Canon containing a rehearsal of the bookes of holy Canonicke Scripture it declareth the book to be supposititious wherein the 3. bookes of Maccabees are comprehended as bookes of the old Testament And againe among the bookes of the new Testament 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 note the preeminent dignitie it reckoneth the two epistles of CLEMENT and his precepts giuen to Bishops comprehended into 8. bookes which were not to be published to all men in respect they contained some secret mysteries Canon Apost cap. 84. Is then the epistles of CLEMENT the 8. bookes of his precepts written to Bishops the actes of the Apostles written by him Canonicke Scripture books of the new Testament equall to the writings of the Apostles yet dited for the most part as secret mysteries to Bâ—…shops to be concealed and hid from the people when as the Apostle PAVL by the contrarie writing to TIMOTHIE and TITVS writeth vnto them wholsome precepts to be communicat to the people And the Apostle IOHN writeth to the Angels of the seuen Churches of Asia nothing but wholesome precepts to be imparted and communicat to the 7. Churches Apoc. 2. 3. such a candle that shall be hid vnder a bushel and not set vpon a candlesticke to giue light vnto the houshold of God I dare not imagine that either the holy Apostles or yet CLEMENT one of the Apostles faithfull successours did euer light such a candle The allowance which these Canons of the Apostles got in the sixt generall Councill Anno 681. whereof GREGORIVS HOLOANDER the conuerter of them out of Greeke into Latin glorieth so much was vpon an occasion whereof the Romaine Church hath cause to blush and to be ashamed rather then to glorie much First because in that generall Councill HONORIVS 1. sometime Bishop of Rome was condemned of heresie Secondly because in that Council the Bishop of Constantinople was ordained to be in equall authoritie with the Bishop of Rome And thirdly because the constitutions of the Latin Church forbidding men who were in ecclesiasticall offices to marie these constitutions I say were vtterly disallowed and the 5. chapter of the Canons of the Apostles gote better allowance because in it it was statute and ordained that the Bishop Elder or Deacon who repudiateth his own wife vnder pretence of religion shall be excommunicat and if he continue so doing he should be deposed Now this generall Councill making in so many principall points against them and onely gracing the supposititious booke of the Canons of the Apostles of purpose to disgrace the constitutions of the Romaine Church if HOLOANDER had remembred what he had bene doing he had bene more sparing in alledging the authoritie therof The shortnes of the treatise wil not permit me to make plaine to the reader how the Council gathered by CONSTANTINVS POGONATVS and the fathers of that same Councill gathered againe by IVSTINIAVNS 2. to perfite the worke they had immediatly afore begun both constitute but one generall Councill Alwayes if any thing seeme to be made vp against vs by the alledgance of a testimonie out of the booke of the Canons of the Apostles remember in what time this testimonie is alledged namely in the 68 1 yeere of our Lord. If IVSTINVS MARTYR or IRENEVS or any ancient father neere vnto the Apostles dayes had cited a testimonie out of this supposititious booke it had bene more likly that the Apostles had giuen command to CLEMENT Bishop of Rome to write that booke As touching the third maske of antiquitie to wit the decretall epistles in the first Tome of Councils and the distinctions of GRATIAN falsly ascribed to the ancient Bishops of Rome I hope in the mercy of God to remember a few of them specially in the 3. Centurie but not to the honour of impudent and vnlearned fellowes who haue forged these decretall epistles as if the world in all ages could produce no broods of better spirits then the asses compositours of these decretall epistles As concerning the accurate speculations of DIONYSIVS AREOPAGITA who was neuer rauished vp vnto the third heauen as PAVL was neither sawe things that were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is things that cannot be spoken and which are not possible for any man to vtter as PAVL did 2. Cor. 12. ver 4. I say of him onely two things First if he had beene so ancient a writer as Papistes speake and the disciple whom PAVL conuerted by his preaching in Mars street Acts 17 then ancient writers had made mention of him such as IVSTINVS IRENEVS and CYPRIAN and such others but of his writings no mention is made in the greatest antiquitie Secondly I say with that reuerent Doctour of our own nation Mr THOMAS SMETON that the books giuen out vnder the name of old DIONYSIVS AREOPAGITA sunt prorsus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they are altogether fecklesse impertinent frivolous books Of Heresie EPIPHANIVS Bishop of Cyprus when hee writeth against Heretiques he intituleth his booke Panarium that is a medicinable boxe or shrine whereinto are contained sauing medicaments against the venome oflying doctrine albeit heresie be a poysonable and hurtfull thing yet treatises of heresie haue bene compiled not to hurt any man but to giue warning to eschewe the pernicious snares of the deuil Like as learned men who haue written of the nature of herbes haue not onely written of such herbes as are meete for food and of such as haue a medicinable vertue to cure diseases but of those also that are venemous and poysonable to the end that men beeing warned of the perill that is in eating of them they may escape danger and be kept in safetie In all ages wicked men haue bene like vnto IVDAS when hee entred into the garden of Gethsemane where Christ was praying and sweating bloodie teares for the saluation of mankinde he stepped in into the garden only of purpose to betray his master so doe wicked men in our daies read the holy Scriptures diligently walking as it were in the middes of the garden of God but onely of intention to betray Christ Iesus and to gainsay his euerlasting trueth On the other side it becommeth vs well when we are driuen either by necessity or by some honest occasioÌ„ to be in places where Satan hath set vp his throne to be walking as it were through the garden that Satan hath planted then let vs mark diligently the abominatioÌ„s of the deuill the multitude of serpents and vipers that are lurking there and giue warning to poore soules who are intangled with error to leaue that habitation of Dragons to come forth out of that comfortlesse den to the end their soules may be refreshed with the delectable flowres of the garden of God I hope in the mercy of God so to speake of heresy as I shal moue no man to be an Heretique And as concerning the rayling words of the aduersaries of the truth who haue with opeÌ„ mouth proclaimed vnto the world that we are Heretiques
made how Paul and Silas visiting the Churches where Paul and Barnabas had preached before they deliuered them the Decrees to keepe ordained of the Apostles and Elders which were at Hierusalem Heere mention is made of the Decrees of a most worthie Councill but heerewith remember two thinges First the Decrees of such a Councill whereinto many Apostles were present who were taught in all trueth by the Holie Spirit according to the prediction of CHRIST Secondly Paul and Silas were not now planting Churches in Asia the lesse but they were waâ—…ing and visiting the Churches already planted and no man denieth but the authoritie of good Councils is profitable to confirme men in the trueth of GOD. But it is the doctrine of the Holy Scripture of GOD that begetteth Faith in the soules of men Therefore let the Holy Scriptures of GOD haue the first and principall honour and no man will be offended that good Councils be regarded in their owne ranke In the next head let vs speake of the abuses of Councils they are manifold But the first and principall abuse of Councils I thinke to bee this when the very end wherefore they were wont to bee gathered is inuerted Of old Councils were gathered to suppresse Heresies and Schismes But when they are gathered to maintaine Hereticall doctrine or to strengthen the handes of Schismatiques directly or indirectly this is a great abuse of Councils Like as the Councill of Ariminum was assembled for confirmation of the Arrian Heresie the second Councill of Ephesus gaue allowance to the errour of Eutyches The Councils of Tyrus Millan indirectly in labouring to suppresse Athanasius were in verie deede supplanting the true Faith which Athanasius professed There is infinite difference betwixt Nimrod and Nehemiah and betwixt Babel and Hierusalem In the re-edifying of Hierusalem there was a purpose to glorifie GOD but in building Babell there was a farre contrarie intention Secondly Councils are abused when they take libertie to statute and ordaine any thing repugnant to the Holy Scriptures of GOD whether it be in forbidding to doe that thing which the Scripture licentiateth to bee done or in allowing thinges disallowed in Holy Scripture This abuse began very early euen in the famous Councill of Nice wherein they forbid men who are conuerted to Christian Religion and are baptized in the Name of CHRIST to returne againe to the warre-fare as if these two thinges were repugnant to be a warriour and a Christian Did not Dauid Iosaphat and Iosias fight the battels of the LORD and in so doing they made not defection from the Couenant of GOD. Was not Cornelius both a Centurion and a Christian And Iohn Baptist when hee was demanded of the Souldiours what they should doe did hee command them to forsake their calling and not rather to use it aright that is to doe violence to no man neither accuse any falsly and to bee content with their wages And was it lawfull to militate vnder the banner of Augustus and Tiberius And shall it be found vnlawfull to fight vnder the banner of Constantine a most Christian Emperour In my judgement this was too much libertie that the Councill of Nice tooke vnto themselues to disallowe anie calling that in Holy Scripture is not disallowed except onelie the abuse of it And of olde the Iewes made no Conscience to fight vnder the banner of Alexander the Great whome hee honoured also with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is with equall honour and freedome of Burgeship with the Graecians in the principall towne of Aegypt called Alexandria builded by himselfe But this constitution of the Councill of Nice might bee excused because all thinges that are lawfull are not also expedient possibly they haue seene at that time great danger to Christian mens saluation in warre-fare vnknowne to vs and therefore they tooke boldnesse to forbid Christians to goe to warrefare But manie other Councils both Nationall and called by the Romane Church generall haue allowed thinges expressely forbiddâ—…n in the written word of GOD such as adoration of Images and the sapramacie of the Bishop of Rome not only ouer all Pastors but also a souereignitie in ciuill thinges ouer the Emperour and Princes of the earth which is an vnsufferable disorder to make the taile the head the head the taile In particular I speake of the Councils holden at Rome by Gregorius the seconde and Gregorius the thirde and Stephanus the thirde and the seconde Councill of Nice holden in the seuenth yeere of the Empresse Irene with the consent and procuration of Adrian Bishop of Rome ANNO 790. The vnhappie Generall Councill of Vienne assâ—…mbled by Clemens the fift ANNO 1311. whereinto it is statuted and ordained that the Emperour shall giue his oath of alleadgeance to the Pope to whom hee is no lesse inferiour then the Moone is infinitely inferiour vnto the splendor of the Sun Can any thing bee spoken more repugnant to the seconde precept of the first Table and the first precept of the seconde Table then the Decretes of the Councils foresaid Therefore let euerie Christian man thinke of Councils as they thinke of Riuers of water which are verie profitable so long as they hold themselues within the compasse of their owne accustomed bankes but if they swell and by vntimous inundation ouer-flowe their owne accustomed boundes then are they verie hurtfull to the neere adjacent fieldes Enen so Councils that take libertie to allowe any thing disallowed in Holie Scripture are very pernicius and hurtfull Thirdly Councils are miserably abused when they are blamed vnjustly and without a cause The Arrians moste vnjustly blamed the Councill of Nice for the worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because this word is not found in Scripture Neuerthelesse the matter it selfe expressed by this word is manifestly coÌ„tained in Scripture as namely when the Apostie Iohn saith There are three which bearâ—… recorde in Heauen the FATHER the WORD and the Holie GHOST and these three are one but the Arrians who blamed the Coun. most wrongfully said there was a time wherein the Sonne was not existant and that Deuilish opinion neither in word nor in matter is to bee found in Scripture Moreouer Councils are abused when as their authoritie is impared not with solide reasons taken out of the Scripâ—…ures of GOD but rather with the railing speaches of contentious men like as a number of Heretiques called Acephali with tumultuarie murmuring and crying out against the Councill of Chalcedon dispersed themselues heere and there and left not off their vngodly courses vntill a new Heresie of the Monothelites an vngracious budde of the rotten and cutted-downe stocke of the Heresie of Eutyches did arise But no man aught to contende against Councils with pride of a contentious minde but rather with humilitie of a modest minde search out whether their Ordinances bee agreeable to the booke of GOD or not Finally Councils are abused when they who are assembled together
was baptized Vlpianus an enemie to Christians Mammea the Emperors mother is instructed by Origen in the faith Turinus killed with smoke Origen wrote a booke de martyrio The malice of Satan against true ' Pastors Origen got not the honor of martyrdome Difference betwixt holy scripture and other bookes The 7. persecution ANN. Ch. 250. Alexander Babylas both dicd in prison Origen at Jerusalem closeth the booke and wepeth The teeth of the holy martyre Apollonia The veritie hath no neede to be vnderpropped with lies Maried Bishops The rigour of Novatus The 8. persecution ANN. Ch. 259. The martyrdome of Cyprian Theotecnus B of Caesarea incourageth Marinus Christians full of pitis The historie of Eusebius concerning the two bâ—…asen images in Caesarea Philipi The 9tpersecution ANN. Ch. 278 Aurelian with ctutle authoritie assisteth the Church against Samosatenus Temples 〈◊〉 built by Châ—…stians after the death of Valerian The 10 persecution ANN. Ch. 308. John a noble man borne rent in pieces the Emperours proclamation The martyrdome of Peter Dorotheus and Gorgonius Horrible crueltie against Christian women A towne in Phrygiaset on fire and al the inhâ—…bitants buâ—…nt with fire Mauritius with a whole legion of Christian souldiers martyred Diocletian and Maximian giue ouer their imperiall function Constantius tried his captames whether they wâ—…re Christians or not Edicts against Christians ingraued in brasse A sudden change of the prosperitie of Pagans into aduâ—…suie Maximinus was ouercome in battel by Licinius Sophronia chused rather to kilâ—…her selfe then to be abused by Maxentius Constantine seeth the similitud of a bright crosse inheauen Maxentius ouer come in battell by Constantine Three cruell edicts of Licinius against Christians Fortie martyrs tormented first with cold and next wâ—…th heate Bishops of Rome Zephyrinus Callistus Vrbanus Pontianus Anterus Fabianus Cornelius A council at Rome against Novatus Lucius Stephanus Xistus 2 Dionysius Felix 1. Eutychianus Caius Marcellinus Marcellus Eusebius Of other preachers doctours Tertullian Origen Cyprian Bishops of Alexandria Bishops of Antiochia Artotyritae Alogi Adamiani Theodotiani Mâ—…deciani Bardesianistae Ualesii Apostolici Origeniani Artemon Helcesaitae Sabelliani Nepotiani Samosatenus Manes Manichei Hieracitae Purgatorie and worshipping of reliques errors borrowed froÌ„ Pagans Foolish borrowing Foolish following Error growing worse worse The error of Purgatorie fire misliked by Augustine but not fully impugned Simil. Many handmaids of Purgatorie An exhortation to detest the originall of Purgatorie Simil. Simil. Preposterous feare credulity of people â—…pholde people An exhortation to corrigible Papists The vse of temporall paines Fault and punishment there of both abolished in Christ. Plaeces of the old Testament abused for stablishing of Purgatorie Places of the new Testament abused A place out of the booke of the Maccabees for câ—…nsi mation of sacrifice for the dead and consequently of Purgaterie Simil. By the praiers made for the dead of old Purgatorie cannot be sufficiently confirmed The place of Augustine serm 32. de verbis Aposloli examined The place of Chrysostom homil 3 in epist. ad Phillip examined Fables of Damascene forstablishing of Purgatory True Christians leane vpon the purging blood of Christ. The corruption of mans nature Simil. The great slight of Satan Another craft of Satan The third craft of Satan We reade of graues opened for dishonouring but not for honouring of bones No example in the nâ—…w Testament of raâ—…sing bones out of the graue to be worshipped The fathers neerest to the Apostles dayes freest of superstition Buriall of Christians hindered to quench the hope of resurrection What time transporting ' of the bones of the Saints began and how long this custome continued without adoration An answeâ—… to an objection Answere to another objection An answere to the thirde objeâ—…tion No testimonie in scripture to proâ—…e the Worshipping ofreliques The sheep-heards staffe of Moses The cloake of Elias The Church of the lewes might haue had moe reliques then the Romane Church Worshipping of reliques after the 592. yeere of our Lord. Object The first answere The second answere The third answere The fourth answere False reliques Simil. Great busines to destroy Christ after he was borne as great businesse to aduance the Antichrist Christ instituted none of the Apostles to be supreme heade ouer the rest The decretal epistles attributed to the Bishops of Rome of old are forged false 1. 2. 3 4 5. 6. The first step Simil. The second step Gratianus exception froÌ„ the councill of Carthage is foolish The third step The fourth steppe The fist step The sixt step The sâ—…uinth steppe Simil. The eighâ—… steppe Acomparison between Christ and the Antichrist The first Tragedie The second Tragedie Simil. The third Tragedte 1. Chr. 14. verse 11. Iudg. 6. verse 16. Gene. 37. verse 34. Gen. 50. verse 1. Epistle Iude verse 11. Isai. 27. verse 1. Similitude â—…seb de vita 〈◊〉 lib. 2. Sozom. lib. 2. Cap. 14. Idem lib. 2. cap. 8. 9. 10. 13. Sozom. lib. 2. cap. 15. Ruffin lib. 1. cap. 9. Theodor. lib. 1 cap. 22. Sozom. lib. 2. cap. 24. Ruffin lib. 1. cap. 10. Socrat lib. 1. cap. 20. Theodor. lib. 1. cap. 23. Sozom. lib. 2. cap. 6. Euseb. de vita Constant. lib. 4. Theod. lib. 5. cap. 20. Socrat. lib. 1. cap. 1. Idem lib. 3. cap. 11. lib. 3. cap. 18 Ruffin lib. 2. cap. 30. Socrat. lib. 1. cap. 18. Sozom. lib. 1. cap. 8. Genes 18. Sozom. lib. 2. cap. 4. Sozom lib. 2 cap. 2. Socrat. lib. 1. cap. 18. Socrat. lib. 5. cap. 8. Socrat. lib. 1. cap. 6. Functii Chronolog Iohn 3. Euseb. do vita Constant. lib. 4. Ruffin lib. 1. cap. 19. Socrat. lib. 2. cap. 46. Idem lib. 2. cap. 5. Socrat. lib. 2. cap. 32. Ruffin lib. 1. cap. 11. Theâ—… li. 2 cap. 3. Theoder li. 2 cap. 3. Thâ—…d ibid. Theod. lib. 2 cap. 13. Theodoret. ibid. Prouer. 10 verse 9. Sâ—…crat lib. 2 cap. 27. Socrat. lib. 2. cap. 32. Socrat. lib. 2. cap. 33. Theod. lib. 2. cap. 32. Socrat. lib. 3. cap. 21. Socrat. lib 3. cap. 1. Socrat. ibid. Socrat. ibid. Theod. lib. 3. cap. 4. Sozom. lib. 5. cap. 4. Theod. lib. 〈◊〉 cap. 8. Socra lib. 13 14. Sozom. lib. 5 cap. 15. Matth. 5. Theod. lib. 3. cap. 16. Sozom. lib. 5. cap. 17. Titus 1. verse 15. 1. Cor. 10. verse 25. Theod. lib. 3 cap. 15. Ruffin lib. 2. cap. 28. Theodor. li 3 cap. 6. Theodor. li. 3 cap. 7. Theod. ibid. Socrat. lib. 3. cap. 2. Socrat. lib. 3. cap. 15. Ruffiin lib. 2 cap. 33. Sozom. lib. 5 cap. 4. Thâ—…odor lib. 〈◊〉 cap. 9 10 Socrat. lib. 3. cap. 18. 19. Theodoret. ibid. Ruffin lib. 1. cap. 37. 38. 39. Socrat. lib. 3. cap. 20. Theod lib. 3. cap. 20. Sozom. lib. 5 cap. 22. Socrat. lib. 3. cap. 21. Sozom. lib. 6 cap. 1. 2. Ruffin lib. 2. cap. 1. Socrat. lib. 3. cap. 21. 22. Theod. lib. 4 cap. 2. 3. Theod. lib. 4. cap. 4. Sozom. lib. 6. cap. 6. Socrat. lib. 4. cap. 31. Ruffin lib.
authoritie to forbid to eate meates that are created by God to the vse of men they vsurpe authoritie ouer the conscience of men binding where God hath loosed loosing where God hath bound and mixing heauen and earth through other as if men on earth should haue such absolute soueraignitie ouer the conscience euen as the God ofheauen hath This is called an apostasie from the faith not because all defection is finished in this but because all defection is grounded in this one point to set a mortal man in the chaire of God to attribut vnto him such absolut souerainitie ouer ourcoÌ„science as God had ouer the conscience of ADAM Gen. 3. as miserable experience hath clearely manifested in the Popedom Doth not the Apostle PAVL craue that the seruice that we offer to God should be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a reasonable seruice Rom. 12. ver 1 But when we are led away either with the conceits of our owne hearts or yet when we cast off the yocke of God and stoupe downe the necke of our conscience vnder the lawes of mortall men in matters of religion what equitie of reason is kept in such doing to match and equall our selues or others to God Moreouer the A post PAVL foretelleth that these backsliders froÌ„ the faith should speake lies in hypocrisie hauing their conscience seared with an hot yron 1. Tim. 4 ver 2. These words cannot be properly applyed to the old Heretiques of whoÌ„ we haue spoken who ascribed the institution of matrimonie to Satan the creatioÌ„ procreatioÌ„ of mankindvnto the deuil because they spak not falshood in hypocrisy but in opeÌ„ blasphemy therfore they might haue bene easily discerned auoided yea in other heades of their doctrine concerning the natiuitie and death of Christ they were so blasphemous that in the worde putativé natus mamfestatus mortuus they were the very aduocats of the deuill lren lib 3. advérsus Valent. cap. 20. 39. But in the Popish church the lawes forbidding mariage to some men and meates at sometimes are so coloured with appearance of holynes that the forgers of such lawes in hypocrisie had neede to be pointed out by the finger of God in his worde to the ende that no maske nor visard put vpon vngodlinesse should peruert the vnderstanding of men But the more subtle hypocrisie that should be vsed the more vigilant and wakrife should the Lordes forewarned people be that they were not deceiued by lies spoken in hypocrisie Likewise the Apostle foretelleth that these deceiuers should haue their ' consuence seared or cut off with an hote yron In which wordes the Apostle alludeth to members of a body first feastered next senslesse and thirdly cut off with an hot yrone So are the conscience of those deceiuers fâ—…st cankered with errour next past feeling albeit wholesome admonitions be vsed for reclaiming them from errour last of all their conscience is a rotten thing and vtterly cut off Wherein it is to be marked that feeling of all senses is most necessarie a most vnseparable companion of the life begunne when the sensitiue life beginneth and ending when it endeth so that to be past feeling is all one as to be vtterly dead in body or conscience But let vs see to whom this can be justly applyed If we call to mind the obstinacie of the old Heretiques true it is that they were sensâ—…sse men of whom IRENEVS justly said that they counted themselues not ouercome by the power of the trueth so long as they adhered fast vnto their errour As if an impudent fellow who wrestleth and is ouerthrowne and is lying on his backe on the ground yet hee would denie that he is ouerthrowne because hee sticketh fast by the grip of his aduersaries garments Iren. lib. 5. adversus Valent. But apply this to the Papists of our dayes and we shall finde them tenfold more senslesse obstinat then the old Heretiques were for they haue found out meanes to harden their harts in error that when they are a thousand times conuicted by the clear shining light of the Gospell then the authoritie of their Church and opinion that it cannot erre doth locke them vp so fast in the bands of the deuill that all the trauell taken vpon them is spent in vaine they remaine senslesse hauing their conscience seared with the hote yron of Satan as the Apostle speaketh In particular the Apostle pointeth out two heades of doctrine that deceiuing teachers should maintaine to wit they should forbid mariage and they should command to abstaine from meates Marke these two words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is forbidding and commanding The word commanding is not in the Greeke text but EPIPHANIVS thinketh this ellipsis must be supplyed by the worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is commanding to abstaine from meates both these wordes are imperious and pointing out men in authoritie and practising their soueraignitie in all things wherinto the eminent power of a Soueraigne is manifested hee biddeth forbiddeth hee maketh lawes and constitutions the disobedience whereof bringeth the contraueeners vnder feare of great punishment euen so the deceiuers of whom the Apostle speaketh in matters of mariage meats should not be content to tell their opinion to allure by persuasiue reasons others to embrace their opinion but being mounted vp in high authoritie they should command to abstaine from meates and they should enterdite mariage to some persons with authoritie adding paines to the commandement that the contraueeners should be deposed from their office they should be counted Heretiques they should be condemned to hell beside all other ciuill punishments which magistrates addicted to their authoritie could inflict These wordes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is forbidding and bidding cannot be applyed to Gnostici Encratitae nor yet to the Manicheans of the next Centurie because they had no soueraignitie nor power to command Yea MANES himselfe was excoriat and put to death by the king of Persia as SOCRATES writeth lib. 1. cap. 22. and that for a light cause by reason hee could not cure his diseased sonne But the words of the Apostle clearely declareth that hee speaketh of men furnished with authoritie to bid abstaine from meates and to forbid mariage and this agreeth well with the Romaine Antichrist and his vsurped authoritie Notwithstanding of all these lawes made in the Romaine church and straite prohibition of mariage to the clergie we ought to follow the example of Christs disciples who after that they knew that celestiall voice that sounded from heauen in time of Christs Baptisme This is my welbeloued Sonne in whwÌ„ I am wel pleased heare him Mat. 3. They closed their eares and locked vp their hearts from hearkning to any voyce in the earth that spake the contrarie some said that he was ELI AS other said that hee was IEREMIAS or some of the olde Prophets but the disciples hearkning to the voyce that came downe from heauen said that he was
sinne to eate flesh that wine was the gall of the Prince of darkenesse that mariage was an euill thing and a meane to bring in captiuitie a parte of the substance of the good God namely the soule within the bands of the substance of the prince of darkenesse that is within the body hath the Spirit of God I say foretolde nothing of these vile heresies in this prediction I answere That the Spirit hath both foretolde the hypocrisie of some and the open blasphemie of others And this is insinuated in these wordes For eue◅y creature of God is good and nothing to be refused if it be receiued with tha◅kesgiuing Truely in these words the Apostle would turne our harts both from blaspheming Manicheis and from hypocrite Papists The Manicheis say that it is neuer lawfull to eate flesh and that the doing of it aduanceth the kingdome of the prince of darknesse The Papists againe say that the eating of flesh on Eryday is a grieuous sinne but what saith the Apostle guided by the Spirit Euery creature is good and nothing to be refused so that both the Manicheis speake blasphemously and the Papistes hypocritically both willing to abridge Christian libertie the Manicheis by their opinion the Papistes both by their opinion and authoritie The Manicheis will needes haue some creatures of God vncleane at all times the Papists wil needes haue men polluted by eating of flesh at sometimes both these opinions are cut off in this word Euery creature of God is good Marke that in this diuersitie of opinions of Manicheis and Papists both of them shoot at one marke to wit that Christ Iesus shall not be the onely Lawgiuer in his Church but something shall be abridged of that libertie that Christ hath giuen to his Church Now the aiming and shooting at one marke is more forcible to proue the vnitie of Manicheis and Papistes then the diuersitie of opinions whereby either of them laboureth to attaine to their intended purpose can proue their diuersitie and therefore let the reader the lesse offend with this fellowship of Manicheis and Papists These two diuerse opinions shooting at one marke as said is are both to bee damned but chiefly that opinion that with greatest subtiltie and craft would thrust God out of his chaire and spoile him of his glory not to bee counted the only Lawgiuer in his Church And I do confidently compare Manicheis and Papistes as AVGVSTINE compare◅h APOLLO and HECATE lib. 19. de civit Det cap. 23. disapproouing both of them because both shot at one marke to hinder people from Christianitie but HECATE more then APOLLO because in praising of Christ as a just man whom APOLLO dispraised as an vnrighteous man justly cōdemned to death by the Iewes yet she called him onely a man not God hindering people after a more subtle maner from adhering to Christianitie then APOLLO did And truly the Manich is by damning flesh at all times as a creature in it selfe vncleane did not so great hurt to the Kingdome of God as the Papists who grant that both flesh and wine are the good creatures of God and yet they dare be bold to set out lawes commanding men vnder the paine of cursing and condemnation that they taste not flesh at some times If these times were times of a publicke calamitie whereinto God by a secret voyce latent in the trouble did cali vs to fasting mourning abstinence frō fish flesh wine Isa. 22. ver 13. then no new or vncouth yocke should be presented 10 mens consciences but Christs owne yocke which we are commanded to beare Mat. 11-but to appoint certaine daies of fasting and abstinence from this meate and not from anothe◅ meace is a noueltie vnder the Gospell and not the yocke of Christ but of the Antichrist Whereas mention is made of thankesgiuing the Apostle will not haue vs to set our hearts vpon the creature vpon the gift but vpon the Creator the giuer Whatsoeuer delite we haue in the creature there is infinitly greater delite in the face of the reconciled Creator and therefore lift vp our harts let our tongues be loosed to praise his blessed name from whose hands we haue receiued the vse of his creatures This if wee doe we haue both the gift the giuer and the presence of the giuer shall not onely sanctifie the gift to our vse but also shall turne our water into wine Iohn 2. when as by the contrarie if wee deuoure and glut vp the benefites of God without thanksgiuing we haue the gift without the fauour of the giuer eating of Gods creatures as the carnall I◅wes eated Quailes in the wildernesse Numb 11. ver 33. and the wrath of God was kindled against them and assuredly those who haue the gift without the giuer some day their wine shall be turned into water But there is not great controuersie in this point and therefore I passe it ouer in fewer words In end the Apostle leadeth vs vnto a sure ground that may quiet our consciences so that we shall not be troubled with the commandements of men for bidding vs to eat of meats which God hath created for our vse namely this thatGod hath sanctified his creatures to vs by his word Gen. 9. ver 3. And incase we joyne with this sanctification of them prayers proceeding from faith that we also may be sanctified receiueGods creatures with a good conscience there is not great peril whether we eat this or that meat moderatly Here marke that the Apost in the very matter of meat drinke corruptible food will haue vs to depend vponGods word to think that we haue not liberty to put one morsel of meat in our mouthes but so farre as God giueth vs allowance in his word how much more in matters pertaining vnto eternall life we are to depend absolutely vpon the vndoubted assurance of Gods written worde In all this discourse it may seeme that we loose the raines to licentious liuing to eating drinking marying and liuing wantonly as the original worlde did when they were drouned with waters but it is not so indeed Only in maters of religion we would haue the yocke of the cōmandements of men taken off mens cōsciences to the end that the yock of Gods commandements only may ly vpon the conscience according as Christ speaketh Take vp my yock vpon you Mat. 11. ver 29. Yea in the very mater of meats mariage there is a time wherinto God calleth vs to mourning lamentation baldnesse and sackcloth Isa. 22. ver 12. and to abstinence from eating of flesh and drinking of wine Yea the very bridegrome must come out of his chalmer fast and lay aside his costly apparell to the end hee may mourne with the humbled societie of Gods people loel 2. ver 16. And this commeth to passe whensoeuer the heauie hande of God is laide vpon a familie vpon a towne or vpon a countrie in the
to them was committed the gouernement of Prouinces and nations as clearely appeared in the preferment of DOROTHEVS and GORGONIVS Thirdly they had libertie to builde oratories and temples large and ample in euery citie Euseb eccl hist. lib. 8. cap. 1. All this came to passe in the fourtie yeeres peace that interueened betweene the reigning of VALERIAN and the nineteenth yeere of the reigne of DIOCLETIAN Yet the Church of Christ in this shorte time beganne to be feastered with the corrupt maners of carnall and fleshly people so that contentions abounded but charitie waxed cold in the Church of God Euseb. ibid. What wonder was it then that the Lorde permitted this tenth and most horrible persecution of DIOCLETIAN to stirre and to waken drowsie Christians who were beginning to be fashioned'according to the likenesse of the world In the 19. yeere of his imperiall authoritie and in the month of March this horrible periccution beganne to arise DIOCLETIAN in the East and MAXIMIANVS in the West bending all their forces to root out the profession of Christians out of the world DIOCLETIAN was puft vp in pride for his manifolde victories and triumphes and would bee counted a God adorned his shoes with gold precious stones commanded the people to kisse his feet This persecution continued 10 yeeres euen vntill the seuenth yeere of the reigne of CONSTANTINE the great So that whatsoeuer crueltie was practised by MAXIMIANVS MAXIMINVS MAXENTIVS and LICINIVS algoeth vnder the name of DIOCLETIAN the authour of this tenth persecution Crnell edicts and proclamations were set foorth in the beginning of this persecution commanding to ouerthrow cast to the ground the temples of Christians to burne the bookes of holy scripture to displace all such as were magistrats and were in office and to cast Christian Bishops into prison and to compell them with sundrie kinds of punishments to offer vnto Idoles Also common people who would not renounce the profession of Christianitie to bee spoyled of their libertie Euseb. lib. 8 cap 3. These edicts were hastely put in execution Many Christians were scourged racked cruciated with intollerable torments Some were violently drawne to impure sacrifice and as though they had sacrificed when indeede they did not were let go some were cast downe vpon the ground and drawne by the legges a great space and the people was made to beleeue that they had sacrificed some stoutly withstood them and denied with a loude voice that they had bene or euer would be partakers of idolatrie Notwithstanding of the weake sort many for feare and infirmitie gaue ouer euen at the first brunt Euseb lib 8. cap. 3. When the foresaid edicts were proclaimed both the Emperours hapned to be in the town of Nicomedia notwithstanding a certaine Christian beeing a noble man borne whose name was IOHN ran and tooke downe the proclamation and openly tare and rent it in pieces For which fact hee was put to a most bitter death which he patiently indured vntill his last gaspe Euseb. lib. 8. cap. 5. The generall captaine of the armie of DIOCLETIAN gaue choice to the souldiers whether they would obey the Emperours commandement in offering sacrifices and keepe still their offices or else lay away their armour and be depriued of their offices but the Christian souldiers were not onely content to lay away their armour but also to offer themselues vnto the death â—…ather then to obey such vnlawfull commandements Euseb. lib. 8 cap. 4. In Nicomedia the Emperour refrained not from the slaughter and death of the children of Emperours neither yet from the slaughter of the chiefest princes of his court such as PETER whose body beeing beaten with whips and torne that a man might see the bare bones and after they had mingled vineger and salt they powred it vpon the most tender partes of his body and lastly rosted him at a soft fire as a man would rost flesh to eate and so this victorious martyre ended his life DOROTHEVS and GORGONIVS beeing in great authoritie and office vnder the Emperour after diuerse torments were strangled with an halter The torments that PETER suffered encouraged them to giue a worthy confession that they were of that same faith and religion that PETER was of Euseb. lib. 8. cap. 6. This persecution raged most vehemently in Nicomedia where the Emperours palace through some occasion beeing set on fire the Christians were blamed as authors of that fact Therefore so many as could bee found out were burned with fire or drowned in water or beheaded with the sword amongst whome was ANTHIMVS Bishop of Antiochia who was beheaded The bodies of the sonnes of Emperours that were buried thâ—…y digged out of their graues and sent them in boates to be buried into the bottome of the sea lest Christians should haue worshipped them as gods if their sepulchres had bene knowne Euseb. lib. 8. cap. 6. such opinion they had of Christians The number of twentie thousand burned in one temple of Nicomedia by MAXIMIANVS smelleth of the libertie that NICEPHORVS taketh in adding many things to the veritie of the historie The martyrdome of SERENA the Emperour DIOCLETIANS wife is rejected by learned men as a fable albeit recorded by HERMANNVS GIGAS The number of Christians cast into prison and appointed for death was so great that scarcely if a voide place could be found in a prison to thrust in a murtherer or an opener of graues such heapes of Christians were inclosed in darke prisons Euseb. lib. 8. cap. 6. The martyrs of Palestina of Tyrus in Phenicia of Tarsus of Antiochâ—…a of Alexandâ—…ia of Mâ—…letina in Armenia and of Pontus Cappadocia and Arabia they could not easily bee numbred In Thebaida horrible and vnnaturall crueltie was vsed against Christian women whome they hanged vpon gibbetts with their heades down-ward toward the ground and fastened one of their legges allanerly to the gibbet the other beeing free thus their naked bodies hanging vpon trees in maner foresaid presented to the beholders a spectacle of most vile and horrible inhumanitie Euseb. lib. 8. cap. 9. In like maner the branches of trees were artificially bowed downe to the earth and the feete and legges of Christians tied to them so that by their hastie returning againe vnto their naturall places the bodies of Christians were rent in pieces This was not a crueltie finished in a short space of time but of long continuance some dayes 20. some 30. some dayes 60. and at some times an hundreth were with sundrie kindes of torments excruciated vnto the death And these torments they suffered with joy and gladnesse and singing of Psalmes vntill the last breath Euseb. ibid. In Phrygia a towne was set on fire by the Emperours commandement the name where of EVSEBIVS passeth ouer with silence and the whole inhabitants beeing Christians men women and children were burned with fire Euseb lib. 8. cap. 11. TIRANNION Bishop of Tyrus ZENOBIVS Presbyter of Sidon SILVANVS Bishop of Gaza and PAMPHILVS
would send from the Heauen the diuine flame of his celestiall loue to the ende that the fleshly conceits of mens hearts may bee brunt vp and that they may bee fully perswaded that the LORD who made the Heauen and the Earth is hee alone to whom spirituall sacrifices are to bee offered and that through IESVS CHRIST to whom with the Father and the Holy Spirit bee praise and glorie now and euer AMEN A TREATISE Of the authoritie of COUNCILS IN the first three hundreth yeeres of our LORD Councils were few in number and verie obscure and few of them had great authoritie except the Councill holden in HIERUSALEM by the Apostles yet was the first age after CHRIST the golden age whether wee consider doctrine or maners in doctrine more sincere in maners more vnreproueable then any age after following in so much that all the accusations forged against their doctrine and conuersation were but calumnies and lyes The banquets of Thyestes and the chambring of Oedipus perpetually objected to the Christians of the primitiue Church what were they but cauillations in thinges whereof they had no vnderstanding They knew not what the spirituall eating of the flesh of CHRIST did meane neither knew they how necessary it was for Christians to keepe holy assemblies in the night time when they had not libertie to doe it in the day time And they spake euill of things they could not nor would not comprehende as the Gracians and Romanes counted the Hebrues Barbarians because they had no regard to vnderstand their language But out of all question the first age was the golden age of the worlde after it was renewed by the comming of CHRIST in doing of good more willing in suffering of euill more patient then anie age that followed the first 300. yeeres of our LORD And that thing where into the primitiue Church seemeth to be inferiour to posteriour times to wit in number and splendor of Councils in that same point it hath a prerogatiue such as Iuda had ouer Israel there were more altars in Israel then in Iuda but that one altar in Hierusalem was better then all their altars And the Councill holden in Hierusalem by the Apostles in the dayes of the Emperour Claudius was better then all the Councils either Generall or Nationall that euer were gathered since those dayes Now before I speake in particular of thâ—… necessitie of Councils of their authoritie of the abuse of Councils and power to conuocate them and who should haue vote in Councils somewhat is to bee premitted concerning the name giuen vnto Gâ—…nerall or Nationall assemblies Gratianus busieth himselfe in manie vnnecâ—…ssarie thinges and in this also to secke out the Etymologie of the Latine word Concilium and hee deduceth it from the word Cilium called in the Greeke language 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the eye lid and the compound word Concilium signifieth the companie of men who agree in one minde as the eye liddes doe when they couer the eyes they couer both together and when they open againe to giue place vnto the sight of the eyes they open both at once And so Gratianus thinketh that Concilium is Coelus consentientium that is a company of men who agree in one mind The fourth Councill of Garthage requireth beside consent and agreement in one minde a consent to the veritie and trueth of GOD therefore they say that the assemblie of Heretiques should not bee called Concilium but Conciliabulum But in acurate seeking out of Etymologies scarce can Plato himselfe in his Dialogue called Cratylus escape the blame of curiositie the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is plainer and is borrowed by the Latinists who usually call a Councill Synodus and it is used in this sence to betoken a meeting of men in spitituall offices for timous suppressing of corruptions either in Doctrine or maners springing vp into the Church The necessitie of Councâ—…ls may bee proued by these arguments following First those ordinarie meanes which the Prophets and Apostles who had their callinâ—… and gifts immediatly from GOD did use for suppressing of false doctrine and corrupt maners should of necessitie continue in the Church But so it is that conuentions assemblies was one of these ordinary meanes ergo they should continue in the Church The seconde part of the argument is proued by the example of the great assemblie gathered at Silo in the dayes of Iosua to suppresse the apparent defection of the Reubenites Gadites and halfe tribe of Manasses from the true worship of GOD as seemed vnto them And this Assemblie had allowance of GOD forasmuch as it was ordered with wisedome the glory of GOD was onely respected and the ende of it was peace in ISRAEL Next the great assemblie of the ten tribes at mount Carmell procured by Helias the Prophet but gathered by the commandement of Achab the king of Israel declareth that assemblies of Church-men and others of chiefe authoritie was an ordinarie meane to reforme abuses in Religion albeit no reformation followed after this assemblie yet the enemies of the true Religion were conuicted in their consciences false teachers were disgraced and punished and the zeale of Helias toward the glory of GOD had allowance by a miracle of fire from Heauen In like maner Samuel by gathering a great assemblie of all Israel at Mizpah procured a reformation both in Religion and maners amongst them Dauid in transporting the Arke to the citie of Dauid Salomon in the dedication of the Temple both used the support of holie assemblies gathered to that effect And in the new Testament the Apostles Elders and Deacons met together in an holie assemblie at Hierusalem and timouslie suppressed the doctrine of false teachers who affirmed that the Gentiles could not bee saued by faith in CHRIST onely except they had also beene circumcised and kept the law of Moses All these examples and manie more contained in holy Scripture teach vs that the meeting of holie assemblies was an ordinarie meane to suppresse corruption in doctrine and maners and to aduance the kingdome of GOD. Secondlie that thing which godlie Emperours did for the suppressing of Heresies following the examples of the Prophets Apostles especiallie when no better meanes could be found out is necessarilie to bee obserued But so it is that the godlie Emperours Constantine Theodosius Valentinian the third and Theodosius the second the sonne of Arcadius and Martianus conuocated Councils for suppressing of the Heresies of Arrius Macedonius Nestorius and Eutyches and no better meanes could be found out neither as yet can bee founde out for suppressing of Heresies Therefore the custome of conuocating Councils at times requisite is necessarilie to bee obserued Other arguments albeit they haue not so necessarie a consecution as the former notwithstanding they proue that lawfull Councils are a terrour to the kingdome of the Deuill and that the instrumentes of Sathan such as Iulian the
Sacramentes ordained by God wee might fight a good fight and finishe our journey with joye This is the Apostolicke doctrine But Papistes will correct the Apostolicke doctrine in all points they wil haue a Christiā to be corroborated by Chrisme the sacrament of confirmation to the end he may passe ouer the stormie tentations of this world in peace Let mee now demand of them two thinges One concerning the signe Another concerning the thing signified Concerning the signe I demand who gaue commandement to vse it Concerning the thing signified I demaunde who hath promised to conferre the seuen-folde grace of the holy Spirite to them who are signated vpon the fore-head by the bishops thombe with the signe of the Crosse These two thinges to wit the commandement and the promise are inlacking in Popish Sacramentes and so their newe found out Sacramentes are like vnto a bodie that is not quickened with a soule The Scholasticke Doctors the first inuentors of this pluralitie of Sacraments they confesse roundly that the Sacrament of Confirmation hath no authoritie in holy Scripture such as Alexander Alensis Bonaventura and Thomas Aquinas who after much fatigation of himselfe and others also hee cannot finde that euer Christ or yet His Apostles conferred this Sacrament to any person Whatsoeuer they can cite out of Tertullian or Basilius or any ancient Councell for the confirmation of Chrisme it is certaine that they confesse that this custome hath no authoritie of the written worde of God And this is the principall marke whereat I aime in all my writinges to prooue that there is no Antiquitie where 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the written word of God doeth not confirme the antiquitie of that which is alleadged The Romane Church waketh great businesse to proue that in holy Scripture many promises of confirmation and corroboration of the worke of God begunne in vs are contained But they bestirre themselues in vaine in proouing that thing which no man denieth But incase they would prooue that the Sacrament of Confirmation is a Sacramēt in a proper sense then it became them to proue that God in His word hath promised the grace of confirmation to such as are signated vpon the fore-head and annointed with Chrisme and buffeted vpon the chieke with the bishops hand Seeing none of these thinges can bee prooued by Scripture it is a friuolous thing for them to alleadge a promise made by God when as they inuent the element whereunto this promise shall bee annexed If this bee a forme according to the which Sacraments should be fashioned then I dare affirme that the number of Sacraments may be multiplied according to the number of the promises contained in the word of God So that God shall make a promise and man shall inuent without anie warrand of Gods commandement an external element wherevnto the promise shall bee annexed By this forme of doing not onely may they make vp seuen Sacramentes but also seuentie times seuen Sacraments True it is that the holy Apostles by imposition of handes conferred the gift of the holy Spirit that is the gift of Languages to many professors of the true Faith and this gift conferred vnto them confirmed them in the faith of Christ. But what belongeth this vnto the Popish Sacrament of Confirmation in the which the externall signe of imposition of handes is inlacking and the promise of a spirituall grace annexed to the signe is also inlacking and finally that thing which was extraordinarie and appertaining to a few is brought in as the ground of an ordinarie Sacrament which shoulde appertaine to all them who beleeue I will not insist long to speake of this new Sacrament of Confirmation Onely this I say that whatsoeuer is brought in into the Church of God with derogation of the dignitie of Baptisme an holy Sacrament instituted by Christ himselfe it should be abhorred But so it is that the Sacrament of Confirmation is brought in with a derogation to the dignitie of Baptisme ergo c. The seconde part of the argument is prooued by their slender and derogatiue speaches of Baptisme together with their superlatiue aduancements of the eminencie of the Sacrament of Confirmation In Baptisme they say that wee receiue not the vpholding defending gouerning and strengthening Spirite of God but all these graces are conferred in the Sacrament of Confirmation Likewise in Baptisme is prepared an habitation to God but the Father Sonne and holy Ghost enter not into this habitation before wee receiue the Sacrament of Confirmation What can be more directly repugnant to H. Scripture wherein it is expressely said He who beleeueth and is baptized shall be saued Can any man be saued befor his soule be an habitation and Temple in the which God is content to dwell So that the doctrine of the Romane Church is like vnto the nauigation of men who dare presume to saile in deepe and dangerous Seas without a Compasse Euen so they talke of matters of great importance without the warrande of holy Scripture whereby it commeth to passe that their doctrine in many pointes is flatte repugnant to holy Scripture Concerning the testimonies of Fathers whereby they endeuour to proue the Sacrament of Confirmation I might answere compendiously with S. Augustine Quicquid attulerint undecunque attulerint audiamus potius si oues sumus vocem pastoris nostri non ergo audiamus haec ego dico haec tu duis sed haec dicit Dominus that is Whatsoeuer they bring in and from whence soeuer they haue brought it in if we be the Lords sheepe let vs rather bearken to the voyce of our shephearde therefore let vs not hearken to them who saye This I saye or this thou sayest but this saieth the Lord. Neuerthelesse seeing they glorie so much of ancient Fathers let the judicious Reader beware of supposititious writings and he shall not find this Chrisme in ancient writers The Sermon of Cyprian De Chrismate is knowne to be supposititious The opinion of Tertullian who writeth that they who are baptized with water haue not receiued the Holy Spirit but are prepared to receiue it by anointing with oyle and imposition of handes after baptisme doeth not euery man who is versed in the reading of Fathers smell that Tertullian writte this when hee made defection from the trueth and was intangled with the errour of the Montanistes And Cyprian in the bookes of his epistles when he attributeth too much to Vnction with Oyle and imposition of hands after baptisme it is easie to perceiue that he borrowed this errour from Tertullian whom he acknowledged as his Master But neither Tertullian nor Cyprian are speaking of the Popishe Sacrament of Confirmation but of annointing with oyle and imposition of handes immediately after baptisme Marke the words of Cyprian where he saith Non posse esse filios Dei si non utroque sacramento nascantur lauacro scilicet aquae in verbo unctione Chrismatis that is They cannot