9. The Words are The Presidents and Princes assembled together to the King and told him That all the Presidents of the Kingdom the Governours and the Princes the Counsellors and the Captains have consulted together to establish a Royal Statute and to make a firm Decree c. Now O King establish the Decree and sign the Writing that it be not changed according to the Law of the Medes and Persians which altereth not Here the Presidents c. assembled consult about the Decree they propose it as they had framed it yet they own it was of no force without the King 's establishing and signing it Which is exactly parallel with the Constitution of the Legislative in England if we joyn the Commoners to the Presidents Princes c. No radical mixture of Power in the two Houses with the King But the Writers for the Long Parliament were so desirous to make the Two Houses to have a Radical Mixture of the Legislative Power equal with the King 's that they sought all the specious and plausible Arguments they could to enforce it having little regard to what was Law it self or ancient Usage Therefore one of them in his (c) Pag. 39. Answer to Dr. Fern saith A Legislative Power is not to be satisfied by a bare powerless Consent Third Objection and therefore deman◠Whether that Consent be causal and authoritative or meerly consiliary and unauthoritative That the Two Houses have an Enacting Authority he would prove from that Clause set in the beginning of Acts Be it Enacted by the King 's most Excellent Majesty This will appear a Form of Words lately made use of in the Twenty fourth Chapter and the Authority of the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament For he saith this implies distinct Authorities for the Addition of the Authority of the Lords and Commons were superfluous if Laws be enacted by the King's Authority alone To which it may replied according to (d) King's Supremacy p. 89. Mr. Sheringham That though it be granted that they have an Enacting Authority in this particular of Law-making which how step by step it hath been brought to the state it is now in will be cleared in the following Chapters yet the Question is first Whether that be only a Power of assenting that such or such a Law shall be established or a Power that commandeth and giveth life and vigour to the Laws Secondly Whether the Power be radically in themselves or derived from the King As to the first It is agreed by the Judges (e) 2 H. 7.14.11 H. 7.25 Lambard Archeion fol. 271. That the Words Assenteth and Enacteth are equivalent in this Case For their Power of preparing Materials for a Law by framing Bills sufficiently denotes their Assent because they are Bills of their own framing and the Wisdom they show in these and the Care of the Government and People will always make that August Body of great use to the Government and valuable by their Fellow-subjects But secondly In this Particular the Writ of Summons is that which gives them all the Power of which in the Chapter of Parliaments I shall enlarge It must be considered from whom they have this Authority They have the Use and Exercise of the Legislative Power so far as is necessary for that Act although it be not radically in them for although the King's Authority cannot be separated from him privativè so as to deprive him of it yet cumulativè it may be inherent in his own Person and yet be in others too as the Light of the Sun is inherent in its own Body and yet diffused through the whole World And so we call it Moon-shine and Star-light when all their Lights are from the Sun And this Delegate Authority may be called theirs because for the time of their Sitting they are by the Sovereign and Constitution of Government so capacitated to act But since they are called by the King 's Writ and dissolved at his Pleasure they cannot be said to have the Power radically in themselves If this radical Power in the Two Houses were true How could the (f) 24 H. 8. 1 E. 6. c. 2. Statutes declare the King to have entire whole and plenary Power and to be so Supreme that all Authority is derived from him and all Obedience and Allegiance due to him and him alone An utmost Chiefty and Primity of Share as they used to speak in 1641. will not make out the Force of the Statutes Because the Kings of England desiring to rule their People by Lenity have out of Princely Clemency condescended so far as not to impose upon them as hereafter it will appear they anciently did any new Law or alter and repeal the old without their own Consents by their Representatives The Black Parliament of 1641. would have the People believe The Encroachments of the Black Parliament that their Authority was equal with the Kings But when Success had hardned them they were not content with a share they at first challenged but laid claim to all wholly excluding the King and denying him his Negative Voice usurping and taking upon them the whole Power of making Laws So that this Serpent of Co-ordinate Power is not to be suffered to wrigle in its Head lest the whole Body glide easily after But I leave the further discourse of this to its proper Place Preface to the following Chapters and shall now proceed to give some Light to the Government the Britans had among them by the Comparison is found betwixt them the Gauls and Germans Being desirous as much as I can to show the Ancientest usages and under the several Conquests of England how the Government hath received Growth and Alteration sometimes the People being under the Slavery of absolute Conquerors and other times factious Nobles bearding their Kings how the even Thred of Regular Government hath been carried on or interrupted how from an absolute Power of giving Law and ruling in a Military way by the Feudal Law and many other particulars the Government is brought to that Temperament whereby the Subjects may if they will be dutiful live happilier than any other do To illustrate all these it will be necessary to represent the State of the Britans under the Romans and to discourse of the Germans from whence our Saxon Ancestors came and of both of their Manners and Laws and from thence to proceed to illustrate the Legislative Power In all which if I carry my Reader out of his Country to view the State of our Ancient Neighbours I hope he will think it no ill spent time to make that pleasing as well as profitable towr And though I represent him his Ancestors rude and barbarous in Comparison of the Roman civilizedness yet he will find they had some Religion some Arts great and generous Souls as well as strong Bodies and their greatest mis-hap seems to be that those in Britan Gaul or Germany were not under one Monarchy
Commons in his said Parliament assembled By Authority of the said Parliament by Authority of the same Parliament Our Sovereign Lord the King hath ordained and established divers Statutes Declarations and Ordinances The Preface to the Statutes at (c) Idem Anno 1452. fol. 286. Reading 31 Regni hath these words Our Lord the King by Assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons being in the said Parliament and by Authority of the same Parliament hath made ordained and established divers Acts and Statutes Here the Commons Assent is joyned with the Lords whereas in most others of his Reign it is At the special request of the Commons So it is in that at Westminster which is like the first only it saith Our Sovereign Lord c. the Thirty ninth of his Noble and Gracious Reign Of the Parliaments in King Edward the Fourth 's Reign THE Preamble to the Statutes of (a) Idem Anno 1461. fol. 291. King Edward by the Grace of God Westminster 1 Regni is Edward by the Grace of God c. to the Honour of God and Holy Church to nourish Peace Unity and Concord within his Realm which he much desireth by the Advice and Assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal of the same Realm and at the special Request of the Commons of his said Realm assembled by Authority of the same Parliament hath ordained The rest of the Prefaces vary very little except that in the 3 E. 4. it is By the Advice and Assent of his Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons c. Of the Parliament in King Richard the Third's time THE Preamble to the Statutes at (a) Idem Anno 1483. fol. 315. Westminster 1 R. 3. runs thus Richard by the Grace of God c. to the Honour of God and of Holy Church and for the Common-wealth of his Realm of England Advice and Assent of Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Request of the Commons c. By the Advice and Assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and at the Request of the Commons of the said Realm summoned to the said Parliament by the Authority of the same Parliament hath ordained and established for the Quietness of his People certain Statutes Of the Parliaments in King Henry the Seventh 's time THE Prefaces to all the Acts in his (a) Idem Anno 1485. fol. 324. Reign are much alike thus The King our Sovereign Lord Henry c. To the Honour of God c. By the Assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in the said Parliament assembled and by Authority of the said Parliament hath done to be made certain Statutes and Ordinances Of the Parliaments in King Henry the Eighth 's time MOST of the Prefaces to the 20th of his Reign are the same as in King H. the 7th mutatis mutandis The Title of the 21 H. 8. (a) Id. fol. 392. only is Statuta ad Rempublicam spectantia edita in 1 Sessione Parliamenti c. Anno Regni invictissimi Principis Henrici c. In the 5th Chapter of the Acts of the (b) Id. fol. 435. 24th of his Reign The King our Sovereign Lord. it is thus Be it enacted by the King our Sovereign Lord with the Assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons of this present Parliament assembled and by Authority of the same So most of the rest are excepting that in the second Chapter of the 26. of (c) Id. fol. 465. his Reign it is said Therefore be it enacted by Authority of this present Parliament So in the first Chapter of the (d) Id. fol. 485. 28 Regni it is said For the Remedy whereof May it please the King c. it be enacted may it please the King our Sovereign Lord by the Assent c. it may be enacted The Title of the Acts 31 H. 8. (e) Id. fol. 537. H. 8. Defender of the Faith and in Earth Supreme Head c. runs thus Henry the 8th c. Defender of the Faith and in Earth supreme Head immediately under Christ of the Church of England to the Honour of Almighty God Conservation of the true Doctrine of Christian Religion and for the Concord Quiet and Wealth of this his Realm and Subjects of the same held his most high Court of Parliament c. wherein were established these Acts following and in the first Chapter it is said Be it enacted c. Be it enacted by the King our dread Sovereign Lord and by the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and by the Commons of this present Parliament assembled The Thirty second of H. 8. hath these Expressions which day the said Parliament continued by divers Prorogations was by His Graces Authority finished and dissolved amongst many other the Acts following By his Highness with the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons assembled in the said Parliament have been Established Ordained and Enacted Of the Parliaments in King Edward the Sixth 's Reign IN the first Chapter of the first (a) Id. fol. 687. Statutes made 1. Regni it is said The Kings most Excellent Majesty King 's Excellent Majesty Princely Serenity Highness minding the Governance and Order of his most loving Subjects to be in most perfect Unity and Concord in all things c. as his most Princely Serenity and Majesty hath already declared by evident Proofs Be it enacted by the Kings Highness with the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and of the Commons of this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same In the second and third Year of Ed. 6. they are called (b) Id. fol. 712. Acts in the Session c. humbly prayen That it may be Ordained and Enacted by His Majesty with the assent of the Lords and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same The rest are much what like these foregoing Of the Parliaments in Queen Mary's Reign IN the Title of her first (a) Id. fol. 817. Acts she is stiled Ordained and enacted by the Queen our Sovereign Lady and Assent of Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons Defender of the Faith and Supreme Head of the Church c. Be it therefore ordained and enacted by the Queen our Sovereign Lady with the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and of the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same After the Marriage of (b) Id. fol. 831. Queen Mary with King Philip of Spain the title is only Acts made in the Reign of our Sovereign Lord and Lady Philip and Mary Defenders of the Faith leaving out Supreme Head c. In the fourth and (c) Id. fol. 863. fifth of Philip and Mary in the Body of the Acts it is thus Be it Enacted Ordained and Established by the King and Queens Majesty the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons
in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same Of the Parliaments in Queen Elizabeth's time WE may observe something new in the Acts of this Queen we have noted once in Henry the Eighth's time the two Houses pray that it may be enacted and so in Edward the Sixth but in the first (a) Id. fol. 873. Chapter of the Acts of this Queen it is more full thus Most humbly beseech Your most Excellent Majesty Most humbly beseech your most excellent Majesty your faithful and obedient Subjects the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons of this your present Parliament assembled and in another (b) Id. fol. 874. Paragraph That it may please your Highness that it may be further enacted and in another place If some redress by Authority of this your High Court of Parliament High Court of Parliament with the assent of your Highness be not had and provided 5 Eliz. Cap. 1. it is thus expressed Be it therefore Enacted Ordained and Established by the Queen our Sovereign Lady and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by Authority of the same And in the Eighth Be it now Declared and Enated by the Authority of this present Parliament Most of all the rest of the Acts of her Reign are expressed after some of these forms The 43 of her Reign in the First Chapter it is thus In most humble wise beseechen your most excellent Majesty the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons of your Highness's Parliament assembled Of the Parliaments in King James the First 's Reign THE Title of his first (a) Id. fol. 1085. Acts is at the Parliament begun c. To the pleasure of Almighty God the Weal publick of this Realm were Enacted c. In the First Chapter We therefore your most Humble and Loyal Subjects the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled In most humble and lowly manner do beseech in most humble and lowly manner do beseech your most excellent Majesty that it may be published and declared in this High Court of Parliament and Enacted by Authority of the same In the Second Chapter it is said Be it further (b) Id. fol. 1086. Enacted by the Kings most Excellent Majesty by and with the Assent and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by Authority of the same In the Seventh of King James is only expressed Be it Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament c. The rest agrees with some of these Of the Parliaments in King Charles the First 's Reign THE Preface of his First (a) Id. fol. 1226. Parliament is At the Parliament c. To the high pleasure of Almighty God and to the weal publick of this Realm were enacted c. In the First Chapter (b) Id. fol. 1227. Be it enacted by the King c. it is said Be it Enacted by the Kings most excellent Majesty the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same In the beginning of the Petition (c) Id. fol. 1229. Petition of Right of Right it is thus worded Humbly shew unto our Soveraign Lord the King the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in Parliament assembled c. and the close of it is All which they most humbly pray your most excellent Majesty as their Rights and Liberties according to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm c and that your Majesty would be graciously pleased In the Seventeenth of the said King (d) Id. fol. 1237. Chap. 6. it is thus expressed Therefore the Kings most excellent Majesty out of his Princely care c. by the Assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same Ordaineth Enacteth and Establisheth Of the Parliaments in King Charles the Seconds Reign THE Preface to the Acts of the two Houses (a) Id. fol. 1249. begun 25 Apr. 1660. not summoned by the Kings Writ is much the same with that of King Charles the First and King James mutatis mutandis In the Third Chapter it is said Be it Enacted by the Kings most excellent Majesty and the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament In the Fourth Chapter (b) Id. fol. 1251. The Commons do by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords in this present Parliament and by Authority of the same give and grant unto you our Supreme Liege Lord and Soveraign one Subsidy c. Supreme Liege-lord and Sovereign In the First Chapter 13 Car. 2. the (c) Id. fol. 1300. enacting part is thus worded Do most humbly beseech your most Excellent Majesty Most humbly beseech Your most Excellent Majesty c. that it may be Enacted and be it Enacted by the Kings most Excellent Majesty by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords and Commons in this present Parliament Assembled and by Authority of the same The rest of the Acts in King Charles the Second's Reign are continued in the same form The Titles of the Acts of Parliament 1 Jac. 2. our most Gracious Soveraign are At the Parliament begun at Westminster the 19th Day of May Anno Dom. 1685. in the First Year of the Reign of our most Gracious Soveraign Lord James c. The Enacting part of the granting an Imposition c. thus Most Gracious Soveraign We your Majesties most Dutiful and Loyal Subjects the Commons Assembled in Parliament towards a Supply c. and with an humble and thankful acknowledgment of your Majesties favourable and tender regard to us your Commons have chearfully and unanimously given and granted unto your Majesty an Aid and Assistance and we do humbly beseech your Majesty that it may be Enacted and be it Enacted by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same All the other Acts which are not Grants of Aid Assistance or Supply are conceived in the latter words By this full enumeration of the most considerable Expressions either of Records or Historians relating to the Great Councils or Parliaments from William the Conqueror's time to this present Age which in a continued series of time I have deduced it appears that till King John's time only the Prelates Earls and Barons and such of the great Tenents in Capite as were not Barons were summoned and at the Kings pleasure by special Writ and after King John's Charter the lesser Tenents in Capite by General Summons Also that the Charters of Kings wherein they granted Liberties to their Subjects were received as Laws and gave as ample Satisfaction as now The King willeth doth to pass a Bill tendred for his Royal Assent by both Houses and there was good
Cabedo Pract. Obs par 2. decis 40. would himself For it is essential to Majesty and Soveraignty and cannot be abdicated while he remaineth King nor separated without the diminution or destruction of Majesty How both King and People are obliged to defend the Rights of the Crown will appear in the Laws ascribed to King Edward the Confessor in the 17.35 and 56. As to the Particular How absolutely necessary the Royal Assent is to all Laws in the Act of Recognition to King James the First it is fully expressed thus Which if Your Majesty shall be pleased as an Argument of your Gracious acceptation to adorn with Your Majestie 's Royal Assent without which it can neither be Compleat and Perfect nor remain to all Posterity according to our Desire as a Memorial of your Princely and tender Affection towards us c. Against what I have laid down those who were for co-ordinate Powers in the two Houses object many things Answers to some Objections against the King's sole establishing of Laws some I have answered in the Chapter of the King's Sovereignty and I shall meet with others in the Chapters of Parliaments And shall here only take notice of some omitted or not fully answered there Against the assertion That the Liberties granted by King Henry the Third were by way of Charter they produce the Preamble (r) Coke 2 Instit fol. 525. to the Confirmation of King Edward the First of Magna Charta La Charte des Franchises la Charte de la Forest les queux fuerent faitz per Commen de tout Royalm en le temps le Roy Henry pier soient tenue c. and Charta de Foresta wherein he saith that the Charter of Liberties and the Charter of the Forest made by the Community of all the Realm in the time of King Henry our Father shall be kept c. To which with the Judicious Doctor (s) General Preface to Compleat History p. 41. The ancient Kings sealing of Charters of Liberties reputed Laws Brady may be answered that these were the Petitions and Requests of the Community of the Kingdom and may be said to be made that is digested by them into the form of a Charter So the Barons offered King John's Magna Charta to him ready drawn in a Schedule and forced him to grant it and cause his Seal to be put to it and the whole strength and validity of the Charter lay in his Grant and the Confirmation of it under his Seal This was the only Security they desired and demanded no other and the Tenour of all the Charters were accordingly We grant We confirm We give for us and our Heirs to them and their Heirs c. Which Grants and Concessious were always in these times accepted and acknowledged to be sufficient without the least doubting or scruple There was no other Power or Authority that gave them being but the King's so that it seemed the great Councils or Parliaments of those times owned the Kings Charters under Seal and the Grants made by them to the People to be of good force and effect and that their Petitions to which he gave his assent and caused to be put under his Seal were by them accepted and from time to time acknowledged as firm and valid Laws The same learned (t) Idem p. 67. The Laws planted by Kings Doctor Brady observes that Sir Edward Coke hath a formal way of speaking The Law doth this and The Law doth that This is Law That is by Common Law of England abstracting it from any dependance upon or Creation by the Government as if it had been here before there was any and had grown up with the first Trees Herbs and Grass that grew upon English Ground and had not been of our antient Kings and their Successors planting by assistance and advice of their great Councils in all Ages as it was found expedient either by them or upon Petition and Request of their People which is acknowledged by all the Bishops Earls Barons and People present at the (u) Claus 1 E. 2. m. 10. dorso Coronation of King Edward the Second in these words Sir Will you grant and keep and by your Oath confirm to the People of England the Laws and Customs granted to them by the antient Kings of England your Predecessors true and devout to God and namely the Laws and Customs and Liberties granted to the Clergy and People by the glorious King Edward your Predecessor Another Objection some make against the Absoluteness of the King's Power Second Objection when it is said in antient Statutes The King ordains The King wills that it hath been resolved by many of the Judges (w) Coke 8. Report s 20. b. that if these Statutes be entred in the Parliament Rolls and allowed as acts of Parliament it shall be intended they were by Authority of Parliament With the Judicious Dr. Brady I shall not enquire how such Entry and such Allowance without any Words in the Statutes to that purpose can make them to be by Authority of Parliament But we may he sure those Words The King ordains The King wills being pronounced in Parliament and recorded in the Rolls thereof do clearly prove the King's Authority and Power in making Laws to be far greater than many Men would allow him or have him to enjoy (x) Lib. 3. c. 9. Bracton and the Author of (y) Lib. 1. c. 17. â—leta applying the Passage of the Civil Law Quod Principi placet Legis habet vigorem to the King of England say That Clause ought not to be understood of every thing that is rashly presumed to be his Will but of that which is justly determined upon good Advice and Deliberation by the Counsel of his Magistrates (z) Râ—ge Authoritatem prastante the King giving it Authority and confirming it for a Law and from hence (a) Cum ipse sit Author Juris non debet inde Injuriarum nasci occasio unde Jura nascuntur infer That when he himself is the Author of the Law Injustice ought not to spring from the same Fountain from whence the Law doth spring It is no diminution of the Sovereignty of a Prince in the matter of making Laws or repealing them to have the Assent of the Nobles and such a select Body of Great and Wise Men as the House of Commons are But when as in the Parliament 1641. the Two Houses claim a Co-ordinate Power and would make their Advices be swallowed as Commands it is this that all Loyal Persons should oppose We generally understand that the Persian Monarchy was as Absolute as any yet in it we have a manifest Discovery of the Concurrence of the Nobles in preparing a Decree The Persian manner of making Laws yet they wanted the King's establishing the Decree by his signing it whereby it might not be changed and Grotius thinks they signed it also (b) Dan. cap. 6. v. 7 8
puts an end to the Sessions so that what ever Bills are ready and pass not the Royal Assent must be again read three times in either House for the more security it is usual to insert a Proviso That the Session is not thereby concluded The Royal Assent is given two ways First Royal Assent by Patent by Commission since the Statute of the 33 H. 8. c. 21. wherein it is expressed That the Kings Royal Assent by his Letters Patents under the Great Seal Signed by his hand and declared and notified in his absence to the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and to the Commons Assembled in the higher House is and ever was of as good strengh and force as if the King had been there personally present and assented openly and publickly to the same The manner of the King 's giving his Publick Assent is in this manner The King cometh in Person in his Parliament-Robes Royal Assent when the King present and sitteth in his State and the Upper House sit in their Robes The Speaker with all the Commons House cometh to the Bar of the Lords House and in Sir Thomas Smith's time Sir Th. Smith's Commonwealth p. 45. Speeches used to be made there the Chancellor for the Lords and the Speaker for the Commons in set Speeches returned the Prince Thanks for that he hath so great Care of the good Government of his People and for calling them together to advise of such things as should be for the Reformation Establishing and Ornament of the Commonweal After which the Chancellor in the Prince's Name giveth Thanks to the Lords and Commons for their Pains and Travel taken which he saith the Prince will remember and recompense when Time and Occasion shall serve and that the Prince is ready to declare his Pleasure concerning their Proceedings whereby the same may have perfect Life and Accomplishment by his Princely Authority I think now mostly Hackwell of Passing of Bills p. 181 182. the Speaker of the House of Commons makes a Speech acquainting the King with the purport of the Bills Then the Clerk of the Crown readeth the Title of the Bills in such Order as they are in Consequence After the Title of every Bill is read singly The Clerk of the Crown pronounceth the Royal Assent or Dissent the Clerk of the Parliament pronounceth the Royal Assent according to certain Instructions given from his Majesty in that behalf If it be a Publick Bill to which the King assenteth the Answer is Le Roy le veult The King willeth If a Private Bill allowed by the King the Answer is Soit fait comme il est desire Let it be done as it is desired And upon a Petitionary Bill the like is used If it be a Publick Bill which the King forbeareth to allow he saith Le Roy se avisera The King will advise To a Subsidy Bill the Clerk pronounceth Le Roy remercie ses loyaux Subjects accepte leur Benevolence aussi le veult The King thanks his Loyal Subjects accepts their Benevolence and also willeth To a general Pardon is pronounced Les Prelates Seigneurs Communs en cest Parlement assembles au nom de touts vous autres Subjects remercient tres humblement vostre Majesty prient Dieu vous donner en sante bone vie longe The Prelates Lords and Commons in this Parliament assembled in the name of all your other Subjects thrice humbly give thanks to your Majesty and pray God to give you in health a good Life and long These P. 46. saith Sir Thomas Smith be taken now as perfect Laws and Ordinances of the Realm of England and none other and as shortly as may be are printed except it be some Private Acts made for the Benefit or Prejudice of some Private Man these be only exemplified under the Seal of the Parliament CHAP. XXIX Of Factious Combinations in Parliaments I Hope in the foregoing Chapters I have so explained the Constitution of Parliaments and the Legislative Power that unbiassed and unprejudiced Persons will no more be misled by the Sophisms and plausible pretences which to aggrandize the Power of the two Houses at first and after of the Commons House only the Penmen of the long Parliament made use of yet because many of late were furbishing the rusty Armour of their Demagogues and trimming their Helmets with fresh Plumes I conceive it necessary to take notice of some of their chiefest Arguments and examine those which had greatest Influence upon the People The great and venerable name of Parliament and its Authority was constantly used as Shield and Buckler to ward off all the Force of the Loyal Assaults and Mr. Prynne writ a large Volume which he stiled The Soveraign Power of Parliaments and when the very Lees and Dregs of the Commons House was put in Ferment that very Kilderkin would admit no lower Stile than the supreme Authority of the Nation to be pearched on its Bunghole Therefore to disabuse the less considerate The various Acceptation of the word Parliament and to detect the Frauds of those which under that great Name applyed whatever they met with in the Laws or History to the House of Commons I think it necessary in the first place to clear the acceptation of the Word Appropriated to the Lords House Sometimes the word Parliament is used for the House of (a) Egerton sect 4. 22 23. Lords only as when upon Writ of Error any Judgment in the King's-Bench is examined in the House of Lords the Judgment is said to be affirmed or reversed by Parliament The Appellation of Parliament is likewise used for the two Houses To both the Houses in regard they are the gross Body whereof the Parliament consists there only wanting the Sovereign Head to compleat it But they are so far from being the High Court of Parliament that they cannot co-unite to be an entire Court either of Sovereign or Ministerial Justice but only in concurring in Votes in their several Houses for preparing of matters in order to an act of all the Body which when they have done their Votes are so far from having any legal Authority in the State as in Law there is no Stile or Form of their joynt Acts further than Bills nor doth the Law so much as take notice of them till they have Royal Assent without which the Votes of the two Houses dye in the Womb like an Embryo So that the proper use of the word Parliament How properly the High Court of Parliament as Authority of Law-making is annexed to the name is only when the King and the two Houses concurr in one Act and in that sence only is the Parliament the Supream Court the highest Judicatory and the most Sovereign Power Not for any Soveraignty in the two Houses and from them transferred to the King by their joining and consenting with him but because every compleat and perfect Act of it is the Act of
bottomed upon the securing of one Faction against another he (o) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Polit. l. 5. c. 6. reckons the keeping up of a standing Army in War and Peace which he saith was by reason of the distrust among themselves whereby they were obliged to commit themselves to the custody of Soldiers and the Commander being by that means impowered to be a Judge or Arbiter betwixt them made himself Lord of both as he instanceth in the time of the Government of the Family of the Alvidi at Larissa and at Samos and Abydus and in Timophanes at Corinth For this reason the Romans fearing Camillus banished him So Julius Caesar for ten years having the command in Gaul was able to master the Senate with more ease If we had never heard of any such thing in the World before yet we had the too late calamitous experience of it in our late Republican Government which was no longer able to subsist but while it had an Army maintained at the charge of the enslaved People to secure them yet they falling into Factions themselves their Army did so likewise and the Houses and Army at last came to have several Interests and to have competitions for Sovereignty which any wise man might have foreseen and at last the Army being divided the happy Restauration of the King was thereby much facilitated Having thus cleared That a Common-wealth cannot so well defend it self against a Foreign Enemy I hope the point That a Commonwealth Government is less conducible than Monarchy to prevent intestine Discords I shall now proceed to discourse how difficult it is in this Form also to defend their Subjects from Foreign Invasions especially without the constituting of Dictators or Generals with unsociable Power which is in effect a temporary Monarchy In all Wars nothing is more requisite than Unity of Councils and Secrecy in the conduct of Affairs which is most difficult to be obtained where many are at the Helm Besides among so many different judgments as there must be in such a Body before they can arrive at a Resolution favourable opportunities for Action are by protractions irrecoverably lost and the fear they have of impowering their General too much lest he should establish himself in the Sovereignty makes them limit and restrain him so as he cannot take advantages when offered and thereby Commanders are cautelous and wary not to offend so many Masters whereby time is lost in procuring new Instructions and sometimes for the reasons aforesaid more Generals than one are appointed that one may be a check to the other So (p) Lib 8. Herodotus observes That the difference of Generals when in equal command hath lost victories as at Isthmus by the dissention betwixt Themistocles and Euribias the Persians had almost mastered all So Thucydides notes that so long as Pericles by his own judgment and will governed the Affairs of Athens so long all things were prosperous but after by the Factions of evil-disposed persons he was opposed he sped as ill Besides in the numerous Masters in a Commonwealth the saving of every one 's own Stake will be the principle of their (q) Nalson's Common Interest c. 3. care and sedulity So that if a Foreign Power give them a defeat they will be easily induced to follow as they of late used to call it Providence in all Revolutions and if they can obtain any assurance of enjoying their private Laws or obtaining an higher pitch of greatness under another power they will not easily resist the temptation of betraying the Liberty of their Country and so quitting the leaking Vessel of the Commonwealth will either fairly tack about in their private Shalop and stand in with the next Shore of safety or by striking Sail come under the Lee of the Conqueror or strike into the assistance of him in hope to have a share of the Plunder Besides in the Multitude of Councellors if there happen any notable miscarriages of State there is safety to themselves In Miscarriages the Authors difficultly known It being difficult to fix it upon any one single person every one shrowding himself in the complex Act of the whole So that though they singly put in for the glory of prosperous Atchievements yet in unfortunate or unlucky Councils and Actions they skreen themselves under the majority of Votes which because they always may do it must necessarily make some more Supine and less Vigilant over the Publick It is in these muddy Pools of Commonwealths the devouring Otters may safelier lodg here the gliding slippery Eel finds Covert the Horseleeches abound the Water-rats lodg in their Banks and the Uliginous parts swarm with Frogs and Toads every one preying upon other Here the Cockatrice breeds and the fiery Basilisks as well as Lizards and Newts Africk is not more fruitful of Monsters than they of Harpyes This is the common Sewer that receives all the sludg and filth of People the hopes and expectation of Liberty alluring all As to the Peoples living freer from oppression in a Republic Great Injustice and Oppression in Commonwealths than under Monarchy it is evidently found the contrary as I shall make it appear in the Chapter of Monarchy And there is strong reason for it since in this form these Lords the States will be continually striving to enlarge not only their Power but their Riches and the more they increase in either the more must the common and middle ranked Men be oppressed and exhausted It hath been from the insolence oppressing and engrossing of Estates by the Governing Party that the Thâ—rians changed their (p) Polit. lib. 5. c. 6. Aristocracy to Democracy that the Messeniac War was occasioned that the Revolutions were at Lygdamus in the Isle of Nexos Maffilia Istria Heraclea and Enidus So the Philosopher says That the unjust Judgments or unusual Severities exercised by the revengeful temper of the Factions caused great Convulsions in the State as he particularly instanceth in Eurition at Heraclea and Archias at Thebes who both being justly condemned for Adultery yet because in an unusual way of Contumely they were tyed to Stakes in the Market place they out of revenge excited their Friends to assist them and overthrew the Oligarchy Besides when Men are thus established in Power few can have Redress for their private injuries and wrongs being that every complaint would but look like contempt of Authority because the Party oppressing being one of the Associates in Power Example in our late Republicans and joynt Rulers he would influence the residue to vindicate him Hence we saw in the late long Parliaments Members yea their Officers and common Soldiers that they were such Tyrants in their Residence and Quarters that none durst question their outrages lest they should be brought before Committees for Malignancy or Delinquency It being a characteristic note of a disaffected Person not to resign up ones self to an absolute slavery to
WEST SEAXNA CYNING I Ine by the Grace of God King of the West Saxons in his preamble to his Laws But until about our Henry the Third it was not of so constant use as that the Stile of the King necessarily required it This Stile of Dei Gratia is frequently given in old time Given to Spiritual Lords and yet in use to Spiritual Lords nothing being more common in the Instruments of Bishops and Abbats in the Chartularies of Monasteries and it is given from Kings to them in the Summons of Parliament and Writs to Assemble or Prorogue Convocations in this form Jacobus c. Reverendissimo in Christo â—â—tri praedilectoque fideli Consiliario nostro Georgio eadeâ—◠〈…〉 Archiepiscopo Cantuariensi c. But at this day though it 〈◊〉 â—â—ven to them they use it not in the first Person but Deâ— (i) Rosula Novella 〈◊〉 cap. 111. â—â—mentia or Providentia Divina and in older times when they writ to the Pope Emperor or King they were not to write Dei Gratia of themselves but only such or such licet indignus vel immerens Bononiae Episcopus c. By all these Titles we cannot but observe that the dignity of Kings and Sovereigns was looked upon in all Ages as deriving Authority from God Almighty and his Vicegerents here upon Earth having the Attributes of God that as he was Supreme over all things in Heaven and Earth so they within their Districts upon Earth I shall end this Chapter with this Observation That the Attribute of Dei Gratia applied to Sovereigns and Bishops might probably have Authority from the Constitution of Justinian (k) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Just Noâ— 6. init 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ibid. which runs thus The greatest Gifts which Gods goodness from above hath conferred on Men are the Priesthood and Empire both of which proceed from one and the same Principle and are for the ordering and disposing of the Affairs of Mankind Concerning the peculiar Title of our Kings of England Defender of the Faith the learned Spelman having given us thâ— Copy of the Bull and discoursed so fully of it I shall 〈◊〉 the curious Reader to him for satisfaction CHAP. XVII Of the Soveraignty of the Kings of England according to our Histories and Laws THE Titles and Attributes which other Soveraign Princes have either assumed The Kings of England have used all the Titles proper to Sovereign Princes or have been given to them our Kings of England have used as might be made appear by innumerable Examples But I shall treat but of a few and shew wherein the Soveraignty is discovered and what ancient Prerogatives they have by their acts of Grace quitted and lastly how the long Parliament of 1641. would have cramped the King's Authority First as to the Title of King or Emperor promiscuously So our Edgar frequently in his Charters calls himself Albionis Anglorum Basileus As King Emperour Lord. and I have noted before that the Grecians esteemed the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be of full as eminent Signification as Emperor So in a Charter (a) Cod. Wigorn. to Oswald Bishop of Worcester he is called Anglorum Basileus omniumque Regum Insularum Oceanique Britanniam circumjacentis cunctarumque Nationum quae infra eam includuntur Imperator Dominus In which we may note that one of our Kings of England writ himself not only Basileus according to the Grecian usage which signified King and Emperor but also Emperor and Lord three of the fullest Attributes either the Grecian or Roman Emperors ever used as also Lord of the British Sea as Canutus his Successor challenged So in a Charter to (b) Mon. Ang. par 1. p. 64. Peterburg Ego Edgar sub ipso sidereo Rege praesidens Regno Magnae Britanniae I have seen another (c) Lib. MS. Roberti de Swapham c. Fundationis Burgensis Coenobii p. 38. of his Charters prefaced thus Gratia Domini nostri Jesu Christi omnium seculorum omnia suo Intuitu distribuentis Regna terrarum moderantis habenas rerum Ego Edgar sub ipso eodem Rege praesidens Regno Britanniae c. So King (d) Id. p. 39. Edward in the same Book stiles himself Ego Edwardus Rex Anglorum Monarchiam Regiminis tenens hoc decretum Patris mei per deprecationem Abbatis Aidulfi perhenniter affirmavi In which we may note that Edgar owns himself subject to Jesus Christ God And King Edward saith he holds the single Command of Government So King Edward in a (e) Coke Praefat. 4. Reports Rex Anglorum totius Britanniae Telluris Gubernator Rector Angligenum Orcadarum necnon in Gyro jacentium Monarcha Anglorum Induperator Charter to Ramsey stiles himself Totius Albionis Dei moderante Dominatione Basileus King of all Albion and King Edwin in a Charter to Crowland calls himself King of England and Governour and Ruler of all the Land of Britain So Ethelred in his Charter to Canterbury stiles himself Of all the English born and the Oreades lying in Circuit about it Monarch and Emperor of the English So that by Orcades must be understood all the Isles about Britain So William Rufus dates his Charter to the Monastery of Shaftsbury secundo Anno Imperii mei By all which it appears that the Kings of England have justly assumed the Supream Imperial Command in their own Dominions and though the Title of Emperor hath been disused Kings of England as much Sovereigns as Emperours yet we shall find the substance of it sufficiently challenged in that of (f) Ipse omnes libertaâ—â—s 〈◊〉 Râ—gno habebat suo quas Imperator vendicabat in Imperio Matt. Paris in vita Willielmi 2. William Rufus to Arch-Bishop Anselm when he told him That he had all the Liberties in his Kingdom which the Emperor challenged in the Empire And in a Constitution (g) Râ—gâ—um Angliae ab omâ—i subjectione Imperiali liberrimum Claus 13 E. 2. m. 6. dorso of King Edward the Second it is declared That the Kingdom of England is most free from all Imperial Subjection which excluded all public Notaries who were made by the Emperor or Popes and by this Constitution were utterly rejected The Statutes for it This further appears in the (h) Stat. Anno 23 E. 3. c. 1. Vide Coke Instit 2. 111. 4 part 6. 8. 3. Instit 120 125. Statute of Praemunire made 23 Ed. 3. which runs thus That it being shown by the grievous and clamorous Complaints of the great Men and Commons how that divers of the People be and been drawn out of the Realm to answer of things whereof the Cognizance pertaineth to the King's Court and also that the Judgments given in the same Court be impeached in another Court in prejudice and dis-inherison of our Lord the King and of his Crown c. Therefore it was enacted That none of the King's Liege-People of
by the Law said to be in the King (z) Sheppard ut supra a threefold greatness of Perfection First of being freed from Infamy and all kind of Imperfections common to Man Secondly of Power in having the command of all his People Thirdly of Majesty being the Fountain of Honour Justice and Mercy The King is Gods immediate Viceroy (a) Câ—k 2.44.5.29 within his Dominions Vicarius Dei As his Protection and Government reacheth to all his People as Subjects so the Allegiance and Obedience of them all is due to him as their Sovereign whether Ecclesiastical or Civil and so he is Persona mixta his Prerogatives are called Jura Regalia Insignia Coronae Ancient Prerogatives and Royal Flowers of the Crown so inseparably annexed to the Crown that none but the King may have them nor can they be communicated to or taken by any Subject (b) Bracton lib. 1. c. 8. Stat. 25 H. 8. c. 21. Nemo terram nisi Authoritate Râ—gia possiâ—et Plowden 136. Jenkins Cent. 7. Case 77. 2. Case 16.17 E. 2. c. 17. Nevil 101.174 All Lands are said to be held of him immediately or mediately he can hold of no Man or any be equal to him as to be joynt Tenant of Land with him and his Jurisdiction is over all places within his Dominions both on the dry Land and on the Sea The Judges are to observe it as a certain Rule That whatever may be for the benefit of the King and his profit shall be taken most largely for him and what against him and for his disprofit be taken strictly neither is it only the duty of Judges but of all other his Subjects in their Stations to help the King to his Right The Perogatives are many and great yet such as are his by the Ancient Law of the Land and what the Kings of England have time out of mind used and are such as are of absolute (c) Coâ—e 12.8.30.2 part Instit 262.496.5 part 11.2.8 necessity for the security of the Government and the Public weals As to call and dissolve Parliaments give his Royal Assent to Laws command the Militia coyn Moneys grant Honors make and dispose of the great Seal dispense with penal Laws pardon Felonies and Treasons make and appoint great Officers Justices of Eyre and Assize of the Peace Gaol-delivery and Sheriffs to grant Charters to Corporations and other Persons or Fraternities He hath the sole Power of appointing ratifying and consummating all Treaties with Foreign Princes making War and Peace granting Safe-Conduct and Protection and all these and many other are firmly ascertained (d) Quod Rex est 〈◊〉 Lex est Regi Rex est Amma 〈◊〉 Lex est Anima Regi by Laws and have ever been and still are in the King alone and at his own Discretion Although there is no need in describing the Sovereignty of our Kings to carry it up to that absoluteness of Monarchy where all things are appointed and reversed by the Sovereigns fiat yet (e) Jus Regium p. 42. we must on the other side consider That the Monarchy which is subject to the impetuous Caprices of the Multitude when giddy or to the incorrigible Factiousness of the Nobility when interested is in effect no Government at all it must be owned That in all Governments a Sovereignty must reside some where and a Monarch can 〈◊〉 no Participants For then it would cease to be a Monarchy and in things that relate immediately to Government the King hath as much right to regulate them as to instance to restrain the Licence of the Press or secure Peace as we have to regulate and dispose of our Property Government being the Kings Property for with the Monarchy the King must enjoy all things that are necessary for the Administration of it according to that just Maxim (f) Quando aliquid â—oneditur omnia concessa videntur sine quibus concessum explicari nequit of the Law When any thing is granted all things seem to be granted without which the thing granted cannot be explained Which warrants the Kings Advocate of Scotland to lay that down as a general (g) Jus Regium p. 77. Rule That their Kings can do every thing that relates to Government and is necessary for the Administration thereof though there be no special Law or Act of Parliament for it if the same be not contrary to the Law of God Nature or Nations The Power and Authority of the Kings of England have been much more unbounded than they are at present (h) Part 1. c. 16. sol 34. Bracton speaking of his time saith That neither the Justices or private Persons might dispute the Kings Charter but if there were a doubt of it the Resolution must come from the Kings own Interpretation If Justice be demanded of the King saith (i) Idem lib. 1. c. 8. p. 5. he seeing no Writ lies against him one must petition that he would correct and amend what he hath done By the Condescensions of gracious Princes such Restrictions have been made of their Sovereign Absoluteness By the Grants and Condescensions of our Kings their Absoluteness lessened that they have obliged themselves to govern their Kingdoms transmitted to them with such Limitations by their numerous Ancestors by Rules of Law Equity Justice and right Judgment in Imitation of their Supreme Head and Omnipotent Monarch That therefore it may demonstratively appear how happily the Government of England is constituted for the Benefit of the Subjects who under so benign a Monarchy enjoy more Advantages in the Security of their Persons and Proprieties than under the most free Commonwealth that ever we read of I shall lightly touch upon some of those Particulars which the Kings of England by reason of several Acts of Parliament they have given their Royal Assents to have precluded themselves from the single Disposal of as in Absolute Monarchies are used yet I hope to make it clear in several Branches of this Discourse That there is no such thing as Co-ordinacy of any other Power or such a mixture as vitiates the Monarchy by a debasing Alloy much less that the Government can be Arbitrary or Tyrannical which hath sheathed the Sword of Justice within the Velvet Scabbard of the Laws and lined the Scarlet Robes of Majesty with the softest Ermine of Indulgence to well deserving Subjects who by their Obedience and Considerateness make their Princes and their own Happiness most perfect For it is equally unhappy to Princes and Subjects where (k) Alii Principes Reges hominum ipse Rex Regum Maximilian's Jest is true That whereas other Princes were Kings of Men he was King of Kings because his Subjects would do but only what they list But to come to the Particulars of Royal Abatements and Indulgences The Kings of England may not rule their People by their Will or by Proclamation as the Roman Emperors by their (l) 〈◊〉 lib. 2. c. 8. The
subsequent Acts of Parliament supplied all Defects and all the Limitations of that absolute Power which accrued by Conquest being the free Concession of himself and his Successors which appears in their Grants by way of Charter as I shall hereafter have occasion to enlarge upon it is most evident that the King's Power is absolute where no Law (f) D. Digs Unlawfulness of Resisting can be produced to the contrary and no special Case can be determined by the Subject to the Kings disadvantage and though the Kings succeeding the Conquest to sweeten Subjection quaedam jura pactis minuerunt and these Acts of Grace were confirmed by Promise and Oath No Contract betwixt King and Subjects whereby they may exact an Account yet we find no Footsteps of any security given that should endanger the Person or Regal Authority by giving to their Subjects any legal Power to unking them if they should not perform Covenant Nor could it be rational to expect such for they knew full well if they should not break such Promises yet a Pretence that they did so as we have known it was alledged concerning the Coronation Oath might upon the first opportunity create a Civil War Therefore their Subjects had as little reason to accept as the Kings had to offer so pernicious a Security as would bring both Parties into such a sad Condition For if Rebellion were to be allowed in any Case that Case would be always pretended and though the Prince were Just Wise and Religious yet ambitious Men to compass their own Ends would impute to him Oppression Weakness or Irreligion as the World knows by too sad Experience was verified in King Charles the Martyr who taking his measures of others Sincerity by the rule of his own Heart suffered pretences of publick Good to grow up to insolent Tumults and at last to Rebellion and notwithstanding his Exemplary Practice in his publick Devotions was traduced to have but handsomly dissembled and favoured another Religion in his Heart and at last brought before a crew of Regicides impeached of breach of Trust Tyranny and I know not how many horrid Crimes against his Subjects who yet died the Peoples Martyr and the Royal Asserter of their Liberties and Priviledges which all his Subjects found to expire with him the greatest Arbitrariness and cruellest Tyranny being during their Power exercised by the new Common-wealth Men that ever was read of in any History Those who read Books among those of the Sect of Libertines in Politicks and so much magnify the great name of Liberty of the Subject and co-ordinate Powers Writers who lived under Common-wealths no Guides to us converse most in Greek and Latin Authors who lived under Commonwealths and so were profuse in the commendation of their Country Government against Usurpers or else these admired Authors were (g) Jus Regium p. 134. Stoicks who out of a selfish Pride equalled themselves not only to their Kings but to their own Gods even as our Quakers who pretend a Light within them a more sure guide to them than the Law Now the same reason they had to commend their form of Government We have more reason to commâ—nd our Government than the Romans or Grecians theirs and so much more as Monarchy is preferrable to Aristocracy we in England have reason to commend our Constitution where our Kings are truly the Fathers of their Country and if they would ballance the convenience or inconvenience of either Government they would soon discover it For whereas they say that the Doctrine of Non-resistance is the readiest Motive to establish Tyranny It is much more certain and experimentally known that the Leaders of the Rabble always prove such and that the Distractions of a civil War which ordinarily are occasioned by the pretence of reforming something amiss in the Governours and Competitions betwixt Persons for Soveraignty destroy more than the Lusts of any one Tyrant can do which made Lucan a Republican and of the Pompeian Party conclude after a sad review of the continual Civil Wars betwixt Sylla and Marius Caesar and Pompey without touching upon what followed under the Triumvirs Foelices Arabes Medique Eoaque tellus Qui sub perpetuis tenuerunt Regna Tyrannis And if he preferred even the Tyranny or absoluteness of those Kings before the State of Civil Wars how much more have we reason to submit and that chearfully to the most easy Yoak of the Sovereignty of our Princes We need not be solicitous that their unaccountableness to their Subjects shall prompt them to Tyranny because we have good Security as strong as humane Wisdom ever invented that we shall live happily under that Constitution which our Fore-fathers enjoyed the Benefit of in an high Degree The Security we have that no Arbitrary Government can be exercised in England never distrusting the sound temper of the Policy For first our Kings swear at their Coronations to preserve the Laws Liberties Properties and Religion Secondly If they should command illegal things the Executors of them are responsible to Parliamentary Inquisitions Lastly the Interest of the King is the same with that of the Subject as to their Prosperity and Misery so that a King will always consult the good of his Subjects which made (h) Praeestis hominibus sed hominum causa nec domini modo Arbitri rerum sed Tutores Administratores estis Collata est in sinum vestrum a deo hominibus Respublica sed nempe in sinum ut foveatur Epist Dedicat ad Imp. Reges Principes Lipsius tell the Sovereigns That they govern over Men but for their good and are not only Lords and Judges of Matters but Tutors and Administrators That the Government of the Commonweal by God and Men is placed in their Bosoms or Laps but so as to be cherished and protected there To conclude this discourse We have heard of or seen the sad Calamities the Republican Rebellion brought upon all his Majesties Dominions when the mild Government of King Charles the First was altered to the most Bloody and Tyrannical one of his rebellious Subjects that any Age could parallel and we have had Experience of the merciful Government of his Royal Son and Successor and have lived to see all the Establishments of Usurpers brought to Confusion We have seen a formidable Rebellion burst forth in our Magnanimous King James the Second's Reign which had been forming seven Years before utterly overthrown in two Months and we cannot peruse Histories but we must meet with infinite Examples of the sad devastations such Rebellions bring to their Country and the unsuccessfulness of them Therefore I would earnestly advise all Malecontents never to make their Country's Ruine and the slain Carcasses of their Countrymen the Steps by which they must ascend the Scaffolds or the Rounds of the Ladders they must mount the Gallows which without a Prince's Clemency are the sure Rewards of all Rebels and their certain Fate CHAP.
XXI Of the King's Authority in making Laws HAving treated of the King's Sovereignty I come now to treat of that Top-branch of it the Power and Authority of the King in giving Laws to his Subjects I must be shorter on this Head because the following Chapters concerning the Great Councils and those particularly concerning Parliaments will more fully illustrate and confirm this Particular In all Government the Legislative Power must be fixed somewhere and it is the concurrent Opinion of all (a) Ab eo i. Principe tanquam a fonte Leges omnes Jura â—manant Vinii Epist Dedicat. Id. Comment in Inst it lib. 1. tit 2. p. 13. a. Civilians That all Laws do flow from the Prince as from a Fountain The Word Lex and Jus by Cicero and the Romans were most-what used promiscuously though Lex or Law did frequently signifie what was writ and enjoyned to be observed Therefore the Plebiscita of the Romans at first were not called Laws because they obliged only part of the Citizens till the Hortensian Law gave them the same force as those which were accorded in Comitiis Centuriatis The Plebiscita were among the Romans The Plebiscita of the Romans after the expulsion of their Kings binding Laws and they were made thus The Magistrates who had the greater Auspices in the Commonwealth such were the Consuls Dictators or Pretors proposed the Laws to the Assemblies of the People and asked them by the Name of Quirites Whether they willed or commanded them And they writ in the Table either A. for Antiquo or V. R. for Vti Rogas As thou askest The Tribunes and Plebeian Aediles were the proper Magistrates of the Plebs but the Aediles were never known to demand the Peoples Suffrage to the Laws The Plebiscita at first were made in the Assemblies of the (b) Tributis Comitiis Centuriatis aut Curiatis Tribes and the Laws in the Hundredary or Curiate Assemblies But to be short L. Valerius and M. Horatius being Consuls it being a doubt whether the Fathers were obliged by the Plebiscita they passed a Law in the Centuriata (c) Anno v. C. 304 305. Howel In the Curiata Comitia saith Dionys Comitia That whatever the Plebs should enjoyn in the Convention of the Tribes should be binding to the People which was confirmed by (d) Anno v. C. 367. Vinnius Q. Hortensius the Dictator at the third Secession of the People to the Janiculum therefore (e) Inter Legem Plebiscitum spâ—â—ies interesset constituendi potestas autem eadâ—m esset Sect. de Origine Juris Id. p. 14. Senatus consultum and Power of the Roman Senate Pomponius saith That the manner of constituting a Law and Plebiscitum differed but the Power was the same That which the Senate commanded and constituted was called a Senatus consultum Vinnius proves That while the Roman Republic stood the Laws were made by the People alone and not by the Senate For they had permitted to them as the Publick Council to take cognisance and Decrees of things that related to the constituting the Republic but so that all Matters of great moment were not established unless the (f) Polyb. lib. 6. Dionys Halic lib. 4. 7. Senatus consulta nullam vim legis babehant nisi plebs ea probaret People confirmed them So that by no Decree of the Senate either any new Law was introduced or any old one abrogated So that neither in Julius Caesar or Augustus's time we find mention of their Decrees And (g) 1. de Repub. c. 10. Bodin affirms That from the time of the expulsion of the Kings to the Empire of Tiberius Caesar the Senate had no power to make Laws but certain Annual Decrees which yet did neither bind the People or Plebs During the Civil Wars there was scarce any Authority but in the Emperors till Augustus in some measure restored the Power of the Comitia as Suetonius tells us who saith That Julius Caesar (h) Jus Comitiorum non in totum populo ademerat sed cum eo partitus est Sueton. in Julio did not wholly abrogate the Power of the Comitia but divided the Power betwixt himself and them and Augustus brought back the ancient Jus of the Comitia And Tacitus tells us of these times Ad eam diem etsi potissima arbitrio Principis quaedam tamen studiis Tribuum fiebant That to that day although most things were done by the Will of the Prince yet some things were done by the Study of the Tribes Yet it is observed That from what time the Laws and the (i) Ex eo igitur tempore legibus plebiscitis quiescentibus Senatus jus facere coepit quanquam non tam propria Auctoritate quam conniventia quadam indulgentia Principum Vinnius p. 14. Plebiscita were weakned or less regarded the Senate began to make Laws but it was by the Connivence and Indulgence of the Princes as appears by the Orations the Princes had in the Senates Therefore (k) Solus arbiter rerum Jure n mine Regio 1. Annal. Tacitus makes his Prince sole Arbiter of Affairs by Kingly Right and Name and gives the Reason for it Because the nature of Commands consists not otherwise than that the last resort be to One Ea est imperandi ratio ut non aliter constet quam si uni reddatur So the Judicious (l) Reges domâ—ni rerum temporumque trahunt conciliis cuncta non sequuntur Lib. 8. Livy saith Kings are Lords of Things and Times attracting all things by their Counsel not following them So Mecaenas's Advice was to (m) Insurgere paulatim munia legum magistratuum ad se trahere Tacit. 1. Annal Augustus insensibly and gradually to draw to himself the Appointment of Laws and Magistrates However by Pliny it is recorded to the Honour of Trajan That he would make no Laws without the Senate as Alexander did nothing in Military Affairs without his Council of Officers or in other Matters of moment without his Council of Prudent Men. Thus the Senate had a shadow of Authority and were something like the Parliaments of France to ratifie the King's Edicts And it was some advantage to a Senate that the Prince concurred with (n) Senatus Potentiam augendo suae serviebant Suet. c. 29. them è contra So we read That Theoderick the Goth passed that obliging Complement upon them (o) Judicium vestrum Patres Conscripti noster comitatur assensus Our Assent Fathers of the Senate accompanies your Judgment So Bodin observes That whenever the Senate had any Authority it was when it was particula quaedam Majestatis and had it not vi Senatus sed quia simul sustinet partem Majestatis So he would ascribe to the Senate Jus decernendi Sententiam pronunciandi but to want the absolute Legislative Power For if the Senate had obtained that the Government must have been Aristocratical How the Equites by a Law
this State of the Empire and of absolute Sovereign Princes (x) Leges jubere universis singulis civilâ—s dare De Repub lib. 1. c. 10. lib. 3. Bodin saith it is the first and principal part of Majesty to command Laws and impose them on all and singular the Subjects and he saith That in the Emperors time the name of the Senate was inscribed only to testify such Laws were made and to render them more acceptable to the People by the opinion they would then have that they were made with Council and Prudence So (y) Polit. c. 11. Law-making the Prerogative of Sovereign Princes Anisaeus ranks it among the first of the Jura Majestatis to make Laws for that the Government saith he is for the most part by Laws therefore they should be in the hand of the Sovereign for that they have no Power but as they are inforced by his Authority who possesseth the Plenitude of Empire I shall only note a few things of the absoluteness of the Roman Emperors in point of Law-making or abrogating and so pass to the considerations of our English Monarchy referring the larger and more explicit treating of it to the Chapters of Parliaments In the Capitol now Lateran Palace is extant a Table of (z) Gruteri Inscript p. 142. A Fragment of the Lex Regia yet extant Brass where is to be seen a fragment of the Lex Regia renewed as to Vespasian confirming many things of Sovereign and sole Authority as descending upon him from his Predecessors and enacting That what he had done decreed or commanded before his Ratification should be held and taken for as good Law as if the People it self had done decreed or commanded it So that tho' he might make use of the Senate or Peoples Ratification yet his Right was as strong before So (a) Tit. De Legibus lib. 1. Constantine challengeth to himself alone Authority to judge betwixt Law and Equity and so in point of Repeal of Laws (b) Non ab aliis sed a sese leges abrogatas suisse Lib. 3. Theodosius and Valentinian say That the Laws were to be abrogated by no other but themselves It is not to be doubted but that great and vast Empires require for their better Government a more absolute Power in the Sovereign to make Laws suitable to Emergencies for the Preservation of the whole So the Ottoman Empire and those of China Persia and the Mogul could not well be conserved entire without it Yet in these there are established Laws agreeable to the Laws of Nature and of Nations whereby the Rights of meum and tuum to Strangers are adjusted and the Subjects though they have no Property like the Europaeans yet are kept in Order and under Protection of the Laws and their Absoluteness consists principally in the ordering the Execution of any Subject without Juridical Process in placing and displacing Governours or depriving Cities Provinces and Kingdoms of Priviledges I have enlarged upon this Head to show how happy we are in England The happy State of England in the disposing of the Legislative Power that though the Force and Vigor of all our Laws flow from our Sovereigns Paternal Care â—â—ace and Bounty yet in the Point of making and abrogating Laws not only Consultation is had with so venerable a Body as the two Houses of Parliament are but nothing is done by the Sovereign without their own Preparation of Bills for his Royal Assent A wise and wealthy part of which are chosen by our selves and by the Kings Permission impowered in that particular to act for us in deliberating upon and fashioning such Bills as they petition the Sovereign to grant So that what the Judicious (c) Preface to the Reader Comp. History Dr. Brady after many other learned Men asserts is most true That by time and the Concessions of our Kings the Subjects of this Government have and may enjoy all Freedom and Happiness that sober rational Men can desire and such as is no where to be found but in this Island and the Dominions to it belonging nor can any Man that loves his Prince or Country wish for other than the present Constitution By the whole series of great Councils in the Saxon times until 49 Hen. 3. and the Parliaments succeeding I shall make it clear That the Royal Assent is that which forms the Preparatory Bills presented by both Houses into Laws and that in ancienter times the Laws were made by the Kings sole Grant by way of Charter I shall here only lay down some Preliminaries to shew in general what the ancient Usage was referring Particulars to the following Chapters First it appears That there were no certain (d) Sheringham's Supremacy p. 51. Anciently Kings called whom they pleased to advise them in making Laws Persons designed by Law whose Concurrence was required to constitute a great Council but the Kings used the Advice only of those whom they pleased to call unto themselves who were always such as they thought most able to counsel and direct them in the matters that were to be consulted of and whose assent was most likely to add most Credit and Estimation to the Laws that were to be divulged So we find in (e) Chron. Sax. Anno 670. fol. 516. And tha haefde getheal mid his witum freondam mid heora Teymenysse fultum gethafunge Christes geleassan onfeng Bed Eccl. Hist lib. 3. c. 22. Bede that Segebert or Sigbercht who was King of the East Saxons in the time of Oswi King of Northumberland who perswaded him to become a Christian held a Council with his Wites i.e. Nobles and Wisemen and his Friends and by their Advice Aid and Consent received the Christian Faith We find that Offa King of the Mercians made Laws without the Assent of his Great Council for he being at Rome (f) Mat. Paris vita Offae p. 171. Hoc autem per totam suam ditionem teneri in perpetuum constituit golng into the School of the English which was there out of his Royal Munificence He gave to the support of the People of his Kingdom that should come thither a Penny to be paid yearly for ever out of every Family by all whose Goods in the Fields exceeded the value of Thirty Pence and this he made a perpetual Constitution throughout all his Dominions excepting the Lands conferred upon the Monastery of St. Albans This Imposition and Law continued a long while in force though we find it not confirmed by any great Council in his own time or his Successors only in the Laws of King Edgar and King Edward it is enjoyned to be payed as the Kings Alms which implies it was the Kings Gift solely not by consent of a great Council So his Son (g) Matt. Paris Auct additam fol. 239 240. Ecgfrid grants Thyreseld to St. Albans with the Consent and Testimony of his Magnates which imports it to be granted by Consent of a Great
the King (e) Remisit libere concessit integre promisiâ— remitted freely granted and fully promised the Investiture by Ring and Staff and freely left the Election of the Prelates to their respective Churches By which we may not only note who made up this Great Council but that the enacting part was solely the King's Grant The Charter (f) Lib. rub Scaccar Twysden LL. Id. 1. p. 175. of Henry the First was made before the Eighteenth of his Reign in which he saith because his Kingdom was oppressed with unjust Exactions in (g) Ego respectu Dei amore quem ergâ— vos habeo Matt. Paris fol. 292. num 10. See the Explanation of this Charter Brady's Argum. fol. 265. and Selden's Epinomis respect of God and the Love which he hath to his Subjects he makes the Holy Church free and so proceeds in the rest of his Laws by way of single Grant and Prohibition Anno 1127. 28 H. 1. (h) Rex auditis Concilii gestis consensum praebuit Authoritate Regia potestate concessit consirmavit statuta Concilii Continuat Florent Wigorn p. 503. W. Archbishop of Canterbury gathered a General Council of all the Bishops Abbats and Religious Persons and at the close of the Acts it is said That the King being at London having heard the Acts of the Council gave his consent to them and by his Kingly Authority and Power granted and confirmed the Statutes of the Council By which we may see that even the Constitutions of Ecclesiastical Councils required the Sovereign's Confirmation Of the Great Councils in King Stephen's time THat he was an Usurper is notoriously known His first great Council is only said by Malmsbury to be gathered at London (a) Coacto magno Episcoporum Procerum Abbatum concilio Fol. 92. b. num 4. consisting of Bishops Nobles and Abbats in which many Ecclesiastical and Secular Matters were ordained Matthew Paris saith That he having gathered at London the Magnates Regni he promised the bettering of the Laws according to the will (b) Juxta voluntatem arbiâ—rium singulorum Fol. 62. num 40. and pleasure of all The reason of which compliance of this King was for that he was set up and Crowned by a Faction there being reckoned by Authors none of Eminence present at his Coronation but the Archbishop of Canterbury the Bishop of Winchester and Roger of Salisbury his Brother no Abbats and but few of the Nobility they having all sworn (c) Malmsb. Hist Novel fol. 101. b. num 16. Fealty to Maud the Empress in Henry the first 's life time though he in the following Charter saith That he was elected King Assensu Cleri Populi But to proceed King Stephen primo Regni at Oxford Anno 1136. grants the Liberties to his Subjects by way of Charter (d) Ego Stephanus Dei gratia assensu Cleri c. omnes exactiones meschenningas injustitias sive per Vicecomites vel per alios quoslibet male inductas funditus extirpo bonas leges antiquas justas consuetudines c. observabo observari praecipio constituo Malmsb. Hist Novel p. 101. b. num 20. that the Church be free and he confirms due Reverence to it and so proceeds to recite many particular Priviledges to it and as to his Lay-Subjects he doth utterly root out all exactions misdeeds and injustices evilly brought in by Sheriffs or any others That he will observe himself and appoints and constitutes to be observed the good Laws and antient and just Customs in Hundreds Pleas or other matters This was by Charter and my Author saith he disdains to set to the names of the Witnesses which were many because he so lightly or foolishly changed all But Richard Prior of Hexham closes the Charter thus (e) Ric. Prior Hâ—gustald col 314. num 6. Anno 1136. 1 Regni The King grants his Charter with a Salvo Haec omnia concedo confirmo salva Regia justa Dignitate mea By which Conclusion it is apparent the King reserved to himself a Latitude to use his Prerogative and some are of opinion Kings cannot by any Concessions divest themselves of that but I want Mittans to handle such noli me tangere's of the Crown What I have further to add concerning this Charter is That the Prior of Hexham makes it granted after the Popes Confirmation (f) Id. 313. num 30. Note That all Authors think strange thâ— Pope should â—â—â—firm and so countenance King Stephen an Usurper of him in which if ever that See consulted its private Interest it was then and in my poor Opinion nothing hath more discovered the Personal failures of Popes than such countenancing of Usurpers my Author I say makes it to be passed at his Parliament at Oxford where he saith he celebrated a general Council Episcopos Proceres sui Regni regali edicto in unum convenire praecepit The Witnesses this Author sets down makes it (g) Id. 315. num 10. appear there were none besides the Clergy and Barons present for after fourteen Bishops named the rest of the Witnesses are Roger the Chancellor Henry Nephew of the King Robert Earl of Gloucester William Earl Warren Ralph Earl of Chester Roger Earl of Warwick Rob. de Vere Miles de Gloucester Rob. de Olli Briano Filio Comitis Constab Robert de Martel Hugh Bigot Humfrid de Bohun Simon de Bellocampo Dapif Rob. de Ferrers William Petrus Simon de Silbanâ—et William de Albania Hugh de Sancto Claro Ilbert de Lecsio All which were very great Barons the last of them being Heir to 150 Knights Fees at least his Grandfather had so many So that we cannot judge the Commons by any Representation were present The other great Councils of this King are to be found in the Authors (h) Flor Wigorn. Anno 1138. fol. 668. cited in the Margent That at Northampton had Turstin Archbishop of York president and the rest enumerated are Episcopi Abbates Comites Barones Nobiles quique per Angliam That of the sixteenth (i) Hen. Hunt Anno 1151. fol. 226. mentions only the Archbishop of Canterbury Eustachius the King's Son Angliae Proceres in the (k) Chron. Norm Anno 1152. Agreement 17 Regni the Conventus was Episcoporum Comitum aliorum Optimatum and the last I find Anno 1154. ultimo Regni e is cum Episcopis Optimatibus (l) Jo. Brompton col 1000. num 50. never any Commons represented being to be met with Of the Great Council in King Henry the Second's Reign THE first considerable Act of State that I find Henry the Second did was Anno 1154. 1 Reg. That he gathered his General Council to London in Lent (a) Spelman Concil Tom. 2. fol. 54. Congregavit Concilium generale renovavit pacem leges consuetudines per Angliam ab antiquis temporibus constitutas he renewed Peace and the Laws and Customs of antient
called 50 Regni By the Statute of Marleburgh 52 H. 3. it is evident All the Barons not summoned but the more discreet and so of the lesser Barons That even all the great Barons were not summoned but only the more Discreet and such as the King thought fit to call and the like is observed of the lesser Barons or Tenents in Capite For if it had been by General Summons that Restriction of the more Discreet had been useless so that it appears that what (z) Britannia fol. 122. Quibus ipâ—â— Rex dignaâ—us est brevia summonitionis dirigere venirent c. non alii Mr. Camden's ancient Author observes is true That after the horrid Confusions and Troubles of the Barons Wars those Earls and Barons whom the King thought worthy to summon by his Writ to meet came to his Parliaments and no other The Preamble to this Statute of (a) Stat. Edit 1576. p. 15. Marlebridge runs thus in Tottel Providente ipso Domino Rege ad Regni sui Angliae meliorationem exhibitionem Justitiae prout Regalis Officii poscit Vtilitas pleniorem convocatis discretioribus ejusdem Regni tam majoribus quam minoribus provisum est statutum ac concordatum ordinatum According to Pulton the (b) Fol. 14. Preamble is thus That whereas the Realm of England of late had been disquieted with manifold Troubles and Dissentions for Reformation whereof Statutes and Laws be right necessary The Use and Benefit of Laws whereby the Peace and Tranquillity of the People must be observed wherein the King intending to devise convenient Remedy hath made these Acts Ordinances and Statutes underwritten which he willeth to be observed for ever firmly and inviolably of all his Subjects as well high as low Thus we see in the whole Reign of H. 3. excepting in that Parliament of Montfort's Faction the Bishops and dignified Clergy Earls Barons and Tenents in Capite were only summoned as Members of the great Councils and there were no Representatives of the Commons and the Kings Authority in summoning dissolving and making Laws is most manifest Of Parliaments in King Edward the First 's Reign I Shall now glean out of Tottel and Pulton's Editions of the Statutes the most material Preambles which give light to the constituent Parts of Parliaments to the Legislative Power in the King with the Concurrence of the two Houses and how that in the Series of the Kings Reign hath been expressed and such other matters relating to the Parliament as may shew the gradual Progress of their Constitution to the usage of this present Age leaving the Reader to make his own remarques from the matters of Fact and the expressions used by my Authors and explaining some The Preface to the Statute of (a) Ceux sont les establishments le Roy Ed. fitz Roy Hen. fait a Westminst c. par son Councel par Passentments des Archevesques Evesques Abbes Priores Countes Barons tout le Commonalty de la terre illonques summons Tottel Stat. fol. 24. Pulton p. 19. Westminster begins thus These are the Establishments of King Edward Son to King Henry made at Westminster at his first General Parliament after his Coronation c. by his Council and by the Assent of the Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors Earls Barons and the whole Commonalty of the Land thither summoned This Parliament was prorogued before it met and the Writ of Prorogation mentions only Quia generale Parliamentum nostrum quod cum Praelatis Magnatibus Regni nostri proposuimus habere c. Therefore having prorogued it mandamus c. Intersitis ad tractandum ordinandum una cum Praelatis Magnatibus Regni nostri (b) Brady against Petyâ— fol. 147. c. So that all the Members are included in the two general Terms of Praelati Magnates which great Men very frequently comprehended as well the Barones Majores as Minores the Earls Barons and greater Tenents in Capite and the less which then were called the Community of the Kingdom The rest of the Preamble of the Statutes made at (c) Pulton's Stat. An. 1275.3 E. 1. f. 19. Westminster runs thus Because our Lord the King hath great Zeal and desire to redress the State of the Realm c. the King hath ordained and established these Acts under written The Preface to the Statute de Bigamis 4 Oct. 4 Ed. 1. is thus (d) In prasentia venerabilium purum quâ—ruâ—dam Episcoporum Angliae aliorum de Concilio Râ—gis â—â—citatae sâ—â—erunt constitutiones â—ub â—riptae postmodâ—â—m coram Domino Rege Concilio sâ—o auditae publicatae Quia omnes de consiliâ—â—am â—usâ—â—â—â—arii quam alii concordaverunt c. Tottel p. 39. b. expressed In the Presence of certain Reverend Fathers Bishops of England and others of the Kings Council the constitutions under written were recited and after heard and published before the King and his Council for as much as all the King's Council as well Justices as others did agree that they should be put in writing for a perpetual memory and that they should be stedfastly observed In the First Chapter it is said Concordatum est per Justiciarios alios sapientes de Concilio Regni Domini Regis It was agreed by the Justices and other wise or sage Men of the Council of the Kingdom of the Lord the King Perhaps saith the judicious Doctor Brady the best understanding of the preamble and first Chapter may be that the Laws and Constitutions were prepared by the King and his (e) Answer to Pâ—tyt fol. 148. Council with the Assistance of the Justices and Lawyers that were of it or called to assist in it and declared afterwards in Parliament (f) Praeâ—iâ—â—ae autem constitutiones eâ—iâ—â— suerunt c. exâ—une lâ—â—um habeanâ— Tottel fol. 40. for it is said in the close of the Statute The aforesaid Constitutions were published at Westminster in the Parliament after the Feast of St. Michael the 4th of the Kings Reign and thence forward to take place The Preamble to the Statute of Gloucester Anno 1278. 6 E. 1. is thus (g) Pour amendment de son Roialm pur plus pleinir exhibition de droit si comâ—â—â—â— prâ—sit dâ— Office demanâ— appâ—lles le plues discretes de son Roialme auâ—â— bien des Granders comâ— des Meindres establie est concordantment ordine Tottel fol. 50. The King for the amendment of the Realm and for the more full Exhibition of Justice according as the benefit of his Office requires having called the most discreet of his Realm as well the greater as the smaller It is established and unanimously ordained as Pulton adds after by the King and his Justices certain Expositions were made The Statute of Mortmain is thus prefaced Nos pro (h) Tottel p. 48. Vtilitate Regni volentes providere Remedium de Concilio Praelatorum Comitum Baronum aliorum fidelium
fol. 165. Gloucester 2 R. 2. is thus Our Lord the King at his Parliament c. amongst other things there assented and accorded hath made certain Statutes and Ordinances The Preface to the Statutes at (c) Anno 1379. fol. 167. Westminster the same year runs thus Our Lord the King c. of the Assent of the Prelates Dukes Earls Barons and other great Men and of the Commons of this Realm summoned c. hath ordained In the first Chapter of the Statutes at (d) Idem Anno 1380. fol. 169. Northampton 4 R. 2. it is thus The Commons of our Parliament have prayed us by their Petition delivered to us at our present Parliament c. We considering the said Supplication will and grant by the Assent of the Prelates and Lords aforesaid In the Fourth Chapter of the Statutes at (e) Idem Anno 1382. fol. 175. Westminsterâ— 5 R. 2. The Members accustomed to be summoned to Parliament are particularly by their Degree distinguished viz. Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors Dukes Earls Barons Bannerets Knights of the Shires Citizens and Burgesses which last are frequently comprehended by the words Others or Commonalty The Preamble to the Statutes 8 R. 2. at (f) Idem An. 1384. fol. 179. Westminster is to the Honour of God and at the Request of the Commonalty of the Assent of the Prelates Great Men and Commons aforesaid Assent of Commons Our Lord the King hath caused to be made The Statutes 9 R. 2. at (g) Idem Anno 1385. fol. 179. Westminster are thus prefaced Our Lord the King of the Assent of the Prelates Dukes Marquesses Earls Barons and Commons hath ordained and established The (h) Idem Anno 1386. fol. 180. Preface to the Statute 10 R. 2. is very full in the Expressions of the kindness of the King to his Subjects in this Form Know ye for the Reverence of God and to nourish Peace Unity and good Accord in all Parties within the Realm and especially for the common Profit and Ease of our People and good Government of the same which we chiefly desire of the Assent of the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament Assent of the Lords and Commons we have caused to be made a Statute So in the 11th Regni (i) Idem Anno 1387. fol. 181. the King heartily desiring That the Peace of the Land be well holden and kept and his faithful Subjects nourished and governed in Quietness and Tranquillity and in that at Westminster (k) Idem Anno 1388. fol. 182. 13 Regni For the Honour of God and Holy Church and for the common profit of his Liege People In the First Chapter of the Statute at (l) Anno 1389. fol. 189. Westminster 13 R. 2. it is thus expressed That our Lord the King at his Parliament holden at Westminster c. Grievous Complaints of the Commons hearing the grievous Complaints of his said Commons c. the more because Charters of Pardons have been easily granted in such Cases the Commons requested that such Charters might not be granted To whom the King answered The King will save his Liberty and Regality That he will save his Liberty and Regality as his Progenitors have done heretofore But to nourish the more Quietness and Peace within this Realm by the Assent of the Great Men and Nobles he hath granted c. In the (m) Idem Anno 1396. fol. 199. Statute 20 R. 2. By the Assent of the Prelates Lords and Commons The Title of the Statutes at (n) Idem Anno 1397. fol. 200. Westminster 21 R. 2. is thus It is to be understood that our Lord the King c. of the Assent of the Prelates Dukes Earls Barons and Commons of his Realm there assembled hath made certain Statutes and Ordinances Repeal of Statutes made by Threats Amongst the rest is a Repeal of the Statutes made 10 R. 2. For that they were made by Threats given to the King and by constraint So it may be noted That Henry the Fourth repealed all the Statutes made in the last Parliament 21 R. 2. Of the Parliaments in King Henry the Fourth's time THE Preamble to the Statute at (a) Idem Anno 1399. fol. 200. Westminster 1 H. 4 runs thus Henry by the Grace of God c. to the Laud and Honour of God and Reverence of Holy Church for to nourish Unity Peace and Concord of all Parties within the Realm of England and for redress and recovery of the same Realm of England which now of late hath been dangerously put to great Ruin Mischief and Desolation of the Assent of the Prelates Instance and special Request of the Commons Dukes Earls Barons and at the Instance and special Request of the Commons of the same Realm assembled c. hath made ordained and established certain Ordinances and Statutes Throughout all this Kings Reign most of the Prefaces are much the same By the Assent or Advice and Assent of the Prelates c. At the Request or special Instance and Request of the Commons Only in the Preface to some Assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal it is By the Assent and Advice of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal this Distinction being mostly brought into use in his time as may be seen in the 4th 6th and 9th of his Reign Of the Parliaments in King Henry the Fifth 's time THE Preamble to the Statutes at (a) Idem Anno 1413. fol. 224. Westminster 1 H. 5. runs thus Our Lord the King at his Parliament c. by the Advice and Assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and at the special Instance and Request of the Commons of this Realm hath ordained established c. and so much like all the rest except the Statutes 4 H. 5. (b) Idem Anno 1416. fol. 234. which hath Our Lord the King with the Assent of the Prelates Dukes Earls Barons and at the special Instance and Request of the Commons Of the Parliaments in King Henry the Sixth 's time THE Preamble to the First Statute of (a) Idem Anno 1422. fol. 239. Westminster 1 H. 6. is thus At the Parliament held at Westminster c. Our Sovereign Lord the King Sovereign Lord the King by the Advice and Assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and at the special Instance and Request of the Commons of the Realm c. hath caused to be ordained and established c. The 2d 3d. 4th and 6th of H. 6. are the same As the first Statutes call him Our Sovereign Lord which was not used formerly so in that of the 8th of H. 6. he is stiled Our most Noble Christian Lord Henry c. 11 Regni (b) Idem Anno 1433. fol. 261. part of a new Phrase was used By Authority of Parliament which after some while is now familiarly used that Preface runs thus By the Assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and at the special Request of the
Chancellor of the Exchequer Judges of his Courts at Westminster Justices in Eyre Justices Assignes Barons of his Exchequer Clerks Secretaries of his Council and sometimes his Serjeants at Law with such other Officers and Persons whom our Kings thought meet to summon The first Writ that Mr. Prynne finds extant in our Records and which Sir William Dugdale mentions is entred in the Clause-Roll 23 E. 1. dorso 9. directed to Gilbert de Thornton and thirty eight more whose Names are in Sir William Dugdale whereof there are eleven by the name of Magistri three Deans and two Archdeacons only I find them differently ranked in Mr. Prynne to what they are in Sir William Dugdale The Writ runs thus Rex dilecto fideâ—i suo Gilberto de Thornton salutem Quia super quibusdam arduis negotiis nos Regnum nostrum ac vos caeterosque de Concilio nostro tangentibus quae sine vestra eorum praesentia nolumus expediri c. Vobis mandamus in fide dilectione c. as in the usual Summons to the Bishops Sometimes as 25 E. 1. there (u) Cl. 25 E. 1. m. 25. dorso was no Writ directed to them but we find under the Name of Milites with a Lines space betwixt them and the Barons thirteen named which by other Records are known to be the King's Justices The differences in their Writs are mostly these Sometimes The difference in their Writs as in 27 E. 1. it is Cum caeteris de Concilio nostro habere volumus colloquium tractatum or as in 28 E. 1. (w) Cl. 28 E. 1. m. 3. dorso showing the special Cause Quia super Jure Dominio quae nobis in Regno Scotiae competit c. cum Juris peritis cum caeteris de Concilio nostro speciale colloquium habere volumus tractatum vobis mandamus c. cum caeteris de Concilio nostro super praemissis tractaturis vestrumque consilium impensuris At the same time there are Writs to the Chancellor of the University of Oxford to send four or five Persons skilful in the Law summoned from the Universities de discretioribus in Jure scripto magis expertis and to the Chancellor of the University of Cambridge to send two or three in the like manner qualified and then follow Writs to several Abbats Priors Deans and Chapters and all these Writs mentioned the Business of the King's Claim to the Jurisdiction of Scotland and in the Writs of Summons to the Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors Temporal Lords Justices and Sheriffs of Counties that Particular is not mentioned which shows that the King summoned these particular Persons as most fit to search and â— send their Chronicles to the Parliament The Occasion and Result whereof and of sending these Lawyers from the Universities you may read at large in (x) An. 13â—2 p. 419. to p. 438. Matth. Westminster and (y) Hist Ang. p. 32. to 58. Walsingham In some Writs as that of 9 E. 2. (z) Cl. 9 E. 2. m. 20. dorso the Justices are appointed to expedite their Assizes that they may not fail to be present at the Parliament or to leave two to attend the Business of the King's Bench And the 7 of E. 2. (a) Cl. 7 E. 2. m. 25â— dorso Justices to leave the Assâ—zes to attend the Parliament That whereas they had appointed the Assizes at Duresm and other Parts in the Northern Circuit at certain days after the time the Parliament was to convene at which he wondred he orders them to put off the Assizes and attend By which two Writs it appears their Summons by Writ to attend and counsel the King in Parliament was a Supersedeas to them to take Assizes during the Parliament and that the Assizes and Suits of private Persons ought to give place to the publick Affairs of the King and Kingdom in Parliament Whoever desires to know who were summoned in this manner and the further variety of Summons may consult Mr. Prynne and Sir William Dugdale's Summons From these Writs we may observe Observations from these Writs first That sometimes the Persons summoned were many in number sometimes very few and always (b) Brief Register part 1. a p. 366. ad p. 394. more or less at the King's Pleasure Secondly in latter times the Clergy-men were wholly omitted Thirdly That they were never licensed to appear by Proxies Mr. Prynne hath collected a great many Precedents to prove that these Persons thus summoned together with the King 's ordinary Council had a very great Hand Power and Authority not only in making Ordinances Proclamations deciding all weighty Controversies regulating most publick Abuses and punishing all exorbitant Offences out of Parliament in the Star-Chamber and elsewhere The Employment of these Assistants but likewise in receiving and answering all sorts of Petitions determining and adjudging all weighty doubtful Cases and Pleas yea in making or compiling Acts Ordinances Statutes and transacting all weighty Affairs concerning the King or Kingdom even in Parliaments themselves when summoned to them Yet these have no Vote but only are to speak to such Matters as their Opinions are required in and sit uncovered unless the Chancellor or Lord Keeper give leave to the Judges to be covered SECT 6. Concerning the House of Commons I Now come to consider the Honourable House of Commons and the Use The Summons of the Knights Citizens and Burgesses Constitution and Priviledges of it and shall first consider the Summons by which they have their Power to act as an House and third Estate in Parliament Mr. (c) Second Part of Brief Register a p. 1. ad 29. Prynn hath cleared that all the Writs of Summons directed to Sheriffs in King John and Henry the Third's time before 49 H. 3. to send Knights to the King at set times were either for Information of the Council what voluntary aid each particular County would grant the King in his great necessity or to assist with Men and Arms and were not elected as Representatives of the Commons till 49 H. 3. To whom I shall refer the curious for Satisfaction as also to Dr. Brady who hath by his own Inspection as well as the considerate application of what Mr. Prynn hath amassed in his Books since his late Majesties Restauration and after 1648 composed many most useful Observations for the understanding of the ancient customs usages and practices relating to Parliaments Therefore I shall endeavour to be as short as possibly I can and without obscurity contract what they and most others that treat of the House of Commons have at large filled Volumes with The form of the Writ 49 H. 3. to the Sheriffs is not (d) Cl. 49 H. 3. m. 11â— dorso expressed but after the recital of the Writ to the Bishop of Duresm and Norwich and the eodem modo to the Bishops Abbats Priors Deans Earls Lords and Barons there follows this entry
Magnatibus Proceribus dicti Regni nostri colloquium habere tractatum Tibi praecipimus firmiter injungentes quod facta Proclamatione in proximo Comitatu tuo post receptionem hujus Brevis nostri tenendo die loco praedicto duos Milites gladiis cinctos magis idoneos discretos Comitatus praedicti de qualibet Civitate Comitatus illius duos Cives de quolibet Burgo duos Burgenses de discretioribus magis sufficientibus libere indifferenter per illos qui Proclamationi hujusmodi interfuerint juxta formam Statutorum inde editorum provisorum eligi nomina eorundem Militum Civium Burgensium sic electorum in quibusdam Indenturis inter te illos qui hujusmodi Electioni interfuerint inde conficiendis sive hujusmodi electi praesentes fuerint vel absentes inseri eosque ad dictum diem locum venire facias ita quod iidem Milites plenam sufficientem potestatem pro se Communitate Comitatus praedicti Cives Burgenses pro se Communitate Civitatum Burgorum praedictorum divisim ab ipsis habeant ad faciendum consentiendum his quae tunc ibidem de communi Concilio dicti Regni nostri favente Deo contigerint ordinari super negotiis ante dictis Ita quod pro defectu potestatis hujusmodi seu propter improvidam Electionem Militum Civium aut Burgensium praedictorum dicta negotia infecta non remaneant quovis modo Nolumus autem quod tu nec aliquis alius Vicecomes dicti Regni nostri aliqualiter sit electus Et Electionem illam in pleno Comitatu factam distincte aperte sub Sigillo tuo Sigillis eorum qui Electioni illae interfuerint nobis in Cancellariam nostram ad dictum dâ—em locum certifices indilate remittens nobis alteram partem Indenturarum praedictarum praesentibus consutam una cum hoc Brevi Teste meipso apud Westmonast THE King to the Sheriff Greeting Whereas by the Advice and Consent of our Council Advice of Privy Council for certain difficult and urgent business concerning us and the State and defence of our Kingdom of England and the English Church we have ordained a certain Parliament of ours to be held at our City of c. the day c. next ensuing and there to have conference Conference with Prelates c. and to treat with the Prelates Great Men and Peers of our said Kingdom We command and straitly enjoyn you Proclamation at County-Court that making Proclamation at the next County Court after receipt of this our Writ to be holden the day and place aforesaid Two Knights girt with Swords c. you cause two Knights girt with Swords the most fit and discreet of the County aforesaid and of every City of that County two Citizens Two Citizens and of every Burrough Two Burgesses two Burgesses of the discreeter and most sufficient Indifferently chosen by those present at the Proclamation according to Statutes to be freely and indifferently chosen by them who shall be present at such Proclamation according to the tenure of the Statutes in that case made and provided Their Names inserted in Indentures betwixt the Sheriff and the Electors and the names of the said Knights Citizens and Burgesses so chosen to be inserted in certain Indentures to be then made between you and those that shall be present at such Election whether the parties so elected be present or absent and shall make them to come at the said day and place To cause them to come at the Day and Place The Knights from the County the Citizens and Burgesses from their Cities Burroughs to have full power to do and consent so that the said Knights for themselves and for the County aforesaid and the said Citizens and Burgesses for themselves and the Commonalty of the aforesaid Cities and Burroughs may have severally for them full and sufficient power to perform and to consent to those things which by the favour of God shall there happen to be ordained by the Common Council of our said Kingdom concerning the businesses aforesaid Lest for want of that Power or improvident Election the Business be undonâ— so that the business may not by any means remain undone for want of such power No Sheriff to be chosen or by reason of the improvident Election of the aforesaid Knights Citizens and Burgesses Election to be in full County But we will not in any case you or any other Sheriff of our said Kingdom shall be elected The Indentures to be sealed by the Sheriff and Electors And at the day and the place aforesaid the said Election made in the full County Court A Counterpart tacked to the VVrit returned into the Chancery you shall certify without delay to us in our Chancery under your Seal and the Seals of them which shall be present at that Election sending back unto us the other part of the Indenture aforesaid affiled to these Presents together with this Writ Witness our self at Westminster SECT 7. Concerning the Speaker and the Privileges of the House of Commons IT is not my design to treat of all things relating to the Constitution My Design not to controvert the Privileges of the House of Commons but to shâ—w the gradual Alterations Laws and Customs of the House of Commons there are several useful Books extant which are fit for the Honourable Members of the House to consult What I most aim at is to shew what the Ancient Usage hath been and how from time to time things have been refined to the Mode and State they are now in and I hope those great Spirits that honour their Countries with their Service will pardon one that designs nothing more than to give them a Profile of the whole Model both in the days of our remotest Ancestors and what it was in more Modern times under just and undoubted Soveraigns as also how much it was transformed when the pretended House of Commons being confederated with a successful Army murthered their Soveraign voted away the House of Lords and assumed the Title of the Supream Authority of the Nation of which last I shall treat in the next Chapter The Members being according to the Kings Command come to the place appointed sometimes the Soveraign with the Lords in their Robes have rid in State to the Parliament which is generally yet observed in Scotland and Ireland The Solemnity at the Opening of the Parliament However at the opening of the Parliament the King is seated on his Throne under the Canopy with his Royal Crown on his Head the Chancellor standing something backward on his Right-hand and the great Officers as Lord Treasurer Lord President of the Kings Council Lord Privy Seal Great Chamberlain the Lord Constable Marshal Lord Admiral Lord Steward and Kings Chamberlain attend on either side the State or in their Seats
intended to invade the Subjects Liberties but if they allowed the Writ the delicious Power of Imprisoning such as they had a Pique to was utterly lost and all Persons referred to the ordinary Courts of Justice or upon their failure to the House of Lords Sir William Jones against any ones Release by Habeas Corpus if they were imprisoned by the House of Commons the Supreme Tribunal of England Sir William Jones insisted much upon the Power of the House and that they did not intend by that Act to bind themselves which yet must bind the King though it might as well be alledged That he did not intend to bind himself by it However Sir William persisted urging See Debates of the House p. 217. That whatever Reasons may be given for discharging such as are not committed for Breach of Privilege if grounded on the Act for the Habeas Corpus will hold as strong for discharging of Persons for Breach of Privilege and so consequently deprive the House of all its Power and Dignity and so make it insignificant and said That was so plain and obvious that all the Judges ought to take notice of it and so judged it below the House to make any Resolution therein but rather to leave the Judges to do otherwise at their peril and let the Debate fall without any Question But Baron Weston had the Courage to grant the Habeas Corpus Baron Weston grants the Habeas Corpus as rather willing to expose himself to the Displeasure of the House than deny or delay Justice contrary to his Oath I could not omit this remarkable Passage as a Specimen of the Arbitrariness of the Leading Party in that House Brief Register part 4. p. 846. and now shall proceed to Mr. Prynne's Remarks upon the Proceedings of the long House of Commons He observes Privilegia omnino amittere meretur qui sibi abutitur concessa penestate Ejus est interpretari cujus concedere Summa Rosella Privilegium 3. That Privileges may be lost by the abuse of the Power and that whatever Privilege the House hath is from the King's Grant or Toleration Therefore according to the Canonists Rule If the Privilege granted be expressed in general dubious or obscure Words then it is in the power of him to interpret who hath the power to grant Now the Petition of the Speaker is That the Commons in this Parliament may and shall have all their Ancient and Just Privileges allowed them Therefore the King Nemini liceat Chartas Regias nisi ipsis Regibus judicare Placita Parl. 18 E. 1. num 19. p. 20. being the sole Granter of these Privileges must be the only proper Interpreter and Judge of them as he is of all his other Charters of Privileges Liberties Franchises and Acts of Parliament themselves after his Regal Assent thereto not the Commons or Persons to whom they are granted and that both in and out of Parliament by Advice of his Nobles or Judges of the Common-Law Therefore he saith first How the Breach of Privilege to be punished according to Mr. Prynne See the Authority Brief Regist part 2. p. 847. That if the Commons by Petition to the King and Lords in Parliament complain of the Breach of their ancient Privileges and Liberties as they ever did in the Cases of Lark Thorp Hyde Clerk Atwyll and others the King by Advice of his Lords in Parliament assisted with his Judges hath been and as he humbly conceives is the sole proper Judge of them and their violations not the Commons who being Parties Prosecutors and Complainants are no legal indifferent Judges in their own or Menial Servants cases if they will avoid partiality which is the reason the Law allows Challenges to Jurors in Civil and Criminal causes Therefore he observes Ibid. p. 1206. that the House of Commons taking Informations without Oath may be easilier abused by misinformation and sometimes thereby are put upon over hasty Votes which upon finding out evil Combinations they are forced to retract Secondly The Chancellor or Lord Keeper to grant the Writ If the complaint of the breach of Privilege be made in the Commons House and thereupon an Habeas Corpus Writ of Privilege or Supersedeas prayed under the great Seal for the Members or menial Servants release whose Privilege is infringed the Lord Chancellor or Keeper of the great Seal representing the Kings person in Chancery the Court for relief in cases of Privilege is the properest Judge and Examiner of the claimed Privilege and its violations upon Oath and other sufficient Evidence assisted by all the Kings Judges in cases of difficulty who thereupon will grant or deny the Writs Thirdly The Judges of the Courts to which the Writ is directed to judge of the validity of the Privilege When these Writs of Privilege Supersedeas or Habeas Corpus are granted to any Member or menial Servants and directed to any of the Kings Courts to enlarge their restrained Persons or stay any Arrests Process or Judgments against them the Kings own Judges in his respective Courts to which they are directed are then the proper Judges of the Privileges of Parliament and of their breaches suggested in these Writs who may examine not only all matters of Law or Fact comprised in them which are Traversable but likewise adjudge allow or disallow the very Privilege it self if no real ancient Parliamentary Privilege allowed by the Laws and Customs of the Realm How far he is in the right I will not undertake to judge but I remember somewhere he wisheth an Act of Parliament to pass to adjust these matters which possibly would prevent many of those chargeable attendances about false Returns and save much expence of time in the discussing of them and enable the Subjects to pay a right and due obedience to them SECT 12. Concerning the Royal Assent to Bills I Have treated so much of this elsewhere as to the sole Power in the King the ancient Custom of Sealing the Acts with the Kings Seal and of some of the Prelates and Nobles as Witnesses of their Assents that I shall only now speak as to the usual formality of passing the Bills into Acts by the Kings last Act. See also his Memorials For Mr. Hackwell hath given a full account of the manner how Statutes are enacted in Parliament by passing of Bills to which Book I refer the curious Reader that would understand the order that is used in the debating and passing of them When Bills are passed by both Houses upon three several Readings in either House Hackwell of Passing of Bills p. 179. ad 182. they ought for their last approbation to have the Royal Assent whereby every Statute is as Mr. Hackwell observes like Silver seven times tryed The Royal Assent is usually deferred to the last day of the Session and because some have been of opinion that the passing of Bills The Royal Assent determines not the Session
and after by himself and his mock-Representatives by Councils of State and Safety and such new Names and Powers as our Laws never heard of and all this under pretence that they Acted by the Peoples Authority and suffrage and all the sad Devastations of that Age resulted from the confiding so much in the pretended Representatives of the People Which (a) England's Universal Distraction p. 4. one some Years before the sad Catastrophe plainly foretold tho' like belief was given to him as of old to Cassandra His Words are That the so much exalting the Power of the Representatives was first to destroy the King by the Parliament and next the Parliament and Kingdom by the People Thus ignorant Politicians that build upon such Quick-sands soon live to see their Insanae Structurae ruinously fall about their Ears Thirdly Whereas the Advocates for the Representatives would gladly have possessed the People that they could rely upon none so securely and safely as upon those they had themselves chosen they being less subject to private ends and affections than any particular man such a Body being not likely to counsel or consent to any thing but what is publickly advantageous It is to be considered that it is a false Postulatum Such a Body being but an Aggregate of particulars may have as many private ends as any other number of Subjects it being well known that Communities themselves are subject to dangerous Inclinations from private Incitements and I the Representatives subject to misleading Factions and Ambitions of private Men and by coalition of Parties when they fall into designs they are most dangerous and fatally violent and tho' it may at first View seem to be repugnant that an Universality should have private ends yet seeing it is not the number of Agents but the capacity in which they act and the quality of the Actors and the coherence or incoherence of what they pursue with the publick end and weal which makes the Actions of men public or private It must needs follow That if without Authority or out of the way of Public Ordinances men pursue any thing though the whole Community concur in the pursuit yet it is all of the nature of a private Action and done to a corrupt and private end Because the Author of some Observations upon some of K. Charles the 1st Messages was reputed the great Champion of the two Houses I shall content my self with culling out some of the daringest assertions Why Reason and Law were not hearkned to by the Advocates of the Long Parliament he and some other of their Triarii used and apply such of those Answers and Reasonings as the Learned and Loyal offered then against them though they could not be heard while the Torrent bore all down the stream The hideous noise of Tumults and after of Drums Trumpets Cannons and Fire-Arms hushed and silenced all the still voice of Law and Reason But now it is to be hoped when Mens Eyes are unsealed the Mask and Vizard dropped or pulled off the fatal Consequences of such pernicious Principles throughly manifested and the loud Thunder of the Two Houses Ordinance allayed mens Spirits will be better fitted to hear them refuted Besides what I have endeavoured to answer before concerning the Authority of the Representative which they would make an Assembly in which the People in underived Majesty are by these Proxies convened to affirm an Imaginary Power supposed to be theirs originally and in such a convention to be put in execution I say besides this which in several places I have refuted That filled all their Declarations Messages and Treatises when they were contriving the setting up the Commons House Topmost to prove That they were a Body that was not easily corrupted byassed tempted or prevailed upon to Act any thing but what was the best for the Peoples advantage Therefore I think fit in many particulars to shew how such Bodies may be warped to sinister ends and especially how that House not only deceived but tyrannized over the whole Nation Private (b) Answer to Observer p. 130 131. How Passions Affections Interests and Factions may sway Representatives Quarrels and the memory of former Sufferings may work upon some discontent and envy at other mens preferment may transport others the fear of the lash and desire to secure themselves have forced some to personate a part great Offices and Honours have been a Pearl in some Mens Eyes to hinder their Fight others have been like Organ Pipes to whom the wind of popular Applause hath only given a sound others who have premeditated their Parts before their design was discovered have upon some pretences or other suppose of an unlawful Election being Monopolists Abhorrers or such like got those excluded by Vote whom they conceived to be likely to oppose their designs The bewitching Power of Oratory prevails upon many In others there is a Speechless Humour of following the Drove The Ambition and Covetousness of Representatives Can we not easily conceive several of this Body may be ambitious which would prompt them to alter the old way of bestowing Offices and collating of Honours so by disservice as well as service in Parliaments some Men have obtained Honours Offices and Estates finding it a good way to get preferment by putting the King upon necessity of granting Good Woodmen say That some have used Deer-stealing as an Introduction to a Keepers place So we have seen a Non-conformist's mouth stopped I might instance in other Professions with a good Benefice whereas before he was satisfied he could gape as wide as his Neighbours Others by more only ways slip into Preferment for Covetousness and Ambition will sail with any Wind. The Covetousness of the Members of the long Parliament by woful experience was found insatiable witness their Voting for one anothers Offices Governments satisfaction for their losses out of Delinquents Estates sharing the Kings Lands and Revenue the Bishops Deans and Chapters Lands and the Estates of the Royal Party hence together with the itch of Arbitrary rule they drew the determination of Causes out of the ordinary Courts of Justice before their Houses and Committees of them and in every County had their Sub-committees to Tyrannize over the People and fleece them Their cruelty appeared in their erecting High Courts of Justice Major Generals and other Arbitrary Courts The Cruelty of the Long Parliament where many a Loyal and brave man for serving his King against such Rebels either lost his Life or his Liberty and Estate and when they were the gentlest yet they could show hatred enough by Imprisoning upon I know not what suspicion and at leasure prosecuting such as they had a pique against The partiality of Members in such Conventions are very frequent The Partiality in shielding their friends from being questioned though their Corruptions were notorious to all the World So in the fatal Parliament of 1641. A Monopolist if a Loyal man was sure to be
expelled the House but if a favourer of the Cause he was never recriminated with that or any other by-past or present ill disposition In such Assemblies there often happen one sort of People who are always representing grievances complaining of Male-administration troubling the Church and State shaking up the Lees and Dregs in the richest Vessel of Wine these have learned to catch Eels Tacitus notes the corruptions of the Roman Senate The Corruptness of the Roman Senate which necessitated the change of that State into a Monarchy under Augustus fully significantly and concisely after his manner Suspecto Senatus Populique imperio ob certamen Potentium avaritiam Magistratuum invalido legum auxilio qua vi ambitu postremo pecuniaturbabantur The Provinces observing in this Supremacy of the Senate and People the contests of the most Powerful the Covetousness of the Magistrates the feeble help the Laws afforded by the Arbitrariness of the Senate we may presume by what force and moyen and lastly how all things were distracted by Bribery they were the more easily induced to admit of one Soveraign These particulars were most obvious in the fatal House of Commons Besides these things I have hinted at Of cunning and designing Men. in such a body as we are speaking of where there cannot want men designing some dangerous Revolutions for the establishing their own greatness though some few wise men may be apprehensive of their designs yet we know maxima est pars artis celare artem Such contrivers will be sure by all imaginable Arts to conceal their intentions and obtain an Ascendent over the Judgment of the gross Body who either are not so quick-sighted or aiming at no such things themselves judge others candor by their own and so by their helps the designers may carry the Vote against even such as penetrate further into the aims of the Contrivers than the Majority do so that those that have good ends may be hood winked by others whose ends are worse Fallit enim vitium specie virturis umbra and private ends will steal upon well affected for all grand Conspiracies are veiled under the Mask of Reformation of removing Grievances and evil Counsellors Gallant and vertuous actions do not more often ingratiate men with such a mixed body than a rolling Tongue a precipitate Head vain-glorious profusion oyly insinuations feigned devotions sufferings though deserved from Superiours and above all opposition to the present State So the memorable long Parliament of 1641. by the specious pretences of redressing Grievances The specious Pretences of the Long Parliament taking care of the Public and particularly of the Liberty of the Subject and their Privileges together with vehement Expressions of their Resolutions of Establishing the Kings Throne upon more firm foundations of the peoples Hearts and Affections by insensible Screws wound themselves into the credit of Patriots and being thereby able to carry a numerous party with them in all their Votes by little and little made such encroachments upon the Soveraignty that having undermined it past support they took the advantage of its fall and ruine out of the same specious pretence that the Commonwealth might suffer no detriment to propose their long designed Model of Government not as by them forethought on but as a necessary expedient to accomplish the end as they pretended they had all this while been aiming at viz. the Peoples prosperity which 〈◊〉 they endeavoured to make the World believe they were most Zealous for when God knows the upshot of all was the total dissolution of the best constituted Government and the Establishing themselves a fattened Commonwealth out of the rich spoils of Monarchy Yet these very men were they who some years before possessed as many as they could delude with an opinion Their Hypocritical Promises that none knew better nor affected more the sweetness of so well ballanced a Monarchy than they and that the Kings just Authority was Sacred to them that they would make him more rich and glorious than any of his Predecessors The Observer told the World That it had been often in the Power of former Parliaments to load the Government with greater Fetters and Clogs but they would not and that change of Government could not be in their desires because the advantage of the Lords and Commons in the State was so great that no change of Government could better them except each one could obtain an hereditary Crown But these were but vain flourishes and empty aiery offers success altered their Principles and they were ill troubled to find out excuses and evasions after the Murther of the Blessed King and change of Government for these their so hypocritical Declarations From all which I shall only desire that Posterity may be cautious how they credit the truth of those who in such Conventions are the most active for any Innovation if they see that they zealousliest pretend some greater happiness to the People by lessening the Authority of the Crown It is reported of Frederick the Emperour (c) Aeneas Sylvius de diaetis Fred. Imp. that in the Speech to the Senators he desired them before they entred into the House of their Assembly they would leave two things behind them and then they would give right Judgment and being asked what those were he told them Simulatio dissimulatio Counterfeiting and Dissembling Another of their Arguments How many Counsellors may mislead for the preference of the Houses Counsel before all other Councils was that many Eyes of so many choice Gentlemen from all parts see more than fewer which Sophism easily midwived in the conclusion that then the two Houses judgment of Affairs was to be preferred before the King and his Privy Councils and the Commons before the Peers and by a parity of Reason though they desired not it should be urged so far home that the body of the People was to be preferred before the Commons House which might be urged upon as common a Proverb That By-standers see more than Gamesters But who are so blind as those that will not see Those very Seers if they would have made use of their Eyes to have perused the Histories of former Ages on what specious pretensions Rebellions had begun and how the Laws had settled the Government in an unparallel'd security of the Peoples Rights as well as the Prerogative of the Crown or by serious consideration foreseen the certain and inevitable miseries that would follow the weakning of the Crown and the necessitating the King for his defence to take up Arms these quick-sighted Commoners might have prevented all those Calamities that ensued The Elected like the Electors Whoever considers how easie it is to possess a People with prejudices against the Government of which elsewhere I must enlarge will soon find that it is no difficult matter to have such Elections of Members as were like to be of the same perswasion with the Electors So that
and his People as they loved to phrase it they answer by their Prolocutor that those who contract to their own ruin or esteem such Contracts before their own preservation are felonious to themselves and rebellious to Nature Inferring from thence That if the legal Constitution of Government The Writers for the Parliament affirm That where the Houses think the Constitution of the Government is not agreeable to the Liberty of the People they may alter it be not agreeable to the Liberties the House conceives needful for them they are obliged to contend to alter them which is no more nor less than if a Criminal being condemned to be hanged should be guilty of another Felony and Treason against Nature to yield to the Sentence but that he ought in his own defence to kill as many as he could that he might thereby save his life by escape Thus I hope I have made apparent the falshood of the Positions ranged in defence of that dismal Parliament How the Long Parliament voted all the Power into their own Hands who made use of them as Platforms upon which to plant the Artillery of their Acts and Ordinances For under the pretext of their obligation to preserve the Kingdom they voted to put it in a posture of defence and they voted from the King his Navies Officers Privy Counsellors and Revenues pretending the Navies were still reserved for the King in better hands than he would put them and for the other they would furnish him with better principled Ministers Whereas by the same Precedent the Subjects were bound to give up their Estates to their ordering as often as they pretended they could dispose of them more wisely For they might alledge the State which they reputed themselves had an interest paramount in them in case of publick extremity so that as they pretended the Head without the Body was the State before so now it was fit the Body should be without the Head whereas the Law hath provided against either exorbitances and if there was necessity we must fall into one we ought in reason to chuse the former because being better acquainted with that we could better digest it and it would be less burthensom to our Estates to satisfie one than five hundred nay ten thousand as it appeared when the greedy Commonwealths men with their Committees Armies c. was that flat Vermine in the Bowels which how true soever it is of the lumbricus latus was certainly true of this Monster That it was every where Head and Mouth It is to be well weighed When Parliaments beneficial when not that as Parliaments are in the highest degree beneficial when they keep within the bounds of duty and sobriety so when they will have their Ordinances to have the force of Laws and not govern themselves by known Laws they are the cause of many Distempers in a Kingdom and the Subjects condition is most unhappy in the Multitude of Physicians for extraordinary Remedies such as they always pretend to use are saith Sir Henry Wotton like hot Waters which may help at a pang but being too often used spoil the Stomach A Compleat Parliament is that (f) Answer to Observ p. 150. Panchreston or Soveraign Salve for all Sores but some would make the name of Parliament a Medusa's Head to transform reasonable men into Stones and subordinate Monarchy to the two Houses who must be denied nothing but with their good will would claim for them a paramount interest with the Soveraign whom they would advance only to the height and mighty Dignity of a Doge of Venice or a Roman Consul whilest they must be the Tribunes of the People their Supervisors So that we cannot be content to gather the blessed fruits right constituted Parliaments would afford us but we must rend away the top Branch yea stub up the Tree that we may scramble for the Fruit. Tacitus (g) 10 Annal. gives a Caution how a Prince may support his Authority that he do not vim Principatus resolvere cuncta ad Senatum revocando Kings not to grant away their Prerogatives at the Importunity of Parliaments It is fit a Prince should have the Glory of performing those things himself which are his Prerogatives and not to refer such things to Conventions of Parliament which properly belong not to their Cognizance Since therefore by the condescensions of our Wise and Gracious Princes there are several things in England the King cannot by Law do alone it is a most requisite Wisdom in Princes that as they observe the Laws in securing the Peoples Liberties and Privileges so by no Arbitrary Assumption of either or both Houses to let their Prerogatives be invaded for those are now no more than are rationally and politically necessary for orderly and established Government The Encroachments of the never to be forgotten long Parliament several of which I have in this and the foregoing Chapter hinted may be sufficient documents to Princes not to yield such a body too much Power for if the ballance once decline a little weight will sink it Therefore though Princes are not to enlarge their Prerogatives nova siti ad alia aliaque properare yet they ought to preserve those that remain For any Raveling once yielded will make the Royal Cittadel defenceless Testudo ubi collecta est in suum tegmen tuta est ad omnes ictus ubi exerit partes aliquas quodcunque nudavit obnoxium infirmum est The Tortoise as long as it keeps within its shell and coverture is safe but if it unbare any part it is obnoxious to danger Above all things a Prince should he careful never to part with the Prerogative of Summoning and Dissolving Parliaments For we cannot forget that the Houses of 1641. not content with a Bill for Triennial Parliaments got an Act for perpetuating themselves and that would not satisfie but they prepared a Bill for the certainty of future Parliaments whether the King had occasion for them or not so that if the King omitted the sending out of Writs and Summons the Chancellor might and for failure the Sheriff and I know not what inferiour Officers of which the Blessed King complains I cannot dismiss this Subject without taking notice of the Fundamental cause of Factious Members of Parliament The fundamental Cause of Factious Members in Parliament In England there is no such powerful Engine to make Faction and Sedition formidable and dangerous to Government as when the Majority of the Freeholders are wrought upon by the Arts I have in some measure hinted before and shall more largely in the Chapter of Faction to chuse Members of the House of Commons of their own Temper for such a Number being imbodied in that House give and receive mutual strength from one another For when such are met they do not take care to unite the minds of the Subjects to their Prince or one to another or imploy their time upon the great concerns of
the Commission of Sewers by Law (e) Discretio est discernere per Legem quid sit justum Coke Inst 4. fol. 41. 3 H. 8. allowing the Commissioners to make Orders c. according to their Judgments and Discretions the word Discretion is interpreted by Lawyers to discern by Law what is Just as appears when a Jury do doubt of the Law and desire to do what is Just they find the special matter and the entry is Et super tota materia petunt advisamentum discretionem Justiciariorum that is they desire that the Judges would discern by Law what is Just and give Judgment accordingly It was resolved in the Court of Common-Pleas when a new Court was (f) Whyte's Sacred Laws p. 33. erected 31 H. 8. to hear and determine according to Law and Custom or otherwise to their sound discretion That the last Clause was against Law For when Laws are writ and published Magistrates know what to command and the People to obey otherwise the Law must necessarily be errant wandring uncertain and unknown which is a (g) Miser servitus ubi jus vagum miserable yea the most miserable Slavery This was the ground of the taking away the most August and very Ancient Court of the Star-Chamber The Court of Star-chamber dissolved though appointed by Act of Parliament (h) 3 H. 7. c. 1. 21 H. 8. and consisting of very great Personages as the Lord Chancellor Lord President of the Council Lord Privy-Seal Bishops Lords and Justices For tho' there were other Reasons that moved the Houses to be so pressing to get that Act pass the grounds of its Repeal alledged in the (i) 17 Car. 1. c. 10. Preamble of the Act are That the Judges have not kept themselves to the points limited by the Statutes and have undertaken to punish where no Law doth warrant and to make Decrees for things having no such Authority and have inflicted heavier punishments than by Law warranted and that all matters Examinable and Determinable before them had their proper Remedy Redress and Punishment by Common Law and in the ordinary Courts of Justice elsewhere In the like manner and on the same reason were the Court of Request (k) Ibid. cap. 9. before the (l) Cap. 48. President of the Marches of Wales of the President and Council in (m) Cap. 49. the North and of the County-Palatine (o) Cap. 37. of Chester either totally abolished or much eclipsed Having thus far discoursed of the several standing Courts I think it necessary to give an account of the Oath the Judges of either Bench are enjoyned to take having before spoke of the Lord Chancellor Lord Treasurer and Barons of the Exchequers Oath SECT 10. Of the Judges Oath COncerning this Oath there is a Controversie betwixt Mr. (p) Animadv on Coke's 4. Inst fol. 38. Prynne and Sir Edward Coke the latter affirming it to be in our Printed Statutes but not upon Record which Mr. Prynne disproves thus That the Oath of the Judges Barons of the Exchequer and Justices Itinerant and the Ordinances annexed to the Oath were made by the King because of divers complaints to him by the assent of the great men and other wise men of his Council and commanded to be openly published by the Sheriffs of every County by (q) 7 May 20 E. 3. special Writs issued to them for the Reasons specified in the beginning and close of the Writs at least three Months before the Parliament was held that Year and they are all entred upon Record as they are Printed in the Statute Books at large (r) Cl. 20 E. 3. part 1. m. 12 13. 20 E. 3. in the Clause-Rolls but not in the Parliament or Statute-Rolls of that Year because not made in but before the Parliament From whence I note a good Argument of the Kings Prerogative in appointing Judges and Commissionating them himself without any Parliamentary concurrence since he appoints the very Oath which was to direct them in their Office out of Parliament We find the Commons so well pleased with this Oath that in the (s) Rot. Parl. 20 E. 3. num 25. Parliament 20 E. 3. they petitioned the King that the Justices of Assise and Enquiry might be sworn by the same Oath as the Justice of the Bench Abridgment of Records p. 48. and that the chief of them might have power to swear the rest which the King assented to with some Qualifications but when in the Twenty first of his Reign they petitioned that his other Ministers might take the Oath and might be sworn to take nothing from any other the King answered that he would advise what other Ministers shall be fit to take the Oath Mr. Prynne refers us to the Cl. 18 H. 3. m. 19. Cl. 35 E. 1. m. 7. Cl. 1 E. 2. m. 19. and Cl. 5 E. 3. m. 27. for some Clauses of the Oaths of Justices agreeing with those prescribed to the Kings Council But the Oath as it hath been after used is to this purpose That they shall swear well and lawfully to serve our Lord the King and his People in the Office of Justice and lawfully counsel the King in his Business not counsel or assent to any thing which may turn him in damage or disherison by any manner way or colour and shall not know of any such thing but cause the King to be warned thereof by themselves or others shall do equal Justice and Execution of Right to all the Subjects and take neither by themselves nor others privily or apertly Gift or Reward of Gold or Silver nor of any thing which may turn to their profit unless it be Meat or Drink and that of a small value of any man that shall have any Plea or Process hanging before them c. shall take no Fee as long as they are Justices nor Robes of any man great or small but of the King give no Advice to any man great or small where the King is Party If any of what condition soever come before them in their Sessions with force and Arms or otherwise against the Peace or against the Statute thereof made to disturb the execution of the Common Law or to menace the People that they may not pursue the Law That they cause their Bodies to be Arrested and put in Prison and if they cannot be Arrested that the King be certified That they themselves nor others maintain no Plea or Quarrel hanging in the Kings Court or elsewhere in the Country That they deny to no man Common Right by the Kings Letter nor none other mans nor for none other Cause and in case any other Letters come to them contrary to the Law they do nothing by such Letters but certifie the King thereof and proceed to execute the Law notwithstanding any such Letters That they shall procure the profit of the King and of his Crown and if in default shall be at the Kings Will of Body Lands and
Issue according to the present interests of his Affairs and Passions that such contradictory Acts could not be all true and though the Responses from Delphos or any Oracles of the Gentile ages might miss the truth as much yet by their dubious answers they forfeited not their reputations so much We may also note (l) Jus Regium p. 178 179. that by God Almighty's Providence and the care of his own Laws the Duke of Richmond was removed by death to prevent the unjust Competitors and Prince Edward was born and by the same Providence and the sence the Subjects had of the great Fundamental of Hereditary Succession contrary to some of these Acts and what Edward the Sixth did in setling the Crown upon the Lady Jane Grey proved of no force for Queen Mary succeeded though she was a Papist and Queen Elizabeth succeeded her though she was declared Bastard The rights of Blood prevailing over the Formalities of Divorce and the Dispensations of the Popes and the Laws made to gratify Henry the Eighth's pleasure as the strength of nature doth often prevail over Poisons and to evince the greater certainty of their being void so little notice was taken of those and the subsequent Acts Anno 1535. that the Heirs of the Blood succeeded without repealing that Act as an Act in it self invalid from the beginning For such Acts are past by without being repealed as we find in the Act of Recognition of Queen Elizabeth no notice was taken of the Act of Parliament against her and Blackwood (m) P. 45. observes very well that so conscious were the makers of these Acts Jus Regium p. 179. of the illegality of them and of their being contrary to the immutable Laws of God Nature and Nations that none durst produce that Kings Testament wherein he did nominate a Successor conformable to the power granted by those Acts but that as soon as they were freed by his Death from the violent oppressions that had forced them to alter a Successor three several times and at last to swear implicitly to whomsoever he should nominate they proclaimed first Queen Mary and after her decease Queen Elizabeth Therefore all these Acts both of Henry the Eighth and Edward the Sixth are to be looked upon as Politick interims to serve for some present ends And as we observe the trepidations vibrations and as we may say uneasiness of things in all that have been displaced till reseated again whereby we have a certain Indicium of any thing Natural so may we note the naturalness of Hereditary Succession by the Tragical Convulsions and unsetledness of things in any State where great force and policy have usurped the Crown till it hath returned to the right owner So we see after the force was removed by the expiration of Henry the Eighth and Edward the Sixth things returned again into their pristin State according to the Laws of the Crown I shall now pass to consider other Reasons and First it may be observed Fundamentals in Government not to be altered That the Venerable Age of such Fundamental Laws should have another kind of respect pay'd to them than to be made obsolete because they will not sort with some new-fashioned Intrigue For it is a most true Maxime Non magis aliunde floret respublica quam si legum vigeat Authoritas So in the first Parliament (n) Cap. 2. of King James the First it is fully expressed That to alter and innovate the Fundamental ad Ancient Laws See Commission for Union 16â—4 Priviledges and good Customs of the Kingdom whereby not only the Kings Regal Authority but the Peoples securities of Lands Livings and Priviledges both in general and particular are preserved and maintained and by the abolishing or alteration of the which it is impossible but that present confusion will fall upon the whole State and frame of Government is of most dangerous consequence whence we may well infer That to endeavour to alter the right of Succession of the Crown in the direct line is one of the most dangerous Innovations of all others as drawing innumerable mischiefs after it Now there can be no greater fundamental right than the Succession of our Monarch The Hereditary Succession is a Fundamental That our Monarchy is Hereditary is the great Basis upon which most of all the positions of the Laws are established which every where we meet with in the Writings of Lawyers viz. That the King never dies the next Successour in Blood is legally King from the very moment in which the last King dies that there needs neither Coronation or Recognition of the People to intitle him to the exercise of his Regal Authority that his Commissions are valid all Men are liable to do him Homage and hold their rights of him and his Heirs he may call Parliaments dispose of the Lands belonging to the Crown and all that oppose him are Rebells Generally this Principle runs through all the Veins of our Laws it is that which gives Life and Authority to our Statutes but receives none from them which are undeniable marks and Characters of a Fundamental Right in all Nations Secondly Such further provision hath the Law made to secure the Succession in the direct line that if the right Heir of the Blood or the Father or Mother of the right Heir be attainted of High Treason by Parliament the Attainder is no obstruction to the descent If he who were to succeed had committed Murther or were declared Traytor formerly to the Crown for open Rebellion against the King and Kingdom yet upon his coming to the Crown he need not to be restored by Act of Parliament but his very right of Blood would purge all these Imperfections For tanta est Regii sanguinis praerogativa dignitas ut vitium non admittat nec se contaminare patiatur saith a (o) Craig learned Lawyer and the Reasons given are For that no Man can be a Rebel against himself nor can the King have a Superior and consequently there can be none whom he can (p) Jus Reg. p. 169. offend and it would be absurd that he who can restore all other Men should need to be restored himself Also the Punishments of Crimes such as Confiscations c. are to be inflicted by the Kings Authority or to fall to the Kings Treasury and it would be most absurd that a Man should exact from himself a Punishment So Richard Plantaginet Duke of York and Edward the Fourth his Son were both attainted yet Edward the Fourth was rightful King and no impediment in the Succession accrued by it So Charles the Seventh of France though banished by Sentence of Parliament did afterwards succeed to the Crown and though Lewis the Twelfth forfeited for taking up Arms against Charles the Eighth yet he succeeded and Alexander Duke of Albany and his Descendants being declared Traytors by his Brother King James the Fourth yet his Son John being called home upon