesitation of the Latin Church which by some is objected especially by Erasmus and given the Reasons of it manifesting that it is of no force to weaken our Assertion unto which I shall now only add that after it was received amongst them as Canonical it was never questioned by any Learned Man or Synod of old whether St. Paul was the Author of it or no but they all with one consent ascribed it unto him as hath been at large by others declared The remaining Exceptions which by some are insisted on are taken from some passages in the Epistle it self that principally of Chap. 2. and the Third where the Writer of it seems to reckon himself among the number not of the Apostles but of their Auditors But whereas it is certain and evident that the Epistle was written before the Destruction of the Temple yea the beginning of those Wars that ended therein or the death of James whilest sundry of the Apostles were yet alive it cannot be that the Penman of it should really place himself amongst the generation that succeeded them so that the Words must of necessity admit of another Interpretation as shall be manifested in its proper place for whereas both this and other things of the same nature must be considered and spoken unto in the places where they occurr I shall not here anticipate what of necessity must be insisted on in its due season especially considering of how small importance the Objections taken from them are And this is the summ of what hath as yet by any been objected unto our assignation of this Epistle unto St. Paul by the consideration whereof the Reader will be directed into the Judgement he is to make on the Arguments and Testimonies that we shall produce in the Confirmation of our Assertion and these we now proceed unto under the several Heads proposed in the entrance of our Discourse § 21 Amongst the Arguments usually insisted on to prove
wrought by Christ and the Tradition delivering them down unto us This also the Jews plead concerning the Miracles § 61 of Moses They were say they openly wrought in the sight of all Israel and that they were so wrought the Testimony of Israel in succeeding Ages is next the Writings its self the best and only witness they have of them And wherein doth our Testimony come short of theirs Nay on both accounts of their first notoriety and succeeding Tradition it far exceeds what they have to plead For as the Miracles of Moses were wrought openly so the most of them were so only in the sight of that one People whom he had under his own conduct in a wilderness remote from any converse with other Nations and that in those dark times of the world wherein men were generally stupid and credulous as having not been imposed on by the delusions which the following Ages were awakened by The Jews also lay no greater weight on any Miracles then thâ—y do on those which were wrought in the wilderness of Midian which had no witness unto them but that of Moses himself But the Miracles of Jesus were all or most of them wrought before the eyes of multitudes envying hating and persecuting of him and that in the most knowing daies of the world when Reason and Learning had improved the light of the minds of men to the utmost of their capacity in and upon multitudes for sundry years together being all of them sifted by his adversaries to try if they could discover any thing of deceit in them And although his personal Ministry was confined to one Nation yet the Miracles wrought by his Disciples in his Name and by his Power for the confirmation of his being the Messiah were spread all the world over so that all mankind were filled first with the report of them and then satisfied with their truth and lastly the generality of them with faith in him which they directed unto The notoriety therefore of his Miracles far exceedeth that of those of Moses And for the means whereby the certainty of them is continued unto us whether we respect the number of persons confirming it or their quality or their dis-interest as to any carnal advantage or their suffering for their Testimony it is notorious that the Jews condition confined meerly to themselves is no way to be compared with it So that we may truly say that no Jew can possibly on any rational account give credit unto the Truth of the Miracles wrought by Moses and deny it unto them wrought by the Lord Jesus § 62 But yet there seems somewhat further necessary in this case Though there were Miracles wrought by our Saviour yet they might be every way inferiour unto them wrought by Moses and so not sufficient to testifie unto a Doctrine and Authority removing and abolishing the Laws and Customs instituted by Moses And this the Jews of old seemed to have had respect unto in their endless tumultuary Calling after Signs and Miracles And hence though the Lord Christ sometimes pleaded with them the works that he wrought leaving them to stand and fall according unto the evidence of them Joh. 15.24 chap. 10.37 As also did the Apostles afterwards Act. 2.22 unto the astonishment of all and satisfaction of the less obdurate Job 7.31 chap. 12.37 Yet both he himself constantly refused to gratifie their curiosity and unbelief when they required any Sign or Miracle of him Matth. 12.38 39. chap. 16.4 Luk. 11.29 And the Apostle expresly condemneth the whole principle in them as that which in the preaching of the Gospel was not to be gratified nor much attended unto 1 Cor. 1.22 But yet neither is there any strength wanting unto our Argument on this account also For although it be not at all necessary that he who comes with an after-Revelation of the will of God reversing any thing before established should be attested unto with more Miracles or those that are more signal then he or they were who were the instruments of the first Revelation of things to be repealed seeing no more is required but that he be sufficiently evidenced to be sent of God which may be done by one true real Miracle as well as by a thousand yet the wisdom of God hath so ordered things that the Miracles wrought by the Lord Jesus did on many accounts exceed those wrought by Moses as by a comparison in some particular instances will appear First The number of them gives them the preheminence The Jews contend that § 63 there were seventy six Miracles wrought by Moses whereas those of all other Prophets as they observe amount but unto seventy four for so do they lay hold on every occasion to exalt him who yet judgeth and condemneth them To make up this number they reckon up sundry things that happened about his birth and death far enough from Miracles wrought by him or in the confirmation of his Ministry They add also every extraordinary work of God that fell out in his daies to the same purpose Be it so then that so many Miracles were wrought by Moses as we are far from diminishing any thing of the Glory of his Ministry yet what are those compared unto those wrought by Christ and his Apostles in his Name and by his Power and Authority Those that are recorded of his own are not easily reckoned up and yet those that are written are far the least part of what he did perform and that in the space of three or four years whereas those of Moses were scattered unto the whole course of his life for an hundred and twenty years Thus John assures us that he did many more signs besides those that are written chap. 20.30 31. and that his Testimony is equal unto that of Moses we have proved before He adds that the world could not contain the Books that might be written of his Miracles chap. 21.25 by which usual hyperbole a great multitude is designed Nor did the Writers of the Story of the Gospel agree to give an account of all the Miracles that were wrought by the Author of it but only to leave sufficient instances on record of his Divine Power in the effecting of them For this end they singled out some works that were occasionally attended with some Disputes or Preachings tending unto the opening and confirmation of the Doctrine of the Gospel Thus upon the coming of the Disciples of John unto him it is said Luk. 7.21 In that same hour he cured many of their infirmities and plagues and of evil spirits and unto many that were blind he gave sight The particular stories of none of these are any where mentioned nor had that season been at all remembred but upon occasion of those Persons who were sent unto him the present works which they saw being made the ground of that answer which he returned unto their Master v. 22. Go tell John the things which ye have seen and heard how that the blind
by the Jews of all sorts to belong to the Messiah his Kingdom and Offices and his design was to deal with them chiefly upon their own concessions and principles As we have some few other helps remaining to acquaint us with what was the received sense of the Judaical Church concerning sundry passages in the Old Testament relating unto the promised Christ so the Paraphrases of Scripture that were either at that time in use amongst them as was the Greek Translation amongst the Hellenists or about that time composed as the Targums at least some parts of them will give us much light into it What of that antient sense appeareth yet in the corrupted Copies of those Translations which remain being considered will much evince the reason and suitableness of the Apostles Quotations And this is needful to be observed to refute that impiety of some as Cajetan who not being able to understand the force of some Testimonies cited by the Apostle as to his purpose in hand have questioned the Authority of the whole Epistle as also the mistake of Hierom who in his Epistle to Pammachius rashly affirmed that Paul did quote Scriptures that were not indeed to his purpose but out of design to stop the mouths of his Adversaries as he himself had dealt with Jovinian which was very far from him whose only design was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to promote the Truth in Love IV. He takes it for granted in the whole Epistle that the Judaical Church-State did yet continue and that the Worship of it was not yet disallowed of God suitably to what was before declared concerning his own and the other Apostles practice Had that Church-State been utterly abolished all observation of Mosaical rites which were the Worship of that Church as such had been utterly unlawfull as now it is Neither did the determination recorded Acts 15. abolish them as some suppose but only free the Gentiles from their observance Their free use was yet permitted unto the Jews Acts 21.20 22 25 26. Chap. 27.9 and practised by Paul in particular in his Nazaretical Vow Acts 21.26 Which was attended with a Sacrifice Numb 6.13 Nor was Mosaical Worship utterly to cease so as to have no acceptance with God until the final ruine of that church foretold by our Saviour himself Mat. 24. by Peter 2 Ep. 3. by James also Chap. 5.6 7 8 9. and by our Apostle in this Epistle Chap. 10.37 Chap. 12.25 26 27. was accomplished Hence it is that our Apostle calls the times of the Gospel the world to come Chap. 2.5 Chap. 6.5 the name whereby the Jews denoted the State of the Church under the Messiah proper unto it only whilest the legal administrations of Worship did continue Thus as de facto he had shewed respect unto the Person of the High Priest as one yet in lawful Office Acts 23.5 So doctrinally he takes it for granted that that Office was still continued Chap. 8.4 5. with the whole worship of Moses institution Chap. 13.11 12. And this dispensation of Gods patience being the last tryal of that Church was continued in a proportion of time answerable to their abode in the Wilderness upon its first Erection which our Apostle minds them of Chap. 3. c. 4. The Law of Moses then was not actually abrogated by Christ who observed the rules of it in the dayes of his flesh nor by the Apostles who seldom used their liberty from it leaving the use of it to the Jews still but having done its work whereunto it was designed and its obligation Expiring ending and being removed or taken away in the death and resurrection of Christ and promulgation of the Gospel that ensued thereupon which doctrinally declared its 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or uselesness God in his Providence put an end unto it as to its observation in the utter and irrecoverable overthrow of the Temple the place designed for the solemn exercise of its Worship so did it decay wax old and vanish away Chap. 8.13 And this also God ordered in his infinite wisdom that their Temple City and Nation and so consequently their whole Church-State should be utterly wasted by the Pagan Romans before the power of the Empire came into the hands of men professing the name of Christ who could neither well have suffered their Temple to stand as by them abused nor yet have destroyed it without hardning them in their impenitency and unbelief V. That which is proposed unto confirmation in the whole Epistle and from whence all the Inferences and Exhortations insisted on do arise and are drawn is the Excellency of the Gospel and the Worship of God therein revealed and appointed upon the account of its manifold relation to the Person and Offices of Christ the Mediator the Son of God Now because those to whom it is directed did as hath been declared some of them adhere to Mosaical Ceremonies and Worship in conjunction with the Gospel others with a preferency of them above it and some to a relinquishment of it especially when they once found its profession obnoxious to Persecution the Apostle institutes and at large prosecutes a comparison between Moses's Law and the Gospel as to their usefulness and excellency in reference unto mens acceptation with God of the one and the other as also of the Spirituality Order and Beauty of the Worship severally required in them And herein though he derogates in no respect from the Law that which was justly due unto it yet on the accounts before mentioned he preferreth the Gospel before it and not only so but also manifests that as Mosaical Institutions were never of any other use but to prefigure the real Mediatory work of Christ with the benefits thereof so he being exhibited and his work accomplished their observation was become needless and themselves if embraced to a neglect or relinquishment of the Gospel pernicious This comparison wherein also the proof of the positive worth and Excellency of the Gospel is included omitting for weighty reasons intimated by James Acts 21.21 by himself Acts 9.25 Chap. 22.19 20 21. all Prefatory salutations he enters upon in the first verses of the Epistle and being thereby occasioned to make mention of the Messiah from whose Person and Office the difference he was to insist upon did wholly arise he spendeth the residue of the Chapter in proving the divine excellency of his Person and the Eminency of his Office as the only King Priest and Prophet of his Church on all which the dignity of the Gospel in the Profession whereof he exhorts them to persevere doth depend He then that would come to a right understanding of this Epistle must alwayes bear in mind 1. To whom it was written which were the Jews of the several sorts before mentioned 2. To what End it was written even to prevail with them to embrace the Gospel and to persist in the Profession of it without any mixture of Mosaical Observations 3. On what Principles the Apostle deals with
of old spoken unto the Fathers in the Prophets hath in these last dayes spoken unto us in the Son whom he hath appointed heir of all by whom also he made the worlds THe Apostle intending a comparison between the Mosaical Law and the Gospel referreth it unto two Heads First Their Revelation and Institution whence the Obligation to the Observance of the one and the other did arise and Secondly Their whole Nature Vse and Efficacy The First he enters upon in these words and premising that wherein they did agree distinctly layes down the severals wherein the difference between them doth consist both which were necessary to compleat the comparison intended That wherein they agree is the Principal Efficient Cause of their Revelation or the Prime Author from whom they were This is God He was the Author of the Law and Gospel He spake of old in the Prophets he spake in the last dayes in the Son Neither of them were from Men not one from one Principle and the other from an other both have the same Divine Original See 2 Tim. 3.16 2 Pet. 1.16 17 18 19 20 21. Herein they both agree Their difference in this respect namely of their Revelation he refers to four Heads all distinctly expressed saving that some branches of the Antithesis on the part of the Gospel are only included in the opposite expressions that relate unto the Law Their difference First Respects the manner of their Revelation and that in two particulars 1. The Revelation of the Will of God under the Law was given out by divers parts that under the Gospel at once or in one dispensation of Grace and Truth 2. That in diverse manners this one way only by the Spirit dwelling in the Lord Christ in his fulness and by him communicated unto his Apostles Secondly The Times and Seasons of their Revelation that of the Law was made of Old formerly in Times past This of the Gospel in these last dayes Thirdly The Persons to whom the Revelation of them was made That was to the Fathers this to us Fourthly And principally the Persons by whom these Revelations were made That was by the Prophets this by the Son God spake then in the Prophets now he hath spoken in the Son The whole stress of the Apostles Argument lying on this last instance omitting the prosecution of all the other particulars he enters upon the further description of this immediate Revealer of the Gospel in whom God spake the Son and layes down in general 1. The Authority committed unto him God made him Heir of all 2. The Ground and Equity of committing that great Power and trust unto him in those words by whom also he made the worlds whereby he opens his way to the farther declaration of his Divine and incomparable Excellencies wherein he is exalted far above all or any that were employed in the Revelation or Administration of the Law of Moses and the holy Worship instituted thereby All these particulars must be opened severally that we may see the intendment of the Apostle and the force of his Argument in the whole and some of them must necessarily be somewhat largely insisted on because of their influence into the ensuing Discourse I. That wherein the Law and Gospel do both agree is that God was the Author of them both About this there was no difference as to the most of them with whom the Apostle treated This he takes for granted For the Professing Jews did not adhere to Mosaical Institutions because God was their Author not so of the Gospel but because they were given from God by Moses in such a manner as never to be changed or abrogated This the Apostle layes down as an acknowledged Principle with the most that both Law and Gospel received their Original from God himself proving also as we shall see in the progress of our Discourse to the conviction of others that such a Revelation as that of the Gospel was foretold and expected and that this was it in particular which was preached unto them Now God being here spoken of â—n distinction from the Son expresly and from the Holy Ghost by evident implication it being He by whom he spake in the Prophets that name is not taken 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 substantially to denote primarily the Essence or being of the Deity and each person as partaking in the same nature but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 denoting primarily one certain Person and the divine nature only as subsisting in that Person This is the Person of the Father as elsewhere the Person of the Son is so signified by that name Acts 20.28 John 1.1 2. Rom. 9.5 1 Tim. 3.16 1 John 3.16 Chap. 5.20 As also the Person of the Holy Spirit Acts 5.3 4. 1 Cor. 12.7 11. Col. 2.2 So that God even the Father by the way of eminency was the peculiar Author of both Law and Gospel of which afterwards And this observation is made necessary from hence even because he immediately assigns Divine Properties and Excellencies unto another Person evidently distinguished from him whom he intends to denote by the name God in this place which he could not do did that name primarily express as here used by him the divine nature absolutely but only as it is subsisting in the Person of the Father From this head of their Agreement the Apostle proceeds to the instances of the difference that was between the Law and the Gospel as to their Revelation from God of which a little inverting the order of the words we shall First consider that which concerns the Times of their giving out sundry of the other instances being regulated thereby For the First or the Revelation of the Will of God under the Old Testament it was of old God spake 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 formerly or of old Some space of time is denoted in this word which had then received both its beginning and end both which we may enquire after Take the word absolutely and it comprizes the whole space of time from the giving out of the first Promise unto that End which was put unto all Revelations of publick use under the Old Testament Take it as relating to the Jews and the rise of the time expressed in it is the giving of the Law by Moses in the Wilderness And this is that which the Apostle hath respect unto He had no contest with the Jews about the first Promise and the service of God in the world built thereon nor about their Priviledge as they were the Sons of Abraham but only about their then present Church Priviledge and claim by Moses Law The proper date then and bound of this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of old is from the giving out of Moses Law and therein the constitution of the Judaical Church and Worship unto the close of publick Prophecie in the dayes of Malachi From thence to the dayes of John Baptist God granted no extraordinary Revelation of his Will as to the standing
and that by it to declare his rule even over his enemies and to make his people those given unto him willing and obedient v. 3. The inheritance given by the Father unto Christ being wholly in the possession of another it became him to take it out of the Vsurpers hand and deliver it up to him whose right it was and this he did and doth by the Revelation of his mind in the preaching of the Word Col. 1.12 13. And from these considerations it is that 4. The whole Revelation and Dispensation of the will of God in and by the Word is as was said eminently appropriated unto the Father Eternal life the counsel the purpose ways means and procurer of it was with the Father and was manifested to us by the word of truth 1 Joh. 1.1 2. And it is the Father that is his will mind purpose grace love that the Son declares Joh. 1.18 in which work he speaks nothing but what he heard from and was taught by the Father Joh. 8.28 And thence he says the doctrine is not mine that is principally and originally but his that sent me Joh. 7.16 And the Gospel is called the Gospel of the glory of the blessed God 1 Tim. 1.11 which is a periphrasis of the Person of the Father who is the Father of glory Ephes. 1.17 And we might also declare that the great work of making this Gospel effectual on the minds of men doth peculiarly belong unto the Father which he accomplisheth by his Spirit 2 Cor. 3.18 c. 4.6 But that is not our present business Thus the Revelation of events that should befall the Church to the end of the world that Christ signified by his Angel unto John was first given him of the Father Revel 1.1 And therefore though all declarations of God and his will from the foundation of the world were made by the Son the second Person of the Trinity and his Spirit speaking in the Prophets 1 Pet. 1.11 12 13. yet as it was not by him immediately no more was it as absolutely so but as the great Angel and Messenger of the Covenant by the will and appointment of the Father And therefore the very Dispensers of the Gospel are said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to treat as Embassadours about the business of Christ with men in the name of God the Father 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith the Apostle as if God the Father exhorted in and by us 2 Cor. 5.20 For to him doth this whole work principally relate And from the appropriating of this work originally and principally to the Father there are three things that are particularly intimated unto us 1. The Authority that is to be considered in it the Father is the Original of all power and Authority of him the whole Family of Heaven and Earth is named Ephes. 3.15 He is the Father of the whole Family from whom Christ himself receives all his Power and Authority as Mediator Mat. 28.18 which when his work is accomplished he he shall give up again into his hand 1 Cor. 15.28 He sent him into the world set him over his house gave him command unto his work The very name and Title of Father carries Authority along with it Mal. 1.6 And in the disposal of the Church in respect of this paternal power doth the Son affirm that the Father is greater than he Joh. 14.28 And runs up the contempt of the word in the preaching of it by his Messengers into a contempt of this Authority of the Father he that refuseth you refuseth me he that refuseth me refuseth him that sent me The Revelation then and dispensation of the mind and will of God in the word is to be considered as an act of Supream Soveraign Authority requiring all subjection of Soul and Conscience in the receiving of it It is the Father of the Family that speaks in this word he that hath all power and Authority essentially in him over the souls and eternal conditions of them to whom he speaks And what holy reverence humility and universal subjection of soul to the word this in a particular manner requires is easie to be apprehended 2. There is also Love In the Oeconomy of the blessed Trinity about the work of our Salvation that which is eminently and in an especial manner ascribed unto the Father is Love as hath been at large elsewhere shewed 1 Joh. 4.9 10 16. God that is the Father saith he is Love And how he exerts that property of his nature in the work of our Salvation by Christ he there shews at large So Joh. 3.16 Rom. 5.7 8. To be Love full of Love to be the especial spring of all fruits of Love is peculiar to him as the Father And from Love it is that he makes the Revelation of his Will whereof we speak Deut. 7.8 c. 33.3 Psal. 147.19 20. 2 Cor. 5.18 19. It was out of infinite Love mercy and compassion that God would at all reveal his Mind and Will unto sinners He might for ever have locked up the treasures of his Wisdom and Prudence wherein he abounds towards us in his word in his own eternal breast He might have left all the Sons of men unto that woful darkness whereunto by Sin they had cast themselves and kept them under the chains and power of it with the Angels that sinned before them unto the judgement of the great dâ—y But it was from infinite Love that he made this condescension to reveal himself and his Will unto us This mixture of Authority and Love which is the spring of the Revelation of the Will of God unto us requires all readiness willingness and chearfulness in the receipt of it and subâ—ission unto it Besides these also 3. There is Care eminently seen in it The great Care of the Church is in and on the Father He is the Husbandman that takes Care of the Vine and Vineyard Joh. 15.1 2. And thence our Saviour who had a delegated Care of his people commends them to the Father Joh. 17. as to whom the Care of them did principally and originally belong Care is proper to a Father as such to God as a Father Care is inseparable from paternal Love And this also is to be considered in the Revelation of the Will of God What directions from these Considerations may be taken for the use both of them that dispense the word and of those whose duty it is to attend unto the dispensation of it shall only be marked in our passage For the Dispensers of the Word Let them 1. Take heed of pursuing that work negligently which hath its spring in the Authority Love and Care of God See 1 Tim. 4.13 14 15 16. 2. Know to whom to look for supportment help ability and encouragement in their work Ephes. 6.19 20. And 3. Not be discouraged whatever opposition they meet with in the discharge of their duty considering whose work they have in hand 2 Cor. 4.15 16. 4. Know how they ought to dispense the
of the dead And 5. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the prolonged world or life eternal Principally with respect to the first distribution as also unto the duration of the whole world unto the last dispensation mentioned in the second doth the Apostle here call it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the worlds Thus the Apostle having declared the Honour of the Son as Mediator in that he was made Heir of all adds thereunto his Excellency in himself from his eternal power and Godhead which he not only asserts but gives evidence unto by an Argument from the works of Creation And to avoid all streightning thoughts of this work he expresseth it in terms comprehending the whole Creation in that distribution whereunto it was usually cast by themselves As John contents not himself by affirming that he made all things but adds to that Assertion that without him nothing was made that was made Joh. 1.3 And this was of old the common faith of the Judaical Church That all things were made and all things disposed by the Word of God they all confessed Evident footsteps of this faith abide still in their Targums For that by the Word of God so often mentioned in them they did not understand the Word of his Power but an Hypostasis in the Divine Nature is manifest from the Personal Properties which are every where assigned unto it as the Word of God did this said that thought went and the like as Psal. 68.17 They affirm that Word which gave the Law on Mount Sinai to dwell in the highest heavens Yea and they say in Bereschit Rabba of those words Gen. 1.2 The Spirit of God moved on the face of the waters 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this is the Spirit of the King Messiah by which they cannot deny but that all things were formed And the Apostle in this expression lets the Hebrews know that Jesus the Messiah was that Word of God by whom all things were made And so the influence of these words into his present Argument is manifest For the Son in whom the Father had now spoken to them and declared the Gospel being his Eternal Word by whom the world and all Ages were created there could be no question of his Authority to alter their ceremonious Worship which he himself had appointed for a season Before we pass to the next Verses we may mark out those Instructions which the words passed through afford us in common as to the abiding interest of all Believers The foundation of them is That the Lord Jesus Christ who is the great Prophet of his Church under the New Testament the only Revealer of the Will of the Father as the Son and Wisdom of God made the Worlds and all things contained in them And therein 1. We have an illustrious testimony given to the Eternal Godhead and Power of the Son of God for he who made all things is God as the Apostle else-where affirms And 2. Unto the Equity of his being made Heir Lord and Judge of all No creature can decline the Authority or wave the Tribunal of him that made them all And 3. A stable bottom of Faith Hope Contentment and Patience is administred unto the Saints in all dispensations He who is their Redeemer that bought them hath all that interest in all things wherein they are concerned that the Sovereign right of Creation can afford unto him besides that Grant which is made unto him for this very end that they might be disposed of to his own Glory in their good and advantage Isa. 54. v. 4 5. And 4. From this Order of things that Christ as the Eternal Son of God having made the worlds hath them and all things in them put under his power as Mediator and Head of the Church we may see what a subserviency to the interest of the Saints of the most High the whole Creation is laid and disposed in And 5. The way of obtaining a sanctified Interest in and use of the things of the Old Creation namely not to receive them meerly on the general account as made by the Son of God but on the more especial of their being granted unto him as Mediator of the Church And 6. How men on both these foundations are to be accountable for their use or abuse of the things of the first Creation But besides these particular Instances there is that which is more general and which we may a little insist upon from the Context and design of the Apostle in this whole discourse whose consideration will not again occur unto us and it is That God in infinite wisdom ordered all things in the first Creation so as that the whole of that work might be subservient to the glory of his grace in the new creation of all by Jesus Christ. By the Son he made the worlds in the beginning of time that in the fulness of time he might be the just Heir and Lord of all The Jews have a saying that the world was made for the Messiah which is thus far true that both it and all things in it were made disposed of and ordered in their Creation so as that God might be everlastingly glorified in the work which he was designed unto and which by him he had to accomplish I shall consider it only in the present instance namely that by the Son he made the worlds that he might be the proper Heir and Lord of them of which latter we shall treat more particularly on the ensuing words This was declared of Old where he was spoken of as the Wisdom of God by whom he wrought in the Creation and Production of all things Prov. 8.22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30. This Son or Wisdom of God declares at large 1. His Coexistence with his Father from Eternity before all or any of the visible or invisible Creation were by his Power brought forth v. 22 23 and so onward And then sets forth the Infinite Eternal and Ineffable Delight that was between him and his Father both before and also in the work of Creation v. 30. Farther he declares his presence and co-operation with him in the whole work of making the world and the several parts of it v. 27 28 29 30. which in other places is expressed as here by the Apostle that God by him made the worlds After which he declares the End of all this Dispensation namely that he might rejoyce in the habitable parts of the earth and his delight be with the sons of men to whom therefore he calls to hearken unto him that they may be blessed v. 31. to the end of the chapter that is that he might be meet to accomplish the work of their Redemption and bring them to Blessedness to the Glory of the Grace of God which work his heart was set upon and which he greatly delighted in Psal. 40.6 7 8. Hence the Apostle John in the beginning of his Gospel brings both the Creations together the first by the Eternal Word absolutely the other
to be at the Right Hand of Christ Psalm 45.9 which as it prefers her above all others so it takes not off her subjection unto Christ. Nero in Suetonius when Tiridâ—tes King of Armenia came to Rome placed him for his Honour on his right hand himself sitting on the Throne of Rule And where three sit together the middle seat is the place of chiefest honour Hence Cato in Africk when Juba would have placed himself in the midst between him and Scipio removed himself to the left hand of Scipio that Juba might not have the place of preheminence above Roman Magistrates It is not unlikely but that there may be an Allusion in this expression unto the Sanhedrin the highest Court of Judicature among the Jews He who presided in it was called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Father of Judgement or Father of the House of Judgement and sate at the right hand of the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Prince of the Sanhedrin next unto him unto whom belonged the execution of the Sentence of the Court. Of this Ab din mention is made in the Targum Cantic 7.4 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Father of the House of Judgement who judgeth thy judgements agreeable to that the Father judgeth no man but hath committed all judgement unto the Son The whole Expression then is plainly Metaphorical and taken from what is or was in use amongst men and thence translated to signifie the State and Condition of Christ in Heaven And this is that which the Apostle in general intimates in these words that as the greatest Honour that can be done unto any one among the sons of men is for the Chief Ruler to set him next himself on his Right Hand so is the Son as Mediator made partaker of the greatest glory that God hath to bestow in Heaven It is not then the Essential Eternal Glory of the Son of God that he hath equal with the Father which in these words is expressed and whereof the Apostle had spoken before but that Glory and Honour which is bestowed on him by the Father after and upon the Sacrifice of himself for the Expiation of sin So then the Right hand of God is not here taken absolutely as in other places for the Power and Strength of God but with the adjunct of sitting at it it shadows out a place and eminency of Glory as he is considered on his Throne of Majesty and therefore it is here termed the Right hand of Majesty and not of Omnipotency or Power In particular two things are intended in this Expression First The Security of Christ from all his Adversaries and all sufferings for the future The Jews knew what he suffered from God and Man Hereof he lets them know what was the reason it was for the purging of our sins And moreover declares that now he is everlastingly secured from all Opposition for where he is thither his Adversaries cannot come as Joh. 7.34 He is above their reach beyond their power secure in the Throne and Presence of God Thus the fruit of the Church being secured from the rage and persecution of Sathan is said to be caught up unto God and to his throne Rev. 12.5 Hence though men do and will continue their malice and wrath against the Lord Christ to the end of the world as though they would crucifie him afresh yet he dies no more being secure out of their reach at the Right hand of God Secondly His Majesty and Glory inexpressible All that can be given of God in heaven God on his Throne is God in the full manifestation of his own Majesty and Glory on his Right hand sits the Mediator yea so as that he also is in the midst of the Thrones Revel 5.6 How little can our weak understandings apprehend of this Majesty See Phil. 2.8 Matth. 20.21 Rom. 8.34 Col. 3.5 Ephes. 1.20 These are the things which the Apostle sets forth in this Expression And they are plainly intimated in the Context of the Psalm from whence the words are taken Psal. 110.1 So that it is not his Rule and Authority but his Safety Majesty and Glory which accompany them that are here intended Thirdly We are to enquire what it was that the Apostle had respect unto in this Ascription of Glory and Majesty unto Christ in the old Church state of the Jews and so what it is that he preferreth him above It is thought by many that the Apostle in these words exalteth Christ above David the chiefest King among the Jews Of him it is said that God would make him his first-born higher than the Kings of the earth Psal. 89.27 His Throne was high on the earth and his Glory above that of all the Kings about him but for the Lord Christ he is incomparably exalted above him also in that he is sate down at the Right hand of the Majâ—sty on High But as was said these words denote not the Rule Power or Authority of Christ typed by the Kingdom of David but his Glory and Majesty represented by the magnificent Throne of Solomon Besides he is not treating of the Kingly Power of Christ but of his Sacerdotal Office and the Glory that ensued upon the discharge thereof That therefore which in these words the Apostle seems to have had respect unto was the high Priests entrance into the Holy Place after his offering of the solemn anniversary Sacrifice of Expiation Then alone was he admitted into that Holy Place or Heaven below where was the solemn Representation of the Presence of God his Throne and his Glory And what did he there He stood with all Humility and lowly Reverence ministring before the Lord whose presence was there represented He did not go and sit down between the Cherubims but worshipping at the foot-stool of the Lord he departed It is not saith the Apostle so with Christ but as his Sacrifice was infinitely more excellent and effectual than theirs so upon the offering of it he entered into the Holy Place or Heaven it self above and into the real glorious presence of God not to minister in humility but to a participation of the Throne of Majesty and Glory He is a King and Priest upon his Throne Zech. 6.13 Thus the Apostle shuts up his general Proposition of the whole matter which he intends farther to dilate and treat upon In this description of the Person and Offices of the Messiah he coucheth the springs of all his ensuing Arguments and from thence enforceth the Exhortation which we have observed him constantly to pursue And we also may hence observe 1. That there is nothing more vain foolish and fruitless than the Opposition which Sathan and his Agents yet make unto the Lord Christ and his Kingdom Can they ascend into heaven Can they pluck the Lord Christ from the Throne of God A little time will manifest this madness and that unto Eternity 2. That the service of the Lord Christ is both safe and honourable
a Degree intimated being made so much more c. now our conceptions hereabout as to this place are wholly to be regulated by the Name given unto him Look saith the Apostle how much the Name given unto the Messiah excels the Name given unto Angels so much doth he himself excell them in Glory Authority and Power for these Names are severally given them of God to signifie their state and condition What and how great this difference is we shall afterwards see in the consideration of the Instances given of it by the Apostle in the Verses ensuing 4. The Proof of this Assertion which the Apostle first fixeth on is taken from the Name of Christ. His Name not given him by man not assumed by himself but ascribed unto him by God himself Neither doth he here by the Name of Christ or the name of the Angels intend any individual proper names of the one or the other but such Descriptions as are made of them and Titles given unto them by God as whereby their state and condition may be known Observe saith he how they are called of God by what Names and Titles he owns them and you may learn the Difference between them This Name he declares in the next Verse God said unto him Thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee It is not absolutely his being the Son of God that is intended but that by the testimony of the holy Ghost God said these words unto him Thou art my Son and thereby declared his state and condition to be far above that of the Angels to none of whom he ever said any such thing but speaks of them in a far distinct manner as we shall see But hereof in the next Verse Some by this excellent Name understand his Power and Dignity and Glory called his name above every name Phil. 2.8 but then this can no way prove that which the Apostle produceth it for it being directly the same with that which is asserted in whose confirmation it is produced 5. The last thing considerable is How the Lord Christ came by this Name or obtained it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he obtained it by Inheritance as his peculiar lot and portion for ever In what sense he is said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Heir was before declared As he was made the Heir of all so he inherited a more excellent Name than the Angels Now he was made Heir of all in that all things being made and formed by him the Father committed unto him as Mediator a peculiar Power over all things to be disposed of by him unto all the ends of his Mediation So also being the Natural and Eternal Son of God in and upon the discharge of his work the Father declared and pronounced that to be his Name see Luke 1.35 Isa. 7.14 chap. 9.6 His being the Son of God is the proper foundation of his being called so and his discharge of his Office the Occasion of its declaration so he came unto it by Right of Inheritance when he was declared to be the Son of God with Power by the resurrection from the dead Rom. 1.3 This then is the sum of the Apostles Proposition and the Confirmation of it A Name given by God to that end and purpose doth truly declare the nature state and condition of him or them to whom it is given But unto Christ the Mediator there is a Name given of God himself exceedingly more excellent than any that by him is given unto the Angels which undeniably evinceth that he is placed in a state and condition of Glory far above them or preferred before them I shall only observe one or two things concerning the Hebrews to whom the Apostle wrote and so put an end to our Exposition of this Verse First then this discourse of the Apostle proving the Preheminence of the Messiah above the Angels was very necessary unto the Hebrews although it were very suitable unto their own principles and in general acknowledged by them It is to this day a Tradition amongst them that the Messiah shall be exalted above Abraham and Moses and the ministring Angels Besides they acknowledged the Scriptures of the Old Testament wherein the Apostle shews them that this Truth was taught and confirmed But they were dull and flow in making Application of these Principles unto the confirmation of their faith in the Gospel as the Apostle chargeth them Chap. 5.11 12. And they had at that time great Speculations about the Glory Dignity and Excellency of Angels and were fallen into some kind of worshipping of them And it may be this Curiosity Vanity and Superstition in them was heightned by the heat of the Controversie between the Pharisees and Sadduces about them the one denying their Existence and being the other whom the body of the People followed exâ—lting them above measure and inclining to the Worship of them This the Apostle declares Col. 2.18 treating of those Judaizing Teachers who then troubled the Churches he chargeth them with fruitless and curious speculations about Angels and the worshipping of them And of their Ministry in the giving of the Law they still boasted It was necessary therefore to take them off from this Confidence of that Priviledge and the superstition that ensued thereon to instruct them in the Preheminence of the Lord Christ above them all that so their thoughts might be directed unto him and their Trust placed in him alone And this Exaltation of the Messiah some of their latter Doctors assert on Dan. 7.9 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I behold until the Thrones were set placed exalted as in the Original Chaldee and as all old Translations Greek Latin Syriack and Arabick render the words however Ours read untill the Thrones were cast down affirming that one of those Thrones was fâ—r the Messiah before whom all the Angels ministred in obedience Secondly It may not be amiss to remark that the Jews have alwayes had a Tradition of the glorious name of the Messiah which even since their utter Rejection they retain some obscure remembrance of The name which they principally magnifie is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Metatron Ben Vzziel in his Targum on Gen. 5. ascribâ—s this name to Enoch when he was translated he ascended into Heaven in the word of the Lord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and his name was called Mitatron the greâ—t Scribe But this opinion of Enoch being Metatron is rejected and confuted in the Talmud There they tell us that Metatron is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Prince of the world or as Elias calls him in Thisbi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Prince of Gods Presence And in the first mention of this Name which is Talmud Tract Saned cap. 4. fol. 38. they plainly intimate that they intended an uncreated Angel by this Expression And such indeed must He be unto whom may be assigned what they ascribe unto Metatron For as Reuchlin from the Cabbalists informs us they say 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
The Teacher of Moses himself was Metatron He it is saith Elias that is the Angel alwayes appearing in the Presence of God of whom it is said My name is in him And the Talmudists that he hath power to blot out the sins of Israel whence they call him the Chancellour of Heaven And Bechai on Exod. 23. affirms that this name signifies both a Lord a Messenger and a Keeper A Lord because he ruleth all a Messenger because he stands alwayes before God to do his Will and a Keeper because he keepeth Israel I confess the Etymologie that he gives of this name to that purpose is weak and foolish as is also that of Elias who tells us that Metatron is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Greek Tongue one sent But yet it is evident what is intended by all these obscure Intimations the increated Prince of Glory and his Exaltation over all with the Excellency of his name is aimed at For the word it self it is either a meer corruption of the Latin word Mediator such as is usual amongst them or a Gematrical Fiction to answer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Almighty there being a coincidence in their numeral letters The Doctrine of the Preference and Preheminence of Christ is insisted on by the Apostle unto the End of this Chapter and therefore I shall not treat of it untill we have gone through all the Proof's of it produced and then but briefly neither having already in part spoken of it in our Consideration of his Soveraignty and Lordship over all That which we are peculiarly instructed in by these words is that All Preheminence and Exaltation of one above others depends on the supream Counsel and Will of God The instance he gives of him who is exalted over all sufficiently confirms our general Rule He had his Name denoting his Glory and excellency by Inheritance an heritage designed for him and given unto him in the Counsel Will and good pleasure of God He gave him that name above every name Phil. 2.9 And that of his own Will and pleasure It pleased the Father that in him all fulness should dwell That so in all things he might have the Preheminence Col. 1.16 17. He fore-ordained him unto it from Eternity 1 Pet. 1.20 and actually exalted him according to his Eternal Counsel in the fulness of time Acts 2.36 Chap. 5.31 This Prelation then of Christ above all depends on the Counsel and Pleasure of God and he is herein a Pattern of all Priviledge and Preheminence in others Grace Mercy and Glory spiritual things and eternal are those wherein really there is any difference among the Sons of men Now that any one in these things is preferred before another it depends meerly on the sole good pleasure of God No man in these things makes himself to differ from another neither hath he any thing that he hath not received God hath Mercy on whom he will have mercy And this Discrimination of all things by the Supream Will of God especially Spiritual and Eternal is the Spring Fountain and Rule of all that Glory which he will manifest and be exalted in unto Eternity Verse V. THe Apostle proceedeth to the confirmation of his Proposition concerning the Preheminence of the Lord Christ above the Angels and of his proof of it from the Excellency of the Name given unto him And this he doth by sundry Testimonies produced out of the Old Testament two whereof are conjoyned in this Verse as the Verses are divided in our Bibles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vulg. dixit aliquando said he sometimes for at any time Syr 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from at any time said God Eloah God is supplyed needlesly though better than those who would render 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 impersonally was it said at any time For it is express in the Psalm from whence the words are taken 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lord said The Lord said unto me 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thou my Son this day have I begotten thee The Elipsis of the Verb substantive in the Original which is perpetual is supplyed by the Apostle with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Thou art my Son Further difficulty in the Grammatical sense of the words there is not And hâ—re we shâ—ll close this Verse or at least consider this Testimony by its self Verse 5. Vnto which of the Angels did he at any time or ever say thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee Two things are considerable in these words 1. The manner of the Apostles producing the Testimony which he intended to make use of Vnto which of the Angels said he at any time 2. The Testimony it self Thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee In the former three things may be observed First That the Testimonie which in a matter of Faith he insisted on is that of the Scripture He refers the Jews unto that common Principle which was acknowledged between them Men had not as yet learned in such contests to make that cavilling return which we are now used unto How do you know those Scriptures to be the word of God Nor indeed is it suitable unto common Honesty for men to question the credit and prostitute the Authority of their own most Sacred Principles for no other end but to prejudice their Adversaries But our Apostle here confidently sends the Hebrews to the acknowledged Rule of their Faith and Worship whose Authority he knew they would not decline Isa. 8.21 Secondly That the Apostle argues negatively from the Authority and Perfection of the Scripture in things relating to Faith and the Worship of God It is no where said in the Scripture to Angels therefore they have not the Name spoken of or not in that manner wherein it is ascribed to the Messiah This Argument saith an Expositor of great name in this place seems to be weak and not unlike unto that which the Hereticks make use of in the like cases And therefore answers that the Apostle argues negatively not only from the Scripture but from Tradition also But this Answer is far more weak than the Argument is pretended to be The Apostle deals expresly in all this Chapter from the Testimony of Scripture and to that alone do his words relate and therein doth he issue the whole Controversie he had in hand knowing that the Jews had many corrupt Traditions expresly contrary to what he undertook to prove particularly that the Law of Moses was Eternally Obligatory against which he directly contends in the whole Epistle An Argument then taken negatively from the Authority of the Scripture in matters of Faith or what relates to the Worship of God is valid and effectual and here consecrated for ever to the use of the Church by the Apostle Thirdly That the Apostle either indeâ—d grants or else for Arguments sake condescends unto the Apprehension of the Hebrews that there is a distinction of degrees and preheminence amongst the Angels
I begotten thee do contain the formal Reasâ—n of Christs being properly called the Son of God and so to denote his Eternal Generation Others think they express only some outward Act of God towards the Lord Christ on the Occasion whereof he was declared to be the Son of God and so called The former way went Austin with sundry of the Antients The 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the bodie or this day here was the same with them which the nunc stans as they call it of Eternity and the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I have begotten thee denotes as they say the proper natural Genâ—ration of the Son by an unconceivable communication of the Essence and Substance of the Godhead by the Person of the Father unto him And this doctrine is true but whether here intended or no is by some greatly questioned Others therefore take the words to express only an Occasion of giving this name at a certain season to the Lord Christ when he was revealed or declared to be the Son of God And some assign this to the day of his Incarnation when he declared him to be his Son and that he should be so called as Luke 1.35 Some to the Day of his Baptism when he was again solemnly from Heaven proclaimed so to be Mat. 3.17 Some to the Day of his Resurrection when he was declared to be the Son of God with Power Rom. 1.3 and Acts 13.33 Some to the day of his Ascension whereunto these words are applyed And all these Interpretations are consistent and reconciliable with each other in as much as they are all means serving unto the same end That of his Resurrection from the dead being the most signal amongst them and fixed on in particular by our Apostle in his Application of this Testimony unto him Acts 13.33 And in this sense alone the words have any Appearance of respect unto David as a Type of Christ seeing he was said as it were to be begotten of God when he raisâ—d him up and established him in his Rule and Kingdom Neither indeed doth the Apostle treat in this place of the Eternal Generation of the Son but of his Exaltation and Preheminence above Angels The word also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 constantly in the Scripture denotes some signal time one day or more And that expression This Day have I begotten thee following immediately upon that other Typical one I have set my King upon my holy hill of Sion seems to be of the same Importance and in like manner to be interpreted Thus far I then chuse to embrace the latter Interpretation of the words namely that the Eternal Generation of Christ on which his Filiation or Sonship both name and thing doth depend is to be taken only declaratively and that declaration to be made in his Resurrection and Exaltation over all that ensued thereon But every one is left unto the Liberty of his own Judgement herein And this is the first Testimony whereby the Apostle confirms his Assertion of the Preheminence of the Lord Christ above the Angels from the name that he inherits as his peculiar Right and Possession For the further confirmation of the same Truth he adds another Testimony of the same Importance in the words ensuing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vulg. rursum ego ero illi in patrem ipse erit mihi in filium I will be unto him for a Father and he shall be to me for a Son So also Syriack 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in patrem and in filium not pro patre pro filio as some render the words Erasmus worse than they ego ero ei loco patris ille erit mihi loco filii instead of a Father and instead of a Son or in the place which agrees not with the letter and corrupts the sense Bâ—za Ego ero ei pater ipse erit mihi filius who is followed by ours And again I will be to him a Father and he shall be to me a son 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and again That is in another place or again it is said to the Son what is no where spoken unto the Angels 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the prefix'd 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth not denote a Substitution or Comparison but the truth of the thing itself So it is said of Rebeckah 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 she was unto him not for or instead or in the place of but his wife And in the words of the Covenant Jer. 31.33 I will be to them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and they shall be to me 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not I will be unto them instead of God and they shall be unto me instead of a people but I will be their God and they shall be my people And the same is the signification of these words I will be his Father and he shall be my Son This is the second testimony produced by the Apostle to prove the preheminence of the Lord Christ above the Angels from the excellency of the Name given unto him One word one witness the testimony being that of God and not of man had been sufficient to have evinced the truth of his assertion But the Apostle addes a second here partly to manifest the importance of the matter he treated of and partly to stir them up unto a diligent search of the Scripture where the same truths especially those that are of most concernment unto us are stored up and down in sundry places as the holy Ghost had Occasion to make mention of them This is that Mine of precious Gold which we are continually to dig for and search after if we intend to grow and to be rich in the knowledge of God in Christ Prov. 2.3 4. Expositors do generally perplex themselves and their Readers about the application of these words unto the Lord Christ. Cajetan for this cause that this Testimony is not rightly produced nor applied as it ought rejects the whole Epistle as not written by the Apostle nor of Canonical authority Such instances do even Wise and Learned men give of their folly and self-fulness every day The conclusion that he makes must needs be built on these two suppositions First that what ever any man might or could apprehend concerning the right application of this testimony that he himself might and could so do for otherwise he might have acknowledged his own insufficiency and have left the solution of the difficulty unto them to whom God should be pleased to reveal it Secondly That when men of any Generation cannot understand the force and efficacy of the Reasonings of the Pen-men of the holy Ghost nor discern the suitableness of the Testimonies they make use of unto the things they produce them in the confirmation of they may lawfully reject any portion of Scripture thereon The folly and iniquity of which principles or suppositions are manifest The application of Testimonies out of the Old Testament in the New depends
of the Kingdom and Reign of the Messiah But the matter of the Psalm it self makes it manifest that the Holy Ghost treateth in it about God's bringing in the first-born into the world and the setting up of his Kingdom in him A Kingdom is described wherein God would reign which should destroy Idolatry and false-worship a Kingdom wherein the Isles of the Gentiles should rejoyce being called to an interest therein a Kingdom that was to be preached proclaimed declared unto the encrease of Light and Holiness in the world with the manifestation of the glory of God unto the ends of the earth every part whereof declareth the Kingdom of Christ to be intended in the Psalm and consequently that it is a Prophesie of the bringing in of the first-begotten into the world 2. Our second enquiry is Whether the Angels be intended in these words They are as was before observed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 omnes dii and are so rendred by Hierom Adorate eum omnes dii and by ours Worship him all ye gods The preceding words are Confounded be all they that serve graven images 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that boast themselves in or of idols Vanities Nothings as the word signifies whereon ensues this Apostrophe Worship him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all ye gods And who they are is our present enquiry Some as all the Modern Jews say that it is the gods of the Gentiles those whom they worship that are intended so making 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gods and vain idols to be the same in this place But 1. It cannot be that the Psalmist should exhort the idols of the Heathen some whereof were Devils some dead men some inanimate parts of the Creation unto a reverential worshipping of God reigning over all Hence the Targumist seeing the vanity of that Interpretation perverts the words and renders them Worship before him all ye Nations which serve idols 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Elohim is so far in this place from being exegetical of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gods or vain idols that it is put in direct Opposition unto it as is evident from the words themselves 3. The word Elohim which most frequently denoteth the true God doth never alone and absolutely taken signifie false gods or idols but only when it is joyned with some other word discovering its application as his god or their gods or the gods of this or that people in which case it is rendred by the LXX sometimes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an idol sometimes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an idol made with hands sometimes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an abomination but here it hath no such limitation or restriction Whereas therefore there are some Creatures who by reason of some peculiar Excellency and likeness unto God or subordination unto him in his work are called gods it must be those or some of them that are intended in the expression now these are either Magistrates or Angels First Magistrates are somewhere called Elohim because of the Representation they make of God in his Power and their peculiar subordination unto him in their working The Jews indeed contend that no other Magistrates but only those of the Great Sanedrin are any where called gods but that concerns not our present enquiry some Magistrates are so called but none of them are here intended by the Psalmist there being no Occasion administred unto him of any such Apostrophe unto them Secondly Angels also are called Elohim 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Cor. 8.5 They have the Name of God attributed unto them as we have shewed before in some instances And these alone are they whom the Psalmist speaks unto Having called on the whole Creation to rejoyce in the bringing forth of the Kingdom of God and pressed his Exhortation upon things on the Earth he turns unto the ministring Angels and calls on them to the discharge of their duty unto the King of that Kingdom Hence the Targumist in the beginning of Psal. 96. which is indeed in the beginning of this expresly mentioneth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his high Angels joyning in his praise and worship using the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for distinction sake as on the same account it often occurs in the Targum We have thus evinced that the Psalm treats about the bringing in of the first-born into the world as also that they are the ministring Angels who are here commanded to worship him For the command it self and the nature of it it consisted in these two things 1. A declaration of the state and condition of the Messiah which is such as that he is a meet Object of Religious Adoration unto the Angels and attended with peculiar motives unto the discharge of their duty The former he hath from his Divine Nature the latter from his Work with his State and Dignity that ensued thereon 2. An intimation of the pleasure of God unto the Angels not that Divine Worship was absolutely due unto the Son of God which they knew from the first instant of their Creation but that all Honour and Glory were due unto him on the account of his Work and Office as Mediator and King of his Church 3. It remaineth only that we shew that this testimony thus explained was suitable unto the Apostles design and purpose and did prove the Assertion in the Confirmation whereof it is produced Now this is a matter of so full and clear an evidence that it will not at all detain us For it is impossible that there should be any more clear or full demonstration of this truth That the Lord Christ hath an unspeakable Preheminence above the Angels than this that they are all appointed and commanded by God himself to adore him with Divine and Religious Worship We may now therefore consider what Observations the words will afford us for our own instruction It appears then from hence 1. That the Authority of God speaking in the Scripture is that alone which Divine Faith rests upon and is to be resolved into He saith It was the begetting of faith in some of the Hebrews and the increase or establishment of it in others that the Apostle aimed at That which he proposeth to them as the Object of their faith that which they were to believe was that Excellency of the Person and Kingly Authority of the Messiah wherein they had not as yet been instructed And hereof he endeavours not to beget an Opinion in them but that Faith which cannot deceive or be deceived To this end he proposeth that unto them which they ought to submit unto and which they may safely rest in For as Faith is an Act of Religious Obedience it respects the Authority of God requiring it and as it is a Religious infallible assent of the mind it regards the Truth and Veracity of God as its Object On this alone it rests God saith And in what ever God speaks in the Scripture his Truth and Authority manifest themselves to
Eternity and their fear of Eternity embitters all things that they should use for the relief of their frailty and that security which they provide against both encreaseth their misery by sin here and suffering hereafter 2. This also will teach us how to use these earthly things how dying Persons should use dying creatures That is to use them for our present service and necessity but not as those that look after rest or satisfaction in them which they will not afford us Vse the world but live on Christ. 3. Not to despond under a sense of our present frailty we see what blessed relief is provided against our fainting on that account Verse XIII THe next Verse contains the last Testimony produced by the Apostle for the confirmation of the Preheminence of the Lord Christ above Angels in the words ensuing Ver. 13. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There is no difference about the reading of these words As they are here expressed by the Apostle so are they in the Translation of the LXX and the Original Text is exactly rendred by them Verse 13. But unto which of the Angels said he at anytime Sit thou on my right hand until I make put place thine enemies thy foot-stool the foot-stool of thy feet The usefulness of this testimony for the confirmation of the Dignity and Authority of the Messiah is evidenced by the frequent quotation of it in the New Testament as by our Saviour himself Matth. 22.42 by Peter Acts 2.34 35. and twice by our Apostle in this place and 1 Cor. 15.28 As the words are here used we may consider the Introduction of the Testimony and the Testimony it self The Introduction of the Testimony is by way of Interrogation Vnto which of the Angels said he at any time And herein three things may be observed 1. That in the Interrogation a vehement negation is included He said not at any time to any Angels he never spake these words or the like concerning them there is no testimony unto that purpose recorded in the whole Book of God The way of Expression puts an emphasis upon the denial And the speaking here relates unto what is spoken in the Scripture which is the only means of our knowledge and rule of our faith in these things 2. That he makes application of this testimony to every Angel in heaven severally considered For whereas he had before sufficiently proved the Preheminence of the Messiah above the Angels in general to obviate their thoughts about the especial Honour and Dignity of any one or more Angels or Angels in a singular manner such as indeed they conceived he applies the present testimony to every one of them singly and individually considered Vnto which of the Angels said he at any time 3. A tacit Application of this testimony unto the Son or the Messiah unto the Angels he said not but unto the Son he said Sit thou on my right hand That the testimony it self doth clearly prove the intendment of the Apostle provided the words were originally spoken of him or to him unto whom they are applied is beyond all exceptions For they contain an Elogium of him of whom they are spoken and an assignation of Honour and Glory to him beyond what ever was or can be ascribed unto any Angel what ever It remains therefore that this be first proved and then the importance of the testimony it self explained 1. For those that believe the Gospel the Authority of the Lord Christ and his Apostles applying this testimony unto him is sufficient for their conviction By our Saviour as was observed it is applied unto the Messiah in Thesi Matth. 22.42 43 44. And had not this been generally acknowledged by the Scribes and Pharisees and whole Church of the Jews as it had not been to his purpose to have mentioned it so they had not been reduced unto that conviction and shame by it as they were The Apostles apply it unto the true Messiah in Hypothesi and herein doth our faith rest 2. But a considerable part of the controversie which we have with the Jews relating much unto this Psalm we must yet farther clear the application of it unto the Messiah from their exceptions Of the Targum or Chaldee Paraphrase there are two Copies one printed in Arias Bible the other in the Basil Edition by Buxtorf The Title of the Psalm in both of them is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A song by the hand of David And the beginning of it is thus rendred by the former of them The Lord said by his word that he would give me the Kingdom because I studied the doctrine of the Law of his right hand wait thou until I make thine enemies thy foot-stool By the other thus The Lord said by his word that he would appoint me the Lord of all Israel but he said unto me again Stay for Saul who is of the Tribe of Benjamin until he die for a Kingdom will not admit of a Companion and after that I will make thine enemies thy foot-stool Besides what appears from other considerations it is hence sufficiently evident that this Targum was made after the Jews began to be exercised in the controversie with Christians and had learned to corrupt by their glosses all the testimonies given in the Old Testament unto the Lord Christ especially such as they sound to be made use of in the New Their corrupting of the sense of the Holy Ghost in this place by a pretended Translation is openly malitious against evident light and conviction The Psalm they own from the Title to be written by David but they would have him also to be the subject of it to be spoken of in it And therefore those words The Lord said unto my Lord they translate The Lord said unto me which assertion is contrary to the Text and false in it self for who ever were the Pen-man of the Psalm he speaks of another person The Lord said unto my Lord say they The Lord said unto me And thereunto are annexed those imaginations about studying the Law and waiting for the death of Saul which in no case belongs to the Text or matter in hand Others therefore to avoid this Rock affirm that the Psalm speaks of David but was not composed by him being the work of some other who calls him Lord. So David Kimchi on the place And this he endeavours to prove from the inscription of the Psalm 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is saith he A Psalm spoken to David for it denotes the third and not the second Case or variation of Nouns But this is contrary to the use of that Prefix throughout the whole Book of Psalms and if this observation might be allowed all Psalms with this Title 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 le David which are the greatest part of those composed by him must be adjudged from him contrary to the received sense and consent of Jews and Christians But fully to manifest the folly of this pretence and that the Author
all Nations for his Inheritance and the utmost parts of the Earth for his Possession Psal. 2.8 Upon this grant a twofold Right ensued 1. A Right to call gather and erect his Church in any Nation in any part of the World to give unto it his Laws and Ordinances of Worship to be owned and observed by them in a visible and peaceable manner Matth. 28.18 19 20. 2. A Right Power and Authority to dispose of and Order all Nations and Persons for the Good Benefit and Advantage of his Kingdom In pursuit of this Grant and Right erecting his Church and therein his visible Kingdom in the world great Opposition is made unto him by all sorts of persons stirred excited and instigated thereunto by Satan And as this Enmity was first acted against himself in his own Person Psal. 2.1 2 3. So it hath continued against him in his Church in all Ages and Places and will do so unto the End of the world The world understands not his Right hates his Government and would not have him to reign Hence hath been all that Rage which hath been executed upon the Professors of his name Kings Rulers Potentates Counsellors the multitude have set themselves against him They are many of them and have been his Enemies Great havock and Destruction have they made of his subjects all the world over and continue to do so in most places unto this very day Especially in these latter Ages after other means failed him Satan hath stirred up a fierce cruel subtle Adversary unto him who he hath foretold his Disciples of under the name of Anti-christ the Beast and false Prophet After the ruine of many other this Enemy by various subtilties and pretences hath drawn the world into a new combination against him and is at this day become the greatest and most pernicious Adversary that he hath in this world Now the aym and design of all these is to dethrone him by the ruine of his Kingdom which he hath set up in the world And this in every Age they have hoped to accomplish and continue to do so unto this day but in vain For as hitherto his Kingdom and Interest in the world hath been maintained against all their enmity and opposition themselves been frustrated and brought to destruction one after another so by vertue of this Promise he shall reign in Security and Glory until all their hearts be broken their strength ruined their Opposition finished and themselves brought under his feet unto all Eternity as our Apostle declares 1 Cor. 15.24 25. And this may suffice to declare the meaning of these words Thirdly We are to consider by whom these Enemies of Christ shall be made thus his footstool I will make them saith God the Father unto him And this Expression wanteth not its difficulty For is it not the work of Christ himself to subdue and conquer his Enemies Is it not said that he shall do so So doing is he described in the Revelation with Glory and Power Chap. 19.11 12 13 14. From Isa. 63.2 3 4 5 6. Who should this work more become or belong unto than him who was persecuted and opposed by them And doth it not directly belong unto his Kingly power Whence is it then that he is here described as one resting in glory and security at his Fathers Right Hand whilest he subdues his Enemies Answer There is no doubt but that the Work of subduing the Enemies of the Mediation and Kingdom of Christ is immediately wrought by himself All Prophecies of him all Promises made unto him the nature of his Office do all require that so it should be and so the Apostle directly expresseth it 1 Cor. 15.26 But yet there are sundry Reasons why that Work which is immediately wrought by the Son may by the way of Eminency be ascribâ—d unto the Father as we see this to be First Power and Authority to subdue and conquer all his Enemies is given unto the Lord Christ by the Father in the way of Reward and it is therefore said to be his work because the Authority for it is from him See Isa. 53.12 Joh. 5.27 Phil. 2.9 Rom. 14.9 This Power then I say of subduing all his Enemies being granted unto the Lord Christ in the love of the Father as a Reward of the Travail of his soul which he underwent in his work on the earth is ascribed unto the Father as his And this Expression signifies no more but that as God hath given him Authority for it so he will abide by him in it until it be accomplished And on this account he takes it on himself as his own Secondly The Work of subduing Enemies is a work of Power and Authority Now in the Oeconomy of the Holy Trinity among the works that outwardly are of God those of Power and Authority are peculiarly ascribed unto the Father as those of Wisdom or Wisdom in the works of God is unto the Son who is the Eternal Wisdom of the Father And on this account the same works are ascribed unto the Father and the Son Not as though the Father did them first or only used the Son as an immediate instrumental cause of them but that he worketh by him as his own Eternal and Essential Wisdom John 5.17 19. But there is also more in it as the Son is considered as Mediator God and man for so he receives and holds his especial Kingdom by grant from his Father and therefore the works of it may be said to be his VI. The last thing remaining for the Exposition of these words is the consideration of the appearing Limitation of this Administration of the Kingdom of Christ in his sitting at the right hand of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 untill untill I make thine enemies c. First It is confessed and may be proved by Instances that those Particles thus used are sometimes exclusive of all things to the contrary before the time designed in them but not assertive of any such thing afterwards In that sense no limitation of the Duration of the Kingdom of Christ is here intimated but only his secure and glorious Reign unto the accomplishment of his work in the subduing of his Enemies is asserted The only time of Danger is whilest there is Opposition but this saith God I will carry it through unto the end And this sense is embraced by many to secure thereby the Promises that are made unto the Lord Christ of the Perpetuity of his Kingdom So Isa. 9. v. 7. Of the increase of his Government there shall be no end upon the Throne of David and his Kingdom to order it and to establish it with judgement and justice from henceforth even for ever His Kingdom shall not be destroyed but stand for ever Dan. 2.24 it is an everlasting Kingdom Chap. 7.27 Others suppose that this Perpetuity of the Kingdom of Christ is not absolutely exclusive of all Limitation but that these two things only are intimated in those Prophecies and
time a little while So that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as in that saying 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 life is short that is of short continuance whether a little in degree or a short time be here intended we shall afterwards enquire 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 prae Angelis more than Angels above the Angels more destitute than the Angels Heb. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Angels of God So all Old Translations render the words And to render it à Deo in the Psalm is needless groundless contradictory to the Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gloria honore coronasti eum with glory and honour hast thou crowned him Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Glory and honour hast thou placed on his head 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thou hast crowned him or adorned his head with Glory and Beauty or honour the first word denotes the Weight and worth the latter the Beauty and Splendor of this Crown 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thou hast set him over That is appointed him to be in Authority as Pharaoh set Joseph over the Land of Aegypt Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 authoritatem potestatem ei tribuisti thou hast given him power or Authority made him Sultan or Lord Heb. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 made him Lord or Ruler as Gen. 1.18 so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used Acts 6. Luke 12. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hast put put down subjected all things under his feet the words all of them emphatically denote subjection and depression and as thus conjoyned the most absolute subjection that can be apprehended Verse 7. Thou madest him lower for a little while than the Angels thou crownedst him with glory and honour and didst set him give him authority over the works of thy hands all things hast thou put in subjection under his feet Verse 8. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Verse 8. For in that he made all things subject unto him he hath left nothing not put in sabjection but now we see not all things made subject unto him Verse 9. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The words of this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 have most of them been considered in the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and they must have the same sense in both places or the reasoning of the Apostle would be Equivocal For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 some old Copies read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 besides God God excepted The Syriack Copies also vary Some read For God himself by his Grace tasted death Others for he God excepted tasted death which came from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and shews that variety to be antient Hence some have imagined it to be a corruption of the Nestorians who dividing the Person of Christ would not grant that God might be said to dye contrary to Acts 20.28 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is gratiâ beneficentiâ beneficio Dei by the grace goodness good will of God expressing the first spring and moving cause of the sufferings of Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 should taste of death an Hebraism for to dye intimating withall the truth reality and kind of his death which was bitter and which was called his Cup 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Masculine not Neuter Gender for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by an Enallage of number that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of whom he treats all and every one of the children unto whom he was a Captain of Salvation Verse 9. But we see Jesus crowned with glory and honour who for the suffering of death was a little while made lower than the Angels that he by the grace of God might taste of death for all Verse V. THe first words of the fifth Verse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for declare that the Apostle is in the pursuit of his former Argument 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for doth not alwayes intimate the Introduction of a Reason in the confirmation of what is past but sometimes a Progression unto somewhat else in the like kind with that which precedeth and so hath not respect unto any especial words or sayings before going but unto the whole matter in hand especially that which doth ensue as nam also is used in Latin nam quis te juvenum confidentissime nostras jussit adire domos A new Argument therefore to the same purpose with that before is intimated by this particle For. The whole Verse contains an Assertion laid down in a negative Proposition the Assumption of the Apostles Argument or the proof of it supposed in a pro-syllogism consisting in the ensuing Testimony with his Explication of it And it is to this purpose The World to come is not made subject unto Angels but it was made subject to Jesus and therefore he is exalted above them This he proves from the Testimony of the Psalmist to this purpose All things were made subject to man who for a little while was made lower than Angels but this man was Jesus and this Assumption he proves from the Event First On the part of man absolutely considered we see that all things were not made subject unto him therefore he cannot be intended Secondly On the part of Jesus All things in the event agree unto him First He was made for a little while lower than the Angels which he shews the reason of and thence takes occasion to discourse of his Death and Sufferings according to the method before declared and then he was crowned with Glory and Dignity all things being made subject unto him from all which it appears that it is he and not Angels unto whom the world to come is put in subjection This is the series of the Apostles Discourse wherein are many things difficult and hard to be understood which must be particularly considered The first Verse as was said layes down the principal Assertion in a Negative Proposition The world to come is not made subject unto Angels One Proof hereof is included in the words themselves For that Expression he hath not put in subjection is the same with our Apostle as it is no where written or recorded in the Scripture There is no Testimony of it God is no where said to have done it See Chap. 1.5 with the Exposition of it And these Negative Arguments from the Authority of the Old Testament He esteemed in this matter cogent and sufficient In the Proposition it self 1. The Subject of it the World to come with 2. It s limitation whereof we treat and 3. The Praedicate negatively expressed is not put in subjection to Angels are to be considered The Subject of the Proposition is the World to come 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The New Heavens and New Earth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which God promised to create Isa. 65.17 Chap. 66.22 which refers unto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the dayes of the Messiah The latter Jews sometimes call it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the future
not put in subjection unto Angels in its Erection or Institution That work was not committed unto them as the Apostle declares in the entrance of this Epistle They did not reveal the Will of God concerning it nor were intrusted with Authority to erect it Some of them indeed were employed in messages about its preparatory work but they were not employed either to reveal the mysteries of it wherewith they were unacquainted nor authoritatively in the Name of God to erect it For the Wisdom of God in the nature and mystery of this work they knew not but by the effects in the work it self Ephes. 3.9 10. which they looked and enquired into to learn and admire 1 Pet. 1.12 and therefore could not be intrusted with authority for its Revelation and the building of the Church thereon But things were otherwise of old The Law which was the foundation of the Judaical Church-state was given by the Disposition of Angels Acts 7.53 Gal. 3.19 And our Apostle here calls it the Word spoken by Angels They were therefore intrusted by God to give the Law and the Ordinances of it unto the people in his Name and Authority which being the foundation of the Mosaical Church-state it was so far put in subjection unto them Secondly It is not put in subjection unto Angels as to the Rule and disposal of it being erected Their Office in this world is a Ministery chap. 1.13 not a Rule or Dominion Rule in or over the Church they have none but are brought into a co-ordination of service with them that have the testimony of Jesus Rev. 19.10 chap. 22.9 being equally with us subjected unto him in whom they and we are gathered into one head Ephes. 1.10 And from their ministerial presence in the Congregations of Believers doth our Apostle press women unto modesty and sobriety in their habit and deportment 1 Cor. 11.10 And the Church of old had an apprehension of this truth of the presence of an Angel or Angels in their Assemblies but so as to preside in them Hence is that caution relating to the Worship of God Eccles. 5.5 6. Better it is that thou shouldst not vow than thou shouldest vow and not pay suffer not thy mouth to cause thy flesh to sin neither say thou before the Angel that it was an errour why should God be angry at thy voice and destroy the work of thine hands By vowing and not paying a man brought upon his flesh that is himself and his posterity a guilt not to be taken away with excuses of haste or precipitation made unto the Angel presiding in their Worship to take an account of its due performance It is true the absolute sovereign power over the Church of old was in the Son of God alone but an especial immediate power over it was committed unto Angels And hence was the Name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God Judge Mighty One communicated unto them namely from their Authority over the Church that Name expressing the Authority of God when unto him ascribed And because of this their acting in the Name and representing the Authority of God the Saints of old had an apprehension that upon their seeing of an Angel they should die from that saying of God that none should see his face and live Exod. 33.20 So Manoah expresly Judg. 13.22 He knew that it was an Angel which appeared unto him and yet says to his wife We shall surely die because we have seen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an Angel vested with the Authority of God And hence it is not unlikely but that there might be a respect or Worship due unto the Angels under the Old Testament which themselves declare not to be meet for them under the New Rev. 19. not that they are degraded from any Excellency or Priviledge which before they enjoyed but that the Worshippers under the New Testament through their Relation unto Christ and the Exaltation of their nature in his Person are delivered from that under-age estate wherein they differed not from servants Gal. 4.1 and are advanced into an equality of liberty with the Angels themselves Heb. 12.24 25. Ephes. 1.10 chap. 3.14 15. As amongst men there may be a respect due from an inferiour to a superiour which may cease when he is advanced into the same condition with the other though the superiour be not at all abased And to this day the Jews contend that Angels are to be adored with some kind of Adoration though they expresly deny that they are to be invocated or prayed unto Furthermore about their Power and Authority in the disposal of the outward concernments of the Church of old much more might be declared from the Visions of Zechary and Daniel with their works in the two great typical deliverances of it from Aegypt and Babylon But we must not here insist on particulars Thirdly as to the power of judging and rewarding at the last day it is openly manifest that God hath not put this world to come in subjection unto Angels but unto Jesus alone This then is the main Proposition that the Apostle proceeds upon in his present Argument The most glorious effect of the Wisdom Power and Grace of God and that wherein all our spiritual concernments here are enwrapped consists in that blessed Church state with the eternal consequences of it which having been promised from the foundation of the world was now to be erected in the days of the Messiah That you may saith he no more cleave unto your old institutions because given out unto you by Angels nor hearken after such works of wonder and terrour as attended their Disposition of the Law in the Wilderness consider that this world so long expected and desired this blessed estate is not on any account made subject unto Angels or committed unto their disposal the Honour thereof being entirely reserved for another Having thus fixed the true and proper sense of this verse we may stop here a little to consult the Observations that it offers for our own instruction Many things in particular might be hence educed but I shall insist on one only which is comprehensive of the design of the Apostle and it is That This is the great priviledge of the Church of the Gospel that in the things of the Worship of God it is made subject unto and immediately depends upon the Lord Jesus Christ and not any other Angels or Men. That this is the priviledge thereof and that it is a great and blessed priviledge will both appear in our consideration of what it is and wherein it doth consist And among many other things these ensuing are contained therein 1. That the Lord Christ is our Head So it was promised of old that their King should pass before them and the Lord on the head of them Mic. 2.13 He shall be their King Head and Ruler God hath now gathered all things all the things of his Church into an Head in Christ Ephes. 1.10 They were all scattered and
other duty or service what ever may he not justly expect that such a one will be diligent in the observation of all his commands especially considering also the Honour and Advantage that he hath by being taken near unto his person employed in his affairs And shall not God much more expect the like from us considering how exceedingly the priviledge we have by this relation unto him surpasseth all that men can attain by the favour of earthly Princes And if we will choose other Lords of our own to serve if we are so regardless of our selves as that we will serve our lusts and the world when God hath had such respect unto us as that he would not suffer us to be subject unto the Angels of heaven how inexcusable shall we be in our sin and folly You shall be for me saith God and not for any other what ever And are we not miserable if we like not this agreement 2. For the manner of our obedience how ought we to endeavour that it be performed with all holiness and reverence Moses makes this his great argument with the people for Holiness in all their Worship and services because no people had God so nigh unto them as they had And yet that nearness which he insisted on was but that of his Institutions and some visible Pledges and Representations therein of his Presence among them now much more cogent must the considerations of this real and spiritual nearness which God hath taken us unto himself in by Jesus needs be to the same purpose All that we do we do it immediately unto this holy God not only under his Eye and in his Presence but in an especial and immediate relation unto him by Jesus Christ. Verse VI. THe Apostle hath shewed that the World to come which the Judaical Church looked for was not made subject unto Angels no mention of any such thing being made in the Scripture That which he assumes to make good his Assertion of the Preheminence of the Lord Jesus above the Angels is that unto him it was put in subjection And this he doth not expresly affirm in words of his own but insinuateth in a Testimony out of the Scripture which he citeth and urgeth unto that purpose And this Way he proceedeth for these two ends 1. To evidence that what he taught was suitable unto the Faith of the Church of old and contained in the Oracles committed unto it which was his especial way of dealing with these Hebrews 2. That he might from the Words of that Testimony take occasion to obviate a great Objection against the Dignity of Christ and Mysteries of the Gospel taken from his Humiliation and Death and thereby make way to a farther Explication of many other Parts or Acts of â—is Mediation many Difficulties there are in the Words and Expressions of these Verses more in the Apostles Application of the Testimony by him produced unto the Person and End by him intended all which God assisting we shall endeavour to remove And to that End shall consider 1. The way and manner of his introducing this Testimony which is peculiar 2. The Testimony it self produced with an Explication of the meaning and importance of the Words in the Place from whence it is taken 3. The Application of it unto the Apostles purpose both as to the Person intended and as to the especial End aimed at And 4. Farther unfold what the Apostle adds about the death and sufferings of Christ as included in this Testimony though not intended as to the first use and design of it And 5. Vindicate the Apostles Application of this Testimony with our Explication of it accordingly from the Objections that some have made against it All which we shall pass through as they present themselves unto us in the Text it self First The manner of his citing this Testimony is somewhat peculiar One testified in a certain place Neither person nor place being specified As though he had intended 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a certain Person whom he would not name But the Reason of it is plain both Person and Place were sufficiently known to them to whom he wrote And the Syriack Translation changeth the Expression in the Text into but as the Scripture witnesseth and saith without Cause The Hebrews were not ignorant whose words they were which he made use of nor where they were recorded The one there mentioned is David and the certain place is the eighth Psalm whereof much need not to be added A Psalm it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the High Praises of God and such Psalms do mostly if not all of them respect the Messiah and his Kingdom as the Jews themselves acknowledge For the time of the Composure of this Psalm they have a conjecture which is not altogether improbable namely that it was in the Night whilest he kept his Fathers sheep Hence in his Contemplation of the Works of God he insists on the Moon and Stars then gloriously presenting themselves unto him not mentioning the Sun which appeared not So also in the Distribution that he makes of the things here below that amongst others are made subject unto man he fixeth in the first place on 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 flocks of Sheep which were then peculiarly under his care So should all the works of God and those especially about which we are conversant in our particular Callings excite us to the Admiration of his Glory and Praise of his name And none are usually more void of holy thoughts of God than those who set themselves in no way acceptable unto him This is the place from whence this Testimony is taken whose especial Author the Apostle omitteth both because it was sufficiently known and makes no difference at all who ever was the Penman of this or that Portion of Scripture seeing it was all equally given by Inspiration from God whereon alone the authority of it doth depend 2. The Testimony it self is contained in the words following v. 6 7. What is man c. Before we enter into a particular Explication of the words and of the Apostles Application of them we may observe that there are two things in general that lye plain and clear before us As First That All things whatsoever are said to be put in subjection unto man that is unto Humane Nature in one or more Persons in opposition unto Angels or nature Angelical To express the former is the plain Design and Purpose of the Psalmist as we shall see And whereas there is no such Testimony any where concerning Angels it is evident that the meaning of the word is unto man and not unto Angels which the Apostle intimates in that adversative 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but but of man it is said not of Angels Secondly That this Priviledge was never absolutely nor universally made good in or unto the nature of man but in or with respect unto the Person of Jesus Christ the Messiah This the Apostle call us to the
horrid nature of sin Fools as the Wise man tells us make a mock of it Stifling for a while their natural convictions they act as if sin were a thing of nought at least not so horrible as by some it is represented And few there are who endeavour aright to obtain a true notion of it contenting themselves in general that it is a thing that ought not to be What direct Opposition it stands in unto the Nature Properties Rule and Authority of God they consider not But the last day will discover the true nature of it when all eyes shall see what it deserves in the judgement of God which is according unto Righteousness Is it a small thing for a Creature to break that Order which God at first placed him and all things in To cast off the Rule and Authority of God to endeavour to dethrone him so that he cannot continue to be the Supream Governour of all things and Judge of all the world unless he punish it Is it a small thing to set up that which hath an utter inconsistency with the Holiness and Righteousness of God so that if it go free God cannot be holy and righteous If these things will not now sink into the minds of men if they will not learn the severity of God in this matter from the Law on the threatning and curse whereof he hath impressed the Image of his Holiness and Justice as was said they will learn it all in Hell Why doth God thus threaten and curse sin and sinners Why hath he prepared an Eternity of Vengeance and Torment for them Is it because he would Nay because it could not otherwise be God being so Holy and Righteous as he is Men may thank themselves for Death and Hell They are no more than sin hath made necessary unless God should cease to be Holy Righteous and the Judge of all that they might sin freely and endlesly And this appears most eminently in the Cross of Christ for God gave in him an instance of his Righteousness and of the desert of sin Sin being imputed unto the only Son of God he could not be spared If he be made sin he must be made a curse If he will take away our iniquities he must make his soul an offering for sins and bear the punishment due unto them Obedience in all Duties will not do it Intercession and Prayers will not do it sin required another manner of Expiation Nothing but undergoing the wrath of God and the Curse of the Law and therein answering what the eternal Justice of God required will effect that End How can God spare sin in his Enemies who could not spare it on his only Son Had it been possible this Cup should have passed from him but this could not be and God continue Righteous These things I say will give us an insight into the nature of sin and the horrible provocation wherewith it is attended And this also opens the Mysterie of the Wisdom and Love and Grace of God in the salvation of sinners This is that which he will for ever be admired in A way he hath found out to exercise Grace and satisfie Justice at the same time in and by the same Person sin shall be punished all sin yet Grace exercised sinners shall be saved yet Justice exalted all in the Cross of Christ. Verse XI XII XIII THe great Reason and Ground of the Necessity of the sufferings of Christ hath been declared It became God that he should suffer But it doth not yet appear on what Grounds this suffering of his could be profitable or beneficial unto the Sons to be brought unto Glory It was the sinner himself against whom the Law denounced the Judgement of death And although the Lord Christ undertaking to be a Captain of Salvation unto the Sons of God might be willing to suffer for them yet what Reason is there that the Punishment of One should be accepted for the sin of Another Let it be granted that the Lord Christ had an absolute and Soveraign Power over his own Life and all the Concernments of it in the nature which he assumed as also that he was willing to undergo any sufferings that God should call him unto this indeed will acquit the Justice of God in giving him up unto death But whence is it that sinners should come to be so interested in these things as thereon to be acquitted from sin and brought unto Glory In these Verses the Apostle enters upon a discovery of the Reasons hereof also He supposeth indeed that there was a Compact and Agreement between the Father and Son in this matter which he afterwards expresly treateth on Chap. 10. He supposeth also that in his Soveraign Authority God had made a Relaxation of the Law as to the Person suffering though not as to the Penalty to be suffered which God abundantly declared unto the Church of the Jews in all their Sacrifices as we shall manifest These things being supposed the Apostle proceeds to declare the grounds of the Equity of this Substitution of Christ in the room of the Sons and of their Advantage by his suffering the Proposition whereof he layes down in these Verses and the especial Application in those that ensue Verse 11 12 13. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There is no Variety in the reading of these words in any Copies nor do Translators differ in rendring the sense of them The Syriack renders the last Testimony as if the words were spoken unto God Behold I and the children 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whom thou hast given unto me O God The Aethiopick Wherefore they who sanctifie and they who are sanctified are altogether to what purpose I cannot ghess 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Is used in this Epistle both in the Legal sense of it to separate consecrate dedicate and in the Evangelical to purifie sanctifie to make internally and really holy It seems in this place to be used in the latter sense though it include the former also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by just consequence for they who are sanctified are separated unto God The Word then expresseth what the Lord Christ doth unto and for the Sons as he is the Captain of their salvation He consecrates them unto God through the sanctification of the Spirit and washing in his own blood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It may be of the Masculine Gender and so denote one Person or of the Neuter and so one thing one Mass one common Principle whereof afterwards The first Testimony is taken from Psal. 22.24 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the LXX render 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The first word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 narrab◠annuntiabo the Apostle renders by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 more properly than they by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In the rest of the words there is a Coincidence the Originall being expresly rendered in them For though 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be rendered simply to praise yet it s most
which necessarily infers his prae-existence in another nature their perswasion about the Person of Christ is utterly overthrown Their exceptions in their controversial writings unto this place have been else-where considered Those of Eniedinus on this Text are answered by Paraeus those of Castalio by Beza and the objections of some others by Gomarus We shall in the first place consider what is proposed for the confirmation of their sense by Schlictingius or Crellius and then the exception of a very learned Expositor unto the sense before laid down and confirmed And Schlictingius first argues from the Context Praeter ipsa verba saith he quae hunc sensum nullo modo patiuntur ut postea dicemus contextus ratiocinatio authoris id repudiat qui pro ratione argumento id sumere non potuit debuitve quod sibi hoc ipso argumento ratione probandum sumsisset De eo enim erat quaestio cur Christus qui nunc ad tantam majestatem gloriam est evectus non angelicam sed humanam morti variis calamitatibus obnoxiam habuerit naturam bujus vero rei quo pacto ratio redderetur per id quod non angelicam sed humanam naturam assumpserit cum istius ipsius rei quae in hac quaestione continetur nempe quod Christus homo fuit natus nunc causa ratioque quaeratur At vero si haec verba de juvandis non Angelis sed hominibus deque ope iis ferenda intelligamus pulcherrime omnia cohaerent nempe Christum hominem mortalem fuisse non angelum aliquem quod non angelis sed hominibus juvandis servandisque fuerit destinatus But the foundation of this Exposition of the Context is a mistake which his own preceding discourse might have relieved him from For there is no such question proposed as here is imagined nor doth he in his following Exposition suppose it The Apostle doth not once propose this unto confirmation that it behoved the Lord Christ to be a man and not an Angel But having proved at large before that in Nature and Authority he was above the Angels he grants verse 8. that he was for a little while made lower than they and gives at large the reason of the necessity of that dispensation taken from the work which God had designed him unto which being to bring many sons unto glory he shews and proves by sundry reasons that it could not be accomplished without his death and suffering for which end it was indispensibly necessary that he should be made partaker of flesh and blood And this he confirms farther by referring the Hebrews unto the Scripture and in especial unto the great Promise of the Messiah made unto Abraham that the Messiah was to be his seed the love and grace whereof he amplifies by an intimation that he was not to partake of the Angelical nature That supposition therefore which is the foundation of this Exposition namely that the Apostle had before designed to prove that the Messiah ought to partake of humane nature and not of Angelical which is nothing to his purpose is a surmise suited only to the present occasion Wherefore Felbinger in his Demonstrationes Evangelica takes another course and affirms that these words contain the end of what was before asserted verse 14 15. namely about Christs participation of flesh and blood which was not to help Angels but the seed of Abraham and to take them into grace and favour But these things are both of them expresly declared in those verses especially verse 15. where it is directly affirmed that his design in his Incarnation and Death was to destroy the devil and to free and save the children And to what end should these things be here again repeated and that in words and terms far more obscure and ambiguous than those wherein it was before taught and declared For by Angels they understand evil Angels and there could be no cause why the Apostle should say in this Verse that he did not assist or relieve them when he had declared in the words immediately fore-going that he was born and died that he might destroy them Neither is it comely to say that the end why Christ destroyed the devil was that he might not help him or the end why he saved the children was that he might assist them Besides the introduction of this assertion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 will not allow that here any end is intimated of what was before expressed there being no insinuation of any final cause in them The Context therefore not answering their occasion they betake themselves to the words Verbum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he significat proprie manu aliquem apprehendere sive ut illum aliquo ducas sive ut sustentes hinc ad opitulationem significandum commodè transfertur quos enim adjutos volumus ne cadant vel sub onere aliquo succumbant aut si ceciderint erectos cupimus iis manum injicere solemus quo sensu Ecclesiastic 4. v. 12. De sapientia dictum est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hoc est opitulatur quaerentibus se eadem est significatio verbi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quod qui aliquem sublevatum velint illi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 adverso manum porrigere solent It is acknowledged that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth frequently signifie as here is alledged namely to help and assist as it were by putting forth the hand for to give relief But if that were intended by the Apostle in this place what reason can be assigned why he should wave the use of a word proper unto his purpose and frequently so applied by himself in other places and make use of another which signifying no such thing nor any where used by him in that sense must needs obscure his meaning and render it ambiguous Whereas therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies to help and relieve and is constantly used by our Apostle in that sense it being not used or applied by him in this place to express his intention but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies no such thing nor is ever used by him to that purpose the sense contended for of help and relief is plainly excluded The place of Ecclesiasticus and that alone is referred unto by all that embrace this Exposition But what if the word be abused in that place by that Writer must that give a rule unto its interpretation in all other Writers where it is properly used But yet neither is the word used there for to help and relieve but to take and receive Wisdom suscipit receiveth or taketh unto it self suo more those that seek it which is the sense of the word we plead for and so is it rendred by Translators So the Lord Christ suo modo took to himself the seed of Abraham by uniting it unto his person as he was the Son of God In the very entrance also of his discourse this Author acknowledgeth that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
This term therefore of visiting doth not precisely design Gods acting in the Exaltation of him visited but such an ordering of things towards him as is attended with great Care Grace and Love So was the nature of man in the Heart of God to do good unto it in and by the Person of Jesus Christ and so he acted towards it or visited it This is that which was the ground of the Psalmists admiration and which will be so in all believers unto Eternity It was not the outward state and condition of mankind in the world which since the entrance of sin is sad and deplorable that excites this admiration in the Psalmist But his mind is intent upon the Mysterie of the Grace Wisdom and Love of God in the Person of the Messiah Verse VII SEcondly The especial instances wherein this Visitation of God expressed it self are contained in ver 7. and therein referred unto two Heads 1. Mans Depression and Humiliation 2. His Exaltation and Glory The first is expressed in these words Thou hast made him lower for a little while than the Angels This was a part of Gods Visitation and though not that which was immediately intended by the Apostle yet that whereof he intends to make great use in his Progress That these words intend not the Exaltation of the nature of meer man as if they should intimate that such is his Dignity that he is made but a little less than Angels and how destructive that sense is unto the Apostles Intention and Application of the words we shall afterwards declare Three things are here expressed 1. The Act of God in making of him low or lessening of him 2. The measure of that Depression than the Angels 3. His duration in that State and Condition a little while First 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Word used by the Psalmist is rendered by the Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and that properly They both signifie a Diminution of State and Condition a depression of any one from what he before enjoyed And this in the first place belongs unto Gods Visitation And the acting of the Will of Christ in this matter suitably unto the Will of the Father is expressed by words of the same importance 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he emptied himself and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he humbled himself Phil. 2.7 8. denoting a voluntary depression from the glory of a former State and Condition In this Humiliation of Christ in our nature how much of that Care and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Inspection and Visitation of God was contained is known Secondly The measure of this Humiliation and Depression is expressed in reference unto Angels with whom he is now compared by the Apostle he was made less than the Angels This the Hebrews had seen and knew and might from his Humiliation raise an Objection against what the Apostle asserted about his Preference above them Wherefore he acknowledgeth that he was made less than they shews that it was foretold that so he should be and in his following Discourse gives the Reasons why it was so to be And he speaks not of the Humiliation of Christ absolutely which was far greater than here it is expressed by him as he afterwards declares but only with respect unto Angels with whom he compares him and it is therefore sufficient to his purpose at present to shew that he was made lower than they 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hierom renders the word in the Psalm à Deo then God and Faher Stapulensis had a long contest with Erasmus to prove that they should be so rendered in this place which is plainly to contradict the Apostle and to accuse him of corrupting the word of God Besides the sense contended for by him and others is absurd and foolish namely that the Humane Nature of Christ was made little lâ—ss than God and humbled that it might be so when it was infinitely less than the Divine Nature as being created The LXX and all old Greek Translations read Angels That Elohim is often used to denote them we have proved before The Targum hath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Angels And the scope of the place necessarily requires that sense of the word God then in his Visitation of the nature of man in the Person of his Son put it and therein him that was invested in it into a condition of wants and streights and humbled him beneath the condition of Angels for the blessed Ends afterwards declared For although from his Incarnation and Birth the Angels adored his Person as their Lord yet in the outward condition of his Humane Nature he was made exceedingly beneath that state of Glory and Excellency which the Angels are in a constant Enjoyment of Thirdly There is a space of time a Duration intended for this condition He made him lower 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for a little while or a short season That 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is often used in that sense and that that is the proper notation of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we have shewed before But that which renders that sense of the words here unquestionable is the Apostles precise restraining them thereunto in v. 9. as we shall see It was but for a little while that the Person of Christ in the Nature of man was brought into a condition more indigent than the state of Angels is exposed unto Neither was he for that season made a little but very much lower than the Angels And had this been the whole of his state it could not have been an Effect of that inexpressible Love and Care which the Psalmist so admires But being it is but for a little continuance and that for the blessed Ends which the Apostle declares nothing can more commend them unto us Secondly There is another Effect of Gods Visitation of man in his Exaltation expressed 1. In the Dignity whereunto he advanced him and 2. In the Rule and Domion that he gave unto him For the first He crowned him with Glory and Honour 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is insigne regium the badge and token of Supream and Kingly Power Hence when David complains of the straightning and Diminution of his Power or Rule he says his Crown was profaned unto the ground Psal. 89.39 That is made contemptible and trampled on To be crowned then is to be invested with Soveraign Power or with Right and Title thereunto as it was with Solomon who was crowned during the life of his Father Nor is it an ordinary Crown that is intended but one accompanied with Glory and Honour To be crowned with Glory and Honour is to have a glorious and honourable Crown or Rule and Soveraignty 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The first denotes the Weight of this Crown 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a weight of glory from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be heavy 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a weight of glory as the Apostle speaks in Allusion to the Primitive signification of this word 2 Cor. 4.17 The other its
Beauty and Glory both Authority and Majesty How Christ was thus crowned we have at large shewed on the first Chapter Secondly This Soveraignty is attended with actual Rule Wherein 1. The Dominion it self is expressed and 2. The Extent of it First Thou madest him have Dominion over the works of thy hands 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 madest him to rule 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 appointedst him in Authority over He had actual Rule and Dominion given him upon his Coronation And Secondly The Extent of this Dominion is the Works of Gods hands And least any from this indefinite Expression should think this Rule limited either to the things mentioned before by the Psalmist v. 4. called the work of Gods fingers that is the Heavens the Moon and the Stars or in the following Distribution of things here below into Sheep Oxen Fowls and Fish v. 7 8. that is all the creatures here below he adds an Amplification of it in an universal Proposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he hath put all things without Exception in subjection unto him and to manifest his absolute and unlimited Power with the unconditional subjection of all things unto him he adds that they are placed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 under his very feet An Expression setting forth a Dominion every way unlimited and absolute Verse VIII THe Apostle having recited the Testimony which he intends to make use of proceeds in the eighth Verse unto some such Explications of it as may make it appear to be proper and suited unto the End for which it is produced by him And they are two the first whereof respects the sense of the words which express the Extent of this Dominion the latter an instance of some Person or Persons unto whom this Testimony as thus explained cannot be applied For the Explication of the Objective Extent of the Rule and Dominion mentioned he adds For in that he hath made all subject unto him he hath left nothing that is not put under him For whereas it might be objected that there is no mention in the Psalm of the World to come whereof he treats he lets them know that that cannot be excepted seeing the Assertion is universal and unlimited that all things whatsoever are put under him It is true our Apostle making use of this very Testimony in another place 1 Cor. 15.27 adds there that there is a manifest Exception in reference unto him who so put all things under him and it is evident that it is so indeed for the Psalmist treats not of God himself but of the works of God and among them saith the Apostle here there lyes no Exception they are all brought into Order under this Rule And so by this Testimony thus explained as necessity requires it should be he hath fully confirmed that the World to come being one of the especial works of God and not put in subjection unto Angels is made subject unto man which was that he undertook to demonstrate Secondly To direct this Testimony unto its proper End and to make way for its Application unto him who is especially intended therein he declares negatively unto whom it is not applicable but now we see not yet all things put under him Man it was concerning whom the words are spoken What is man This must denote the nature of man and that either as it is in all mankind in general and every individual or in some especial and peculiar instance in one partaker of that nature For the First He denyes that this can belong unto man in general all or any of them on that general account of being men And in this Negation there are two Circumstances considerable First The manner of his asserting it by an appeal to common Experience we see this is a matter whereof every one may judge We all of us know by experience that it is otherwise we need neither Testimony nor Argument to instruct us herein Our own condition and that which we behold other men in is sufficient to inform us And this is a way whereby an appeal is made as it were to common sense and Experience as we do in things that are most plain and unquestionable Secondly There is a limitation of this Experience in the word yet wee see not as yet And this doth not intimate a contrary state of things for the future but denyes as to all the time that is past A long space of time there hath been since the giving out of this Testimony much longer since the Creation of man and all other things and yet all this while we see that all things are far enough from being put under the feet of man or if there be in the word a reserve for some season wherein this word shall in some sense be fulfilled in meer man also it is for that time wherein they shall be perfectly glorified with him who is principally intended and so to be admitted as it were to be sharers with him in his Dominion Revel 3.21 These things make plain what is here denyed and in what sense All mankind in conjunction are very remote from being invested with the Dominion here described from having the whole Creation of God cast in subjection under their feet It is true there was given unto man at first in his Original condition a Rule over those creatures here below that were made for the use and sustentation of his natural life and no other And this also is in some measure continued unto his Posterity though against the present bent and inclination of the creatures who groan because of the bondage that they are put unto in serving of their use and necessity But all this at first was but an obscure Type and shadow of the Dominion here intended which is absolute universal and such as the creatures have no reason to complain of their proper condition being allotted unto them therein Hence we our selves by our own Observation may easily discern that this word respects not principally either the first man or his posterity for we see not as yet after this long space of time since the creation that all things are put into subjection unto him Having thus unfolded the Testimony insisted on before we proceed unto the Apostolical Application of it unto the Person to whom it doth belong we may stay here a little and gather something from it for our instruction And it is in general that The consideration of the Infinitely Glorious Excellencies of the nature of God maninifesting themselves in his Works doth greatly set out his Condescension and Grace in his regard and respect unto mankind This the occasion of the Words and the Words themselves do teach us 1. This the method of the Psalmist I say leads us unto He begins and ends his consideration of the works of God with an Admiration of his Glorious Excellency by whom they were made v. 1.9 O Lord our Lord how excellent is thy name how glorious art thou and thou manifestest thy self so to be and