Author then was it secret therfore cannot be the religiō of Christ which is a wayes apparent manifest And whatsoeuer in this discourse hath byn said and proued concerning Lutheran religion yow must vnderstand to haue byn said and proued also of Caluinisme and Anabaptisme for that the selfe same nouelty and reasons belong to all three but that for perspicuityes sake and not often to repeat with tediousnes all three names we haue only nominated one Therfore do I conclude with the words of S. Hierome Hier. Dial. contra Lucifer in fine who writeth thus That I way set thee downe briefly and playnely any opinion Thou must saith hee remayne in that Church which was founded by the Apostles and continueth vntil this very day And if by chance thou shouldest he are those that be called Christians to be named of some other and net of Iesus Christ to u it of the Marcionites Valentiniās Montanistes c. know thou certainly that that is not the Church of Christ but the Synagogue of Antichrist for that because they were institued afterward they do demonstrate themselnes to be those whome the Apostle foretould c. Nor let them flatter themselues if out of certaine places of Scripture they do seemete affirme that with they say for that the Diuell did also alleagde Scripture for his purpose and the force of Scripture doth not consist in reading but in vnderstanding So S. Hierome Nouelty therfore is a signe of heresy fortould by the Apostle denomination is a signe of nouelty and the vsurping of Scripture is common to the Diuell himselfe and all heresyes The II. Reason Taken from the defect of Succession ANOTHER reason why these religions are not to be allowed of is The want of succession for that they want an orderly and continuall Succession of Ministers in the Church from the Apostles which succession is necessary that any Religion or Church should be deemed Apostolicall for without the same it cannot be continued with the Apostolike So as the Ancient Fathers for the most part teach that they who say they haue the true Church of Christ with them must bring forth the succession of their Bishops and reduce the same vpwards to some one of the Apostles by an orderly continuation which if they cannot do it is an easy matter to conuince them that the true Church of Christ is not with them For so Optatus Mileuitanus in his second booke against Parmenian when he would conuince the Donatistes that they had not the true Church with them said Shew forth the origen or beginning of your sea yow that wildaime the Holy Church to your selues And Tertullian in his prescriptions againg heretiks saith Let heretikes shew forth the origen of their Churches let them recount the order of their Bishops succeeding from the beginning that he who was the first should haue some Apostle or Apostolike man for his Author and predecessour c. The same argument do the rest of the Fathers commonly vse as (a) lib 3. cap ◠Irenaeus (b) hoeresi 27. Epiphanius (c) cont Lucifer Hieronymus S. (d) cap. 4. cont Epist Fundam Augustine and others Now it is well knowne that neyther Lutherans Caluinistes nor Ana baptistes can with any the least colour do the same For to whome I pray you did Luther who for the most part was the Author and first parent of these new religions succeed Whose Chayre and authority did he occupy who before him was the prelate of the Luther an religion as also before Caluin and Zwinglius who was their predeceslour And if none can be assigned it is cleere that they want that succession which the Ancient Holy Fathers do require that any Church should be ioined with that of the Apostles Againe Want of Ordination they do not only want succession of Chayre and authority but euen the ordination of degrees descending from the Apostles For that there was alwayes requisite a double power in the Ministers of the Church both of them by an orderly continuation deriued from the Apostles as before we haue shewed in the 7. Consideration to wit Power of Order by which Sacrifice is offered and Sacraments are made to sanctify the faithfull and Power of Iurisdiction by which the authority of gouerning and feeding the Church with the word of God is giuen c. But these new religions can reduce neither of them to the Apostles Not the power of Iurisdiction because they want succession as before we haue said nor yet the Power of Ordinatiō or Order for who ordained Luther or Caluin a Bishop of their Church And if they say that order is not needfull they do contradict all antiquity and the perpetuall vse of the Church For neuer yet was there Bishop in the Church so as he had authority to exercise all Bishoply functions but that he was ordained by some other Bishop to whome by the Constitution of the Apostles themselues must be adioined two other bishops as is expressely commaunded in the first Canon of the Apostles fourth of the Nicene Councel as also insinuated by S. Paul writing to Timothy a Bishop 1. Tim. 4. and warning him thus Do not neglect the grace which is in thee which grace is giuen thee by prophesy with imposition of the hands of Priesthood that is to say of those Bishops who togeather with the Bishop that doth ordaine do lay their hands vpon him that is ordained as the Ancient Fathers do expound it By which it is cleere and euident that the Lutherans and Caluinists haue neither of these forsaid powers from the Apostles nor can they deriue the same from the Apostles and consequently in that they do not descend from them they haue not the true religion and Church with them For that the true Church according to both powers ought to be deriued and to haue continued with them from the Apostles as we haue shewed before seing that all power spirituall ought to be deriued from Christ through the Apostles and their successours by a continuall and orderly succession and communication to other ministers of the Church as the corporall life of man is deriued by certaine meanes through a continuall succession from our first parent Adam to the last For euen as in the old Testament there were no priests except those that descended from the Tribe of Leui thorough Aaron so in the new there are no priests or Bishops except those that descend in degree of Order and power of Iurisdiction from Christ the chiefe Priest through the Apostles and their successours And therfore as the Sinagogue could not be without priests descending by a continuall succession from Aaron so the Church of Christ cannot be without Priests or Bishops descending by the same continuall succession from the Apostles and their successours But the Congregation of Lutherans and Caluinistes had neuer any such ministers had neuer any Bishops-lawfully ordayned amongst them descending in power of Iurisdiction from the
by vertue and power of Gods decree And this againe was in tymes past an heresy of Simon (d) VinceÌ„t Lirin Magus and of (e) Eusebius l. 5. c. 20. Florinus 3. Both teach that good works be not necessary to saluation and that fayth is ynough But this was an heresy of the same Simon (f) Iren. l. 1. c. 20â— Magus and of (g) Aug. haer 54. the Eunomians about the yeare of Christ 360. 4. Both also teach that syns though neuer so many and great do not hurt him who hath fayth for that the malice of them is not imputed to him who beleeueth And this was also in tymes past an heresy of the (h) Aug. haer 54. Eunomians and of Basilides and Carpocrates as witnesseth Irenaeus l. 1. c. 23. 24. 5. Caluin denyeth the reall presence of Christs body in the Eucharist But this was againe an heresy of Berengarius about the yeare of our Lord 1051. Where it is to be noted first though some priuately before Berengarius doubted of that matter and moued the question about it yet none was so hardy as to professe it in publike as testifieth Hugh of Langres and Adelman of Bressia in their epistles to Berengarius and Paschasius in his booke of the words of the Institution of this Sacrament In so much as this was the constant and vniforme doctrine of the Church not opposed against by any arch-heretike vntill the tyme of Berengarius Secondly that Berengarius his opinion was whiles he yetlyued condemned in fiue Councells and that Berengarius himselfe thrise abiured his opinion and in conclusion died very penitent in the Catholike fayth He being dead the same heresy lay buried vp welneere two hundred yeares vntill the tyme of the Lollards who brought it to light againe as is gathered out of Trithemius in his Chronicle about the yeare 1315. After this againe VVicliffe held the same as appeareth by his third article After his death againe there was a deep silence of that matter for the space of an hundred yeares vntill Swinglius renewed it and Caluin and some others after him Whereby it euidently appeareth that this opinion was euer in the Church held for a manifest heresy therfore eyther the Church hath euer erred in a principall article of fayth and so consequently it was neuer Christs Church or that opinion which abrogateth and disclaymeth from the Reall presence of Christs body is an heresy indeed 6. Both take away all traditions and would haue all things to be comprehended in Scriptures alone The same was the heresy of the Arians as is recorded by S. Augustine also of Nestorius l. 1. contra Maxim c. 2. vlt. Dioscorus and Eutiches as is declared in the seauenth Synod Act. 1. 7. Both deny the Sacraments of Penance and of Confirmation The Nouatians taught the same opinion long ago as witnesse S. Cyprian l. 4. epist 2. l. 3. baer fabularum and S. Theodoret 8. Both teach that the Church consisteth of good alone and that the Church in former tymes visible perished notwithstanding for many ages that in this tyme it only remayneth in their congregations The very like was the heresy of the Donatists as testifieth S. Augustine l. de vnit Eccl. c. 12. 9. Both of them teach that prayer is not to be made for the dead that 〈◊〉 fast of Lent or any other stable fasts be not to be keep but euery one is then to fast when it shall to him seeme good The Aerians taught the very same in former ages if we beleeue Epiphamus haer 75. and S. Augustine l. dehaer c. 33. 10. Both deny the veneration of holy Reliques of Christs and Saints Images and call it Idolatry Vigilantius did no lesse many ages past as witnesseth S. Hierome The same did the Image breakers as testify Zoneras Cedrenus and Nicephorus touching them who made war against Images By these it is more then manifest that the chiefest opinions whereof Lutheranisme and Caluinisme consist be ancient heresyes long since condemned by the Church and that the same were alwayes held in the Church for heresyes The same may we easily exemplify and declare touching the rest Vide Bellar de notis Eccl. c. 9. Coccius de signis Eccl. l. 8. art 3. Wherehence it followeth that these Religions be nothing but the very sincke of heresyes of old longe ago put to silence and now in these latter dayes brought to light againe The XI Reason From the want of a Rule of Faith THESE new Religions haue no certaine rule of Faith to follow therfore they are not to be receyued For the principall heads of Religion must be determined certaine and withall immutable And that they haue not any certaine rule of beliefe whereby it may be resolued what is necessary to be beleeued and what not is euident First for that they admit neyther the traditions of the Church nor the authority of generall Councells nor the iudgment of the ancient Doctors of the Church and of those who flourished and liued before these our Controuersies Luther reiecteth all traditions in c. l. 4. c. 8. §. 6.7 8 in Antid ad 4. fesâ— Conc. Trident 1. ad Galatas as doth Caluin also l. 4. Instit and they teach that nothing is to be beleeued nothing to be receyued an holy Scripture Luther so contemneth Generall Councells which haue hitherto had most great authority in Gods Church for they be as it were the Parlaments of Princes In art 115 sequentib Peers in Christs Kingdome as he will haue the definitions therof subiect to the iudgment and censure of euery priuate person And he further sayth that it is a mad thing that the Councells will conclude what is to be beleeued And in the same place he teacheth that what is to be beleeued what not is to be left to the iudgment of euery spirituall man Caluin insinuateth no lesse l. 1. c. 7. § 1.2 4. when he sayth that it is not for the Church to iudge what books be Canonicall but that appertayneth to the inward spirit alone Finally as touching the Fathers Luther careth not for a thousand Augustines l. contra Regem Augiae a thousand Cyprians Caluin also in very many places contemneth them and affirmeth that they erred Wherefore none of all these is vnto them a rule of fayth But say they The Scripture it selfe is vnto vs a rule of fayth it caÌ„not erre But it is an easy matter â—o shew that this rule serueth not the turne First because we by this rule cannot iudge of the Scripture it selfe and so the rule it selfe will remayne vnto vs vncertain which yet should haue the greatest certitude of all For by the Scripture it cannot come to be knowne for certaine that such a book is truly Scripture is not Apocripall nor composed by some deceiptfull person that this or that sentence is not peruerted northrust in Finally that nothing is added or taken
disciple of his but he was in danger to haue byn strangled himself by that diuel Cochlaeus in actis Lutheri en 1523. as witnesseth Fredericus Staphilus who was present at the act And at another time he would haue raysed to life one that was drowned in the riuer of Alba but in vayne In like manner Caluin attempted to raise one to life who by his perswasioÌ„ feigned himselfe dead but with that successe that of aliue man he became dead indeed for that by the iust iudgment of God when as Caluin came to raise him he was found without life The whole story wherof with all particulers is at large recounted by M. Hierome Bolsecke in vita Caluini cap. 23. Wherfore seing neither true nor feigned miracles do succeed with them they endeauour to take quite away from the Catholike Church this most strong rocke and firmament of miracles which altogeather conuinceth the vnderstanding of man but with no shew of probability at all as we haue shewed As those therfore who pondering and weighing well the miracles of our Sauiour and his Apostles with a quiet and humble mynd setting aside all hatred other euill affections could not doubt but that their doctrine proceeded from God euen so now they that without hatred passioÌ„ of mynd consider well of the miracles that haue byn wrought in the Catholike Church by holy men in all ages both aliue and dead cannot doubt but that their Doctrine and Religion proceedeth from God and that the Church wherunto they adhere is the true Church of God V. CONSIDERATION From the Conuersion of Nations by the imbracers of Catholicke Religion THAT Religion is esteemed to be the true and consequently to be imbraced wherunto alwayes Nations haue byn conuerted For that our Lord hath often promised in Scripture this conuersion of Nations Psal 1. 21. Ose 1. matth marc Luc. vltimo to the true faith and worship of God which promise must be fulfilled But the Religion wherunto Nations in all ages haue byn and now in this our age also are conuerted is the Catholike and Roman Religion Ergo there can be no doubt but that this is the true Religion of Christ Now then that Religion wherunto these nations haue alwayes being and are conuerted is the Catholike and Roman Religion is most manifest by that which hath byn done aswell in this our age as in former before For that in this our age there haue byn infinite and dayly still are conuerted in the East Indies in Iapone and in the vast Kingdome of China besides in many Ilands of the Indian seas All these passe from their Gentility to the Catholike Religion are vnited to the Roman Church and this by Religious mens indeauours sent thither by authority from the Pope In the last or fourtenth Age one only S. Vincent surnamed Ferrerius of the order of S. Dominicke conuerted to the Catholike faith fiue and twenty thousand partly Iewes and partly Saracens as testifieth S. Antoninus a famous Writer of that age 3. p. Histor tit 23. cap. 8. § 4. In the 13. Age were conuerted very many to the Catholik faith in-the Kingdome of Tartary by two Friars of S. Dominickes order being sent thither from the Pope the Emperour of Tartary himselfe whome they cal the Great Cam desiring the same as wryteth Paulus Venetus whose help and endeauour the said Emperour vsed in effecting of this busines In the 12. Age the people of Nor why were conuerted vnto the RomaÌ„ Faith by * This Adrian was an Englishman and called Nicolas Break-speare before he was asluÌ„pted to the Apostolik Sea Adrian the fourth before he was Pope as writeth Platina in the life of Pope Alexander the fourth In the 11. Age were the Hungarians for the most part conuerted and Bishops ordayned and appointed there by the Pope of Rome at the request of their King StepheÌ„ after wards a Saint that was newly conuerted to the said Roman faith as wryte the Centuriators of Magdeburge Cent. 11. cap. 2. In the 10. Age were many prouinces conuerted to the Roman faith by the endeauours of Henry the first Emperour Adalbert and Methodius Archbishops of Bohemia and Morauia as testify the Centuriators aboue mentioned cent 10. cap. 2. In the 9. Age were the VVandalls Bulgarians Sclauonians Polonians with those of Denmarke and Morauia conuerted to the faith and vnited to the Roman Church Centur. 9. cap. 2. In the 8. Age was conuerted a great part of Germany to the Roman faith by S. Boniface sent thither for that purpose from Pope Gregory the second Cent. 8. cap. 2. In the 7. Age were conuerted those of Franconia or Franke-County by S. Kilian sent thither from the Pope of Rome also Cent. 7. cap. 2. In the 6. Age were the Englishmen conuerted to the Roman faith by Monkes sent thither for that purpose from S. Gregory the Great Cent. 6. cap. 2. Finally those of Brabant Flaunders Holland Frizeland VVestphalia France and other adioyning Nations by whome were they conuerted Were they not conuerted by disciples of the Roman Church to wit S. Seruatius S. Eloy S. Rumwold S. Amandus S. Vedastus S. Leuin S. Remigius S. VVillebrord S. Swibert S. VVulfrane and others who all were most addicted to the Roman Church By which it is manifest that all Nations which haue byn conuerted from Paganisme or Iudaisme to Christ for these thousand yeares last past were conuerted to the Catholike Roman faith and vnited and incorporated to the Roman Church This is also confirmed besides other tokens to haue byn the Roman faith and Religion by Priests by altars by worship of holy Reliques Images by pilgrimages by InuocatioÌ„ of Saintes by Monasteryes by Monkes by Obedience to the Pope and by very many other things proper to Catholike Religian which were in vse among all Nations after their Couuersion vntill of â—ake they were take away and abolished in some places by these new vpstart Religions What man is there that maturely considering these things can any way doubt but that Catholike Religion is the true For that in her he seeth fullfilled Gods diuine promise of the coÌ„uersion of Nations To her do fly so many people so many remote Nations so many most porent Kingdomes forsaking their Idolatry abandoning the impurity of life reiecting the multitude of wiues forgetting their barbarous sauage manners banishing all former liberty of life and as it were to become tame and tractable vnder the yoke of Christ sweetly to tast of the feare of God to comforme themselues to all modesty of life and last of al to be inflamed with the contempt of temporall things and loue of celestiall How is it possible that that Religion should be false and impious which doth worke such wonderfull mutation in the harts of barbarous people To conclude how can it possible be tâ—â—t the Diuine Frouidence should permital these Nations so many yeares to be deceyued when as they haue forsaken their Idolatry so hartily imbraced verity and
so likewise is it manifest what tyme and with what words our Sauiour sent the Apostles and what he inioyned them to do c. But now these our new Prophets were so simple that they did not thinke of feigning any such thing if they would haue had themselues thought to haue byn sent immediatly from God and therfore they made no mention at all therof which is a most certaine and manifest token of lying and falshood when of necessity they be driuen to say they were sent from God For who can doubt but that if they had felt the least semblance or shaddow of this Diuine mission they would haue presently published the same in the first front of their writings and haue manifested the same to the world to wit the expresse tyme place manner commandement of God and other circumstances belonging thereto Fifthly I adde that if they were sent of God they were not only sent as reformers of Manners as the Prophets were but as reformers also of the whole doctrine and Religion and therfore a most exact description of this mission an expresse mention of such things as God would haue reformed had by naltogeather necessary that the same should haue byn propounded to the Church in God his name and in the very word◠that he spake them as the Prophets were wont to do when they did propound to the people Gods diuine cōmandements in his name But these new Prophets haue not proceeded so but haue gone from one opinion to another vpon mere chaunces and as times and things haue so required as it is wont to happen in contentious and debates when mens minds be more and more prouoked to anger and reuenge and as they learned by experience to preferre most their owne comodityes and oppugne the Sea Apostolike that condemned them For whatsoeuer they thought might most endomage the Popes authority or profit and confirme their owne that they estabished as a point of faith and the very kernell of the word of God as afterward we shall shew Sixtly In humane Policy and Gouerment it is not inough for a man that is sent from a Prince who is far off and cannot be spoken with to say that he is sent from him to execute such or such Authority but he must haue letters Patēts sufficient sealed with the Princes seale which are notwithstanding carefully examined for feare of deceyt and if by chance any signe of imposture be deprehended therin he is not admitted vntill further testimony be produced The same we see in like manner in the Popes Legates and Nuntij who all must shew their Patents Authenticall wherin their Mission Cōmission is conteyned or els they are not receyued nor haue Authority What sottishnesse then is it to admit into the Church and Kingdome of Christ not only new Pastors and Teachers but Reformers also of the whole Religion wheron the Church consisteth vpon pretence and colour only that they say they are sent of Christ and haue the spirit God not shewing their Patents nor any other signe or token wherby to confirme the same Seauenthly The very computation of tyme is also mightily against them For if the Church from 600. yeares after Christ hath byn decayed and fallen away and consequently byn made the Synagoge of Antichrist as they say it hath then how happeneth it that the Mission of these new Reformers hath byn delayed vntill now Why hath God forsaken his Church for whole 900 yeares and suffered her to be thus ruinated and swym in all Idolatry and superstition as though she did nothing belong to him and now after all this tyme at last to send these new Reformers or Architects vnto her Is this the loue of Christ thinke yow towards his Church which he washed with his bloud quickned with his spirit and adopted to his Spouse Far more louingly thē so did he beare himselfe towards his hand mayde to wit the Iewish Synagoge to whome he sent Prophets and did not forsake her although she fell into Idolatry and wickednes sonding vnto her continually euen to her very last end and destruction his seruants and endeauouring by al meanes possible to reclayme her And therefore if these men will needs seeme to be Reformers they should haue feigned the Church to haue perished a little before and not to haue layne rotten and putrisyed in her fall for so many ages or els the great space of tyme betweene doth confute their mission and show it to be imprudently feigned Eightly To these may be added other most certaine signes of their not sending from Christ as for example their bad life their pride their contempt of the holy Fathers their errours and vntruthes wherin they are euery day deprehended and taken their inconstancy of doctrine c. of which I meane to treat in the ensuing reason And last of all they teach that nothing is to be belieued but what is in Scripture Let them then shew vs out of Scripture that they were sent of God to reforme the Church in what place and in what words the Scripture saith this Authority was graunted vnto Luther or Caluin or otherwise we may not belieue them themselues being witnesses and much lesse accept them for Reformers of the Church The Lutherans indeed do go about to establish the mission of their Prophet by a certaine Chronographical prophesy out of S. Ambrose S. Augustine insinuated in this verse of Te Deum Tibi Cherubin Seraphin incessabili voce proclamant For that a few yeares agoe they set forth a picture of Luther cut in brasse with this inscription Diuinum atque admirabile Vaticinium D. Ambrosy Augustini de tempore aduentu S. Lutheri quo contra Antichristum Romanum scribere coepit vt in litteris huius versiculi numerum anni represent antibus continetur quod est apud Christianos Fideles admiratione notatu dignum A diuine admirable Prophesy of S. Ambrose S. Augustine concerning the tyme and comming of Saint Luther when he began to wryte against the Roman Antichrist as it is conteyned in the letters of the verse following representing the number of the yeares a thing worthy to be noted and admired of all faithfull Christians tIbI CherVbIn scraphIn InCessabILIVoCe proCLaMant The numbers of the letters of this verse they say do make M. CCCCLL VVIIIIIII or 1517. in which yeare of our Lord Luther began to preach But this verse doth little help the pretended cause of Luther For first no certanity can be gathered by such numbers as by many examples in former yeares of the euent of thinges hath byn seene And then secondly let vs graunt it to be a prophesy insinuated of Luther by the number of these letters yet therby should not be signified a reioyeing and exultation of heauenly Spirits for Luthers preaching as his Sectaryes would haue it but an excecation or blinding rather of Luther of althose which were to imbrace and follow his Doctrine like as in the
Caluin is also manifest out of the Iudiciall Actes and processe of the Citty of Noyon in France Bolsecus in vita Calui ni cap. 5. Iul. Brigerus pag. 59. that he was conuicted of a wicked crime and by sentence condemned to haue byn publiquely burned if by the intercession of the Bishop of that place that punishment had not byn changed into whipping and burning vpon his backe with a hoat iron Wherby it is cuident that both by law deed he was infamous L. 1. ff de his qui not antur insamia and L. Quid ergo § Ex compromisso ff de his qui not antur infamia Of the pride and rayling of Luther it is euident First because from this fountaine to wit of pride all his doctrines toke their beginning For when as certayne Indulgences were to be promulgated in Germany and that the office therof hauing heertofore belonged to the Augustine Friars now they being at this tyme pretermitted the same was giuen in Commission to the Dominicans Which thing Luther taking in very ill part began with a splene to preach against Indulgences and though he were therof admonished and reprehended notwithstanding by little and little he not only continued the same but adioyned heerunto many more and greater articles of faith against the Authority of the Pope wherby he caused wonderfull troubles and garboyles throughout all Germany as largely wryteth Ioannes Cochlaeus that was an eye wittnes of all these things in the Acts of Luther an 1517. This pride and anger then was the first origen and ofspring of all Luthers doctrine without which perhaps Lutheran Religion had neuer byn nor so many other new sectes neither which since that tyme haue sprong vp and risen from thence Secondly for that Luther in his Epistle to those of Strasburge writeth that he would gladly deny the Reall presence of Christ in the holy Eucharist therby to trouble vex the Popedome if the Scriptures were not cleere against the same to the contrary And in another place he writeth thus If a Councell should appoint or permit the receyuing of the SacrameÌ„t vnder both kinds lib. de formula miss we by no meanes would vse both but in despite of the Councell and appointment therof would eyther vse one or neyther cursing all such as by order of that Councell should vse both kinds c. Heere yow see he teacheth vs to abstayne from a thing necessary for our Saluation and that only in despite of the Councell that should comand or appoint it when as notwithstanding we may and oftentymes ought to obay euen a Tyrant when he comaundeth things lawfull Wherby we may see with what spirit he was caried way For what may be compared to this fury of his The same Luther in his booke against K. Henry the 8. of England wryteth that Kings Princes Popes are not worthy to loose the lachet of his shoe and that himselfe will be accompted for a holy man whether men will or no. Also that he cares not for a thousand Cyprians nor a thousand Augustines Also Christian Princes Kings and Emperours he calleth Tyrants Idiots fooles simple fellowes wild beasts hangmen nittes bubles enemyes of God most wicked knaues inuenteth scurrilous songes and rithmes against them Of Caluins pride and rayling besides that which D. Bolsecke hath aboundantly written the same is most euident in * lib 2. Inst c. 14. §. 3. lib. 3. c. 4 §. 10. lib. 4. c. 12. §. 20. alibi Caluins owne books also for that he doth euery where contemn al the holy and ancient Fathers of the Church and male partly accuseth them of errour The Schoole doctors he calleth Sophistes In his Sermons he oftentymes brake forth into these and such like words I am a Prophet I haue the spirit of God and if I erre God hath deceyued me and brought me into errour for the sinnes of the people c. He wrote also diuers letters and pamphlets of his own praises dignity merit in the Church which he alwaies published eyther in other mens or some feygned name as D. Bolsecke and others do wryte Many the like trickes might I alledge aswell against these as against other Authors and defenders of the new Religions of this Age but that I am very vnwilling to occupy my selfe in such affayres He that will see more in this kind let his read the life of Beza written also by D. Bolsecke Flores â—ulij Brigeri Surius his Comentaryes others Now then considering these things who can once thinke with himselfe that God would choose and vse such men as these were to wit infamous by all law and iudgment of the whole world of a most filthy life of an vnbridled and rayling tongue of a proud ambitious angry and enuious mind to be the reformers of his Church Who euer noted any such conditions or qualityes either in the Apostles or Prophets who were all most humble and no wayes infamous for any wickednes And although they were vnlearned and simple notwithstanding vpon a suddaine the were indued with admirable wisdome sanctity of life and grace of miracles They were wonderfully lowly of mynd of wonderfull meeknes they contemned the pleasures of this life and the earthly delightes of all thinges they were indued with wonderfull charity towards their neighbours they were wonderfully modest and circumspect in all their words and actions These and the like conditions and qualities we fee to haue byn in all such whome God hath vsed for the Conuersion of Nations and reformation of Christian people As for example in S. Augustine the Apostle of the English in S. Bonisace the Apostle of the Germans in S. Adalbert S. Etto S. VVillebrord S. Eloy and other Apostles of other Nations Also in S. Benet S. Bernard S. Romuald S. Dominike S. Francis and others by whose example and doctrine very many haue byn stirred vp to the contempt of earthly and transitory things and loue celestiall And if God did vse such men as these to the Conuersion of any Nation or Prouince or to the reformation or correction of manners in any people whose life was admirable to the world who notwithstanding did not receiue their mission immediatly from God but from the Pope by whome they were sent to do and execute these offices then I pray yow what manner of men had it byn fit that these should-haue byn who are said to haue byn sent inmediatly froÌ„ God and this not only for the reformation of the chiefe heads and points of religion but also to the reedification instauration of the whole Church and Kingdome of Christ now ruined And although al the sanctity and excellency all the vertues and spirituall giftes which were eyther in S. Iohn Baptist or any of the Apostles had byn all heaped togeather in one and had byn all infused into these men yet had the same not byn sufficient to warrant their Authority of so great a busines And shall we be so sottish then