only temporary and for that age and season wherein the Gospel was first promulgated and planted and for this purpose do urge that other text of Paul in 1 Cor. 12.28 And God hath ordained some in his Church as first Apostles secondly Prophets thirdly Teachers then them that do miracles after that the gifts of healing helps governments diversity of tongues and therefore hence do argue That because some officers that are here numbred up are but temporary and for that first age as the gifts of miracles healing c. Therefore the Apostolical gift and function is ceased also with them which was as they say for the first planting of the church not for its growth and continuance To which I answer first By distinguishing between times and persons and grant that Officers since Christ's time have not that measure of Unction and Spirit of infallibility as the first Apostles had yet withal assert that for all what the contrary minded say is but petitio principii for they only affirm that the Apostolical office was but temporary for the first age but prove it not and though they rank it up amongst some of the primitive Gifts and Offices that are interr'd yet to perswade the ingenious they should inform where in the Temple I mean God's Word is their grave to be found They may from this last Scripture as justly argue that the gifts and functions of Teachers Prophets Helps and Governments are also ceased in the church because the gifts of healing miracles c. are ceased in and amongst which catalogue they are also ranked Secondly This Tenent of the Opponents is the ready way and I presume had a great influence of late in hatching and cherishing the sect of the Seekers and anti-Scripturists for when it is asserted and maintained by the reputed Orthodox that most of the primitive offices as Apostles gifts of Miracles Healings c. are ceased to the church under the defection and falling away by the rise of antichrist They forthwith rejoyn and object Why If some gifts are evacuated in the church and no vertue in them as you confess why not the rest of the same foundation and catalogue as well as they and so upon the same grounds that some are ceased they pertinaciously affirm that all other offices and ordinances are null and defunct also being only for that age and ministration and to that end do interpret that promise of Christ's spiritual support and presence with his Church in the last of Matthe◠That he would be with them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we render to the end of the world or all generations yet they for their own interest render to the end of that age and so consequentially deny the Word and Ordinances and the Being of a church for how should there be a church without VVord and Ordinances and how should the VVord and Ordinances be administred without Officers according to that of Rom. 10. How shall they believe unless they hear And how shall they hear without a Preacher And how shall they preach unless they be sent This hath been the sad consequence of asserting that relaxation of some Offices and gifts in the church and not evidencing where their graves lie or their repeals Thirdly I answer That Eph. 4.11 12 c. is strongly convincing for the contrary for all those offices that are there recounted which Christ gave unto the church there is not the least intimation that some were for the church then in being of that present age and the rest for futurity to continue but rather the contrary is evinced And he gave some Apostles c. Cuibono To what end For the perfecting of the Saints for the work of the Ministery for the edifying of the body of Christ till we all come in the unity of the faith c. Now I would anti-query Are the Saints all perfected Is the work of the Ministry at an end Is the church the body of Christ so sufficiently edified and confirmed that they are all come to the unity of faith and to perfect knowledge and to a full measure and stature of Christ I hope none will affirm it unless the Perfectists and Quakers But here again they will say VVe grant ordinary Officers as Pastors Teachers Elders c. are still continued in the church for this work until we all come to be a perfect man in Christ but extraordinary officers as Apostles c. are ceased I answer again This is asserted and not proved therefore it is a begging of the question Secondly I affirm That those which are called the standing ordinary officers as Pastors Teachers Elders c. were in their first institution of an extraordinary Spirit and of the same Unction though differing in measure with the Apostles themselves and somtimes Apostles Pastors and Elders were taken as Synonima's though really differing amongst themselves in gifts and offices as to instance James the first Pastor or Bishop of Jerusalem was also a pillar and an Apostle John the great and beloved Apostle is in his Epistle called the Elder And in that great Synodical assembly Acts 15. the Elders are in joynt commission with the Apostles and being men of an extraorindary spirit also as appears by all those of the first unction as Stephen Ananias Barnabas c. and the rest of the brethren who went abroad upon the persecution of the church and preached and wrought miracles every where Acts 8. Object But here some may say this is to level all officers and to make the Apostles themselves but of equal authority with the ordinary offices of Pastors Teachers Elders c. I answer Not at all for though I grant some purity in their gifts being both extraordinary in their first unction yet the first twelve in some acts of their offices were to excel all others as is evident by Acts 1.22 when the eleven chose Matthias into Judas Bishoprick Peter urged that one must be ordained to be a witness with them of the Resurrection that was conversant with them from the baptisme of John to the time of Christ's resurrection as this was a great part of their office to bear witness of the life death and resurrection of Christ unto the world and this they could attest as truth as eye witnesses being with Jesus all the time he went in and out amongst them and herein they surpassed all others that came after Secondly They excel all other officers in that they had their commission immediately from Christ to convert disciple and baptize all Nations into the faith but all other officers had it derivatively from them Thirdly They had the pre-eminence in gifts of miracles which was most frequently adjoyned to their Ministery for the confirmation of their Doctrine But it is very inconsequent that the whole Apostolique office is quite ceased to the church because some of the most eminent gifts and endowments of that office as it was in the Apostles of the first institution are ceased which
in himself is too weak for such a work may be fitted in some measure from thy self who art the Wisdom of God and to whom the Revelation of all things is given of the Father because thou art found worthy O do thou enlighten his minde with true Light from above And remove all impediments his iniquities out of thy sight by the washing of thine own bloud then thou maist discover thy minde unto thy poor Servant being hallowed by thy self to a fruitful reception thereof Grant O Christ that by thy favour and the guidance of thy good Spirit he may diligently consider the misteries of this Book and that unto sobriety and declare it forth unto others that the Church of God may receive some advantage by him And if thy Servant O Lord hath herein through weakness built any hay and stubble upon thy precious structure O let it be consumed but so as that thy Servant may be saved in the great day of the Lord God Almighty but if any of thine receive good hereby to thee for it as most due which is and which was and which is to come the Almighty be praise glory and Dominion for ever and ever Amen A Catalogue of diverse Questions in this Treatise discussed WHether this Book of Revelation be of divine authority pag. 1 Whether John the divine the subordinate Author thereof be the same with John the Apostle and Evangelist or some other Person 5 Whether the Title of this Book viz. The Revelation of John the Divine be John's own or some other Persons 7 What is meant by the Christian wish or salutation grace and peace unto you 19 How comes John to wish grace and peace to the Churches whilst being Churches of Christ they had this grace and peace aforehand 19 Whether Christ shall have two last commings to Iudgment 25 Whether Christians when they are called unto it are bound in duty to suffer for the profession of all the truths of God 31 and 112 Whether the Lords day mentioned Rev. 1.10 wherein John received his Visions be the first day of the week or not 33 How shall we know Divine raptures extasies or Visions from diabolicall the Divel being Gods ape herein 34 Doth not the Divel often foretell the truth of events 37 Did not Satan tell Saul in that apparition of Samuel in the 1 Sam. 28 19. That he should be delivered with all his host into the hands of the Philistines and that he and his Sons on the morrow should be all with Samuel that is dead and was not that prediction truly fullfilled 38 Whether that Samuel which the Witch of Endor raised unto Saul was the true Prophet Samuel or the Divel in his shape and likeness or otherwise some cousening consort and confederate of the cousening Pythonists 38 39 Whether Christ according to his manhood appeared unto John Rev. 1 13. when he appeared to him as one like unto the Son of man 43 Whether there can be any separation between the deity and manhood of Christ 44 Whether the two edged sword that proceeded out of Christs mouth is to be only spiritually understood and not matterially also 50 51 Whether the blessed heavenly Spirits and Angels or glorified Persons after the Resurrection do or shall see the essential glory of God 53 Do not Angels see Gods face in Heaven and did not Moses and Jacob see God and talked with him face to face 54. and do not divines hold that in Heaven we enjoy the beatifical Vision 55 Whether Christ according to his divine nature was impassible 58 Why John is commanded particularly to write to each Church of the seven apart 68 Whether a sound Church may censure a corrupted Church 69 70 Whether by Angel of the Church of Ephesus be meant the Metropolitane over the rest of the Bishops of Ephesus and whether the Angel of Ephesus was the Metropolitane over the other six sister Churches 71 Whether the Angel of the Church of Ephesus is to be interpreted the Presbytery 72 What gives unto our works the denomination of good works And whether any of our works are simply and strictly to be called good and perfect 79 and 80 In whom lyes the power to try judge and examine false Apostles false teachers and their Doctrines 83 and 196 Whether the jurisdiction of the Church be above the word 84 Whether wicked Persons or unsound in the faith are to be admitted or being admitted to be tolerated in the fellowship of the Church 85 86 c. Whether any else besides true and real Saints or believers in the judgment of charity are to be admitted into Church fellowship 86 87 Whether the judicials or ceremonials of Moses are any foundation for a Gospel ordinance 88 89 Whether Baptisme is administred with best satisfaction of conscience upon infants 88 Whether it must be true justifying faith or dogmatical only that entitles to Baptisme 90 91 Whether the Apostolical Office be ceased to the Church or not and whether it was only tyed unto the first twelve 92 93 94 95 Whether the first 12 Apostles were but of equal authority with other ordinary Officers as Pastors Elders c. 95 Whether the gift of miracles does continue unto the Church 97 How shall we know or try false Apostles from the true 101 102 c. To what Church shall one repaire to receive a sound and orthodox call for the minâ—stery of the Gospell 105 106 c. How should the first reformers have a right call to the ministery if they â— had it not from Rome 108 Whether the Presbytery of England have a right call from the late Bishops as true Presbyters 110 VVhether Believers complaints for want of wills to repent be just or not 118 Whether it be a Legal Teaching to denounce wrath and Judgments on non-amendment or for want of Repentance 119 VVhether Repentance is to be joyned to Christ in some causality unto salvation or joyntly with him somwhat subordinate to that great end 120 And whether Faith and Repentance be the condiiion properly so taken of the Covenant of Grace 121 VVhat is meant by the Spirit that speaks unto the seven Asian Churches 126 What is meant by the Tree of Life and what is meant by Paradice 130 Whether Paradice and Heaven above be all one 131 Whether God tempteth man And whether he tempteth unto evil or sin 143 Doth not many Scriptures say That God tempteth man 144 Whether God hath a hand or efficiency in and about sin 146 Why doth God often afflict his own children with so sharp tribulations And whether the justice of God can be vindicated in that particular 149 VVhether great corruptions nullifies a Church 173 What is the reason that full Reformation cannot be attained 171 172 How is Gods justice vindicated if he smites godly and ungodly together for the sins of the wicked among them 179 VVhether Christ received now by faith to justification and absolution be the hidden Manna and white Stone promised Rev. 2.17 to
in the resurrection so hath power to deliver them from the state of death and hell Or secondly Take death and hell for the state of the damned and he hath power over that too he holds the key of the bottomless pit Rev. 20.1 as he hath obtained power since his exaltation to give Crowns and Thrones to all his faithful ones that shall persevere and overcome so also to chastise his impenitent and obstinate adversaries with hell and death The Keys in Scripture do signifie Power Dominion and Rule He that keeps and commands the keys of a City hath the Power and Rule over it The Keys were anciently carried before the chief Magistrate and are in some places at this present time as symbols and badges of authority On Peter's honourable confession in Mat. 16.19 the Keys of the Kingdom of heaven is given unto him by Christ which intimates the power of shutting and loosing which was by Christ deposited in the Church It is said in the third chapter that Christ hath the key of David that shutteth and no man openeth and openeth and no man shutteth and in chap. 20. v. 1. Christ is there represented by an Angel that had the key of the bottomless pit All this connotes Observ That Christ hath the full power over all powers and principalities of darkness over the divel and death and hell it self which before he hath attained and purchased by his death 1 Cor. 15.55 c. they cannot move nor stir to the destruction of souls but as he permits them it is a most vain conceit yea and savours of little faith in those that think that the godly or faithful ones of Christ are in the hands of Divels or Witches to be hurt by them or tormented at their pleasures Christ hath the Keys of hell and death the wicked Angels are so surely locked in their prisons and reserved in chains up by his providence that they cannot possibly touch any one of those that are dear to God no not to hurt a hair of their head or the least lamb in their fold without Christ's special commission for it and then too they are like a dog in a chain under his hand and direction to go thus far and no farther The Divel could not touch Iob who was hedged about by God before he bid him go And therefore O! How reasonless and weak it is to affirm or hold that they are in the Divel's power to touch or hurt at his pleasure for whom Christ hath said down his most precious blood and are as dear unto him as the apple of his eye but if at any time God shall give any of his into the hand of Satan to be touched by him either in person or goods let us consider it is either to withdraw and wean us from sin and to bring us to repentance for it or else to winnow and try us whether we will bless the name of God or not In such cases which seldom God exercises his children under for few are able to bear such temptations and God will lay no more on his then they are able to bear the most high and eminent in grace are only fit to meet with such strong tryals and not sink under them as Iob and Paul whom Satan buffetted but if God shall use the hand of Satan to smite any of his children let them look upon God as the principal Mover and Author of it and though Satan be the Instrument yet to say with wise and godly Iob The Lord hath done it The Lord taketh and the Lord giveth Blessed be the name of the Lord. Observ 2. Another observation hence is That Christ's obstinate enemies according to the Prophesies in this Book may expect and look for a most sure and certain ruine and destruction For here Christ says unto Iohn Fear thou not Iohn that is of the truth and execution of those dreadful predictions and judiciary visions which I shall now make known unto thee concerning those high implacable and obstinate enemies of mine they may think I have not power to execute those judgements upon them but they shall know that I have the keys of hell and death that Satan is at my command and beck to be the executioner of my wrath upon them and that I have power to open the door of hell death and destruction and to shut them up together with Satan in that Lake of fire that burneth with fire and brimstone for evermore Rev. 19.20 and 20.10 Hence two Uses arise very naturally First That the godly need not fear hell nor death either that of the grave or that of the second death for Christ their head is the Key-keeper of both and hath power thereof Next Let the impenitent wicked and such as will not have Christ to reigne over them fear and tremble for he has the keys of hell and death Therefore repent in time and kiss the Son lest he be angry before the day come wherein he shall shut and no man openeth Verse 19. Write the things which thou hast seen and the things which are and the things which shall come after Verse 20. The mystery of the seven Stars which thou sawest in my right hand and the seven golden Candlesticks is this The seven Stars are the Angels of the seven Churches and the seven Candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven Churches After Christ had fitted and confirmed John in his Prophetical Office by laying his hand upon him and by giving his Spirit to him and assuring him that it was he that is the first and the last that is alive but was dead and had the power over hell and death most able and mighty therefore to bring to pass and execute all the dreadful predictions and visions which Christ should make known unto him and being thus qualified and confirmed he receives his commission to write the things that he had seen and the things which are that is to Record these things which he had seen and were represented to him by and in the precedent visions which relate unto things that are present and in being to wit God's discovery of his will and judgements towards the famous seven Asian churches some whereof had much back-slidden from their native purity which the first second and third chapters do treat of as things that were then present and in being Next Iohn is commanded to write the things which shall come after that is he is to record visions and things which he shall see which are related unto the future Observ Hence Note That this book of Prophesies is not only a Historical relation and discovery under hyerogliphick figures of things present but also of things to come Iohn is commanded to write to the then seven Asian churches and that as an Introduction to all the future Prophesies and this is that that is intimated in cap. 5. v. 1. where a book is represented written within and without within that is secret sealed under seven Seals and their end yet
hence ariseth to Christ's churches That if they be zealous of God's glory and their own well-being that they suffer not peaceably amongst them either evil doers or false Teachers both equally tending if tolerated to their destruction and ruine Observ 2. It is often a matter of great trouble and travel for the churches of Christ to deal with evil doers and false teachers in the church When the corrupted part is become a great Interest in the church how difficult is it for the sound part to meddle with it Witness the present state of our churches in England and elsewhere amongst the Nations desiring Reformation from Antichristian errors and idolatry what a matter of trouble it is and somtimes of much affliction and sufferings to divers precious and sound christians when they go about to reprove the false teachers and evil workers the great hinderers at present of a thorow Reformation in the Ordinances and Doctrines of Christ How they fall upon such as the troublers of Israel Not considering that their lusts are the principal causes thereof and if Christ's witnesses speak against them in faithfulness they are presently branded as troublers of their peace and factions and often suffer for it The church of Ephesus had their portion herein of travel and patience for their integrity unto Christ and his Truth against these teachers and wicked persons in that primitive age so neer Christ's time and the pouring forth of the Spirit and therefore no marvel if under the falling away and Antichrist's dominion Christ's faithful witnesses have a share therein also But to proceed And thou hast tryed them which say they are Apostles and are not and hast found them lyars It seems Ephesus had pseudo-Apostles or false Apostles as well as Corinth and other churches 2 Cor. 11.13 who pretended themselves to be true Apostles of Christ who under that pretence came with deceitful and soul-destroying doctrines as That the Resurrection was past already That the Mosaical Law was to be joyned to faith in Christ for justification That the community of all things and women were lawful which they called spiritual marriages which the sect of Nicolaitans held These were the errours of the false Apostles of the primitive days Now the Apostles of Christ were extraordinary Officers sent by him so the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies one sent to his service for the publishing the Messias and his doctrine over the whole world and so were universal Officers and could act in and over all churches by their Apostolical authority but for others to argue from their practise that are ordinary officers and of an ordinary spirit that they may act as they did is a meer non sequitur Now the false Apostles would it seems needs arrogate the same authority to themselves in imposing their dictates upon the churches but the church of Ephesus had so much spiritual wisdom as to try and examine them and so found them false ones and liars Hence note That it is a most commendable practise and duty in Christ's churches to make a diligent and narrow inquisition into the truth of all doctrines and teachers that come among them The church of Ephesus was very famous for this very thing and an Euge given them by Christ for this action And indeed how could they or any other churches find out the deceitfulness and falsity of those that were false Apostles and false Teachers unless they had tryed and examined their doctrines Paul accounted the Bereans more noble then others for this very thing for the enquiry into the truth of his doctrine whether things were so or no as he delivered unto them for indeed it argues a most stupid kind of disposition to receive all things that comes from men without enquiry either into the truth thereof or at least the integrity faithfulness and the authority of the Relator thereof for as some truths lie deep and every common person or member cannot fathom it yet every one though never so weak that cannot satisfie their consciences by their own sight in the entertainment of a truth yet can in part acquiesce in the ability and fidelity of their Teacher and so may get much satisfaction unto themselves from the authority of their guides and teachers therefore it is a duty incumbent on all First for the more spiritual and quick-sighted christian to try all things and to hold fast what is good Next for the weaker christian to try the faithfulness and integrity of his Teachers and to hold fast what he commends unto him in things disputable and not of easie discernment Query But a Question may be moved who shall try judge and examine false Apostles false Teachers and their corrupt doctrines I answer First every private or particular christian may do it Judicio discretionis by a judgement of discretion and of private discerning But secondly to try them Judicio Authoritativo by a judgement of authority and juridically it must be done by that whole church wherein they are risen up and maintained for in them lies the plenary judicial power and authority of judging all doctrines and teachers which is usually called the power of the Keys Neither is this power in the Officers or Eldership of the church when distinct from the Body as some would have it but collectively in the whole church Officers and Members though unto the Presbyterie or Officers I should grant the precedency in many things yet the Body collective is above the Officers for the Officers are ordained more principally for the Body but not the Body for the Officers but the head cannot say unto the body I have no need of thee nor the body unto the head but all joynt together makes up a compleat harmony and an organical Body Officers and Members in a church make up a compleat christian or microcosm or commonwealth wherein all the Laws of Christ are juridically administred and who have the full power of trying censuring and judging all false Teachers and doctrines that shall rise amongst them For if the juridical power were solely in the Presbyterie or Officers of the church then the church of Ephesus would not collectively deserve that Eulogie and approbation for their zeal against false Apostles but it would rather be attributed to the Angel of the church or chief Officers or Overseers of the church only but here the whole church of Ephesus is praised and approved for their non-toleration of evil persons and for their trying of and sifting out the false Apostles therefore it argueth very strongly that the power of censures and trying is not singly in the Officers but in Officers and members joyntly as making up one organical Body politique which is Christ's highest Judicature on earth to decide and judge of all Doctrines rising in his churches that will not hold weight according to the shekel of the Sanctuary A farther instance ye have pregnant to this purpose in the church of Thyatira in verse 20. following where the reproof is
only indeed was temporary and necessary alone for the first plantation of the Christian faith it will as well follow that Pastors Teachers and Elders are defunct because some of their first primitive and extraordinary gifts are ceased also But secondly I am of opinion that what is necessarily essential to denominate an Apostle did not consist solely in being eye-witnesses of Christ's life death and resurrection or of power of miracles for others of the Disciples might be partakers in those gifts and were so equally with themselves and yet no Apostles and Paul that wanted much of the accomodation of witnessing unto the life death and resurrection of Christ though supplyed by a miraculous sight from heaven none can deny but was the great Apostle and light unto the Gentiles Lastly In the affirmative I assert the true essentials of an Apostle does consist in his Call and Commission to that work and function Christ calls the first twelve Matth. 10.1.5 which were only denominated Disciples and from their mission unto the lost sheep of Israel they were then first baptized into the name of Apostles and so having taken their names from their office as men sent it soon became their proper appellations Now I say it is a right mission and commission that gives a being and essentially unto an Apostle Christ he was the first author that commissionated unto this office in that of Matth. 10. his commission was more strict and of narrower jurisdiction but in Matth. 28.19 it was much enlarged for in the first they were only to go to the lost sheep of Israel and not in the way of the Gentiles but in the second they were commanded to go and Disciple all Nations and to preach the Gospel to every creature Now as they were sent on this great Embassie for Christ and by Christ so they send others to go on with the same work Matthias was the first we read of Acts 1. that they chose into the place of Judas After that Paul and Barnabas Acte 13.2 3. were chosen and separated unto this work and sent unto the Gentiles and so might be truly called the Apostles of the Gentiles They again with the rest of the Apostles in their several Provinces went about gathering and constituting churches and ordaining Elders and officers in every church and those political churches made up of Officers and Elders and Members were the true Delegates of the Apostles and the center of all just power and authority and they again from this delegated power commissionates others and sends them forth as the Apostles of Christ by vertue of that power committed unto them to disciple the Gentiles and unconverted Nations abroad in the world for this was the then practise unless we affirm that all churches were planted and all Nations converted by the Apostles themselves in their days that we read of in history were afterward converted to the faith and became famous churches The Apostles were men but of one generation and to ascribe to them that work were to make them eviternal Though their Doctrine continue yet their persons are translated and gone to their Fathers and this propagation of the faith and work of conversion must be carried on from generation to generation till all the Elect be called in and we all come to a perfect man and unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ and this must necessarily be done by Apostolical men and officers For I would have the ingenious to consider that the offices of Elders Pastors Teachers Helps and Governments are but relative Functions and have their being only dependant and limited to their relations and churches they are neither Elders Pastors nor Governents without their own churches therefore it is very necessary that there must be other officers universally commissionated to preach the Gospel to the unconverted Gentiles and these are properly called Apostles of Christ authorized by the church of Christ unto this service Joseph of Arimethea as antiquity testifies was our English Apostle which was sent by the church unto our Nations conversion Dionisius Areopagita was the Apostle unto France James unto Spain Anthony unto Italy Thomas unto Italy and so others unto other Nations And when christianity was almost lost and obliterated here in England by the incursions of barbarous Nations Gregory the Bishop of Rome not yet Antichistianized some centuries of years after sent here Austin as an Apostle and a Restorer of their almost lost faith and christian profession So likewise when our churches send men to convert the Gentile Nations of America and elsewhere as private Disciples they cannot go for how can they preach unless they be sent as Officers to wit as Pastors Elders Teachers or Governents they cannot for they are relations only to their own churches therefore they must go as Apostles which is only sutable to so general and universal work And if it be objected That if the Apostolical offices must continue as necessary to do the full work of Christ and his church why not the gifts of healings miracles tongues c. I answer There is no necssity for it for they were only added because of unbelief and to confirm the truth of that doctrine which was first delivered unto the Saints Secondly I am not sensible what great inconveniencies will follow upon it if it were admitted that such gifts of miracles healings c. are still continued by Christ unto his church though not so clear and ordinary as in the first churches I have read of Tertullian and after him Cyprian about the second century who provokes their adversaries to the tryal of the truth of their profession by miracles by bringing persons possessed with divels into their assemblies which if they should not be effected and made to confess themselves to be divels and Christ to be the Son of God then they were content to suffer M. Baxter gives us a farther account out of Athanasiâ— Austin and many of the Fathers that there was a continuation of miracles in their days and attested to by so many and honest witnesses that they were credible to reason page 63. upon that question in his book of Infidelity and in that part of the book of the sin against the holy Ghost page 15. speaking of casting out divels Of which sort saith he some think that really they did so by the power of God as we may do now by fasting and prayer somtimes To this purpose consider what the prayers and appeals of God's people have strangely and miraculously perfected and produced at the hands of God of late and within our memories in divers examples which is now too long to rehearse Some have been restored to health and miraculously recovered when there was no hope others dispossessed of evil spirits that had palpably vexed and possessed them and that only by the prayers of faith of somg odly persons I shall only give one instance I heard it related by a faithful messenger of Christ in a publique
Sermon in the City of Exeter to wit M. Lewis Steukley a workman that need not be ashamed who occasionally in that discourse spoke of a great man's Steward in Scotland really possessed with the Divel who was tormented so sore many days that his tongue was swollen without his mouth to that magnitude and extensiveness that it was impossible for him to bring it in or contain it within his mouth and so thereby was utterly deprived of all use of speech yet however in that horrid posture and speechless there was a clear distinct voice heard within him saying unto that Minister that Minister that came to visit the possessed party being his neighbour That he might save his pain for that the person possessed was his own To whom the Minister answered I cannot believe thee Satan for thou hast been a lyar from the beginning Then the spirit or voice within would answer again Be gone for he is mine To whom the Minister replyed If Christ died for him thou hast no interest in him and I will try with my God by prayer to prove thee a lyar Satan Whereupon he departed and left the party miserably extorted and tormented and as he was in his way returning to his house it was in his thoughts to pitch upon some certain faithful christians to joyn with him and assist him in this duty to God on the behalf of the possessed party and to send for them as soon as he returned But observe the providence when as he came unto his house he found all these persons there coming on other accounts to speak with him which he in his thoughts had in the way pitched on when he saw that he admired and blessed God for the providence and presently told them that he intended forthwith to send for them all in particular to assist him in duty and prayer to God for the recovery and releasement of such a person possessed by Satan and would try their interest with God for him and on his behalf they gladly heard it and entertained the motion and so continued that evening some hours together very fervent in prayer and after the duty performed they all departed to their several rests The next morning very early the party possessed came to the Minister well composed and sensible and his tongue restored to his wonted bigness and station speaking to the Minister plainly and distinctly that he wrestled with God for him for he affirmed by his prayers he was healed and delivered from the evil one that vexed him The Minister demandsed him By what time he had releasement He answered by such a time in the precedent evening by which the Minister found it swas about the same time he was in prayer to God for him and so both Minister and party gave glory to God for it This was the sum of the story and he avouched he had it from a godly Minister of his acquaintance who received it from the Minister's own mouth that was the actor of it and coming from so serious and godly man and especially in the publique exercise it deserves as much of an historical faith as any story of like kind whatsoever And why the church should now want miracles I know not seeing the primitive christians had that abundance of them if it is not because that the church of Rome have of late so cheated the world with so many legends of them that we will now give credit to none because there are so many false ones coyned and so by reason of our little faith we are deprived of them But to return that I may not seem singular in this opinion of the continuation of Apostles in the church of Christ which I press not as a matter of necessary faith but dogmatically only I shall recite some of good authority to defend me from the censure of singularity herein but for such opinions as are only conversant about the accidentals of Religion I would have that of the Poet recognized Hisce Veniam petimusque damusque vicissm And first D. Hammond Resolv 6. page 351. asserted That in the primitive times Bishops were usually called Apostles and manifested that the notion Apostles is not always taken properly or strictly to be understood And M. Parker Of the Cross part 2. 126. affirms That the ancient church extended the Apostolical times beyond the age of the Apostles even to the Nicene Councel and therefore some Authors and persons of antiquity are said to live Temporibus Apostolorum in the time of the Apostles that lived about 300. years after Christ and our Bishop Jewel admits of these first five centuries of years after Christ to be Apostolical pure and uncorrupted for the main and therefore I cannot see what disadvantage or inconvenience can happen to the church of Christ by the entertainment of this dogmatical point and tenet but rather much many ways by want thereof for as I said before what general or universal officer doth the church now enjoy that can rightly preach abroad to the conversion of the Gentile Nations in the world unless under the notion and office of an Apostle for all other ordinary officers are meerly relatives and cannot move or act authoritatively beyond their own proper spheres and relations to wit their flocks and churches unless they will hereby inevitably grant a liberty of prophesie to all gifted persons and so rank themselves amongst those that do it only virtute doni non authoritatis unto the unconverted world and to acknowledge that it is only done virtute doni is to slight the authority of the church and tacitely to conclude that the church hath no power in it to confer such an office whereby Christ may be publiquely taught unto the Gentile or Heathenish world for it is clear that the preaching of the Word unto the world is an act of authority Rom. 10. and Matth. 28.19 for how shall they preach unless they be sent and to prophesie interpret or preach the Word virtute doni was only a relative duty and permitted and exercised within the church assemblies only that I can collect either from the practise of the first churches in the Acts of the Apostles or their Epistles and therefore all that were sent to the conversion of the Ethnick world were sent ordinarily from the church some extraordinary cases only excepted which never amounts unto a rule in the notion of Apostles as was Paul and Barnabas c. and for want of the continuation of these ordinary officers in the church we are enforced to maintain heterodoxical opinions concerning the authority the power of preaching missions c. and in effect conclude with the Papists that there must be an universal Bishop or at least as absurdly universal Elders Pastors Teachers Ministers being meerly relatives that must have power over the whole world From the discoursed premises I shall only add this argument If the word cannot lawfully ordinarily be preached to the conversion of the world either by private christians or
denied the instrumentality of his Spirit be sure that in stead of a Zion such will erect a Babel and being ignorant where the green pastures of the Gospel lies they will like idle Shepherds either starve the sheep of their flocks or at least poyson them with unwholsome herbage And these I account as sufficient rules to try and examine false Apostles and Teachers by and to find them liars Object But an Objection may here arise from him that hath the first call of abilities from God That if I count it so necessary for him to denominate him Orthodox in his call to have the additional call of the church also But then saith he to what church shall I repair to receive this call seeing there are so many that are pretenders to be the true and right churches of Christ and that the alone ordaining authority is in them and not in others This is indeed locus lubricus a slippery question and I should be loth to deal with it lest I should offend the contrary minded by ventilating my judgement herein but I profess ingeniously it was neither men nor parties self interests nor by-affections that did lead me first to this undertaking but only the general good of christians unto which the Lord moved my heart with much singleness of Spirit being clearly unbyassed and not so over-much engaged to any of the new parties of these times but that I can reserve my judgement free to close with truth wheresoever I can find it And therefore I think it not amiss but to prosecute my first intendment in the singleness of heart to endeavour to clear up truth according to the scantle of my judgement not as walking in the clouds but in plainness and perspicuity though for my reward I may have his hire that traced truth so near at the heels that had his teeth dashed out for his pains but if I be a fool herein yet being reputed a fool for the promotion of truth it will be some comfort and if I suffer loss herein yet this consideration will consolate Magnis tamen excidit Ausis First then to the business Understand that the word Church in Scripture is ordinarily taken to avoid all criticizing upon the word to be the company of the faithful gathered out of all Nations by the ministry of the Word and Spirit and this I conceive to be the genuine definition of the church which may abundantly be made good both by good authority and Scripture Now this church is either more improperly first called the invisible church or secondly more properly the visible church The invisible church comprehends only the elect and seeing their number to us are unknown therefore they are denominated invisible But secondly The visible church is either to be taken for the visible universal catholique church or secondly for a visible particular political church Now the question is concerning the church in this last notion for 't is apparent the invisible church as invisible hath not to do in visible and outward ordinances Neither secondly the visible universal church can by themselves or others their representatives convene for the institution of Officers for how can it stand with conveniency or with the least shew of reasonableness that all the churches of Christ dispersed and planted in the various and far distant corners and Ilands of the world should either by themselves or their representing Officers meet together in one catholique assembly for the disposing and conferring of all mediate calls and Offices And therefore Christ hath ordained that All wise order and gubernation in and over his mystical body the church that every part of this universal body I mean every particular christian assembly of the church catholique for every particular is part of the whole should have within their own limits and jurisdiction a full power to exercise all the offices and ordinances which Christ hath given and instituted for the good and edification of his church unto the end of the world Neither is the church to be called catholique in respect of any her Officers for we know no such office since the first Apostles that were so extraordinary gifted as to have the denomination of Catholique authority over the universal church though they may be accounted to have Jus ad rem fit to be officers of any parts of the catholique church and so to have a potential right thereunto yet actual they have not before their particular calls does invest them into Jus in re as well as their gifts and abilities does to Jus ad rem But the profession of that catholique universal faith which is one and the same in all churches over the whole world that gives denomination to the universal or catholique church therefore the results and conclusions of combined Churches Provincial or National may be only admitted as prudentially binding and obliging as Ecclesiastical Laws and Canons but not as having a divine authority stamped upon them though agreeable to the divine truth it self so that such constitutions are to be received and embraced not solely virtute authoritatis convocation is sed virtute veritatis propositae which if the same conclusions were enjoyned by a particular christian political church were to be received by all of that church not only for the truths sake therein but in submission to the divine authority of the church that commands and institutes them Such is the difference between prudential Ecclesiastique Edicts and Ecclesiastique divine Institutions the one is humane and binding only prudentially the other is divine and obligeth conscienciously These considerations being cleared I come to answer the question to what particular visible church must a candidate apply himself for a mediate authoritative call and mission to receive it rightly and according to the mind of God and satisfaction of a good Conscience I answer and take leave here first to distinguish and take notice between the bene esse and the esse of a call There may be particular churches which I cannot deny but to be truly churches of Christ but not true ones that is they may have being in Christ by faith as branches in the Vine yet mixed with much rottenness and unsoundness and as a leprous person is a man yet a sorry one so a church holding the faith which is as the soul and life thereof yet entertaining much corruption and errour may be truly called a christian church but a sad one So the Ministerial call does answer the constitution of the churches from whence they proceed It s observable that the off-springs constitution do follow the parents temperature strong issues are not to be expected of sickly parents Fortes creantur fortibus as Seneca so in politique bodies of particular churches if they are found and healthy in the faith their off springs are strong and healthy also then their officers and ordinances will be lively efficacious and virtual If ootherwise be with them they will lose much of their vigour life and vertue and
by interposing an intervening necessity and clear obstacle thereunto and therein God loves obedience better then sacrifice Secondly I answer That the first Ministerial Reformers never maintained a personal succession of Ministery and Officers from the Apostles lineally through the loyns of Antichrist but only a succession of doctrine which in all ages was by the invisible church maintained and asserted somtimes with more perspicuity and visibility then other for if we should grant a personal succession of officers and Ministery from the Apostles days we must needs also grant a perpetual and necessary visibility of a church and consequentially a truth of Ministery and Ordinances of Christ in the Antichristian state and how a true christian Ministery and Ordinances can be found in that Antichristian state in that man of sin that mistery of iniquity that whore of Babylon as I formerly said I know not or how the same state can be both meerly antichristian and christian a Whore of Babylon and a Spouse of Jesus Christ a Ministery of God and a mysterie of iniquity a Temple of God and oâ— Idols I leave it to the Judicious to consider In the next place in the affirmative I hold That a true and Justifiable call respecting the essence thereof may be received in any the churches of Christ holding the foundation aright of godliness towards God and faith towards our Lord Jesus Christ though otherwise differing among themselves in many circumstantial points yet de bene esse it may more comfortably be received from one church then another as formerly was evinced the more pure spiritual and sound the churches are the more sound spiritual and edifying their Ministerial functions are the more loose unsound and corrupted the churches are the more corrupt and loose their Ministerial call will be Therefore the godliest churches and soundest in the faith are in the first place for missions Ministerial calls and offices to be sought and repaired unto But if any one should ask me what I thought then of the present Ministery of England as now constituted who as Presbyters ordain one another to their Ministerial offices who were first ordained themselves by the late Bishops and so holding their ordination from them as from true Presbyters I answer and I think it not meet but contrary to the simplicity of the Gospel to cloud my judgement in any thing If the English Presbyterie as the Helvetian and Genevan hath done to their perpetual glory had declared to the world that the Romish church was the antichristian whore and so publiquely renounced all ministerial calls as derived from her then I grant such ministery and Presbyters to be true Ministers and Presbyters as unto the essence and being thereof though collating of offices meerly as officers or Presbyters without the just assent and assistance of their churches is not so justifiable as hereafter I may have occasion to evince but if they maintained their calls from the Bishops to be good as by succession of Presbyters they have utterly nullified and undone their case and their call too in my judgment and my reason is for what was not good and justifiable in the fountain and first origen cannot be made justifiable by succession in the streams and branches a polluted fountain cannot send forth sweet wholsome streams causa causae causa causati If that Episcopacy was antichristian as most of them grant though both name and office are warrantable in a Gospel regulated sense from whom they had their first mission and calls how then comes their calls more warrantable then that of their first Authors and Founders If Bishops in their ministery were orthodox and sound how came they to supplant them and pull them down Christ's ministery is not for the work of desolating and dethroning Brethren in the same holy function but rather for consolidating and confirming therefore surely there was somwhat amiss all was not right or else they might have stood to this day Witness the National Covenant against Antichristian Prelacy c. But the truth is Episcopacy as it was then constituted in England was of the off spring and brood of Babylon they always held their call good as ministerial Bishops having their personal calls from such successively as first received it from the church of Rome and so could never be made good or justifiable in the succession neither will it suffice as some say to salve it that Christ had always a church of invisible Saints under antichrist because they must prove themselves then to succeed that very church or those very invisible Saints and not only that but that those very Saints were ministerial officers or Presbyters or else all will be in vain according to their own concessions for men may be Saints but not ministerially Saints sent or Presbyters who according to them hath the alone power of ordination and therefore in want of such true ministerial Presbyters in the succession of the Ministery must either unavoidably acknowledge according to their own principles their ministerial offices void and null or otherwise plainly concede that they have it derivatively from the church of Rome and what a sorry call that is if at least so to be called I have formerly evinced And it is a maxime in Law that quod initio vitiosum est non porest tractu temporis convalescere See more hereon Du Plessis Treat Of the Church p. 3624. and Bishop Jewel Defen Apolog. part 2. page 131. who are witnesses without exception manifesting the vanity of such a claim But I proceed to the next verse Verse 3. And hast born and hast patience and for my names sake hast laboured and hast not fainted Observe from this Observ That false Teachers and false Apostles are great persecuters of the faithful ones of Christ The church of Ephesus had suffered much from such false Teachers for Christ's sake and his truth The false Prophets of old were alwaies against the true ones and caused them often to be smitten and afflicted as Micaiah was jeared by Zedekiah Which way went the Spirit from me to thee 1 Kings 22. 2 4. and that not all but was smitten disgracefully on the check also Shemaiah stirred up the authority against Jeremiah the Lord's Prophet and would have cast him in the prison Ier. 29.24 Yea saith Ezekiel 22.25 There is a conspiracy of her Prophets in the midst thereof not only like Foxes but even like Lions ravening the prey These false Teachers have been always very pernicious to Gods true church What great persecuters Arrius and his followers were to Athanasius and the Orthodox They were the Priests and false Prophets of old that shed the blood of Christ and his Apostles though not by their own hands yet by incensing the authority to do it How willingly would Pilate release Christ if it were not for the out-cry of the Priests and their followers false prophets still exclaim and fastigate the Magistrate and tells them that they shall do God good service in
such helps Jo. 2.25 The Divel knows but some of our thoughts at some times but God knows all our thoughts and secretest immaginations of our hearts and that cotinually And this is the reason because he is the alone Judge of the world therefore he must know all secrets else how can he righteously reward every one according to his works Eccles 12.14 Rom. 2.6 Observ 2. God in his distributive justice deals with all persons according to the equity of their works He who is Justice in the abstract will give unto every one what is his God will give good things unto good men and evil things unto evil men And that the certain rule and measure of this discriminating judgment will be in the last day according to our works Object But will it not hence follow That we may merrit by our works Answ It is not here said that God will reward us for our works but according to our works and so in Rom. 2.6 Works do not merrit at the hand of God Rom. 4.2 then we should have whereof to glory but not before God 1. Because the best are imperfect in respect of the most perfect Law of God requiring perfection in every punctillio and circumstance thereof 2. Our works being in themselvs imperfect and finite cannot merit before an infinite perfection as God is 3. Works cannot merit because they are not our own primarily but of God's efficiency 4. Because men do them as their obliged duties unto God their Creator but God is debitor unto none 5. There is no proportion between works and the reward the one being finite the other infinite both in time and measure yet howsoever though good works cannot be an even rule of merit with God as they are with men yet they are a manifest rule or measure of equitie For it is very equitable that it go well or ill with us as we have done either good or evil and so every one shall be rewarded according to his works Object But evil-works merit eternal death as their proper hire and why not good works merit Heaven as his due reward and wages Answ True The wages of sin is death but the gift of God is eternal life The one is of our selves most perfect and therefore deserves its wages and reward but the other is a free gift of the grace of God in respect our best and most perfect works are imperfect in his sight Vers 24. But unto you I say and to the rest in Thyatira as many as have not this doctrine and which have not known the depths of Satan as they speak I will put upon you no other burden Vers 25. But that which ye have already hold fast till I come Though God is a God of Justice and Judgments against Jezabel her Adulteries and their children their false doctrines and practises yet as unto those of Thyatira that had not embraced those wicked ways God is a God of grace and mercy unto them for he tells them But unto you I say that is even to the rest of them that are at Thyatira so many of you as have not embraced this divelish doctrine and have not approved those depths of Satan as they speak that is those misteries those high and profound speculations which are no better then Satan's own devices and stratagems Hence Note Observ 1. That Satan will have his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his misteries his profound speculations in his false worship as well as God shall have in his true worship The Devil will be God's Ape and as God has his wisdom his depths his heights and misterious doctrines so the Divel will have his profound speculations for his Disciples also if God will have true Prophets and Prophetesses the Divel will have his Balaamites Nicolaitans and Jezabels and those shall have their misterious doctrines as the Gnosticks of old who did walk in the way of high speculations and notions hardly intelligible to any sober christian somewhat like the Necromantick conjurations of the old Romish Priests or the sublevated alegorizing Familists and Quakers of these days who when they think they speak with most understanding when they are least understood either by themselves or others I will put upon you no other burden but that which ye have already Burden in the Prophetical writings of the Old Testament is taken for the doctrine of God's Judgments against his enemies Isa 13.1.15.1.17.1.19.1 and in the Gospel it is taken for the doctrine of any person as in Mat. 23.4 it is said That the Pharisees laid burthens on other mens shoulders that they themselves would not touch with one finger that is their strict and severe doctrines and mandates to which they would have others bound unto but would keep themselves at large in Mat. 11.30 Christ's doctrine is called his yoke and his burden his yoak is easie and his burden light And this is that burden that Christ will lay on the Thyatirans and no more but this to wit Christ's true and Apostolique doctrine which they had formerly received from John and other of Christ's Embassadors Hence Note Observ The Churches of Christ are to receive no other burdens or doctrines then what they have already received from Christ Christ himself will add no further burden then his first doctrine of truth delivered by himself and his Apostles But by what authority do over-presumptuous men under pretence of Catholique and Apostolique Traditions add unto the christian Religion which is pure and simple many of their own vain superstitious ceremonies and inventions against which Christ hath declared both here and in Mar 7. and Luk. 11. and other places Surely one day it may be asked of them Who required these things at your hands To walk by God's manifest and plain commands is a sure path and leadeth unto eternal life but to make superstructures of our own or kindle sparks of our own fire and warm our selves thereat at least notwithstanding those we may ly down in sorrrow What burdens did the late Prelatical party lay on the consciences of the godly which they never had received from Christ or his Apostles and therefore they were truly burdens unto them and very grievous to bear but Christ's burden is easie and his yoke is sweet Mat. 11.30 Every thing of Christ is pleasant unto the enlightned soul though his yoke be heavy unto flesh and blood yet it is nothing irksom but rather sweet as hony to the regenerate and spiritual christian Observ 2. That true Christian Doctrine is a burden or yoke He that takes up a burden must go through with it and tugg under it and pass through all difficulties or else he may loose his reward It is not a burden or yoke taken up by our selves for of our selvs we would not willingly come under it it is tedious to flesh and blood and therefore Christ is said to put it on us he makes us first willing by his spirit of grace and then we are ready to yeild our
the conquering Saints 181 182 In whose power is it to remove false Teachers 196 VVhether the power of the Keys be singly in the Officers and Presbytery or joyntly in the Officers and Brethren together 198 How will it stand with the Justice of God to cut off innocent Infants with their Parents in his wrath and judgements that have never done good or evil 204 How comes Infants dying Infants to be saved that have not faith And whether the Parents faith is the condition of their salvation 205 c. Whether we may merit by our works 208 237. How are the Saints Co-partners with Christ in his Imperial Reign and Kingdom 212 Is it not in the power of Saints to recover themselves out of sin without going to Christ by faith 223 Whether true Saints may finally fall away from grace 223 241. Whether perfection may be had in this life 225 Whether Christ creates war and sends the sword into the world 233 Whether the Saints of God for their iniquities may be blotted out of the Book of Life 241 VVhether it be lawful to pray that God would blot out any name or person out of his Book of Life 242 Whether the Civil Magistrate hath authority over the Church 250 251 Whether Magistrates may not suppress errors being well advised by a Learned Assembly of Divines 851 Whether the Magistrate be not subordinate unto Christ as Mediator to make Laws for him to rule next and immediately under him in his Church 252 VVhen shall the Jews and Gentiles be gloriously united into one Church 261 VVhether Saints may be said to be saved in the hour of Temptation and yet suffer in it 262 VVhether the tryumphant State of the Church shall be here on earth or in the supernal Heavens 276 313 VVhether the Imperial Reigne of the Saints shall be after the general Resurrection or before 277 VVhether Christians may not be over-hot and Zealous in matters of Religion And whether a moderate temper would not be more advantagious therein then an over-furious one 285 VVhether we are to buy of Christ his Graces by way of contract or not 295 How is Christ said to love those whom he bitterly chastiseth 302 VVhether does Christ always use a spiritual force for the reclaiming of his back slidden people 304 VVhether Christs Kingdom and the Fathers be all one 310 Whether the Saints as Saints may justly expect by vertue of promise in the Word the Rule and Dominion under Christ on Earth at this present time 335 Whether the Saints in order to the obtaining of the Rule and Dominion may oppose the Supreme Magistracy they live under 335 337 VVhether Heathenish or Antichristian Magistrates may be opposed 338 339 VVhether the Saints Imperial Reign be far off or near at hâ—nd 341 342 VVhether it be not lawful for Saints to put to a helping hand in pulling down the Powers of the world that uphold Babylon and the VVhore thereof 346 347 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Or PRAECOGNITA THE REVELATION OF Iohn the Divine CHAP. I. VER I. The Revelation of Jesus Christ which God gave unto him to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass and he sent and signified it by his Angel unto his servant John THis Book hath for Title 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Revelation of John the Divine And here in the Entrance I shall take leave to insert some 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or preliminary discourses and questions which are necessary to be discussed before I enter upon the Exposition of the Body of this Book Quest 1. Whether this Book of the Revelation of John be of Divine Authority 2. Whether John who in the Title of this Book is named John the Divine the Author thereof be the same with John the Apostle and Evangelist the beloved Disciple of Christ or some other person 3. In the last place I shall give a compendious view and taste of the scope and designe of the whole Book 1. Concerning the Divine Authority of this Book I should say very little or nothing unto it well knowing how dangerous it is to move Foundation stones or to question the Authority of any of the Books of God received reverently in the Churches of Christ from age to age as the Canon and Rule of their Faith and Manners If it were not that the Adversary of old took advantage by this artifice to hinder the growth and cast prejudice on many of the Truths of God and to weaken the comforts of his Saints mainly cherished and supported by the Prophesies in this Book The occasion of the first doubting of the Divine Authority of this Book Hence rose in that it favoured the pretended Heresie of the Chyliasts or Millenaries and their adversaries endeavoured to father it rather on Cerinthus the Heretick then the Apostle John thereby if possibly they might not only enervate its Testimony but quite shut it out for ever out of the number of the Canonical Books of God that it might never do the Chyliasts any service more Vpon this ground Hyrome was the first that did most publiquely call its authority into question about the year of Christ 400. and that in pure opposition unto the Millenaries the followers of Justin Martyr Tertullian Ireneus Lactantius and others of good credit and authority in the Church of Christ in that judgement Secondly it became suspected as Erasmus witnesseth who in this particular and concerning other Divine Books also was very unstable in his own Judgment in that some of the ancient Greek primitive Christians did not receive the Revelations as of Divine Authority and this Hierome himself also testifies But on what slender grounds this came to pass I shall presently consider And though it is granted that some ancient Greek Christians did not receive it yet it was by others of the same age and of the far abler parts judgement and integrity numbred amongst the Books of God and acknowledged to have the publique stamp of his Spirit on it There was one Caius or Gaius as Eusebius witnesseth in the fourth book of his History who saith That this Book was written of one Cerinthus an Heretique who held among many other errors That after the resurrection of Christ his Kingdom should become earthly and sensual wherein the flesh should be satisfied again in all manner of concupiscences for the term of a compleat millenary of years Dionisius of Alexandria takes up this report from this Caius an obscure person and as is thought was one of the heretical Alogi who denied as Epiphanius testifies the Word of God and on the false report of this Caius Dionisius doubts of the Divine Authority of this Book But Hierome takes up the same slender ground from Dionisius and doth object it strongly But I answer it seems Hierome would admit of any slender testimony to the invalidating of the Authority of this Book because this book was the great Fortress of his adversaries the Chiliasts yet however though Hierome
and some others of suspected credit and of obscure note as Dorotheus Dionisius Eusebius Caius do oppugne it yet Epiphanius was so passionate friend to it that he reckons them among Heretiques that did reject it and Justin Martyr and Ireneus of sounder judgement and of singular piety did not only approve this book as canonical but wrote commentaries on it 2. Whatsoever that Caius was that fathers the Apocalyps on Cerinthus on whose report all his followers were misled yet the relation it self holds not any resemblance of truth for Ireneus Tertullian and Epiphanius who write very largely of the heresies of Cerinthus and his successors yet never mentions that he held this opinion of Chiliasme or the Kingdom of Christ on earth which they could not be ignorant of therefore this story of Caius concerning him and his Apocalyps is Apocryphal and a meer figment on purpose devised by the adversary to lessen the authority of this book see more at large hereof in D. Homes lib. 3. chap. 3. sect 3. Further if Cerinthus was the Author of this book doubtless he would have besprinkled it with some other of his errors that were peculiar to him as that of the creation of the world by Angels denying of the Divinity of Christ and affirming his generation to be only of the seed of Joseph and Mary as is testified by M. Baxter's book of Infidelity treating of the heresies of Cerinthus Carpocrates and their followers page 129. c. But in this book of the Revelation there is not one word to this purpose but rather the contrary strongly confirmed in many places thereof as the subsequent discourse thereon will manifest And lastly If it were granted that Cerinthus held and expected a riotous and luxuriant Millenary which is now disproved yet this of the Apocalyps hath not the least intimation thereof but of a Millenary of rest and joy in a higher and more spiritual key then ever the Church enjoyed on earth heretofore there is great difference between an earthly sensual reigne and to reigne on earth Saints may be on earth and yet be most spiritual so they may have a Kingdom here on earth and yet a most spiritualized and heavenly one which is fully confirmed in the 21 and 22 chapters of this book And so I have answered the first ground of suspecting the divine authority of this Apocalyps Secondly Hierome the great Antagonist of this book writeth that many learned men spake very sharply against this book and the whole matter thereof as not becoming the gravity of an Apostle being only a common history of things shaddowed under dark figures and hard kind of speeches I answer Rather it becomes and savours the excellency and authority of an Apostle being directed to the then seven famous Churches of lesser Asia carrying in it all along the spirit of Prophesie and the very steps sentences and figures of the old Prophets being full of pregnant testimonies of the Divinity of Christ and of this perfecting of the work of our Redemption and Salvation by his continual Intercession and providential acts of gubernation of his Church to the end of the world I confess the book in the figures and expressions thereof is dark and mysterious but that is not strange in prophetical writings as in Daniel Ezekiel c. It seemed good to God to set us on diligence to enquire into the dealings of God with his Church and people and not to over-slip the judgements of Gods providence which are reserved in God's infinite wisdom unto their appointed times of discovery that from generation to generation his people and Church may be comforted and supported unto the end of all Thirdly Dionisius aforesaid Bishop of Alexandria reasons very slightly against the divine authority of this book when he saith That it doth not suit with the gravity of an Apostle to cast up so oft his own name since in his Gospel he never nameth himself but only pointeth it out by some modest marks as these The Disciple whom Jesus loved But here in this Book in his Visions and Conferences with the Angel he hath never done with these kind of words I John This reason moved Dionisius to think that this book was rather set out by some other in his name then by himself I answer This opposition is but weak for he that writes a History or matters of Doctrine as the Gospel is mixed of both he need not often insert his own name for the truth of that depends on its present verity and other apparent circumstances witnessed unto by the spirit of God in miracles and its operations on the hearts of Believers But it is far otherwise with the Writers of Prophesie for that receives authority by the Author who is known to be a Prophet for in every Prophesie that foretelleth things to come we must enquire first who revealed it and then to whom it was revealed that the person being known to be a Prophet and to have divine Revelations we may give credit to it for otherwise who would give credence or faith to any of the Prophetical predictions or books of the Prophets before they saw them accomplished and fulfilled As to instance in the Prophet Jeremiah who maketh mention of his name at least a hundred times and the Prophet Isaiah how oft doth he repeat these words Isaiah the son of Amos And in Daniel's Prophesie we shall find his name more then threescore times repeated yea ye shall find I Daniel about nine times from the seventh to the tenth chapter and Paul when his Apostleship was called in question by some false Brethren and to shew the excellency of his Ministry how often shall you read I Paul an Apostle not of men nor by men but of Jesus Christ And why should it be accounted strange when John mentions not his name above five times in this whole book and with that modesty that none might doubt of the truth of this Prophesie Having wiped off the objections that have cast jealousies and suspicions on these divine Revelations I shall in the next place endeavour to clear the divine authority thereof and add some testimonies for that end and I doubt not but that being cleared there is no true christians but will receive this Book of Prophesies but as the Oracles of God The testimonies are of two sorts either from without or secondly within the said book Those from without are the general consent of the churches of Christ in all ages excepting in the heat of contest amongst some violent persons to the receiving of them into the Canon The Councels of Laodicea the third Councel of Carthage and the Councel of Toletan 5. cap. 16. decreed it to be received as holy and divine Scriptures Secondly it was so received by most of the ancient Orthodox Fathers as Justin Martyr Tertullian Cyril Epiphanius Lactantius Ireneus Augustine and many others and so this book is often quoted by them as of divine authority in their writings I shall